Homepage
FRESH Analysis Report
Jun 11, 2026
1 day ago · 100% complete · +6 refreshed

Alcoa Corporation

AA NYSE Categories PDF
Basic Materials · Aluminum
Pittsburgh, PA 15212-5858, United States IPO 2016 alcoa.com Updated Jun 11, 3:00am
Price
$65.55
Market Cap
$17.3B
Employees
13,900
Beta
1.57
Avg Volume
5,097,952
CEO
William F. Oplinger
Business Description

Alcoa Corporation stands as a global industrial leader, primarily focused on the production and sale of bauxite, alumina, and aluminum products. Its extensive operations span multiple continents, including North America (United States, Canada), Europe (Spain, Iceland, Norway), South America (Brazil), and Australia, along with other international markets. The company's activities are strategically divided into three principal segments: Bauxite, Alumina, and Aluminum. Alcoa initiates its process with bauxite mining. This raw material is then refined into alumina, which is subsequently sold to customers for conversion into various industrial chemical products. Additionally, the company is involved in aluminum smelting and casting, supplying primary aluminum in forms like alloy or value-added ingots. These aluminum products cater to a diverse range of industries, including transportation, building and construction, packaging, wire manufacturing, and other industrial applications. Beyond its core metals business, Alcoa also operates hydroelectric power generation facilities. These plants generate and sell electricity into the wholesale market, serving a wide array of clients, from traders and large industrial consumers to distribution companies and other power generators. Founded in 1888, the company is headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It officially adopted the name Alcoa Corporation in October 2016, prior to which it was known as Alcoa Upstream Corporation.

Business History
Generated: Jun 11, 2026 3:02am
Price Overview
Last updated: Jun 11, 2026 3:00am (1d ago)
$65.55
-6.86 (-9.47%)
Day Range
$65.46 – $71.67
52-Week Range
$27.72 – $84.38
50-Day MA
$69.03
200-Day MA
$52.75
Volume
6,520,947.00
Analyst Price Targets
Low $70.00
Consensus $75.60
High $80.00
(45 analysts)
Share Structure
Outstanding 263,889,875.00
Float 262,448,105.00
Free Float 99.5%
High free float — 99.5% of shares trade freely, ~0.5% held by insiders/institutions
Very liquid — most shares trade freely. Low insider ownership can mean less management alignment, but makes large position sizing straightforward.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Jun 11, 2026 3:06am (1d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Jun 11, 2026 3:03am (1d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
API Direct from provider CALC Derived from statements
Industry comparison last run: Jun 11, 2026 3:01am
P/E Ratio (Price per dollar of earnings)
API
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
16.86
Stock Price: $65.55
EPS (Diluted): 4.47
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
API
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
2.27
Stock Price: $65.55
Total Equity: $6.12B
Shares: 263,299,637
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
API
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
10.63
Market Cap: $17.30B
Total Debt: $2.49B
Cash: $1.69B
EBITDA: $1.86B
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
API
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$14.9B
Market Cap: $17.30B
Total Debt: $2.49B
Cash: $1.69B
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
API
Gross Profit / Revenue
13.6%
Gross Profit: $1.73B
Revenue: $12.74B
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
API
Operating Income / Revenue
7.6%
Operating Income: $971.00M
Revenue: $12.74B
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
API
Net Income / Revenue
9.0%
Net Income: $1.15B
Revenue: $12.74B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
API
Net Income / Total Equity
16.1%
Net Income: $1.15B
Total Equity: $6.12B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
API
NOPAT / Invested Capital
6.6%
Operating Income: $971.00M
Tax Rate: -4.5%
Equity: $6.12B
Total Debt: $2.49B
Cash: $1.69B
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
API
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
1.44
Current Assets: $5.47B
Current Liabilities: $3.80B
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
CALC
Total Debt / Total Equity
0.41
Short-Term Debt: $50.00M
Long-Term Debt: $2.44B
Total Debt: $2.49B
Total Equity: $6.12B
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
CALC
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$48.37
Revenue: $12.74B
Shares: 263,299,637
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
CALC
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
$23.24
Total Equity: $6.12B
Shares: 263,299,637
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
CALC
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$2.15
Operating CF: $1.19B
CapEx: -$618.00M
Shares: 263,299,637
CapEx is negative (outflow) — added to OCF to get FCF
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
API
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
0.8%
Last Dividend: N/A
Stock Price: $65.55
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
Dividends Paid / Net Income
Dividends Paid: N/A
Net Income: $1.15B
Dividends paid not available in cash flow statement
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Jun 11, 2026 3:01am
Compares AA against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Deep Analysis
Last run: Jun 11, 2026 3:05:40 am

Pre-flight intelligence scans the company first, then routes to the right analytical methods.

0 Company Classification — What type of company is this?
1 Industry Landscape — Where is the industry headed?
2 Company Momentum — Where is this company trending?
3 Forward Projection — 1Y & 2Y projected metrics (requires Layer 1 + 2)
4a DCF Valuation — Present value of future cash flows
4b Earnings Power Value — Floor value — worth with zero growth
4c Anchored PE — Industry PE adjusted for growth differential
4d Reverse DCF — What growth is the market pricing in?
4e Revenue-Based DCF — For growth/narrative companies (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4f Anchored P/S — Price-to-Sales peer comparison (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4g Scenario Analysis — Bull / Base / Bear (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4h Dividend Discount Model — For dividend/income stocks only
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4i Book Value Analysis — For deep value / turnaround stocks only
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4j Insider Activity — Are insiders buying or selling?
4f Cash Flow Quality — How trustworthy is the FCF?
4g Debt Maturity Risk — Can it handle its debt?
4h Macro Environment — Rates, market valuation, volatility
4i Sector Intelligence — How does this company compare within its sector?
4j Revenue Confidence — How reliable is the growth projection?
4k Sensitivity Analysis — How fragile is the fair value estimate?
4l Sector Demand Cycle — Is the sector in a boom, steady state, or contraction?
5 AI Investigation — Adaptive research engine (Claude)
5b Thesis Evaluation — What does the market believe? (narrative/platform stocks only)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
6 Valuation Synthesis — Weighted verdict from all methods (requires Layer 4)
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 11, 2026 3:03am (1d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue $12.4B $12.8B $10.7B $12.2B $12.7B
Cost of Revenue $9.8B $10.8B $10.5B $10.7B $11.0B
Gross Profit $2.6B $1.9B $241.0M $1.5B $1.7B
Operating Expenses $258.0M $236.0M $265.0M $332.0M $758.0M
Operating Income $2.4B $1.7B -$24.0M $1.2B $971.0M
Net Income $429.0M -$123.0M -$651.0M $60.0M $1.1B
EBITDA $2.1B $1.4B $155.0M $1.1B $1.9B
EPS $2.30 $-0.57 $-3.65 $0.28 $4.47
EPS (Diluted)
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 11, 2026 3:00am (1d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Cash & Equivalents $1.8B $1.4B $944.0M $1.1B $1.7B
Total Current Assets $5.0B $5.3B $4.4B $4.9B $5.5B
Total Assets $15.0B $14.8B $14.2B $14.1B $16.1B
Current Liabilities $3.2B $3.0B $3.0B $3.4B $3.8B
Long-Term Debt $1.7B $1.8B $1.7B $2.5B $2.4B
Total Liabilities $8.7B $8.2B $8.3B $8.9B $9.9B
Total Equity $4.7B $5.1B $4.3B $5.2B $6.1B
Retained Earnings -$315.0M -$570.0M -$1.3B -$1.3B -$271.0M
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 6, 2026 1:36pm (6d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Operating Cash Flow $920.0M $822.0M $91.0M $622.0M $1.2B
Capital Expenditure -$390.0M -$480.0M -$531.0M -$580.0M -$618.0M
Free Cash Flow $530.0M $342.0M -$440.0M $42.0M $567.0M
Acquisitions (net) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Debt Repayment
Dividends Paid
Stock Buybacks -$150.0M -$500.0M $0 -$15.0M $0
Net Change in Cash $314.0M -$450.0M -$427.0M $187.0M $458.0M
Analyst Estimates (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 11, 2026 3:00am (1d ago)
Metric 2027 2028 2029 2030
Revenue $15.5B
$14.1B – $16.8B
$15.0B
$15.0B – $15.0B
$14.5B
$13.6B – $15.3B
$15.0B
$14.0B – $15.7B
EBITDA $1.6B
$1.5B – $1.8B
$1.6B
$1.6B – $1.6B
$1.5B
$1.4B – $1.6B
$1.6B
$1.5B – $1.7B
Net Income $1.9B
$1.4B – $2.7B
$2.1B
$1.0B – $3.0B
$0 $0
EPS
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Jun 11, 2026 3:03am (1d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue Growth +2.6% -16.1% +13.8% +4.5%
Gross Profit Growth -26.3% -87.5% +521.6% +15.4%
Operating Income Growth -28.2% -101.4% +4,958.3% -16.7%
Net Income Growth -128.7% -429.3% +109.2% +1,813.3%
EBITDA Growth -30.8% -89.1% +601.3% +71.5%
Insider Trading (Recent)
Last updated: Jun 11, 2026 3:03am (1d ago)
Type codes PPurchase SSale AAward / grant MOption exercise FIn-kind (tax) CConversion GGift DReturn to issuer
All SEC Form 4 codes
Open market
P Purchase
Open-market or private purchase of shares.
S Sale
Open-market or private sale of shares.
Compensation (Rule 16b-3)
A Award / grant
Grant or award of securities (RSUs, options, etc.) under Rule 16b-3.
D Return to issuer
Securities disposed back to the company under Rule 16b-3.
F In-kind (tax)
Shares withheld or delivered to pay the option-exercise price or tax — not an open-market sale.
I Discretionary
Discretionary transaction under an employee plan — Rule 16b-3(f).
M Option exercise
Exercise or conversion of a derivative (option/RSU) into shares — exempt.
Derivatives
C Conversion
Conversion of a derivative security into the underlying shares.
E Short expiration
Expiration of a short derivative position.
H Long expiration
Expiration or cancellation of a long derivative position with value received.
O OTM exercise
Exercise of an out-of-the-money derivative.
X ITM exercise
Exercise of an in-the-money or at-the-money derivative.
Other exempt
G Gift
Bona fide gift of securities.
L Small acquisition
Small acquisition under Rule 16a-6.
W Inheritance
Acquisition or disposition by will or the laws of descent.
Z Voting trust
Deposit into or withdrawal from a voting trust.
Other
J Other
Other acquisition or disposition (explained in a Form 4 footnote).
K Equity swap
Transaction in an equity swap or similar instrument.
U Tender / buyout
Disposition via tender of shares in a change-of-control transaction.

Compensation-plan codes (A, D, F, M) are routine and rarely directional. Open-market P (buy) and S (sale) carry the most signal.

Date Insider Type Shares Price Value
2026-05-08 Roberts Jackson Prince A-Award 2,532.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-08 Roberts Carol L A-Award 2,532.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-08 de Oliveira Marques Roberto A-Award 2,532.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-08 HUGHES JAMES ALTON A-Award 2,532.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-08 Gorman Thomas Joseph A-Award 2,532.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-08 Galovich Brian A-Award 2,532.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-08 Fiore Pasquale A-Award 2,532.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-08 Field Alistair A-Award 2,532.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-08 Citrino Mary Anne A-Award 2,532.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-08 Bevan John A A-Award 2,532.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-06 Galovich Brian 0.00 $0.00 $0
2026-04-15 Olson Emily M. A-Award 8,760.00 $0.00 $0
2026-04-06 Olson Emily M. 0.00 $0.00 $0
2026-02-23 Jones Tammi A A-Award 3,884.00 $0.00 $0
2026-02-23 Jones Tammi A A-Award 77.00 $59.81 $4,605
2026-02-23 Jones Tammi A F-InKind 41.00 $59.81 $2,452
2026-02-23 Jones Tammi A F-InKind 2,059.00 $59.81 $123,149
2026-02-23 Jones Tammi A A-Award 1,463.00 $0.00 $0
2026-02-23 Jones Tammi A A-Award 29.00 $59.81 $1,734
2026-02-23 Jones Tammi A F-InKind 16.00 $59.81 $957
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Jun 6, 2026 1:36pm (6d ago)
Date Dividend Declaration Record Payment
2026-05-19 $0.10 2026-05-07 2026-05-19 2026-06-05
2026-03-10 $0.10 2026-02-26 2026-03-10 2026-03-26
2025-11-04 $0.10 2025-10-22 2025-11-04 2025-11-21
2025-08-12 $0.10 2025-07-30 2025-08-12 2025-08-28
2025-05-20 $0.10 2025-05-09 2025-05-20 2025-06-06
2025-03-04 $0.10 2025-02-20 2025-03-04 2025-03-20
2024-10-29 $0.10 2024-10-16 2024-10-29 2024-11-15
2024-08-12 $0.10 2024-07-31 2024-08-12 2024-08-29
2024-05-20 $0.10 2024-05-09 2024-05-21 2024-06-07
2024-03-04 $0.10 2024-02-22 2024-03-05 2024-03-21
2023-10-30 $0.10 2023-10-18 2023-10-31 2023-11-17
2023-08-07 $0.10 2023-07-27 2023-08-08 2023-08-24
2023-05-15 $0.10 2023-05-04 2023-05-16 2023-06-02
2023-03-06 $0.10 2023-02-23 2023-03-07 2023-03-23
2022-10-31 $0.10 2022-10-19 2022-11-01 2022-11-18
2022-08-08 $0.10 2022-07-28 2022-08-09 2022-08-25
2022-05-16 $0.10 2022-05-04 2022-05-17 2022-06-03
2022-03-07 $0.10 2022-02-24 2022-03-08 2022-03-24
2021-10-28 $0.10 2021-10-14 2021-10-29 2021-11-19
2016-11-02 $0.09 2016-10-24 2016-11-04 2016-11-25
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for AA.
Delvantic AI Findings
Independent analyst synthesis · Delvantic - Cairn AI · generated 2026-06-11 03:06:17
Reviews the pipeline's own verdicts
Verdict Late-cycle multiple on peak earnings — fair value $45-50 on normalized $700-800M earnings power; pass at $65.55, revisit on a cyclical drawdown or evidence Q1 margins are sustainable rather than seasonal.

Looking at the raw quarterly tape first: Q1 2026 revenue of $3.19B with $425M net income (13.3% margin) is a genuine standout against a four-quarter band of 5-8% margins, and follows Q1 2025's $548M/16.3% margin print. Both Q1s are conspicuously fat versus the surrounding quarters — that's the LME aluminum price spike and Section 232 tariff tailwind showing up, not structural margin expansion. Strip the two Q1s and you get a business doing ~6% net margins on ~$3B/quarter — i.e., roughly $700-800M annualized earnings power, not the $1.15B 2025 print. The 2025 full year benefited from a one-time gain and favorable alumina pricing; 2024 NI was $60M on nearly identical revenue ($12.18B vs $12.74B). That's the cyclicality the synthesis model is correctly flagging.

FCF tells the harder truth. $567M FCF on $1.15B reported NI is a 49% conversion ratio in what was supposedly a banner year — capex of $618M is eating most of OCF, and this is a capital-intensive smelter business where maintenance capex doesn't go away. At $17.3B market cap, that's a ~3% FCF yield at the cycle peak. EV/EBITDA of 10.6x TTM is not cheap for a commodity producer at mid-to-late cycle; historical aluminum names trade 4-6x at peaks. The 9.5% revenue CAGR is a recovery artifact off the 2023 trough ($10.71B rev, -$651M NI) — don't extrapolate it. ROIC of 6.6% TTM, at what should be near-peak earnings, is below any reasonable cost of capital for a cyclical — that's the punchline on this business model.

I largely agree with the Market Forces and Synthesis models, but I think the Narrative layer is too generous calling this "anchored" with only a 4.3% premium to DCF — any DCF on a commodity producer using TTM earnings as the base is anchoring on peak. The reverse-DCF's 60% implied FCF growth critique is the right frame: to justify $65.55, you need to believe either (a) aluminum prices step up structurally on EV/grid demand faster than Chinese supply responds, or (b) Alcoa earns peak margins through-cycle. Neither is a base case. The Pre-Flight model's "$1B+ at normalized $2,400-2,600/ton aluminum" is plausible but not bullish at this multiple — $1B normalized earnings at a 12-14x cycle multiple gets you $12-14B market cap, i.e., $45-53/share, not $65. The contrarian counter: if we're entering a genuine multi-year deficit on Western low-carbon aluminum (CBAM, IRA tax credits, Chinese export curbs), Alcoa's integrated bauxite-alumina-aluminum chain has operating leverage that compounds — and the stock recovery from $27 to $65 suggests smart money already sees this. But operating leverage cuts both ways and the Q2-Q3 2025 margins (5-7%) tell you the spot environment isn't actually that tight.

Data gaps matter here: total debt and equity are blank in the tile, which is a real problem for a capital-intensive business — I can't independently verify the balance sheet quality, and current ratio of 1.44 is adequate but not comforting given commodity price volatility. The insider data is useless (ten identical 2,532-share awards on one day = annual board grant, not signal). I dissent mildly from the synthesis's "Disconnected from Fundamentals" framing — that's overstated. The stock isn't a meme; it's a cyclical trading at a late-cycle multiple on peak earnings, which is a more mundane mistake. Fair value on through-cycle earnings of ~$700-800M at 12x is roughly $40-50/share; you'd need genuine conviction in a structural aluminum supercycle to underwrite $65+. I'd be a buyer below $45 and a seller above $70.

GPT Critique
Second-opinion review · gpt-4o · generated 2026-06-11 03:06:25
Reviews the Opus findings above
Verdict I agree with Opus — overvalued at $65.55, with fair value likely in the $45-50 range, assuming normalized earnings and cycle reversion.

In reviewing the raw data for Alcoa Corporation, several key elements stand out. Notably, the company's quarterly revenue has shown a pattern of volatility, with revenues peaking at $3.98 billion in Q4 2024 but declining to $3.19 billion by Q1 2026. This fluctuation is reflected in their net income margins, which have swung from as high as 16.3% to as low as 0.7% recently. The annual revenue figures reveal a similar story of inconsistency, with a pronounced recovery in 2025 (net income of $1.15 billion) after a significant loss in 2023 (net income of -$651 million). The cash flow data further illustrates this cyclical nature, with free cash flow being substantially impacted by high capital expenditures, indicative of the capital-intensive nature of Alcoa's operations.

I largely concur with Claude Opus's analysis that Alcoa is trading at a late-cycle multiple on peak earnings. Opus highlights the outsized Q1 margins as non-recurring, influenced by external factors like aluminum price spikes, and correctly points out that stripping these anomalies reveals a business with lower earnings power, closer to $700-800 million annually. The reliance on current high aluminum prices to justify the stock's valuation seems speculative, given the historical volatility and cyclical nature of commodity markets. Furthermore, Opus's observation that the company's free cash flow conversion is weak (49% on $1.15 billion net income) adds weight to the skepticism about the sustainability of current earnings levels.

However, I diverge from Opus regarding the narrative surrounding Alcoa's potential for structural growth driven by the EV transition and decarbonization efforts. While Opus views the narrative as overly optimistic, the market has shown a tendency to price in long-term demand increases from these trends. The modest 4.3% premium to DCF might suggest a slight overvaluation, but it does not entirely dismiss the potential for longer-term strategic positioning in a transitioning energy market.

A careful skeptic might argue that both Opus's and my analyses underestimate the current market's inclination to look beyond cyclical downturns to potential future tailwinds. They could point out that the market's recovery from $27 to $65 might be more than just speculative enthusiasm, possibly reflecting a genuine strategic shift towards green aluminum. Nonetheless, without definitive evidence of sustained margin improvements or clear balance sheet strength, skepticism about Alcoa's current valuation remains justified.

Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · two lenses
Two separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?) and Valuation (is it mispriced?), kept deliberately apart · 2026-06-11 03:07:46
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Pass at $65 — bid sub-$53 7/10
Mediocre commodity cyclical trading at fair value — no edge here; I wait for the cycle to hand me a real discount.
The cruxWhether aluminum prices hold the late-cycle bid or roll over — at $65 I'm paying full FV for that bet with zero margin of safety.
Company Quality
-47
Mixed
edge √Σ 74 · risk √Σ 121 · conf 6/10
Valuation / Mispricing
-47
Fairly Valued
edge √Σ 32 · risk √Σ 79 · conf 7/10
Liquidity & RunwaySelf-Funding
DilutionHeavy Dilution
Earnings QualityHigh Earnings Quality
The Play — combined read across both lenses Delvantic - Cairn AI

Both lenses landed at -47 and they're telling the same story from different angles: Quality says this is an honest but mediocre cyclical with 38% share count creep in four years and grey-zone balance sheet — not a compounder, just a price-of-aluminum P&L. Valuation says $65.55 vs ~$63 FV gives me a 4% premium when what I need for a -47 quality cyclical is a 15-20% discount. Paying full freight for a business whose per-share value structurally drifts down via dilution is exactly the trade I don't take. No action at $65.

My playbook: zero position today, alert set at $53 and a harder alert at $48. If aluminum rolls over and AA gets dragged into the low-$50s on macro fear — not on a company-specific blowup — I start a 1% starter and scale to a 3% full position into the $45-48 zone, where I'd actually be getting paid for the cyclical risk and the dilution drag. Catalyst to flip me aggressive earlier: a clean signal management has stopped issuing equity (buyback authorization at depressed prices, insider open-market buys) combined with aluminum holding firm — that would shift the per-share math meaningfully. Catalyst to walk away entirely: another major equity-funded acquisition. Until one of those, this is a watch-list name, not a portfolio name.

The evidence behind each score — switch lenses
-47 Mixed edge √Σ 74 · risk √Σ 121 · conf 6/10

Alcoa is a textbook commodity smelter: revenue oscillates in a tight $10.7B–$12.8B band while gross margin whipsaws from 21.1% (2021) to 2.3% (2023) back to 13.6% (2025), and operating margin swings from +19% to -0.2% to +7.6%. Net income flipped from +$429M to -$651M to +$1.15B inside four years — this is price-of-aluminum P&L, not a managed earner. Earnings quality on the mechanical checks looks clean (accruals -3.8%, OCF/NI 1.34x, Beneish -2.41), and FCF was positive in 4 of 5 years ($567M in 2025), so the reported numbers appear real.

The problem is per-share value. Diluted share count went from 190M (2021) to 263M (2025) — a ~38% increase in four years, or ~8.5% CAGR. With SBC only ~0.3% of revenue, this dilution is not comp-driven; it almost certainly reflects equity issuance (the 2024 Alumina Limited acquisition is the obvious candidate). Net debt of -$747M means the $1.74B cash pile is offset by borrowings, and Altman Z of 2.13 sits in the grey zone — survivable but not a fortress for a cyclical. Insider tape shows only routine A-Awards and zero open-market buys, which is neutral-to-slightly-negative for a stock whose insiders presumably know the cycle.

Net: the accounting is honest, FCF is real, but this is a capital-intensive cyclical that has materially diluted owners and earns its cost of capital only at the top of the cycle.

Strengths 3
m55
Clean accruals and earnings-quality signals
Accruals -3.8% of assets, OCF/NI 1.34x, Beneish M -2.41. No evidence of manipulation or aggressive recognition — the volatile P&L is honestly volatile, not dressed up.
m40
Self-funding through the trough
Even with a -$651M net loss and -$440M FCF in 2023, the company emerged with $1.74B cash and resumed positive FCF ($567M in 2025). Demonstrates ability to absorb a full cyclical down-leg without an emergency raise.
m30
Buyback/SBC ratio of 348% suggests historical capital return discipline
Buybacks have run ~3.5x SBC, indicating management is not just plugging dilution with repurchases — though this is dwarfed by the issuance-driven share count growth.
Concerns 5
m78
Severe share count growth dilutes per-share economics
Diluted shares rose from 190M (2021) to 263.3M (2025), an 8.5% CAGR / ~38% cumulative increase. With SBC at just 0.3% of revenue, the dilution is from issuance (likely the Alumina Limited deal), so business growth has to outrun a meaningfully bigger share base.
m70
Commodity-driven margin volatility
Gross margin swung 21.1% → 15.1% → 2.3% → 12.3% → 13.6% and operating margin went from +19% to -0.2% inside two years. Net income flipped from +$429M to -$651M to +$1.15B — pure price-taker behavior with limited evidence of structural moat.
m45
Net debt position, grey-zone Altman Z
$1.74B cash but -$747M net cash, and Altman Z of 2.13 sits in the distress grey zone. For a cyclical that just printed a -$440M FCF year (2023), the balance sheet is a constraint not a cushion.
m35
Weak/volatile FCF quality across the cycle
FCF: $530M, $342M, -$440M, $42M, $567M. Even in 2024 with $12.2B revenue, FCF was only $42M — capex intensity and working capital swings mean the business converts poorly in mid-cycle years.
m20
Insider tape shows only awards, no open-market buying
All recent transactions are A-Awards (grants) at $0; no P (open-market buys) from insiders who would know the cycle best. Neutral, but no conviction signal either.
This is a competent, honest commodity cyclical — not a great business. The accounting looks clean and they survived a brutal 2023 without breaking, which counts for something. But the P&L is whatever aluminum prices say it is, FCF is lumpy and thin in mid-cycle years, the balance sheet is leveraged enough to show up in Altman's grey zone, and most damning for a quality lens: shares outstanding ballooned ~38% in four years. Even if the underlying tonnes and EBITDA grow, per-share value has to fight that headwind. I'd call it Mixed — a legitimate operator in a tough industry, not a compounder, and quality here will always be hostage to the LME price.
Verify before trusting this (6)
  • Confirm the 2024–2025 share count jump (178M → 263M) was driven by the Alumina Limited acquisition and quantify any residual organic issuance
  • Aluminum/alumina price assumptions embedded in 2025 results — how much of the $1.15B net income is cycle vs. structural improvement
  • Smelter cost-curve position vs. peers (Rusal, Rio Tinto, Norsk Hydro) — does Alcoa have a structural cost advantage or is it median?
  • Energy contracts and exposure (smelting is power-intensive) — long-dated hydro/renewable PPAs vs. merchant exposure
  • Pension and asset-retirement obligation balances — common hidden liabilities in legacy aluminum operations
  • Capex split between maintenance and growth, and any large smelter restart/curtailment decisions pending
-47 Fairly Valued edge √Σ 32 · risk √Σ 79 · conf 7/10
Price $65.55 vs deserved ~$62.86 composite FV → ~4% premium; effectively fair, zero cyclical margin of safety. attractive below $52.00

The e2e composite and signal-adjusted fair value both land at $62.86, while the stock prints $65.55 — a ~4% premium. That's not rich enough to short and not cheap enough to buy; it's the market correctly pricing a mid-to-late cycle aluminum producer with clean books but mediocre per-share economics. The Quality lens (score -47, share count creep, grey-zone balance sheet) argues the deserved multiple should be at the LOW end of the fair-value band, not the high end, so I'd anchor deserved value closer to $60 than $63.

What's priced in: continued firm aluminum prices, no China demand air-pocket, and the EV/grid/aerospace tailwind narrative holding. That's a reasonable base case but it's the BULL case being treated as base — typical for cyclicals near the top of the band. For a commodity producer you want to buy at a visible discount to mid-cycle FV, not a premium. There is no margin of safety here against a cycle turn, and earnings-quality is high (no haircut needed), so the FV number is trustworthy — the issue is purely price vs that FV.

Net: fairly valued bordering on slightly rich. I need a meaningful pullback before this is interesting on valuation alone.

Cheap signals 2
m20
Clean earnings quality means FV is trustworthy
High earnings-quality signal (score 2) means no haircut needed; the $62.86 FV is a reliable anchor rather than an inflated accounting artifact.
m25
Optionality on aluminum supercycle not fully priced
If EV/grid/aerospace demand drives a sustained price step-up, mid-cycle earnings reset higher and current FV understates — but this is option value, not base case.
Rich / priced-in 3
m55
Trades 4% above composite FV
$65.55 vs $62.86 signal-adjusted FV — small premium, but for a cyclical commodity producer you want a discount, not a premium, to mid-cycle value.
m45
No margin of safety on a cyclical
Aluminum is whipsawed by China demand and macro; paying full FV on a -47 quality score business with lumpy FCF leaves no buffer when the cycle rolls over.
m35
Share dilution erodes per-share deserved value
Persistent share count growth means the same EV supports fewer claims per share over time — deserved price-per-share drifts down even if business value holds.
Fairly valued, and that's the honest answer. At $65.55 vs ~$63 deserved I have no edge — I'm paying full price for a mediocre-quality cyclical and hoping the supercycle narrative bails me out. For a commodity name with -47 quality and chronic dilution, I want a 15-20% discount to FV before I'm interested, which means sub-$53. Above $65 this is a pass; near $52 it becomes a real buy.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Mid-cycle realized aluminum price assumption embedded in the $62.86 FV
  • Forward share-count guidance and any buyback authorizations to offset dilution
  • Segment EBITDA bridge (Alumina vs Aluminum) for sustainable run-rate margin
  • Net debt trajectory and any pension/environmental liability one-offs
  • Management commentary on China supply discipline and tariff impacts
Two lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality is price-agnostic; Valuation is price-conditional. The scores are not blended (yet). Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for AA. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
Data via Financial Modeling Prep · Cached for performance · fmp
v1.1.330 · 344c2a54 · 2026-06-09 20:20:16