Knowledge Base

Hydrogen Handling — Deferred to Phase 2+

Draft High Research 253 words Created Mar 3, 2026

Hydrogen Handling & Transfer — Deferred to Phase 2+

Status: Not Required for Phase 1

Phase 1 uses all syngas energy to power the ship. No hydrogen is exported, stored, or transferred. This eliminates:

  • Hydrogen compression/liquefaction equipment
  • On-board hydrogen storage tanks (explosive risk next to plasma reactor)
  • Ship-to-ship hydrogen transfer (extremely dangerous — widest flammability range of any gas, 4–75%)
  • Hydrogen carrier logistics

Why It Was Deferred

1. Safety — hydrogen has invisible flames, embrittles metals, and has the widest flammability range of any fuel. Storing it on the same vessel as 5,000°C plasma torches is an unnecessary risk for Phase 1. 2. Complexity — hydrogen extraction from syngas requires PSA (pressure swing adsorption) equipment. One more system to build, certify, and maintain. 3. Logistics — transporting hydrogen from the GPGP to shore adds a major logistics chain that doesn't need to exist if the ship powers itself. 4. Economics — at 5–10 TPD, hydrogen production is ~300–600 kg/day. At $10/kg, that's $3,000–6,000/day — meaningful but not worth the infrastructure cost and safety risk in Phase 1.

Phase 2+ Considerations

If/when hydrogen export is revisited:

OptionSafetyInfrastructureRecommendation
Compressed H₂ tankerDangerous — ship-to-ship transfer of explosive gasRequires compression to 350–700 barNot recommended
Convert to ammonia (NH₃)Safer — liquid at -33°C, shipped globallyRequires Haber-Bosch reactor on-boardBest option if exporting
Convert to methanol (CH₃OH)Safest — liquid at room temperatureRequires methanol synthesis reactorGood option, simpler than ammonia
Don't exportSafestNonePhase 1 recommendation
Detailed hydrogen economics analysis is available in the knowledge base under Hydrogen Economics at Sea.