Skip to main content
Homepage
Full 18-step deep-dive · ~20–30 min · a member feature.
AGING Analysis Report
Aug 10, 2026
13 days ago · 100% complete
NOT DEPENDABLE This report predates a filing — its financial basis has been replaced.
Report generated: Aug 10, 2026 · Filing on record since: Aug 22, 2026 · 12 days after
For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page

What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.

Our current read (analysis of 2026-08-23): Designation Watch · Gem Score -2 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality 66 · Value -57 · Sentiment 64 (timing only, not weighted) · Composite fair value $36.38 vs $178.07 at analysis

Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable reference-name attribute you can cite):

  • profile-header / price-overview — company profile, live quote, market cap
  • extended-analysisthe core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memo
  • future-predictions — our forward price-band predictions
  • market-narrative / ai-findings / gpt-critique — narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)
  • Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers): price-history, income-trend, key-metrics, financials (statement tables), insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.

More for machine readers: site briefing at /llms.txt · any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER · raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds); every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.

Airbnb, Inc.

ABNB NASDAQ
Consumer Cyclical · Travel Services
San Francisco, CA 94103, United States airbnb.com Updated Aug 10, 12:02am
Price
$178.07
Market Cap
$105.7B
Employees
8,200
Beta
1.14
Avg Volume
4,037,977
CEO
Mr. Brian Chesky

Airbnb, Inc. is a global online marketplace that connects hosts with travelers seeking short-term stays and travel experiences. Airbnb’s platform enables individuals and property managers to list private rooms, homes, boutique accommodations, and other lodging options, while also offering a curated range of local activities and services in selected markets. The company serves leisure and business travelers, hosts, and property operators through a digital platform that supports discovery, booking, payments, reviews, and trust-and-safety tools. Its business is centered on facilitating peer-to-peer and professional hospitality supply rather than owning the properties it lists, making it an asset-light participant in the travel and lodging industry. Headquartered in San Francisco, California, Airbnb remains a major platform in the alternative accommodations market, shaping how consumers book stays and experiences across regions worldwide.

Runs with full report Generated: Aug 10, 2026 12:15am
Price Overview
Price at report time
$178.07
as of Aug 10, 12:18am (13d ago)
Change · Aug 10
+26.43 (+17.43%)
Day Range
$163.45 – $178.48
52-Week Range
$110.81 – $178.48
50-Day MA
$143.51
200-Day MA
$133.34
Volume
15,890,600.00
Right now · live
Log in to get the live feed
Members see the real-time price and the move since this report (over 13d).
Share Structure
Outstanding 599,000,000.00
Float 402,657,542.00
Free Float 67.2%
Normal free float — 67.2% of shares trade freely, ~32.8% held by insiders/institutions
Healthy float typical of established companies. Good liquidity for entering and exiting positions without major price impact.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Aug 10, 2026 12:27am (13d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Aug 6, 2026 6:55pm (17d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
TD Twelve Data statement HEX SEC filing
Industry comparison last run: Aug 10, 2026 12:13am
P/E Ratio (Price per dollar of earnings)
HEX
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
44.18
Stock Price: $178.07
EPS (Diluted): 4.03
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
HEX
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
13.53
Stock Price: $178.07
Total Equity: $8.20B
Shares: 623,000,000
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
HEX
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
39.38
Market Cap: $105.69B
Total Debt: $2.00B
Cash: $6.56B
EBITDA: $2.56B
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
HEX
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$100.9B
Market Cap: $105.69B
Total Debt: $2.00B
Cash: $6.56B
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
HEX
Gross Profit / Revenue
83.0%
Gross Profit: $10.16B
Revenue: $12.24B
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
HEX
Operating Income / Revenue
20.8%
Operating Income: $2.54B
Revenue: $12.24B
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
HEX
Net Income / Revenue
20.5%
Net Income: $2.51B
Revenue: $12.24B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
HEX
Net Income / Total Equity
30.6%
Net Income: $2.51B
Total Equity: $8.20B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
HEX
NOPAT / Invested Capital
56.0%
Operating Income: $2.54B
Tax Rate: 20.0%
Equity: $8.20B
Total Debt: $2.00B
Cash: $6.56B
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
HEX
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
1.38
Current Assets: $18.80B
Current Liabilities: $13.65B
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
HEX
Total Debt / Total Equity
0.24
Short-Term Debt: $2.00B
Long-Term Debt: $0.00
Total Debt: $2.00B
Total Equity: $8.20B
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
HEX
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$19.65
Revenue: $12.24B
Shares: 623,000,000
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
HEX
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
$13.16
Total Equity: $8.20B
Shares: 623,000,000
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
HEX
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$7.46
Operating CF: $4.65B
CapEx: $0.00
Shares: 623,000,000
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
TD
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
Last Dividend: $0.00
Stock Price: $178.07
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
HEX
Dividends Paid / Net Income
Dividends Paid: N/A
Net Income: $2.51B
Dividends paid not available in cash flow statement
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Aug 10, 2026 12:13am
Compares ABNB against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 6, 2026 6:55pm (17d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue $6.0B $8.4B $9.9B $11.1B $12.2B
Cost of Revenue $1.2B $1.5B $1.7B $1.9B $2.1B
Gross Profit $4.8B $6.9B $8.2B $9.2B $10.2B
Operating Expenses $4.4B $5.1B $6.7B $6.7B $7.6B
Operating Income $429.3M $1.8B $1.5B $2.6B $2.5B
Net Income -$352.0M $1.9B $4.8B $2.6B $2.5B
EBITDA $515.3M $1.8B $1.5B $2.6B $2.6B
EPS $-0.57 $2.97 $7.52 $4.19 $4.10
EPS (Diluted) $-0.57 $2.78 $7.24 $4.11 $4.03
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 6, 2026 6:55pm (17d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Cash & Equivalents $6.1B $7.4B $6.9B $6.9B $6.6B
Total Current Assets $12.4B $14.9B $16.5B $17.2B $18.8B
Total Assets $13.7B $16.0B $20.6B $21.0B $22.2B
Current Liabilities $6.4B $8.0B $10.0B $10.2B $13.6B
Long-Term Debt $2.0B $2.0B $2.0B $2.0B $0
Total Liabilities $8.9B $10.5B $12.5B $12.5B $14.0B
Total Equity $4.8B $5.6B $8.2B $8.4B $8.2B
Retained Earnings -$6.4B -$6.0B -$3.4B -$4.2B -$5.5B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 6, 2026 6:55pm (17d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Operating Cash Flow $2.2B $3.4B $3.9B $4.5B $4.6B
Capital Expenditure -$25.3M -$25.0M
Free Cash Flow $2.2B $3.4B
Acquisitions (net) $0
Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) -$2.0B $0 $0
Dividends Paid
Stock Buybacks $0 -$1.5B -$2.3B -$3.4B -$3.8B
Net Change in Cash $2.1B $2.4B $564.0M $93.0M $726.0M
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Aug 6, 2026 6:55pm (17d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue Growth +40.2% +18.1% +11.9% +10.3%
Gross Profit Growth +42.7% +19.0% +12.3% +10.1%
Operating Income Growth +319.7% -15.8% +68.2% -0.4%
Net Income Growth +637.7% +153.1% -44.7% -5.2%
EBITDA Growth +258.0% -16.7% +67.3% -0.3%
0Company Classification 1Industry Landscape 2Company Momentum 3Forward Projection 4aDCF Valuation 4bEarnings Power Value 4cAnchored PE 4dReverse DCF 4eRevenue-Based DCF 4fAnchored P/S 4gScenario Analysis 4hDividend Discount Model 4iBook Value Analysis 4jInsider Activity 4fCash Flow Quality 4gDebt Maturity Risk 4hMacro Environment 4iSector Intelligence 4jRevenue Confidence 4kSensitivity Analysis 4lSector Demand Cycle 5AI Investigation 5bThesis Evaluation 6Valuation Synthesis
computed not applicable not yet run 14 computed · 6 not applicable · 4 not yet run
Risk : Reward — if the last quarter repeats
Live · as of 2026-08-23 02:38
-0.6 : 1 recovery upside vs repeat-quarter downside
Even the bull case prices 50% below today — the ratio here measures the model-vs-market gap, not payoff odds. Another quarter like the worst recent one costs 82%.
CaseGrowthMarginFair valuevs price ($178.07)
Bull — recovery +26% 23.5% $88.73 -50%
Base — stabilizes +18% 20.5% $60.68 -66%
Bear — keeps slipping +9% 17.4% $40.44 -77%
Stress — last quarter repeats +12% 11.4% $31.39 -82%
The next quarters keep the trajectory of the worst recent matched quarter (ending 2025-12-31) — growth stays at 12.0% and margins bend by the same profit-vs-revenue ratio (×0.56). Stress is a trajectory, not a prediction — it answers "what if the ship's current heading simply continues," which history says is the case to respect.
Why this is appearing: this company files quarterly, so its recent trajectory could be measured rather than assumed — the engine matched Jun 2026, Mar 2026 against the same quarters one year earlier and found revenue +17.1% · operating income +29.8% · net income +22.6% year-over-year. That measured heading is what the stress case extends forward. Of those, the stress case extends the worst matched quarter — the one ending Dec 31, 2025 (revenue +12.0%, operating income -37.4% YoY) — not the average. Data measured through Jun 30, 2026 — this card recalculates automatically when the next quarterly filing is ingested. Companies without quarterly filings (many foreign listings) never show this card: with no measured trajectory, there is nothing honest to repeat.
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for ABNB — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
Claude Reading
Independent analyst synthesis · claude-opus-4-7 · generated 2026-08-10 00:26:32
Verdict Overvalued but not catastrophically so — fair value $130-150 vs $178; synthesis $33 DCF is broken, but insider dumping and premium-to-Booking argue for patience, not shorting.

Starting with the raw tape: TTM revenue running roughly $13.2B ($3.61+$2.68+$2.78+$4.10 last four prints if we trust the labels), against 2024 full-year $11.1B and 2025 full-year $12.24B. That's ~11% top-line growth, matching the stated CAGR. But look carefully at the quarterly cadence: 2025-09 shows $4.10B/33.6% margin while 2024-09 showed $3.73B/36.7% — Q3 is the seasonal cash cow and margin actually compressed 310bps YoY on the peak quarter. Q2 2026 at $3.61B vs Q2 2025 $3.10B is +16.5% growth with margin expanding to 22.6% from 20.7% — that's actually the strongest data point in the file and the synthesis models seem to underweight it. Full-year 2025 NI of $2.51B was down from $2.65B in 2024 despite $1.1B more revenue, so operating leverage is negative on a reported basis, though 2023's $4.79B NI included a large deferred tax benefit and shouldn't be the comp.

On valuation, the synthesis "fair value $33.25" is not credible on its face. A business generating $4.65B operating cash flow, ~$4B+ FCF, with $6.56B net cash, growing double-digits at 20%+ net margins does not clear at 3.5x earnings or ~7x FCF — that's a distressed multiple for a category-leading platform with 83% gross margins and 56% ROIC. The DCF is either using a punitive discount rate, terminal decay to zero, or ignoring the balance sheet. The Market Forces model calling this "collapsing margins" and "losing share" is contradicted by the Q2'26 print (+16.5%, margin up YoY) and by the "Sector Leader" tag from the sector intel model. These two prior models are internally inconsistent and I'd discount the "compelling short" framing as hyperbole.

That said, the bear case isn't wrong on direction, just magnitude. At $178 / $105.7B market cap, EV of roughly $101B against ~$4B FCF is ~25x — not $33 fair value territory, but also not cheap for an 11% grower with regulatory overhang in Barcelona, NYC, Paris, and now increasingly in secondary US markets. The insider activity is genuinely ugly: ~2.1M shares sold across two days in late July 2026 with zero offsetting buys and only a token gift. That's not routine 10b5-1 noise, that's a coordinated distribution near highs, and it deserves weight. The Q1 seasonality (Q1'26 $2.68B, only +18% vs Q1'25 $2.27B but margin still just 6%) shows the business remains highly seasonal and Q1/Q4 profitability is thin — the "22.6% net margin" headline is a Q2/Q3 phenomenon.

A careful contrarian pushing back on my skepticism would note: Chesky has been signaling the Experiences/Services relaunch as a genuine second act, the platform has never had meaningfully lower churn or higher take-rate optionality than now, and 44x P/E on a company with a net cash balance sheet, no capex, and 38% FCF conversion is closer to 30x on an ex-cash FCF basis — reasonable for a category-defining brand. Fair. But the counter is that Booking.com trades at ~20x forward earnings with faster growth and better margins, and Expedia at ~14x — ABNB's premium to peers is what's stretched, not the absolute multiple. I'd anchor fair value at roughly 25-28x FCF on ~$4.2B, or ~$110-125B EV, translating to roughly $130-150/share including net cash. That's a 15-25% overvaluation, not 80%. I dissent hard from the $33 composite but agree directionally with "overvalued." The Market Forces "short opportunity" framing is too aggressive given Q2'26's actual reacceleration; the Narrative layer's "anchored, moderate durability" read is closest to correct. Insider selling + Q3 margin compression + regulatory drift + premium to Booking are the four things I'd watch; a break of $160 would confirm the re-rating, while a Q3'26 print above $4.3B with margin holding 34%+ would force a rethink upward.

GPT Reading
Independent reading · gpt-5.4 · generated 2026-08-10 00:26:47
Verdict Overvalued at $178 — superb platform economics, but ~44x earnings and ~9x sales are too rich for a business growing ~10-16% with flat operating profit; fair value is closer to $135-$145.

Airbnb still looks like an excellent business, but the numbers here do not support paying a premium-growth multiple. Revenue is growing, yet only at a rate that is becoming ordinary for a company already at $12.24B of sales: 2025 revenue grew 10.3% to $12.24B from $11.10B, and the latest quarter rose 16.5% year over year to $3.61B from $3.10B, while 1Q26 grew 18.1% off an easy base. That is healthy, not explosive. More importantly, profit conversion is not marching upward with scale. Annual operating income was essentially flat at $2.54B in 2025 versus $2.55B in 2024 despite the extra $1.14B of revenue, implying operating margin compressed from 23.0% to 20.8%. Net income fell from $2.65B to $2.51B even as revenue advanced. On a quarterly basis, the business remains strongly seasonal, with margins swinging from 6.0% in 1Q26 to 22.6% in 2Q26 and 33.6% in 3Q25. That is fine operationally, but it argues against a software-like multiple.

The quality of the franchise is obvious in the gross margin and cash generation. An 82.9% gross margin and $4.65B of operating cash flow on $12.24B of revenue are elite. The balance sheet is also a strength: $6.56B of cash against just $2.00B of debt gives Airbnb real resilience and optionality. Return metrics are high, with ROE at 30.6% and ROIC at 55.9%, which tells you the platform model is economically attractive. But valuation already capitalizes that strength and then some. At $178, the stock trades around 44x earnings, 9.1x sales, and 39x EV/EBITDA. Those are demanding multiples for a company with roughly 10%-11% top-line growth, flat operating profit, and slight net income decline. If Airbnb were compounding revenue 20%+ with clear evidence that margins were re-expanding, I could tolerate that setup. Here, the market is paying for moat, brand, and optionality as if the next leg of growth is already visible in the P&L. It isn’t.

What stands out most is that the “mature earner” framing is basically right, while some of the more dramatic bearish language is overstated. This is not a deteriorating business with collapsing economics. The data show a very profitable global marketplace with strong cash generation, modest balance-sheet risk, and continued growth. But it is maturing, and the stock price has not fully acknowledged that maturation. The annual numbers since 2023 show the issue clearly: revenue rose from $9.92B to $11.10B to $12.24B, while operating income went $1.52B to $2.55B to $2.54B. Airbnb has already harvested a large chunk of the obvious post-COVID operating leverage. From here, sustaining a 44x P/E likely requires either a new growth engine or a renewed margin expansion cycle. The raw data do not yet show either. Add a cluster of insider selling in late July 2026, including seven-figure share dispositions, and it is hard to argue management behavior is signaling a bargain.

The best counterargument is that I am underestimating the durability and scarcity of the asset. There are not many consumer internet platforms with global brand power, structurally high margins, net cash, and more than $4.5B of annual operating cash flow. If 1H26 is the start of a re-acceleration rather than a temporary lift, the multiple could hold. The latest two quarters did improve year-over-year revenue growth versus the 2025 annual pace, and quarterly net income also improved in absolute dollars from $642M to $816M in the June quarter. A bull would also point out that 2023 net income was distorted higher at $4.79B, so the earnings CAGR looks worse than underlying economics; by normalized earnings power, 2024-2026 may be steadier than the headline suggests. I weigh those points less heavily because the burden of proof is on a $105.7B company priced at 9x sales. Great business quality is not the same thing as undervaluation.

What would change my mind is simple: if Airbnb can show that 2026 revenue growth sustains in the mid-teens while operating margin climbs back above 23%-24% instead of stalling around 21%, then the premium would start to look earned. Concretely, I would want to see full-year 2026 revenue above roughly $13.8B with operating income above $3.2B and operating cash flow pushing past $5.2B. Short of that, I would need a materially lower price. Around $130-$140, the stock would be easier to underwrite on existing fundamentals; at $178, too much future success is already paid for.

Grok Reading
Independent reading · grok-4.5 · generated 2026-08-10 00:27:27
Verdict Overvalued at $178; quality compounder but 44× earnings and 9× sales price in growth that has already faded to ~10%

The raw numbers describe a high-quality but clearly maturing platform, not a compounding growth engine. Airbnb printed $12.24B in 2025 revenue, up just 10% from $11.10B the prior year and continuing the steady deceleration from the 40%+ post-COVID bounce; the trailing revenue CAGR sits at 11.1% with recent YoY at 10.3%. Net income came in at $2.51B for a clean 20.5% net margin, but that figure is actually down from $2.65B in 2024 and a distant cry from the anomalous $4.79B in 2023, producing a –27.6% earnings CAGR. Quarterly seasonality remains extreme—Q3 delivers 33–37% net margins and $1.37B profits while Q1 collapses to 6% margins and ~$150–160M—yet the full-year operating margin has settled at 20.8% after the earlier peak. Gross margin holds at an elite 83%, operating cash flow reached $4.65B, the balance sheet is fortress-like with $6.56B cash against only $2.0B debt and a 0.24 debt-to-equity ratio, and returns are outstanding (ROE 30.6%, ROIC 56%). Those are the hallmarks of a durable, asset-light cash machine. What they are not is a business still growing into a 44× P/E, 9.1× sales, or 39× EV/EBITDA multiple at a $178 share price and $106B enterprise value.

The valuation synthesis calling the stock 80%+ overvalued relative to a ~$33–36 DCF is directionally correct even if the absolute fair-value pin is too punitive; more realistic multiples for a 10% grower with 20% margins would land closer to 25–30× earnings or 5–6× sales, implying a mid-$90s to low-$120s range. Insider activity reinforces the caution: the last ten filings are almost entirely large open-market sales totaling well over 2 million shares in a two-day window at the end of July 2026. The market narrative of “platform monopoly / winner-take-most lodging distribution” is still firmly anchored and explains why the stock can trade at a several-hundred-percent premium to fundamental cash-flow value, but the quantitative momentum and secondary signals (decelerating revenue confidence, macro headwinds, unusual selling) show the story is already fraying at the edges.

The strongest counter-argument is that Airbnb still converts revenue into cash at extraordinary rates, possesses genuine two-sided network effects and brand pricing power that hotels and OTAs have failed to replicate, and could re-accelerate via experiences, longer-term stays, or corporate travel. A bull would correctly note that 38%-ish incremental FCF margins and a net-cash balance sheet give the company enormous strategic flexibility, that structural share shift from traditional hotels continues in many markets, and that a 44× multiple is not outrageous if management can push revenue growth back into the mid-teens while holding or expanding the 20%+ net margin. Those points have merit; the business quality is real. I simply weigh the observed growth trajectory and current multiple more heavily: 10% top-line growth and flat-to-down earnings do not support an 8–9× sales multiple when regulatory risk in core cities is rising and the easy post-pandemic mix shift is exhausted.

Sustained quarterly revenue growth re-accelerating above 15–16% YoY for two consecutive periods, coupled with operating margins expanding back through 25%, or a material capital-return program that shrinks the share count while the multiple holds, would force a reassessment toward fair value.

Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Each AI above independently stated a direction (undervalued, fairly valued, or overvalued) and how strongly it believes it (conviction, 0–5). We combine those into a Bull-Bear Index on a 0–10 scale: 5 is neutral, 10 is maximum bullish (undervalued at full conviction), 0 is maximum bearish. We compute the score ourselves with the same arithmetic for every seat — the models never grade their own bullishness — so the three are directly comparable. Δ shows how far each seat sits from the panel average of 1.3; a large Δ marks the dissenting voice, usually the one worth reading.
Claude claude-opus-4-7 2.0
overvalued · conviction 3/5 · Δ +0.7 vs panel · self: 4.0
GPT gpt-5.4 1.0
overvalued · conviction 4/5 · Δ -0.3 vs panel · self: 3.0
Grok grok-4.5 1.0
overvalued · conviction 4/5 · Δ -0.3 vs panel · self: 2.0
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
Separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-08-10 00:52:32
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Quality - wait for a dip 7/10
Strong platform, wrong price - the AI-narrative tailwind has stretched ABNB roughly 35-45% above where the quality-adjusted math actually works.
The cruxWhether the fresh AI-margin narrative can sustain a 20%+ premium to deserved value long enough to grow into it, or whether narrative fatigue drags the multiple back toward the $130 zone.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from ABNB's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwaySelf-Funding
DilutionStable Share Count
Earnings QualityHigh Earnings Quality
The four lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
+66
Strong
edge √Σ 156 · risk √Σ 77 · conf 8/10

Airbnb is a structurally high-quality business: 83% gross margins, 20%+ operating margins, and $4.65B of FCF on $12.24B revenue (a ~38% FCF margin). Revenue has scaled from $5.99B (2021) to $12.24B (2025), a ~20% CAGR, while OCF/FCF has expanded every single year. The balance sheet is a fortress: $11.01B liquid cash, $9.02B net cash, Altman Z of 5.39, and no external funding need. Earnings quality is clean - accruals at -8.5% of assets indicate conservative accrual behavior, and reported net income is well-supported by cash (FCF has exceeded net income in 4 of 5 years; the 2023 net income spike was a deferred tax valuation allowance release, not core earnings). Dilution is well-controlled for a tech platform: diluted shares fell from 680M (2022) to 623M (2025), a net reduction, with buybacks running 184% of SBC. That said, SBC at 13% of revenue (~$1.6B) is a real economic cost that gets masked by GAAP margins - true cash compensation intensity is high. Operating margin also compressed from 23% (2024) to 20.8% (2025) even as revenue grew, suggesting reinvestment or cost creep worth watching. The insider tape is a genuine yellow flag: 90 sells for $629M with zero buys over 12 months, headlined by co-founder Joe Gebbia unloading ~$316M in two days. This is likely 10b5-1 diversification by billionaire founders rather than a fundamental signal, but the one-sidedness and scale deviate from norms and deserve attention.

Strengths 5
m85
Elite cash generation on asset-light model
$4.65B FCF on $12.24B revenue (38% FCF margin) with 83% gross margins - platform economics working at scale, FCF up every year from $2.16B in 2021.
m80
Fortress balance sheet
$11.01B cash, $9.02B net cash, Altman Z 5.39 - zero solvency risk and full strategic optionality.
m65
Disciplined share count
Diluted shares declined from 680M (2022) to 623M (2025); buybacks at 184% of SBC actively shrinking the count despite 13%-of-revenue SBC.
m55
Clean earnings quality
Accruals at -8.5% of assets, FCF ($4.65B) meaningfully exceeds net income ($2.51B) in 2025 - no evidence of accrual-based earnings inflation.
m60
Durable consumer brand and network effects
Two-sided marketplace with global scale; revenue nearly doubled from 2021 to 2025 with margin expansion, implying pricing power and structural demand.
Concerns 3
m55
Heavy one-sided insider selling
90 sells totaling $629M, zero buys over 12 months; Gebbia sold ~$316M in two days late July 2026. Likely diversification but the scale and unanimity are notable.
m45
High SBC economically dilutive absent buybacks
SBC at 13% of revenue (~$1.6B/yr) is a real cost; net share reduction depends on continued aggressive buybacks - remove buybacks and dilution would be meaningful.
m30
Operating margin compression
Op margin slipped from 23% (2024) to 20.8% (2025) despite revenue growth, suggesting rising cost intensity or reinvestment (Experiences, Services relaunch).
This is a genuinely high-quality business - the kind of asset-light platform that prints cash with minimal capital intensity, and management has actually used that cash to shrink the share count, which is rare in big tech. Balance sheet is unimpeachable and earnings are cash-backed. What holds me back from calling it 'Fortress' is threefold: SBC is a real 13%-of-revenue cost that the GAAP margin flatters, 2025 shows the first hint of operating leverage running the wrong way, and the insider tape is uniformly one-directional at meaningful scale. None of these is a red flag on its own, but together they say 'excellent business, not flawless.' Solidly Strong, not elite.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Whether the July 2026 Gebbia sales were executed under a pre-arranged 10b5-1 plan
  • Composition of 2025 opex growth - is margin compression from Services/Experiences reinvestment or core cost creep?
  • Geographic and regulatory concentration (EU short-term rental rules, NYC-style bans) in the 10-K risk section
  • Take-rate trend and nights-booked growth vs revenue growth to confirm pricing vs volume mix
  • Nature of the 2023 net income spike ($4.79B vs $3.88B FCF) - deferred tax asset release confirmation
Valuation / Mispricing
-57
Rich
edge √Σ 20 · risk √Σ 85 · conf 6/10
Price $178 vs deserved ~$100-130 - roughly 35-45% above my central estimate; the EPV $36 is a red flag but not a target. attractive below $130.00

The e2e composite fair value of $36.38 (EPV floor) implies -81% downside, but that number is almost certainly a runaway low-end anchor - EPV on a capital-light growth platform with mid-teens FCF margins understates deserved value badly. I discount it heavily rather than take it literally. A more honest deserved-value range for a Strong-quality, asset-light, FCF-generative platform with ~13% of revenue in SBC leakage and moderating growth is roughly 20-25x maintainable FCF, landing somewhere in the $90-130 per share zone depending on how much you credit the moat narrative. Against $178, that leaves the stock priced for continued platform dominance, resilient take rates, and no material regulatory drag - i.e. the bull case is already in the tape.

Cheap signals 1
m20
Buyback shrinking the float
Management has actually reduced share count - rare and value-accretive - which modestly supports deserved value but does not close a 35%+ gap.
Rich / priced-in 4
m55
Priced for the bull narrative
At ~$106B market cap on a business generating mid-single-digit-billion FCF, the multiple demands durable platform economics and continued take-rate expansion - the platform-monopoly story is already the base case in the price.
m45
SBC drag not in headline multiples
SBC at ~13% of revenue is a real economic cost; adjusting deserved value for it lowers the multiple a rational owner should pay versus screens that use GAAP or adj-EBITDA.
m35
Regulatory and commoditization tail risk uncompensated
City-level restrictions and hotel/OTA competition are real; at this price you are not being paid to underwrite that tail.
m30
EPV floor screams overvalued
Even discounting the $36 EPV as a lowball, the fact that a legitimate method lands 80% below price is a signal that downside scenarios are ugly if growth stalls.
I like the business, I do not like the price. A Strong-quality asset-light platform deserves a premium, but $178 is already paying that premium in full and then some - the EPV method screaming $36 tells me the downside scenario is not benign either. I would want this closer to $130 before it earns a look, and I would get genuinely interested sub-$110 where the quality-adjusted math actually works. Today it is a hold-your-nose fair-to-rich, not a buy.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Nights-booked growth trajectory and ADR trend in next print
  • Take-rate direction and any hint of host-side pricing pressure
  • SBC dollars vs revenue - is the ratio flattening or growing
  • Regulatory rulings in top-10 metros
  • Free cash flow conversion vs adjusted EBITDA gap
General Sentiment
+64
Strong Tailwind
tail √Σ 128 · head √Σ 52 · conf 8/10

The pressure on ABNB is decisively positive. The Aug 7 print did two things at once: beat and raise (validating the platform-monopoly story) AND handed the market a new, cleaner narrative hook - AI as a margin lever, endorsed on the call by the CEO. The stock gapped ~14-17% to a four-year high, which is the market re-rating the story, not the fundamentals. Coverage since has been uniformly constructive (four-year high, 'is it a buy', AI pays off), with zero visible bear counter-narrative in the flow.

Tailwinds 3
m88
AI-margin narrative just crystallized
The CEO explicitly framing AI as a cost/margin unlock gave the platform-monopoly story a fresh, quantifiable hook. That is exactly the kind of narrative refresh that re-rates a name, and it just happened on the tape with a 14-17% gap.
m75
Blowout print + raised guide
Beat and raise into a four-year high removes the 'growth is stalling' bear angle short-term. News flow is uniformly positive with no visible pushback in the 72h window.
m55
Risk-on tape + rate-cut jolt
Regime score +52, VIX sub-15, S&P at highs, and a soft payrolls print fueling cut hopes. A 1.14-beta consumer discretionary platform name is exactly the profile this tape lifts hardest.
Headwinds 3
m35
Narrative durability is only moderate
Platform-monopoly story with medium cult and moderate durability means the AI hook has to keep producing evidence. Post-gap, the bar is higher and any soft data point gets punished harder.
m30
Rates/valuation backdrop still hostile in absolute terms
10y at 4.69% and market PE 26 remain a structural drag on long-duration growth multiples. Currently masked by the rate-cut narrative, but re-emerges if cuts get pushed out.
m25
3-year deceleration in the rearview
-27.8pp growth deceleration over 3 years is a latent bear talking point that a single AI-cost narrative does not erase. Not pressing on the tape today but available to short-sellers on any wobble.
Net pressure is strongly to the upside right now. You have a rare alignment: a fresh, CEO-endorsed AI narrative landing on a beat-and-raise, into a risk-on tape that just got a dovish jobs print - and a 1.14 beta to catch all of it. Valuation and rates are real background headwinds, but on a 1-3 month sentiment horizon they are being drowned out. I would call this Strong Tailwind, with the caveat that the stock is now extended and narrative durability is only moderate, so the tailwind is powerful but not necessarily long-dated.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Whether sell-side target revisions follow the print - silence after a 17% gap would be a tell that the move is retail/momentum-led
  • Durability of the AI-margin story in Q3 commentary and any concrete opex/take-rate numbers
  • Any re-emergence of regulatory headlines in major cities, which is the dormant bear catalyst
  • Rate-cut path - if the payrolls-driven cut narrative fades, high-multiple consumer names give back first
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
Growth Outlook
not run

This lens hasn't been run for this ticker yet.

The forward growth verdict — is the business itself likely to grow (next 2 quarters / year 1 / years 2–3), judged against its category and against printed expectations. The full horizon ladder + creme renders on the Growth Outlook card above. Not a call on the price (Valuation owns that) or the tape (Sentiment owns that).
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure), and Growth Outlook (the forward growth verdict). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Price Prediction
Lower -13.5% v0.6.0 View full prediction →

When we made this prediction on Aug 10, 2026, ABNB was $178.07. We expect it to be $154.00 by Feb 2027, and we consider it great value under $130.00. This is an early model (v0.6.0) — the direction is more reliable than the exact price. Made Aug 10, 2026.

Price when predicted$178.07
Our estimate for Feb 2027$154.00-13.5%
Great value below$130.00
Price history shown (6 Months)

Blue is our prediction, starting the day we made it. Grey is a slower route to the same place — the same destination, taking longer. Black is the actual price, so you can see how we are doing.

Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for ABNB. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
v1.1.562 · 9b2927c4 · 2026-08-22 16:52:06