Back to INTU
Report comparison · INTU
13 decision changes · 15 fields changed total
Field
Jun 3, 2026 · 8:49 PM
linear-pipeline · pipeline_end · $0.343
earlier
Jun 7, 2026 · 2:25 PM
linear-pipeline · pipeline_end · $0.434
later
Δ
Bottom line
Classification
mature_earner
mature_earner
· confidence
88.0%
88.0%
·
Synthesis verdict
Potentially Undervalued
Potentially Undervalued
· verdict detail
changed
Composite fair value: $385.69 → signal-adjusted: $518.37 vs current price $296.76 (+74.7%). Methods disagree — mixed signals. Treat the composite with caution. …
was: Composite fair value: $365.69 → signal-adjusted: $419.97 vs current price $311.44 (+34.8%). Methods disagree — mixed signals. Treat the composite with caution. Market prices in less growth than projected — potential for re-rating if growth materialises.
now: Composite fair value: $385.69 → signal-adjusted: $518.37 vs current price $296.76 (+74.7%). Methods disagree — mixed signals. Treat the composite with caution. Market prices in less growth than projected — potential for re-rating if growth materialises.
Opus verdict
changed
Undervalued but synthesis overshoots — fair value $370-400 (25x TTM EPS), not $518; starter position justified at $297 but full sizing requires confir
was: Fairly valued near $311 — dissent from the $420 synthesis; fair value $300–$340 on normalized FY26 earnings, wait for a sub-$270 entry or a Consumer-segment de-risking catalyst before sizing up.
now: Undervalued but synthesis overshoots — fair value $370-400 (25x TTM EPS), not $518; starter position justified at $297 but full sizing requires confir
GPT critique
changed
I agree with Opus — undervalued at $296.76, but I'd align fair value closer to $370-400, acknowledging growth risks and AI challenges.
was: I agree with Opus — Intuit is fairly valued at $311, considering the realistic risks facing its Consumer segment; $300–$340 is a reasonable range, but I wouldn't buy above $270 without further clarity on regulatory threats.
now: I agree with Opus — undervalued at $296.76, but I'd align fair value closer to $370-400, acknowledging growth risks and AI challenges.
Thesis verdict
Reasonable Premium
High Conviction Required
· thesis score
1
0
▼ 1
Valuation
Current price
$311.44
$296.76
▼ $14.68
Scenario — fair value
$281.33
$297.51
▲ $16.18
· upside
-9.7%
0.3%
▲ 9.9 pp
Reverse DCF — implied growth
10.0%
6.8%
▼ 3.3 pp
· growth gap
15.2%
18.4%
▲ 3.3 pp
Analyst target (consensus)
$458.82
$458.82
·
Signal scoreboard
Debt maturity
Strong Balance Sheet
Strong Balance Sheet
· risk score
2
2
·
FCF quality
Strong Cash Flow Quality
Strong Cash Flow Quality
· quality score
2
2
·
Revenue confidence
High Revenue Confidence
High Revenue Confidence
· confidence score
2
2
·
Insider activity
Net Insider Buying
Net Insider Buying
· net value
$84,619
$84,619
·
Macro environment
Macro Headwinds
Macro Headwinds
· macro score
-1
-1
·
Sector demand cycle
Sector Expanding
Sector Expanding
· demand score
1
1
·
Sector intelligence
In Line With Sector
In Line With Sector
· sector score
0
0
·
Industry outlook
strong_tailwind
strong_tailwind
· outlook score
2
2
·
Company momentum
strong_positive
strong_positive
· momentum score
2
2
·
Thesis & framing
Market thesis
changed
The market is pricing in permanent multiple compression from 40x+ earnings to low-20s due to fears about AI disruption, government tax competition (IRS Direct F…
was: The market is pricing Intuit at ~16x revenue (based on $311 price and $18.8B revenue) with 20% net margins, implying a SaaS-quality business trading at a significant discount to peak. The collapse from $813 to $311 suggests the market stopped believing in the AI-driven acceleration narrative and/or re-priced Credit Karma's contribution as dilutive rather than synergistic. Current price likely reflects skepticism about TurboTax durability (IRS competition) and uncertainty about whether QuickBooks can sustain double-digit growth as online penetration matures.
now: The market is pricing in permanent multiple compression from 40x+ earnings to low-20s due to fears about AI disruption, government tax competition (IRS Direct File), and SMB spending pressure. The $297 price suggests investors no longer believe Intuit deserves a premium SaaS multiple and are treating it as a mature, low-growth cash cow despite 15%+ revenue growth and accelerating FCF generation.
Key risks
changed
IRS Direct File expansion could eliminate 20-30% of TurboTax TAM over 3-5 years if government pushes free filing aggressively · AI-powered accounting alternativ…
was: IRS Direct File expansion could cannibalize TurboTax's 25% of revenue, with no clear replacement growth vector · Credit Karma's advertising-based model is cyclically exposed and could see margin compression if financial services marketing budgets contract · QuickBooks ecosystem has limited TAM expansion—already penetrated addressable SMB market, so growth depends on price increases that could accelerate churn or invite competition · AI assistants (ChatGPT, etc.) could commoditize tax preparation and bookkeeping advice, reducing willingness to pay for software · Regulatory risk: California and other states have pushed for free tax filing, and federal政策 could shift against paid preparation lobbying
now: IRS Direct File expansion could eliminate 20-30% of TurboTax TAM over 3-5 years if government pushes free filing aggressively · AI-powered accounting alternatives (ChatGPT plugins, Xero AI, new entrants) could erode QuickBooks' moat faster than Intuit can integrate AI defensively · Credit Karma's lead-gen model is highly sensitive to credit cycles - if banks tighten lending or reduce affiliate payouts, revenue could decline sharply · Regulatory risk on consumer data monetization practices, particularly around Credit Karma's financial product recommendations and data sharing · SMB churn acceleration if recession hits - small businesses are Intuit's core customer but also most economically fragile
Key catalysts
changed
Successful AI product launches (Intuit Assist) that demonstrate pricing power and engagement improvements across QuickBooks/TurboTax · IRS Direct File proves li…
was: Credit Karma cross-sell metrics showing conversion of users to QuickBooks or TurboTax, validating acquisition synergies · QuickBooks fintech attach rate acceleration (payments, payroll, capital) driving ARPU from ~$50/month to $75+ · AI product launches that increase customer retention or expand TAM by serving previously unaddressable micro-businesses · TurboTax Live (human-assisted) pricing power demonstration—shift from $60 DIY to $200+ assisted would offset volume risks · M&A in adjacent spaces (payroll, vertical SaaS for specific industries) to reignite growth narrative
now: Successful AI product launches (Intuit Assist) that demonstrate pricing power and engagement improvements across QuickBooks/TurboTax · IRS Direct File proves limited in scope/adoption, validating TurboTax's value proposition and removing overhang · Credit Karma margin expansion from scale and product mix shift toward higher-value financial products · Accelerated buyback program given stock dislocation and strong FCF generation ($6B annual FCF supports 7-8% buyback yield at current price) · International expansion success, particularly QuickBooks in Canada/UK/Australia where SMB digitization is earlier stage
Key metrics (market data) — drift expected, shown for context
P/E
18.75
17.87
▼ 0.88
P/B
11.15
11.15
·
EV/EBITDA
12.96
12.36
▼ 0.6
EV/Revenue
11.87
11.87
·
ROE
23.3%
23.3%
·
ROA
21.9%
21.9%
·
Net margin
20.5%
20.5%
·
Current ratio
1.36
1.36
·
Highlighted rows are analytical-judgment changes. Market-data drift (metrics) is shown muted — it moves every run and isn't flagged as a change.