For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page
What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.
Our current read (analysis of 2026-10-07): Designation Low · Gem Score -27 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality 17 · Value -56 · Sentiment -62 (timing only, not weighted) · Composite fair value $25.47 vs $74.45 at analysis
Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable
reference-name attribute you can cite):
profile-header/price-overview— company profile, live quote, market capextended-analysis— the core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memofuture-predictions— our forward price-band predictionsmarket-narrative/ai-findings/gpt-critique— narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)- Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers):
price-history,income-trend,key-metrics,financials(statement tables),insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.
More for machine readers: site briefing at
/llms.txt ·
any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER ·
raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds);
every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.
Affirm Holdings, Inc.
AFRM NASDAQAffirm Holdings, Inc. is a financial technology company that provides consumer payment and merchant commerce solutions. Affirm helps shoppers pay for purchases over time through point-of-sale installment options, including its app, virtual and physical card offerings, and checkout integrations for online and in-store transactions. The company also offers tools that help merchants present flexible payment choices, manage checkout experiences, and support commerce across e-commerce, retail, travel, and other consumer-facing industries. Its platform is designed around transparent repayment terms and a broad payments network that connects consumers, merchants, and partner financial institutions. Headquartered in San Francisco, California, and founded in 2012, Affirm Holdings, Inc. focuses on digital payments, consumer finance, and merchant enablement in the modern commerce market.
Price Overview
Price History (1 Year)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
| Period | Revenue | Net Income | Net Margin | YoY/QoQ |
|---|
Key Metrics
EPS (Diluted): 0.15
Total Equity: $5.48B
Shares: 347,906,667
Total Debt: $9.79B
Cash: $1.63B
EBITDA: $711.81M
Total Debt: $9.79B
Cash: $1.63B
Revenue: $3.22B
Revenue: $3.22B
Revenue: $3.22B
Total Equity: $5.48B
Tax Rate: 15.1%
Equity: $5.48B
Total Debt: $9.79B
Cash: $1.63B
Current Liabilities: N/A
Long-Term Debt: $9.79B
Total Debt: $9.79B
Total Equity: $5.48B
Shares: 347,906,667
Shares: 347,906,667
CapEx: -$238.35M
Shares: 347,906,667
Stock Price: $74.45
Net Income: $52.19M
Industry Benchmarks
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Sep 1, 2026 5:13am (36d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $870.5M | $1.3B | $1.6B | $2.3B | $3.2B |
| Cost of Revenue | $322.9M | $576.5M | $873.2M | $845.1M | $1.0B |
| Gross Profit | $547.6M | $772.8M | $714.8M | $1.5B | $2.2B |
| Operating Expenses | $878.5M | $1.6B | $1.7B | $1.7B | $1.8B |
| Operating Income | -$331.0M | -$796.4M | -$982.0M | -$264.8M | $338.0M |
| Net Income | -$441.0M | -$707.4M | -$985.3M | -$517.8M | $52.2M |
| EBITDA | -$370.7M | -$602.4M | -$635.7M | $4.5M | $711.8M |
| EPS | $-2.72 | $-2.51 | $-3.34 | $-1.67 | $0.16 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-2.88 | $-2.51 | $-3.34 | $-1.67 | $0.15 |
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Sep 1, 2026 5:00am (36d ago)| Metric | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash & Equivalents | $1.3B | $892.0M | $1.0B | $1.4B | $1.6B |
| Total Current Assets | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Assets | $7.0B | $8.2B | $9.5B | $11.2B | $15.8B |
| Current Liabilities | — | — | — | — | — |
| Long-Term Debt | — | — | $1.8B | $7.6B | $9.8B |
| Total Liabilities | $4.4B | $5.6B | $6.8B | $8.1B | $10.3B |
| Total Equity | $2.6B | $2.5B | $2.7B | $3.1B | $5.5B |
| Retained Earnings | -$1.6B | -$2.6B | -$3.1B | -$3.1B | -$1.1B |
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Sep 1, 2026 5:38am (36d ago)| Metric | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | -$162.2M | $12.2M | $450.1M | $793.9M | $1.2B |
| Capital Expenditure | -$86.3M | -$120.8M | -$159.3M | -$192.2M | -$238.3M |
| Free Cash Flow | -$248.5M | -$108.6M | $290.8M | $601.7M | $992.6M |
| Acquisitions (net) | -$6.0M | -$16.1M | $0 | $0 | — |
| Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) | — | $0 | $0 | $920.0M | $0 |
| Dividends Paid | — | — | — | — | — |
| Stock Buybacks | $-86,000 | $-109,000 | $0 | -$250.0M | $0 |
| Net Change in Cash | -$141.8M | -$290.9M | $35.5M | $461.0M | $676.6M |
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Sep 1, 2026 5:13am (36d ago)| Metric | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | +55.0% | +17.7% | +46.3% | +38.8% |
| Gross Profit Growth | +41.1% | -7.5% | +106.7% | +47.3% |
| Operating Income Growth | -140.6% | -23.3% | +73.0% | +227.6% |
| Net Income Growth | -60.4% | -39.3% | +47.5% | +110.1% |
| EBITDA Growth | -62.5% | -5.5% | +100.7% | +15,585.5% |
Deep Analysis
Risk : Reward — upside vs downside from this company's own quarters
Computed 2026-09-06 18:55A +1σ run of quarters pays +1%; a −1σ run costs 30%. Ratio 0.0:1 (μ 34.6%, σ 7.3% , 16 pairs).
Older method (repeat-worst-quarter): 0.8 : 1
| Case | Growth | Margin | Fair value | vs price ($74.45) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bull — recovery | +49% | 35.0% | $89.79 | +21% |
| Base — stabilizes | +33% | 35.0% | $59.84 | -20% |
| Bear — keeps slipping | +16% | 35.0% | $38.68 | -48% |
| Stress — last quarter repeats | +30% | 35.0% | $55.11 | -26% |
| Upside — a +1σ run of quarters (v2) | +42% | 35.0% | $75.31 | +1% |
| Stress — a −1σ run of quarters (v2) | +27% | 35.0% | $51.83 | -30% |
Narrative Economics
market-narrative step).
Growth Outlook
Analyzed 2026-09-01 05:48The question every valuation on this page silently assumes: is this company likely to grow? Judged forward — the business, its category, the world — against what's already printed.
Claude Reading
The June 2026 quarter is the entire story and nobody is stress-testing it hard enough. Revenue $1.17B with $1.62B net income and a 138.7% margin is not an operating result — that's almost certainly a deferred tax asset release (valuation allowance reversal) plus possibly gain-on-sale or fair-value marks on the loan book. Strip it out and the underlying quarterly run-rate looks like ~$100-130M in "real" net income on ~$1.1B revenue, i.e. ~10% net margin, consistent with the prior three quarters (8.6%, 11.5%, 9.9%). So the trailing $1.62B NI that drives the 496x P/E and the FCF CAGR of 84.7% are both artifacts. The synthesis models mostly gesture at this but none of them price it: ex-DTA, Affirm trades at roughly 60-70x normalized earnings, not 496x, and roughly 20x $1.23B operating cash flow — expensive but not absurd for 38.8% YoY revenue growth.
The balance sheet is where I part ways with the "high-growth profitable" archetype label. $9.79B of debt against $5.48B of equity and $1.63B cash, with 0.8x interest coverage per the market-forces read, means Affirm is fundamentally a levered specialty lender wearing a fintech multiple. The 8.03x P/S and 8.44x P/B only make sense if you believe the platform/network-effects framing; if it's a lender, peer comps (SoFi, Ally, Discover) trade at 1-2x book and 8-12x earnings. That's a 4-5x valuation gap that only closes in Affirm's favor if merchant lock-in and take-rates prove durable against Klarna, PayPal Pay Later, Apple Pay Later (now defunct — a small point for Affirm), and Amazon's in-house financing. The bear thesis weight of 78/100 on commoditization looks correctly calibrated to me; the market has not yet seen a real credit cycle test the 6% loss assumption.
Where I'd push back on the bearish synthesis: revenue acceleration is real and the quarterly cadence ($698M → $866M → $783M → $876M → $933M → $1.12B → $1.04B → $1.17B) shows genuine 38-40% YoY growth with expanding GMV, not financial engineering. Operating cash flow of $1.23B and FCF of $992M on $3.22B FY2025 revenue is legitimate — 31% FCF margin is exceptional for a lender and suggests the funding model (warehouse + forward flow to third parties like Sixth Street) is working. The contrarian bull case is that Affirm is one of maybe two Western BNPL platforms that will survive consolidation (Klarna being the other), and if take rates hold at current levels through a full credit cycle, the $25B market cap could look cheap in 2028. Insider activity is genuinely neutral — small option-exercise churn, no red-flag selling by Levchin.
I'm landing partial-dissent from the synthesis's "High Conviction Required" hedge and closer to the thesis evaluation's -6 slightly-bearish read, but with a different reasoning: the stock isn't dramatically overvalued if you normalize out the DTA release, it's just priced with zero margin of safety for the two things that actually matter — credit losses in the next recession and take-rate compression from Big Tech competition. At $74 and $25B market cap, you're paying ~20x normalized operating cash flow for a levered consumer lender growing 38% with unproven cycle-tested credit. Fair value on normalized earnings and a hybrid lender/platform multiple (say 12-15x OCF blended) is closer to $50-58. I'd want either a pullback to the mid-$50s or one clean recessionary quarter proving credit holds before sizing up. The "category winner" narrative is doing 30-40% of the work in this price, consistent with the narrative premium the market-narrative layer flagged.
GPT Reading
Affirm’s numbers show a real business improvement, but the stock price assumes that this improvement is the beginning of a durable compounding machine rather than the first clean year after an ugly credit and rate cycle. The operating turnaround is undeniable: annual revenue went from $2.32B in FY24 to $3.22B in FY25, up 39%, while operating income swung from -$264.8M to +$338.0M and net income from -$517.8M to +$52.2M. Quarterly revenue has also stayed strong, rising from $698.5M in Sep-2024 to $1.17B in Jun-2026, a roughly 68% increase in seven quarters. Cash generation now looks serious too, with $1.23B of operating cash flow and $992.6M of free cash flow in the latest annual cash flow statement. If I looked only at the direction of travel, I’d say the company has crossed an important threshold from speculative fintech to scaled lender-platform.
What stops me is that the valuation is already discounting much more than “crossed a threshold.” At $25.1B, AFRM trades around 8.0x sales, 9.4x EV/revenue, 42.6x EV/EBITDA, 8.4x book, and a meaningless-looking 496x earnings because net income is still tiny on an annual basis. Those multiples might be defendable for a software-like platform with recurring, low-capital-intensity economics; they are much harder to defend for a credit-exposed model with $9.79B of debt against $1.63B of cash and only $5.48B of equity. Debt/equity at 2.48x matters here because Affirm is not just selling code; it is carrying real balance-sheet and funding risk. Even after the turnaround, FY25 net margin was only 1.6%, ROE 1.7%, ROIC 3.1%, and ROA 0.47%. That is not the return profile of a business that should casually command a premium growth multiple unless you have very high confidence that margins are about to scale dramatically.
The most important contradiction in the data is between the appearance of profitability and the quality/sustainability of that profitability. The quarterly trend is better than the annual headline suggests, with four straight profitable quarters from Jun-2025 through Jun-2026 before the latest quarter’s bizarre $1.62B net income blowout. But that Jun-2026 margin of 138.7% is clearly non-operating noise, not evidence of suddenly magical unit economics. Strip that out and the prior three quarters showed net margins of 8.6%, 11.5%, and 9.9% on revenue between $933M and $1.12B, which is good—but not yet enough to justify treating the business as a stable compounder. In other words, the business likely deserves credit for reaching a real mid-single to low-double-digit quarterly margin zone, but the market is valuing it as if that zone is secure, scalable, and resistant to the next credit normalization. For a lender-adjacent company in consumer finance, that is too generous.
The best argument against my skepticism is straightforward: once a credit platform reaches scale, the P&L can inflect fast, and Affirm may be earlier in that curve than bears admit. Gross profit was $2.18B on $3.22B of revenue in FY25, a very healthy 67.5% gross margin, and if operating costs stay disciplined, the move from barely profitable to meaningfully profitable could happen faster than traditional valuation frameworks expect. Revenue momentum also remains strong; recent YoY growth near 39% is not the profile of a business running out of room. Free cash flow near $1.0B against a $25B market cap is not cheap, but it is no longer absurd if that cash flow is repeatable and can grow 25%+ for several years. A bull would also say the market is correctly paying for the winner in a category where scale, merchant integration, and underwriting data can create a widening moat. If quarterly earnings settle around 8-10% net margin on a $4B+ annual revenue base, today’s multiple could compress naturally without the stock falling much.
I weigh those bullish points less heavily because they still require a near-perfect continuation of three things at once: high-30s revenue growth, stable credit performance, and expanding margins despite a leveraged funding structure. The stock does not leave much room for any one of those to wobble. What would change my mind is evidence that the business can produce clean, repeatable profitability without one-off gains and without sacrificing growth: for example, several consecutive quarters of revenue above $1.15B, net margins sustainably above 8% excluding unusual items, and annualized free cash flow remaining near or above $1.0B while leverage stops rising. If, instead, revenue growth slips into the low-20s or margins fall back toward breakeven, the multiple has a long way to de-rate. At $74, I think investors are paying as if the hard part is done; the data says the hard part has only recently become visible.
Grok Reading
The numbers that matter most are not the $1.62B net income printed in the June 2026 quarter—that 138.7% net margin is almost certainly a one-time item (tax, fair-value, or similar) and should be ignored for any run-rate judgment—but the multi-year arc underneath. Affirm went from $870M of revenue and deep operating losses in FY2021 to $3.22B of revenue, $338M of operating income, and $52M of net income in FY2025, then kept growing into a $1.17B quarterly revenue run-rate with positive operating leverage visible in the preceding four clean quarters (net margins roughly 8–12%). Free cash flow of $993M on that base is real and high-quality relative to the earlier loss years; operating cash flow of $1.23B against only $238M of capex shows the model can throw off cash once scale arrives. Gross margin at 67.5% and operating margin at 10.5% annually confirm the unit economics have crossed a genuine threshold. Revenue CAGR of 42.5% and recent YoY of 38.8% remain strong, though the quarterly sequence ($783M → $876M → $933M → $1.12B → $1.04B → $1.17B) already shows deceleration rather than reacceleration.
What the valuation is asking you to believe is that this trajectory continues without a serious credit or funding shock. At $74.45 and a $25.1B market cap the stock trades at 8.0x sales, 9.4x EV/revenue, and 42.6x EV/EBITDA, with a trailing P/E of 496 that is meaningless given near-zero normalized earnings base and the one-time spike. ROE of 1.7%, ROIC of 3.1%, and ROA of 0.5% are still feeble for a specialty lender; debt of $9.79B against $5.48B of equity (D/E 2.48) and only $1.63B of cash is the funding model of the business, but it leaves thin coverage if charge-offs rise or funding costs reprice. The market is paying platform multiples for what remains, in cash-flow terms, a high-growth consumer credit originator whose FCF can reverse quickly in a downturn. Strip the narrative premium the models flag (30–50%) and the equity is pricing something closer to 25%+ sustained revenue growth plus margin expansion into the mid-teens—possible, but not the base case once Big Tech and bank BNPL products commoditize take rates.
The strongest opposing case is straightforward and numerate: nearly $1B of FCF, a clean operating-profit inflection from –$982M to +$338M in two years, 67% gross margins, and still-high-30s revenue growth at scale are exactly the setup growth investors pay 8x sales for. If Affirm holds credit losses in check, continues converting GMV into high-teens operating margins, and compounds revenue at even 25% for five years, today’s $25B cap looks cheap on 2030 cash flows and the stock has room toward $100+. Insider activity is noise (option exercises and small sales), cash generation is strong, and the Levchin/PayPal-mafia execution track record has already delivered the profitability turn many skeptics said would never arrive. I weigh this less heavily because the same data set shows decelerating revenue confidence, lagging sector peers, macro headwinds, elevated leverage, and a thesis score already net negative once commoditization and rate sensitivity are aggregated; FCF multiple of ~25x is only attractive if the credit cycle cooperates, which is a hope rather than a demonstrated through-cycle fact.
I would flip to constructive on a clean two-quarter stretch of net margins sustainably above 12% with stable or falling provision rates, revenue growth reaccelerating above 40% YoY, or a material reduction in net leverage alongside funding-cost improvement; a sharp rise in delinquencies, regulatory capital rules that raise the cost of the loan book, or another sequential revenue deceleration below 25% would confirm the overvaluation read.
Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
The operating trajectory is genuinely impressive: revenue compounded from $870M (FY21) to $3.22B (FY25), gross margin recovered from a 45% trough in FY23 to 67.5%, operating margin swung from -61.8% to +10.5%, and net income turned positive at $52M with FCF of $993M. OCF/NI of 4.39x and accruals of -9.4% of assets suggest reported earnings are conservative relative to cash - not a red flag on quality of earnings itself. Classification as high_growth_profitable fits. The offset is capital structure and per-share math. Net debt of roughly $8.16B against $1.63B liquid cash reflects the funding stack behind the receivables book - normal for a BNPL originator but it means the balance sheet is a working constraint. Altman Z of 1.64 is largely a model-fit artifact for a lender, though it still flags leverage. Diluted shares grew from 153M to 348M - a 22.8% CAGR - with SBC at 9.5% of revenue and buybacks recovering only 13.8% of SBC. The business is compounding; per-share value is being taxed heavily by issuance. Insider tape is neutral-to-soft: one small S-sale, routine option exercises and tax-withholding events, no open-market buying. Nothing damning, nothing confirming.
Verify before trusting this (7)
- Charge-off rates, delinquency trends, and loan-loss provisioning by vintage
- Warehouse facility capacity, covenants, and securitization execution
- Merchant and partner concentration (Shopify, Amazon, Walmart exposure)
- Terms and dilution schedule of any convertibles or warrant liabilities
- SBC grant-vs-vest schedule and expected forward dilution rate
- Interest-rate sensitivity of funding costs vs merchant/consumer take rates
- Segment split between 0% APR merchant-subsidized volume and interest-bearing loans
AFRM trades at $74.45 for a $25B market cap on a business that just crossed into GAAP profitability for the first time. The e2e synthesis flags it as 'priced for domination it faces structural headwinds to achieve' - meaning the current quote embeds continued high-teens+ GMV growth, stable take rates, and benign credit through a cycle. That is a heroic bundle for a levered consumer lender competing with Klarna, PayPal, Apple, Amazon and card networks. Company-quality is Solid, not Strong - the 22.8% annual share dilution is a real drag on per-share deserved value that the market cap masks. Earnings quality is clean, so no additional haircut, but nothing about the quality profile justifies paying a premium multiple versus specialty lenders that trade at 1-2x book with double-digit ROEs. Deserved value sits materially below the current print; I read fair somewhere in the high-$50s to low-$60s, with a real margin of safety only in the high-$40s.
Verify before trusting this (5)
- Take-rate trajectory by merchant cohort in the next 10-Q
- Delinquency and charge-off trends vs guidance
- Stock-based comp as percent of revenue and any buyback authorization
- Funding cost and warehouse capacity terms
- Guidance for GMV growth and adjusted operating margin
The tape is nominally risk-on but soft (S&P off its high, VIX 14.9), and with a 3.62 beta AFRM should be leveraged to any bid. Instead the stock is doing the opposite: down 6% on a Bernstein target raise, down 4% the prior session, unwinding a post-earnings rally despite 36% GMV growth, 51% merchant expansion, and 5.2M card users. That price-vs-print disconnect is the tell - sentiment on this specific name is heavier than the macro backdrop implies. The mission-driven BNPL narrative has moderate durability but is visibly cracking: the bear frame (Amazon, PayPal, banks commoditizing BNPL; credit losses creeping; $25B valuation demanding uninterrupted growth) is winning the tape, and Levchin's own cautious consumer commentary in the call gave bears the quote they needed. Analyst tone (Bernstein raise) is a mild tailwind but the market shrugged it off, which is itself a bearish sentiment signal - good news is not being paid for. Sector context compounds it: SoFi and PayPal headlines frame BNPL as a crowded, margin-pressured space rather than a category-definer. Net: narrative fatigue plus a high-beta profile with no defensive ballast in a wobbly tape equals real headwind pressure on the name, even though the business printed well.
Verify before trusting this (5)
- Whether AFRM can hold post-earnings lows or breaks down through them - a failed rally signature
- Sell-side revisions in the next 1-2 weeks: if more analysts follow Bernstein higher and the stock still fades, sentiment is decisively broken
- Any Amazon, PayPal, or bank BNPL product headline - each one directly compresses the moat narrative
- Consumer credit data (delinquencies, charge-offs) that would validate or refute Levchin's cautious tone
- VIX behavior and 10y yield - a real risk-off leg would maul this beta profile
The structural shift from revolving credit-card balances to fixed-term, disclosed installment credit at the point of sale is still early in adoption, and the world is helping: merchants pay for conversion lift, younger cohorts are card-averse, and embedded checkout rails are consolidating around a few underwriters. Against that, the macro is unfriendly — a 4.73% 10y and a flat-ish curve raise the cost of the capital that funds every loan, and consumer credit is at the point in the cycle where losses normalize upward rather than downward. The net: demand-side tailwind is real and multi-year, cost-of-funds and loss-rate headwinds are cyclical and could take a year or two of growth off the top without breaking the model. Sector expansion plus expanding industry margins means Affirm is not fighting its environment for revenue — only for spread.
When we made this prediction on Sep 1, 2026, AFRM was $70.41. We expect it to be $54.00 by Mar 2027, and we consider it great value under $48.00. This is an early model (v0.6.0) — the direction is more reliable than the exact price. Made Sep 1, 2026.
Blue is our prediction, starting the day we made it. Grey is a slower route to the same place — the same destination, taking longer. Black is the actual price, so you can see how we are doing.