Back to INTU

Report comparison · INTU

6 decision changes · 6 fields changed total
Field
Jun 3, 2026 · 8:29 PM
linear-pipeline · pipeline_end · $0.314
earlier
Jun 3, 2026 · 8:49 PM
linear-pipeline · pipeline_end · $0.343
later
Δ
Bottom line
Classification
mature_earner
mature_earner
· confidence
88.0%
88.0%
·
Synthesis verdict
Potentially Undervalued
Potentially Undervalued
· verdict detail
changed
Composite fair value: $365.69 → signal-adjusted: $419.97 vs current price $311.44 (+34.8%). Methods disagree — mixed signals. Treat the composite with caution. …
was: Composite fair value: $365.69 → signal-adjusted: $471.55 vs current price $311.44 (+51.4%). Methods disagree — mixed signals. Treat the composite with caution. Market prices in less growth than projected — potential for re-rating if growth materialises.
now: Composite fair value: $365.69 → signal-adjusted: $419.97 vs current price $311.44 (+34.8%). Methods disagree — mixed signals. Treat the composite with caution. Market prices in less growth than projected — potential for re-rating if growth materialises.
Opus verdict
changed
Fairly valued near $311 — dissent from the $420 synthesis; fair value $300–$340 on normalized FY26 earnings, wait for a sub-$270 entry or a Consumer-segment de-…
was: Modestly undervalued quality compounder — fair value $360–$380, not the synthesis's $470; starter position at $311, add below $280, trim above $370.
now: Fairly valued near $311 — dissent from the $420 synthesis; fair value $300–$340 on normalized FY26 earnings, wait for a sub-$270 entry or a Consumer-segment de-risking catalyst before sizing up.
GPT critique
changed
I agree with Opus — Intuit is fairly valued at $311, considering the realistic risks facing its Consumer segment; $300–$340 is a reasonable range, but I wouldn'…
was: I disagree with Opus's "modestly undervalued" call — at $311, fair value is closer to $340-$360, not $360-$380; growth deceleration risks are understated.
now: I agree with Opus — Intuit is fairly valued at $311, considering the realistic risks facing its Consumer segment; $300–$340 is a reasonable range, but I wouldn't buy above $270 without further clarity on regulatory threats.
Thesis verdict
Reasonable Premium
Reasonable Premium
· thesis score
1
1
·
Valuation
Current price
$311.44
$311.44
·
Scenario — fair value
$281.33
$281.33
·
· upside
-9.7%
-9.7%
·
Reverse DCF — implied growth
10.0%
10.0%
·
· growth gap
15.2%
15.2%
·
Analyst target (consensus)
$458.82
$458.82
·
Signal scoreboard
Debt maturity
Strong Balance Sheet
Strong Balance Sheet
· risk score
2
2
·
FCF quality
Strong Cash Flow Quality
Strong Cash Flow Quality
· quality score
2
2
·
Revenue confidence
High Revenue Confidence
High Revenue Confidence
· confidence score
2
2
·
Insider activity
Net Insider Buying
Net Insider Buying
· net value
$84,619
$84,619
·
Macro environment
Macro Headwinds
Macro Headwinds
· macro score
-1
-1
·
Sector demand cycle
Sector Expanding
Sector Expanding
· demand score
1
1
·
Sector intelligence
In Line With Sector
In Line With Sector
· sector score
0
0
·
Industry outlook
strong_tailwind
strong_tailwind
· outlook score
2
2
·
Company momentum
strong_positive
strong_positive
· momentum score
2
2
·
Thesis & framing
Market thesis
changed
The market is pricing Intuit at ~16x revenue (based on $311 price and $18.8B revenue) with 20% net margins, implying a SaaS-quality business trading at a signif…
was: The market is pricing Intuit as a mature SaaS compounder (22x P/E, ~5x EV/Sales) betting on incremental ARPU expansion rather than explosive growth. The 62% drawdown from 52-week high suggests Mr. Market panicked over TurboTax threats (IRS Direct File) and reassessed Credit Karma's synergy potential. Current valuation implies ~10-12% perpetual FCF growth—reasonable for sticky SMB SaaS but doesn't credit breakthrough fintech optionality.
now: The market is pricing Intuit at ~16x revenue (based on $311 price and $18.8B revenue) with 20% net margins, implying a SaaS-quality business trading at a significant discount to peak. The collapse from $813 to $311 suggests the market stopped believing in the AI-driven acceleration narrative and/or re-priced Credit Karma's contribution as dilutive rather than synergistic. Current price likely reflects skepticism about TurboTax durability (IRS competition) and uncertainty about whether QuickBooks can sustain double-digit growth as online penetration matures.
Key risks
changed
IRS Direct File expansion could cannibalize TurboTax's 25% of revenue, with no clear replacement growth vector · Credit Karma's advertising-based model is cycli…
was: IRS Direct File expansion could permanently impair TurboTax's 25% revenue segment, with no clear replacement growth driver · Credit Karma acquisition ($7.1B, 2020) has unclear synergy realization—if cross-sell fails, it's a stranded asset diluting returns · AI automation could commoditize basic bookkeeping, reducing QuickBooks's pricing power and attach rate for premium services · SMB recession would hit QuickBooks subscription growth and Credit Karma referral volumes simultaneously—correlated segment risk · Regulatory risk: Tax software faces periodic political scrutiny; fintech faces evolving consumer finance regulations (CFPB)
now: IRS Direct File expansion could cannibalize TurboTax's 25% of revenue, with no clear replacement growth vector · Credit Karma's advertising-based model is cyclically exposed and could see margin compression if financial services marketing budgets contract · QuickBooks ecosystem has limited TAM expansion—already penetrated addressable SMB market, so growth depends on price increases that could accelerate churn or invite competition · AI assistants (ChatGPT, etc.) could commoditize tax preparation and bookkeeping advice, reducing willingness to pay for software · Regulatory risk: California and other states have pushed for free tax filing, and federal政策 could shift against paid preparation lobbying
Key catalysts
changed
Credit Karma cross-sell metrics showing conversion of users to QuickBooks or TurboTax, validating acquisition synergies · QuickBooks fintech attach rate acceler…
was: Credit Karma integration success: Evidence of TurboTax users converting to Credit Karma financial products (or vice versa) would validate flywheel thesis · QuickBooks Payments/Payroll attach rate acceleration—each 5% penetration increase is $500M+ revenue opportunity · IRS Direct File remaining limited in scope (income thresholds, state restrictions) removes TurboTax existential threat · AI-powered bookkeeping INCREASING QuickBooks value (automating reconciliation, invoicing) rather than replacing it—Intuit Assist adoption metrics critical · International expansion: QuickBooks has <10% revenue from non-US/Canada markets—successful global SMB penetration unlocks new TAM
now: Credit Karma cross-sell metrics showing conversion of users to QuickBooks or TurboTax, validating acquisition synergies · QuickBooks fintech attach rate acceleration (payments, payroll, capital) driving ARPU from ~$50/month to $75+ · AI product launches that increase customer retention or expand TAM by serving previously unaddressable micro-businesses · TurboTax Live (human-assisted) pricing power demonstration—shift from $60 DIY to $200+ assisted would offset volume risks · M&A in adjacent spaces (payroll, vertical SaaS for specific industries) to reignite growth narrative
Key metrics (market data) — drift expected, shown for context
P/E
18.75
18.75
·
P/B
11.15
11.15
·
EV/EBITDA
12.96
12.96
·
EV/Revenue
11.87
11.87
·
ROE
23.3%
23.3%
·
ROA
21.9%
21.9%
·
Net margin
20.5%
20.5%
·
Current ratio
1.36
1.36
·

Highlighted rows are analytical-judgment changes. Market-data drift (metrics) is shown muted — it moves every run and isn't flagged as a change.