For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page
What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for Maplebear Inc. (CART) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.
Our current read (analysis of 2026-09-11): Designation Watch · Gem Score +5 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality 15 · Value -2 · Sentiment 11 (timing only, not weighted) · Composite fair value $53.46 vs $44.76 at analysis
Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable
reference-name attribute you can cite):
profile-header/price-overview— company profile, live quote, market capextended-analysis— the core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memofuture-predictions— our forward price-band predictionsmarket-narrative/ai-findings/gpt-critique— narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)- Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers):
price-history,income-trend,key-metrics,financials(statement tables),insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.
More for machine readers: site briefing at
/llms.txt ·
any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER ·
raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds);
every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.
Maplebear Inc.
CART NASDAQMaplebear Inc. is a technology company that operates a large-scale online grocery and everyday essentials platform in North America. Doing business as Instacart, it connects consumers with local retailers and personal shoppers through its website and mobile application, enabling online ordering, same-day or scheduled delivery, and in-store pickup of groceries, household goods, pet care products, ready-made meals, and other essentials. Beyond its consumer marketplace, Maplebear Inc. functions as an enablement partner for the grocery industry, offering enterprise-grade software solutions that power retailers’ e-commerce experiences, order fulfillment, inventory management, and store digitization. The company also runs a retail media and advertising business, including Instacart Ads, which provides brands with sponsored product placements, display advertising, coupons, and data-driven insights on consumer behavior. Maplebear Inc. serves national, regional, and local grocers and retailers primarily in the United States and Canada, and was incorporated in 2012 with headquarters in San Francisco, California.
Price Overview
Price History (1 Year)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
| Period | Revenue | Net Income | Net Margin | YoY/QoQ |
|---|
Key Metrics
EPS (Diluted): 1.60
Total Equity: $2.71B
Shares: 279,621,000
Total Debt: $0.00
Cash: $637.00M
EBITDA: $589.00M
Total Debt: $0.00
Cash: $637.00M
Revenue: $3.74B
Revenue: $3.74B
Revenue: $3.74B
Total Equity: $2.71B
Tax Rate: 19.6%
Equity: $2.71B
Total Debt: $0.00
Cash: $637.00M
Current Liabilities: $917.00M
Long-Term Debt: $0.00
Total Debt: $0.00
Total Equity: $2.71B
Shares: 279,621,000
Shares: 279,621,000
CapEx: -$61.00M
Shares: 279,621,000
Stock Price: $44.76
Net Income: $447.00M
Industry Benchmarks
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Jul 30, 2026 6:48pm (42d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $2.6B | $3.0B | $3.4B | $3.7B |
| Cost of Revenue | $608.0M | $720.0M | $764.0M | $836.0M | $984.0M |
| Gross Profit | $1.2B | $1.8B | $2.3B | $2.5B | $2.8B |
| Operating Expenses | $1.3B | $1.8B | $4.4B | $2.1B | $2.3B |
| Operating Income | -$86.0M | $62.0M | -$2.1B | $489.0M | $498.0M |
| Net Income | -$73.0M | $428.0M | -$1.6B | $457.0M | $447.0M |
| EBITDA | -$70.0M | $96.0M | -$2.1B | $545.0M | $589.0M |
| EPS | $-1.12 | $1.08 | $-12.43 | $1.69 | $1.68 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-1.12 | $0.96 | $-12.43 | $1.58 | $1.60 |
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Jul 30, 2026 6:26pm (42d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash & Equivalents | $1.1B | $1.5B | $2.1B | $1.3B | $637.0M |
| Total Current Assets | — | $2.7B | $3.3B | $2.7B | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | — | $3.7B | $4.7B | $4.1B | $3.7B |
| Current Liabilities | — | $795.0M | $733.0M | $798.0M | $917.0M |
| Long-Term Debt | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Liabilities | — | $911.0M | $800.0M | $836.0M | $974.0M |
| Total Equity | -$573.0M | $2.8B | $3.9B | $3.3B | $2.7B |
| Retained Earnings | — | -$977.0M | -$2.6B | -$3.6B | -$4.5B |
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Jul 30, 2026 6:48pm (42d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | -$204.0M | $277.0M | $586.0M | $687.0M | $971.0M |
| Capital Expenditure | -$13.0M | -$24.0M | -$54.0M | -$64.0M | -$61.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | -$217.0M | $253.0M | $532.0M | $623.0M | $910.0M |
| Acquisitions (net) | -$54.0M | -$93.0M | $0 | $0 | -$106.0M |
| Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividends Paid | — | — | — | — | — |
| Stock Buybacks | $0 | $0 | -$36.0M | -$1.4B | -$1.4B |
| Net Change in Cash | -$71.0M | $434.0M | $694.0M | -$844.0M | -$623.0M |
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Jul 30, 2026 6:48pm (42d ago)| Metric | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | +39.1% | +19.2% | +11.0% | +10.8% |
| Gross Profit Growth | +49.3% | +24.4% | +11.6% | +8.5% |
| Operating Income Growth | +172.1% | -3,554.8% | +122.8% | +1.8% |
| Net Income Growth | +686.3% | -479.0% | +128.2% | -2.2% |
| EBITDA Growth | +237.1% | -2,286.5% | +126.0% | +8.1% |
Deep Analysis
Risk : Reward — upside vs downside from this company's own quarters
Computed 2026-09-06 19:01A +1σ run of quarters pays -29%; a −1σ run costs 63%. Ratio -0.5:1 (μ 12.2%, σ 3.3% floored by sector, 11 pairs).
Older method (repeat-worst-quarter): 0.2 : 1
| Case | Growth | Margin | Fair value | vs price ($44.76) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bull — recovery | +23% | 17.3% | $50.56 | +13% |
| Base — stabilizes | +15% | 15.0% | $35.28 | -21% |
| Bear — keeps slipping | +8% | 12.8% | $23.96 | -46% |
| Stress — last quarter repeats | +12% | 6.8% | $15.93 | -64% |
| Upside — a +1σ run of quarters (v2) | +16% | 13.2% | $31.71 | -29% |
| Stress — a −1σ run of quarters (v2) | +9% | 8.1% | $16.73 | -63% |
Narrative Economics
market-narrative step).
Claude Reading
Looking at the raw quarterly cadence first: revenue has climbed from $823M (Q2'24) to $1.02B (Q1'26), a clean ~24% two-year lift with no negative sequential quarter — that's steadier than most "mature" internet retailers post. But the earnings line is noisy: NI oscillates between $61M and $148M with margins swinging from 7.4% to 16.8% quarter-to-quarter, which tells me GAAP net income is being whipsawed by SBC true-ups, tax items, or fair-value adjustments rather than clean operating leverage. Trailing four quarters of NI ≈ $485M against $3.87B revenue = ~12.5% net margin, and FCF of $910M against $3.74B FY25 revenue is a 24% FCF margin — that's the number that matters, and it's excellent. At $10.52B market cap net of $637M cash, EV is ~$9.88B, so EV/FCF is ~10.9x. That is not a mature-earner multiple; that is a cheap multiple for a company compounding revenue at ~11% with expanding cash conversion.
Where I disagree with the models: the rule-based "mature_earner" tag at 0.78 confidence is lazy — a business growing revenue 10.8% YoY with FCF CAGR of 30.8% and 19% ROIC is not mature, it's a de-rated growth compounder. The pre-flight "high-growth" call is closer to right but overstates it; 11% top-line is solidly mid-teens-adjacent, not high-growth. The synthesis composite of $40.71 signal-adjusted to $61.90 is a wide spread that betrays methodological disagreement — I'd anchor on the FCF yield math instead: $910M FCF on $10.5B cap = 8.6% FCF yield, which for a double-digit grower with a net cash balance sheet and 74% gross margins is a demonstrable discount. Fair value in the $55–65 range is defensible; the synthesis's $61.90 signal-adjusted number is roughly where I land, but for different reasons than DCF hand-waving.
The contrarian case deserves airtime and the bear narrative captures it well but underweights two risks. First: the FY23 -$1.62B NI was almost certainly IPO SBC — but SBC hasn't vanished, it's still diluting holders and inflating "adjusted" numbers versus GAAP. If you re-add stock comp, true owner earnings are meaningfully lower than the $447M FY25 GAAP NI suggests. Second: the entire bull thesis rests on Ads take-rate expansion against grocer budgets that are structurally finite; Kroger, Albertsons, and Walmart all have competing retail-media ambitions, and Instacart's ~3-3.5% ads-as-%-of-GTV is not obviously scalable to DoorDash- or Amazon-caliber. Third, and the models miss this: insider activity is not "neutral" — the pattern shows only sales and awards, zero open-market buys, including a 181,000-share sale on 2026-06-02. That's not damning but it's not neutral either. Fourth: the "2026-03-31" and "2026-07-15" dates in the file are forward-dated relative to any realistic filing calendar; either the dataset is projected/estimated or mis-tagged, and I'd want to verify before sizing.
Data-quality flags aside, I agree with the synthesis direction (undervalued) but partial on magnitude. The 38% upside to $61.90 looks aggressive; I'd target $52–58 as a defensible re-rating range, implying 16–30% upside, with the path dependent on (a) Ads revenue disclosure showing >20% growth for another 2-3 quarters and (b) SBC as % of revenue declining below 10%. If either of those breaks — Ads growth decelerates to low-teens, or SBC stays sticky at 12-15% of revenue — fair value compresses back toward $40, and the market's current price is roughly right. The market-forces "Tailwinds" call ignores that gig-worker classification (CA Prop 22 successors, DOL rules) is a live regulatory tail risk that could compress delivery unit economics by 200-400bps overnight. Net-net: I'm long-biased here, but not table-pounding — this is a starter-size position at $44.76 with clear fundamental support, not a fat pitch. The 10.9x EV/FCF for an 11%-grower with net cash and 19% ROIC is the anchor; everything else is narrative garnish.
GPT Reading
What stands out is not “high growth,” but a business that has already become a very solid cash machine while revenue growth has settled into the low-teens. Revenue rose from $3.38B in 2024 to $3.74B in 2025, up 10.7%, and the quarterly cadence is similarly steady: $823M, $852M, $883M, $897M, $914M, $939M, $992M, then $1.02B. That is healthy, predictable expansion, but it is not the profile of a company that deserves to be underwritten on aggressive optionality alone. The more important fact is the quality of earnings and cash generation: 2025 operating income was $498M, net income $447M, operating cash flow $971M, and free cash flow $910M on only $61M of capex. On a $10.52B market cap, that is roughly an 8.6% FCF yield, and with $637M of cash and no debt, the balance sheet removes a lot of downside scenarios. The market appears to be paying about 28x earnings for a debt-free platform compounding revenue around 11% while converting that into very real cash. That is not obviously expensive.
The key interpretive issue is whether 2025 margins are durable or already near peak. Gross margin at 73.7% and operating margin at 13.3% are unusually strong for anything tied to last-mile delivery, which tells you the reported business is much more marketplace/ads/software-like than a pure fulfillment operator. Even more telling, quarterly net margins have mostly stayed in a 12-15% band, with only one softer quarter at 8.2% and one stronger one at 16.8%. The latest quarter, $1.02B of revenue and $144M of net income, printed a 14.1% net margin while revenue grew 13.7% year over year from $897M. That combination—double-digit top-line growth plus mid-teens net margin—is better than the stock’s “mature earner” label implies. If I annualize the latest quarter loosely, the business is running above $4.0B revenue and around $575M net income; against a $10.52B market cap, that is closer to 18-19x run-rate earnings, not 28x trailing. On that lens, the current price looks more like a fair-to-cheap multiple for a high-return platform than a fully valued delivery stock.
I also think the ugly 2023 operating loss of $2.14B and net loss of $1.62B is more distortion than signal, because the surrounding years do not support a broken core business. Revenue stepped up from $2.55B in 2022 to $3.04B in 2023 to $3.38B in 2024 to $3.74B in 2025, while reported profitability snapped right back to nearly $500M of operating income in both 2024 and 2025. When a business produces $910M of free cash flow in 2025 after a one-off loss year, I am inclined to treat the loss as an accounting event unless subsequent margins collapse. They have not. Return metrics back that up: ROE of 16.5%, ROIC of 19.3%, ROA of 12.1%. Those are strong numbers for a company supposedly boxed into structurally bad unit economics. My read is that the market is still partly anchored to “grocery delivery is low quality,” while the actual reported company is a higher-quality, asset-light monetization platform sitting on top of grocery demand.
The strongest case against this view is that the stock may simply be a no-growth-to-low-growth company wearing a tech multiple. Revenue growth around 11% is decent but not hard to replicate, and recent earnings growth is flat to down: the latest quarter’s $144M net income was exactly flat against the $144M posted two quarters earlier and down slightly versus the year-ago trend implied by the momentum data. Annual net income actually slipped from $457M in 2024 to $447M in 2025 despite higher revenue, and operating income was basically unchanged at $489M versus $498M. That suggests the margin story may already have matured, with future top-line gains not flowing through incrementally. On trailing numbers, 3.3x sales and 16.8x EV/EBITDA are not screaming bargains for a company facing obvious competitive pressure from bigger platforms and grocers. Insider activity also leans mildly negative purely optically, with a notable 181,000-share sale in June 2026 and no open-market buys disclosed in the sample. A smart bear would say this is a good business, not a mispriced one.
What would change my mind is evidence that the growth-plus-margin balance is deteriorating rather than stabilizing. If revenue growth slips from the current 11-14% range down toward mid-single digits while quarterly net margin falls below 10% for more than a quarter or two, the valuation support weakens fast and I would stop calling it cheap. Likewise, if 2026 free cash flow fails to hold near the 2025 level of $910M despite revenue growth, then the cash conversion case breaks. On the upside, if the company can sustain $1.0B+ quarterly revenue and keep net income in the $130M-$150M range, that points to a business earning $500M-$600M annually with net cash, which would justify a price above the mid-$40s. My base case is that the market is underrating the durability of this cash generation more than it is overrating the growth.
Grok Reading
The numbers describe a company that has completed its post-IPO cleanup and settled into a durable, high-conversion cash machine rather than a hypergrowth story. Revenue has compounded from $1.83B in 2021 to $3.74B in 2025, but the recent trajectory is a steady ~11% CAGR with the latest quarter at $1.02B (+roughly 14% YoY from the year-ago $897M). What stands out is not top-line acceleration but cash generation: 2025 free cash flow of $910M on only $61M of capex against a $10.52B market cap equates to an ~8.7% FCF yield, with zero debt and $637M cash. Gross margin at 73.7% and operating margin at 13.3% confirm the advertising and software mix is already doing the heavy lifting; net margin of ~12% and ROIC of 19.3% are those of a mature earner, not a pre-profit platform. The 2023 $1.62B net loss is clearly the IPO stock-comp anomaly—operating profit flipped from –$2.14B to +$489M the next year and held at $498M in 2025—so the clean earnings base is now $447–457M. At 28x trailing earnings, 3.3x sales and 16.8x EV/EBITDA the market is paying a full but not egregious multiple for mid-teens returns on capital and high-single-digit to low-double-digit growth.
The contradiction between the “high-growth” pre-flight label and the rule-based “mature_earner” archetype is resolved by the data: 10.9% revenue CAGR and –2.2% recent earnings growth are not high-growth metrics. The valuation synthesis’s signal-adjusted $61.90 fair value (+38%) rests on growth assumptions the underlying series do not yet support; the unadjusted composite of $40.71 sits slightly below the current $44.76 print, which is the more honest anchor given flat net income year-over-year. Insider activity is a steady drip of sales (including a 181k-share block) with no open-market buys, consistent with a post-lockup management team monetizing rather than signaling undervaluation. The business is real, the cash is high-quality, and the balance sheet is fortress-like, but the growth rate has already normalized.
The strongest opposing case is that an 8.7% FCF yield with net cash, 74% gross margins and a path to advertising leverage should command a higher multiple, and that any re-acceleration in ads or enterprise software would re-rate the stock toward the $60 area the models flag. A skeptic of my more cautious stance would also note sequential revenue still climbing every quarter ($823M → $1.02B over eight quarters) and argue that DoorDash’s $86B valuation leaves ample room for CART to close the gap if grocery logistics prove sticky. I weigh that less heavily because earnings have stalled at ~$450M despite the revenue climb, FCF growth is already capitalized in the 30.8% historical CAGR that will mean-revert, and competitive take-rate pressure plus gig-worker regulatory risk remain unquantified headwinds that justify the market’s discount to the optimistic DCF.
I would flip more decisively bullish on two consecutive quarters of net-income growth above 15% YoY together with FCF holding above $250M per quarter, or on explicit evidence that advertising is driving incremental gross margin expansion past 76%. A break below $38 on deteriorating GMV or take rates would confirm the mature-compounder multiple is still too rich.
Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
Instacart has crossed into structurally profitable territory: revenue grew from $1.83B (2021) to $3.74B (2025), gross margin expanded from 66.8% to 73.7%, and operating margin swung from -4.7% to +13.3%. FCF scaled from -$217M to $910M, and OCF/NI of 1.35x with accruals at -15.6% of assets and Altman Z of 6.65 point to real, cash-backed earnings. Net cash of $687M plus $910M annual FCF means the company is fully self-funding with no survival math to worry about. The mechanical earnings-quality checks (Beneish M -3.13) show no obvious manipulation flags.
Verify before trusting this (5)
- IPO lockup effects on the share count trajectory - what does organic dilution look like ex-IPO in 2025-2026?
- Customer/retailer concentration (Kroger, Costco, etc.) and contract renewal terms in the 10-K
- Advertising revenue mix and growth - the true margin driver behind GM expansion
- Order volume and GTV growth vs revenue growth - is the take-rate expanding or is order growth stalling?
- Ongoing SBC run-rate post-IPO vesting cliffs and net buyback capacity
The e2e composite FV of $40.71 sits below the $44.76 price, but that composite is dragged down by an EPV floor of -$11.49 which is clearly a runaway output (a real business generating $910M FCF cannot have negative earning power) and should be discounted. Stripping EPV, the DCF ($61.56) and anchored P/E ($51.22) average around $56, giving a deserved value roughly 20-25% above spot. The signal-adjusted FV of $61.90 lines up with the DCF and implies ~38% upside, which is meaningful but not extraordinary given the caveats.
Verify before trusting this (4)
- Ads revenue growth rate and take-rate trajectory in next print
- SBC as % of revenue and net buyback pace - is dilution actually being neutralized
- GTV growth vs order growth to gauge whether take-rate expansion is durable
- Enterprise/Connected Stores revenue disclosure to size the SaaS optionality
The macro tape is stress-off (VIX 20.7, S&P -3.9% from highs, 10y at 4.61%), which normally punishes internet-retail names, but CART's 0.75 beta and the fact that the hype cycle already deflated at IPO mean it absorbs the blow softly rather than getting mauled. The active narrative is a moderate-intensity fallen-angel repricing: Ads and enterprise software are quietly rehabilitating the story, and momentum has been strong (+65pp over 3 years), but cult coefficient is low so there is no fan base bidding this up on story alone. Analyst and press flow is constructive-neutral: Zacks flagging a likely earnings beat, inclusion in resilient-retail write-ups, and the Morrisons Caper smart-trolley launch all feed the platform-not-just-delivery narrative. Offsetting that, a CLO opening-selling 18,390 shares reads as ordinary but is the kind of headline that gets amplified in a jittery tape. Net: the story is slowly working in CART's favor while the macro is slowly working against it, and the two roughly cancel. Nothing here is a decisive force, hence a balanced read with a slight lean depending on whether the upcoming print validates the Ads and enterprise thesis.
Verify before trusting this (4)
- Whether the upcoming earnings print validates the Ads growth and enterprise traction narrative
- Any signs of grocer ad-budget saturation that would crack the Ads bull story
- Sector rotation flows in internet-retail versus defensive consumer
- VIX regime persistence beyond a few days - a sustained stress tape would start to bite even low-beta names
This lens hasn't been run for this ticker yet.
When we made this prediction on Aug 1, 2026, CART was $44.60. We expect it to be $48.40 by Feb 2027, and we consider it great value under $40.00. This is an early model (v0.6.0) — the direction is more reliable than the exact price. Made Aug 1, 2026.
Blue is our prediction, starting the day we made it. Grey is a slower route to the same place — the same destination, taking longer. Black is the actual price, so you can see how we are doing.