Skip to main content
Homepage
Full 18-step deep-dive · ~20–30 min · a member feature.
AGING Analysis Report
Aug 15, 2026
8 days ago · 100% complete
NOT DEPENDABLE This report predates a filing — its financial basis has been replaced.
Report generated: Aug 15, 2026 · Filing on record since: Aug 22, 2026 · 7 days after
For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page

What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for Dominion Energy, Inc. (D) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.

Our current read (analysis of 2026-08-23): Designation Watch · Gem Score -9 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality 9 · Value -24 · Sentiment 29 (timing only, not weighted) · Composite fair value $65.38 vs $68.77 at analysis

Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable reference-name attribute you can cite):

  • profile-header / price-overview — company profile, live quote, market cap
  • extended-analysisthe core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memo
  • future-predictions — our forward price-band predictions
  • market-narrative / ai-findings / gpt-critique — narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)
  • Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers): price-history, income-trend, key-metrics, financials (statement tables), insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.

More for machine readers: site briefing at /llms.txt · any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER · raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds); every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.

Dominion Energy, Inc.

D NYSE
Utilities · Utilities - Regulated Electric
Richmond, VA 23219, United States dominionenergy.com Updated Aug 14, 10:34am
Price
$68.50
Market Cap
$60.3B
Employees
15,200
Beta
0.63
Avg Volume
4,214,612
Last Dividend
$2.67
CEO
Mr. Robert M. Blue

Dominion Energy, Inc. is a regulated utility company that provides electricity and natural gas services across parts of the United States. The company serves residential, commercial, and industrial customers through its electric generation, transmission, and distribution operations, alongside regulated natural gas service in select markets. Dominion Energy also develops and operates renewable energy assets, including offshore wind and solar projects, reflecting its role in the transition toward cleaner power generation. Its business is centered on dependable energy delivery, infrastructure management, and long-term utility operations, making it an important provider in the regulated energy market. Headquartered in Richmond, Virginia, Dominion Energy focuses on essential utility services that support homes, businesses, and regional power systems.

Runs with full report Generated: Aug 15, 2026 12:22am
Price Overview
Price at report time
$68.77
as of Aug 15, 12:18am (8d ago)
Change · Aug 15
+0.23 (+0.34%)
Day Range
$68.38 – $68.93
52-Week Range
$55.85 – $72.99
50-Day MA
$68.98
200-Day MA
$63.61
Volume
1,461,589.00
Right now · live
Log in to get the live feed
Members see the real-time price and the move since this report (over 8d).
Share Structure
Outstanding 879,512,484.00
Float 859,516,734.00
Free Float 97.7%
High free float — 97.7% of shares trade freely, ~2.3% held by insiders/institutions
Very liquid — most shares trade freely. Low insider ownership can mean less management alignment, but makes large position sizing straightforward.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Aug 15, 2026 12:33am (8d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Aug 15, 2026 12:32am (8d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
TD Twelve Data statement HEX SEC filing
Industry comparison last run: Aug 15, 2026 12:20am
P/E Ratio (Price per dollar of earnings)
HEX
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
19.93
Stock Price: $68.50
EPS (Diluted): 3.45
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
HEX
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
1.76
Stock Price: $68.50
Total Equity: $33.42B
Shares: 855,300,000
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
HEX
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
15.77
Market Cap: $60.28B
Total Debt: $48.79B
Cash: $250.00M
EBITDA: $6.80B
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
HEX
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$107.3B
Market Cap: $60.28B
Total Debt: $48.79B
Cash: $250.00M
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
HEX
Gross Profit / Revenue
Gross Profit: N/A
Revenue: $16.51B
Missing from API: Gross Profit
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
HEX
Operating Income / Revenue
26.7%
Operating Income: $4.41B
Revenue: $16.51B
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
HEX
Net Income / Revenue
18.2%
Net Income: $3.00B
Revenue: $16.51B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
HEX
Net Income / Total Equity
9.0%
Net Income: $3.00B
Total Equity: $33.42B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
HEX
NOPAT / Invested Capital
4.6%
Operating Income: $4.41B
Tax Rate: 14.7%
Equity: $33.42B
Total Debt: $48.79B
Cash: $250.00M
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
HEX
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
0.77
Current Assets: $8.07B
Current Liabilities: $10.44B
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
HEX
Total Debt / Total Equity
1.46
Short-Term Debt: $2.46B
Long-Term Debt: $46.33B
Total Debt: $48.79B
Total Equity: $33.42B
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
HEX
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$19.30
Revenue: $16.51B
Shares: 855,300,000
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
HEX
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
$39.07
Total Equity: $33.42B
Shares: 855,300,000
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
HEX
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$6.27
Operating CF: $5.36B
CapEx: $0.00
Shares: 855,300,000
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
TD
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
3.9%
Last Dividend: $2.67
Stock Price: $68.50
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
HEX
Dividends Paid / Net Income
76.0%
Dividends Paid: -$2.28B
Net Income: $3.00B
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Aug 15, 2026 12:20am
Compares D against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 15, 2026 12:32am (8d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue $14.0B $17.2B $14.4B $14.5B $16.5B
Cost of Revenue
Gross Profit
Operating Expenses $10.9B $15.6B $11.0B $11.2B $12.1B
Operating Income $3.0B $1.6B $3.4B $3.2B $4.4B
Net Income $3.3B $994.0M $2.0B $2.1B $3.0B
EBITDA $5.5B $4.4B $6.0B $5.6B $6.8B
EPS $3.98 $1.09 $2.29 $2.44 $3.46
EPS (Diluted) $3.98 $1.09 $2.29 $2.44 $3.45
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 11, 2026 12:48pm (12d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Cash & Equivalents $283.0M $153.0M $184.0M $310.0M $250.0M
Total Current Assets $7.3B $9.9B $25.4B $6.6B $8.1B
Total Assets $99.6B $104.2B $109.0B $102.4B $115.9B
Current Liabilities $8.7B $13.5B $24.5B $9.3B $10.4B
Long-Term Debt $41.9B $40.2B $39.3B $46.3B
Total Liabilities $70.7B $76.4B $81.5B $72.2B $82.4B
Total Equity $28.9B $27.9B $27.5B $30.2B $33.4B
Retained Earnings $5.4B $4.1B $3.5B $2.0B $2.3B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 15, 2026 12:32am (8d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Operating Cash Flow $4.0B $3.7B $6.6B $5.0B $5.4B
Capital Expenditure
Free Cash Flow
Acquisitions (net)
Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) $2.7B $3.6B -$2.4B $3.3B $7.2B
Dividends Paid -$2.0B -$2.2B -$2.2B -$2.2B -$2.3B
Stock Buybacks
Net Change in Cash $161.0M -$67.0M -$40.0M $64.0M -$22.0M
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Aug 15, 2026 12:32am (8d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue Growth +23.0% -16.2% +0.5% +14.2%
Gross Profit Growth
Operating Income Growth -47.1% +113.9% -4.9% +35.9%
Net Income Growth -69.8% +100.6% +6.5% +41.1%
EBITDA Growth -19.5% +35.4% -6.7% +21.6%
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Aug 11, 2026 12:48pm (12d ago)
Date Dividend Declaration Record Payment
2026-05-29 $0.67
2026-02-27 $0.67
2025-12-05 $0.67
2025-09-05 $0.67
2025-05-29 $0.67
2025-02-28 $0.67
2024-11-29 $0.67
2024-08-30 $0.67
2024-05-31 $0.67
2024-02-29 $0.67
2023-11-30 $0.67
2023-08-31 $0.67
2023-06-01 $0.67
2023-03-02 $0.67
2022-12-01 $0.67
2022-09-01 $0.67
2022-06-02 $0.67
2022-03-03 $0.67
2021-12-02 $0.63
2021-09-02 $0.63
0Company Classification 1Industry Landscape 2Company Momentum 3Forward Projection 4aDCF Valuation 4bEarnings Power Value 4cAnchored PE 4dReverse DCF 4eRevenue-Based DCF 4fAnchored P/S 4gScenario Analysis 4hDividend Discount Model 4iBook Value Analysis 4jInsider Activity 4fCash Flow Quality 4gDebt Maturity Risk 4hMacro Environment 4iSector Intelligence 4jRevenue Confidence 4kSensitivity Analysis 4lSector Demand Cycle 5AI Investigation 5bThesis Evaluation 6Valuation Synthesis
computed not applicable not yet run 14 computed · 6 not applicable · 4 not yet run
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for D — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
AI Lens 4th lens · how AI reaches this business · 5-yr
2026-08-15
The creme is there an opportunity here? Opportunity
Dominion is one of the purest ways to own the physical bottleneck of the AI buildout, with the caveat that regulators and equity issuance decide how much of it reaches a share.
Exposure is high (80) and the direction is favorable (74): scarcity migration scores 91 because AI made interconnection and firm power the binding constraint, and Dominion's franchise sits on the densest data-center corridor in the world — already visible in 14.2% revenue growth versus 7.4% industry and 26.7% operating margin. What kills it is not technology but ratemaking: ai_margin_conversion at 45 says efficiency gains flow to ratepayers, and share count rose 808M→855M funding the capex, so the load boom can arrive without per-share capture. Watch large-load tariff cost-allocation rulings and the signed-contract share of the interconnection queue before the market reprices the difference between forecast load and contracted load.
74
AI Position
Favorable — AI load growth lands directly in the rate base
Dominion sells the one input AI cannot synthesize — firm power and interconnection in the densest data-center market on earth — and cheap intelligence enlarges its regulated asset base rather than threatening it, with the catch that regulators, not markets, decide how much of that value reaches shareholders per share.
Exposure 80 Confidence 70 50 = neutral
Primary Tailwind

Dominion Energy Virginia serves the world's largest data-center cluster; AI compute growth converts into multi-year load and interconnection demand, justifying transmission, generation and grid capex on which the utility earns an authorized regulated return — AI literally expands the rate base.

Primary Pressure

Regulated returns are politically administered: soaring capex funded partly with equity (shares 808M→855M in four years) plus rising residential bills creates pressure for cost disallowance, ROE compression, or legislative reallocation, so per-share value can lag load growth badly.

Critical Hinge

Whether Virginia's SCC and legislature let Dominion recover AI-driven capex on time and make large loads bear their own cost — visible in large-load tariff rulings, rate case ROE and rider outcomes, and the share of the interconnection queue backed by signed contracts with minimum-take terms.

Hard to Reproduce

A legislated service-territory monopoly over Loudoun-corridor wires, existing licensed nuclear (North Anna, Millstone) as clean firm capacity, and siting/interconnection rights that no amount of cheap software can manufacture.

Forensic fingerprint same 11 factors for every stock · 0 unfavorable · 50 neutral · 100 favorable
Underlying Need Persistence do people still need this at all? 96
Electricity demand is the most AI-proof need in the pool and AI increases it.
Cheap intelligence raises, not lowers, the need for delivered power; data-center load in Dominion's Virginia territory is the direct transmission channel.
Virginia peak load forecast revisions · data-center MW energized per year · residential vs large-load demand mix
relevance 92 · confidence 92
Solution Persistence will they still solve it this way? 86
Grid-delivered regulated power remains the default way AI campuses get electricity.
On-site generation and SMRs can shave marginal load but still typically require interconnection, backup and delivery service from the incumbent utility.
behind-the-meter deals in territory · standby/backup tariff terms · hyperscaler on-site gas turbine announcements
relevance 75 · confidence 72
Intelligence Commoditization does cheap AI power them or copy them? 63
Cheap AI improves grid operations but cannot replicate a franchised wires network.
Predictive maintenance, outage prediction and load forecasting reduce O&M modestly; none of it is copyable into a competing utility because the barrier is legal, not computational.
O&M per customer trend · AI outage-prediction deployments · vegetation and inspection cost savings
relevance 34 · confidence 62
Responsibility Transfer are they paid to take the blame? 71
Dominion is paid to carry reliability and compliance obligations no hyperscaler wants to own.
Firm service, NERC compliance, storm restoration and nuclear licensing are liabilities customers deliberately outsource; that preference strengthens as loads become mission-critical for AI training.
reliability metrics and penalties · firm vs interruptible large-load contracts · nuclear license extension progress
relevance 46 · confidence 64
Scarcity Migration do their assets get rarer or more common? 91
AI makes interconnection capacity, transformers and firm clean generation dramatically scarcer.
The bottleneck for AI has shifted from chips to power and land with grid access; Dominion controls the queue and the wires in the highest-value corridor.
interconnection queue length and pricing · transmission project approvals · nuclear uprate and co-location filings
relevance 88 · confidence 78
Customer DIY Preference will customers just build it themselves? 52
Hyperscalers are the one customer class rich enough to self-generate.
Direct nuclear PPAs, fuel cells and on-site gas represent genuine partial bypass; scale, permitting and reliability economics still favor utility service for most of the load.
direct hyperscaler generation contracts · Virginia rules on bypass/self-supply · large-load tariff opt-out provisions
relevance 62 · confidence 58
AI Intermediation Position do AI agents go through them or around them? 58
Agents cannot route around a physical distribution monopoly.
There is no software intermediation layer between Dominion and its captive customers; the only routing decision AI affects is where hyperscalers site campuses.
site-selection shifts to other states · competing utility incentive packages · data-center moratorium proposals
relevance 22 · confidence 66
Data Leverage does their data make AI better? 49
Grid and AMI data aid internal optimization but are not a monetizable AI asset.
Interval and asset data improve forecasting and maintenance, yet regulation limits external monetization and no competitor is trying to replicate the dataset.
AMI analytics program filings · load-forecast accuracy vs actuals · any data-derived revenue disclosures
relevance 24 · confidence 58
AI Margin Conversion do the AI savings become profit? 45
Regulation routes most AI-driven cost savings to ratepayers, not shareholders.
Cost-of-service ratemaking claws back O&M efficiency at the next case; the shareholder gain comes from earning a return on more capital, not from margin expansion.
earned vs authorized ROE · O&M savings retained between cases · performance-based ratemaking adoption
relevance 48 · confidence 68
Revenue Unit Durability does the thing they charge for survive? 79
The monetized unit — kWh plus return on rate base — is expanding, though rate design is contested.
AI load lifts volumes and capital deployment simultaneously; the risk is not unit disappearance but political reallocation of who pays for the buildout.
large-load tariff cost allocation · rate case revenue requirement outcomes · contracted minimum-take provisions
relevance 80 · confidence 74
Entrant Compression how easily can newcomers copy them? 83
Cheap software does not create a competing regulated utility.
Entry barriers are statutory franchise, siting, capital and interconnection control; the only entrant pressure is distributed/behind-the-meter supply at the margin, not new utilities.
retail choice legislation in Virginia · merchant generation siting in territory · microgrid/fuel-cell penetration
relevance 58 · confidence 76

AI Lens thesis

AI reaches Dominion on the demand side, not the cost side: intelligence gets cheap but the electrons, transformers, transmission rights and firm capacity feeding it get scarcer, and Dominion holds a regulated monopoly on delivering them into the highest-density AI compute geography in the US. The monetized unit — kWh delivered plus allowed return on invested capital — is untouched by automation; AI's effect is to raise the volume of capital Dominion can deploy at an authorized spread, which is why revenue grew 14.2% YoY versus 7.4% for the industry and operating margin reached 26.7%. The offsets are structural to regulation rather than to technology: internal AI-driven O&M savings mostly flow to ratepayers at the next rate case, growth capex needs external equity that dilutes per-share capture, and the political economy of residential bills rising because of hyperscaler load is the live risk. Behind-the-meter generation and hyperscaler nuclear/on-site gas deals are the only genuine bypass channel, and even those usually still need Dominion's wires and backup service.

Thesis breaker A Virginia legislative or SCC outcome that caps allowed returns on data-center-driven capex, disallows CVOW or grid spend, or a visible wave of hyperscalers contracting large-scale behind-the-meter generation that bypasses Dominion delivery service.
What the market may be underestimating

Upside Existing nuclear becomes a strategically scarce clean-firm asset — uprates, license extensions and co-location or premium-priced contracted output (including Millstone) can be monetized at valuations set by AI scarcity rather than by historical cost-of-service logic.

Downside AI load growth may be capitalized into share count rather than EPS: if the equity funding requirement keeps outrunning the earned return, shareholders finance the AI buildout while regulators and hyperscalers split the gains.

Outcome range spread 42

46Bear case
73Central case
88Bull case
Three headline numbers, deliberately never blended: Position (which way), Exposure (how much it matters at all), Confidence (how sure). The fingerprint asks every stock the same 11 questions so companies a sector label would lump together get told apart. Not an input to GEM/Coal or the Q/V/S lenses.
Growth Outlook
Analyzed 2026-08-17 16:17

The question every valuation on this page silently assumes: is this company likely to grow? Judged forward — the business, its category, the world — against what's already printed.

Growing Regulated rate-base compounding plus one of the strongest load-growth franchises in the country (Virginia data centers) makes Dominion a durable mid-to-high-single-digit earnings grower — but funded by heavy capex, so the growth is engineered rather than free. conf 8/10
Share gain Category growing · Category (regulated electric) is in a confirmed boom with ~9.1% median recent growth and industry-wide margin expansion; Dominion's recent 14.2% YoY revenue exceeds the 7.4% industry comparison, a +6.8pp gap. Some of that gap is fuel pass-through rather than franchise gain, but the underlying territory load growth from Virginia data centers is genuinely faster than the national average.
Next 2 quarters
Growing
Load growth plus rate/rider step-ups already in effect carry the top line; CVOW phases entering service add earning assets. Quarterly comps are weather-sensitive but the direction of the base business is upward and the recent print cadence has been steady.
↑ above expectations
Year 1
Growing
Full-year trajectory is the rate-base algorithm: approved capex plus load growth against a constructive category backdrop. Interest expense and equity funding trim, but not enough to break out of mid-single-digit-plus EPS growth.
≈ inline with expectations
Years 2–3
Growing
Structurally the earnings power grows: data-center interconnection queues in Virginia extend well beyond three years and translate into approved investment, while the portfolio is now simplified and regulated. Erosion scenarios require a regulatory clamp or a CVOW cost blowup, not a demand failure.
↑ above expectations
The creme: each rung's call measured against what's already printed (vs analyst estimates · vs guidance / FY consensus · vs price-implied growth) — expectations in print are already in the price, so only the variant margin can pay. Hover a rung's chip for the margin read.
Growth drivers
77 Virginia data-center load growth — Dominion's electric service territory contains the densest concentration of US data centers; the resulting load-growth pipeline converts directly into transmission/distribution and generation rate base. This is the clearest company-specific demand mechanism in regulated electric and is why the company's recent 14.2% YoY revenue print exceeds the 7.4% industry pace.
63 Rate-base/capex-to-earnings machine — For a regulated utility, approved capex compounds allowed-return earnings. Elevated spend (grid, solar, CVOW offshore wind entering service) mechanically lifts rate base for years, supporting the company's long-standing 5-7% EPS growth framework regardless of volume swings.
49 Sector in confirmed boom phase — Category median recent growth 9.1%, industry 3-yr revenue CAGR 5.4%, and industry operating margins +2.1pp over three years. A rising category means constructive regulatory posture toward recovery of investment — the tide is with the business, not against it.
33 Execution track record vs estimates — Five consecutive EPS beats (+12%, +1%, +40%, +4%, +18%) after the post-restructuring reset suggests the simplified, regulated-only portfolio is delivering at or above the guided cadence — evidence the earnings base is real, not accounting drift.
Growth risks
64 Negative free cash flow / funding drag — FCF CAGR of -9.7% against +7.1% revenue CAGR is the signature of capex intensity outrunning operating cash. Growth must be financed with debt and equity; every equity block issued dilutes the per-share growth the EPS framework promises.
53 Offshore wind execution and cost risk — CVOW is a multi-billion, single-project concentration. Cost overruns, supply-chain/tariff exposure or schedule slippage would be recovered only partially and slowly, and could trigger regulatory pushback that caps the return on the largest single addition to rate base.
50 Regulatory/rate-case dependency — All earnings growth is permissioned. Virginia's biennial review structure and political sensitivity to residential bills rising because of data-center-driven investment create a real risk that allowed ROE or cost-recovery timing is trimmed.
36 Rate/financing backdrop — 10y at 4.63% with a macro-headwind read raises the cost of the debt that funds the capex program; utilities' earnings growth is levered to spread between allowed ROE and marginal financing cost, and that spread is narrower than in the last decade.
28 Headline growth partly pass-through — Reported revenue for a regulated utility includes fuel and purchased-power pass-throughs, so the 14.2% YoY figure overstates true share/volume gain. The economic growth rate is closer to rate-base growth than to the top-line print.
The world is re-electrifying: AI/data-center compute, electrification of heat and transport, and onshoring are turning a decades-flat load curve upward, and regulated utilities are the tollbooth. Dominion sits on the single densest data-center corridor in the world, so it captures this shift structurally rather than speculatively. The offset is that this era's growth is capital-hungry at a time when the 10y sits at 4.63% — the constraint on utility growth is no longer demand, it is the cost and political tolerance of the capital required to serve it. Dominion's direction is therefore set by two things outside its control: regulators' willingness to let bills rise to fund investment, and its own ability to build offshore wind near budget.
Growth position composite +9
ShrinkingStallingHoldingGrowingAccelerating
70Next 2 quarters · Growing
70Year 1 · Growing
70Years 2–3 · Growing
+9Composite (−100…+100)
A research prediction, not advice. Forward-graded: each rung is scored against the prints that follow it. Not an input to the GEM designation — track record first.
Claude Reading
Independent analyst synthesis · claude-opus-4-7 · generated 2026-08-15 00:32:10
Verdict Modestly overvalued — fair value $58-62 against $68.50; ROIC below WACC, CVOW execution risk, and refinancing drag not priced in. Wait for a pullback or dividend yield >4.3% before adding.

Looking at the raw numbers first: Dominion's TTM revenue is roughly $17.45B (summing the last four quarters) versus $14.46B in FY2024 — that's ~20% growth, which is extraordinary for a regulated utility and deserves scrutiny before celebration. Q1 2026 revenue of $5.02B is the highest quarterly print in the file, and net income of $621M gives a 12.4% margin that's compressed versus the 22.2% posted in Q3 2025. The margin volatility (5.5% → 23.7% → 16.3% → 19.9% → 22.2% → 13.9% → 12.4%) is characteristic of weather-driven demand, regulatory true-ups, and gains/charges — not a clean earnings trajectory. Annual op income jumped from $3.25B to $4.41B (+36%), yet operating CF was only $5.36B against $48.79B of debt. That debt-to-equity of 1.46 and current ratio of 0.77 are aggressive even for a utility, and ROIC of 4.6% sits below any reasonable weighted cost of capital — Dominion is earning below its cost of capital while paying out 76% of earnings as dividends.

The synthesis calls this "fair value" with a composite of $66.72 and signal-adjusted $75.79 — a 15% spread that itself signals model disagreement. I side with the lower anchor. At 19.9x earnings and 3.56x sales, Dominion trades at a premium to peers like Duke (~19x) and Southern (~21x) without the balance sheet quality to justify it. The pre-flight note calling it "traditional" is correct on business model but understates the CVOW offshore wind exposure — that's a $10B+ capex project with cost-overrun history across the industry (Ørsted, Avangrid have taken multi-billion writedowns). Market Forces gets closer to the truth calling it "a leveraged bet on AI electricity demand... masquerading as a utility." The narrative layer's "steady-compounder / minimal intensity" framing feels too generous given FCF CAGR of -9.7% alongside earnings CAGR of 22.6% — that divergence IS the story, and it's not a compounder story, it's a capex-intensity story.

The contrarian case cuts both ways here. Bull contrarian: PJM capacity prices have exploded, Virginia data center demand is structurally underpriced by street models, and Dominion has monopoly rate base in the fastest-growing electricity market in America — rate base growth of 9-10% annually compounds shareholder value even at sub-WACC ROIC because regulators keep raising the base. Bear contrarian, which I find more compelling: the insider "buying" flagged as significant is all A-Awards (grants), not open-market purchases — that's compensation, not conviction, and the secondary signal is misleading. The earnings CAGR of 22.6% is flattered by a 2022 base ($994M NI) that was depressed by asset sale accounting; normalized earnings growth is closer to mid-single digits. With $48.79B debt against $250M cash and rising long rates, refinancing risk is real — every 100bps on rate resets on ~$5B of annual refinancings is $50M of pretax income, roughly 1.5% of NI.

I dissent modestly from the "fair value" synthesis and land at moderately overvalued. Fair value anchored to a 17x multiple on normalized $3.0B earnings (~$8.50 EPS run-rate on ~355M shares implied by market cap) yields roughly $58-62, not $68.50. The 3.89% yield is competitive with the 10-year but not compelling given payout ratio at 76% and capex needs that will likely require equity issuance (Dominion has diluted shareholders repeatedly this decade). The narrative layer is right that fundamentals are doing the work, but the fundamentals are weaker than the headline growth suggests once you separate rate-base mechanics from actual value creation. Best action: hold if owned for the dividend, don't chase here; entry closer to $60 (yield ~4.4%, 17x normalized) offers a reasonable margin of safety against CVOW cost overruns and refinancing drag. The signal-adjusted $75.79 composite reflects momentum overlay that I think will disappoint — Q1 2026's margin compression is the leading indicator.

GPT Reading
Independent reading · gpt-5.4 · generated 2026-08-15 00:32:26
Verdict Fair to slightly overvalued at $68.50 — solid earnings momentum is real, but leverage and weak cash-conversion quality cap fair value around $62-66.

Dominion’s recent numbers are better than the stock’s “just a sleepy utility” framing suggests, but the balance sheet and capital intensity keep me from calling it clearly cheap. Revenue rose from $14.46B in 2024 to $16.51B in 2025, up 14%, while operating income jumped from $3.25B to $4.41B, a much stronger 36%. Net income increased from $2.12B to $3.00B, and the quarterly run-rate in 2025 into 2026 stayed solid: the latest quarter posted $5.02B of revenue versus $4.08B a year earlier, with net income of $621M versus $665M, so sales growth remains strong even if quarter-to-quarter earnings are choppy. What stands out is that the earnings recovery looks real at the annual level after the weak 2022-2024 period, and the operating margin at 26.7% is healthy for a regulated utility. At 19.9x earnings and 1.76x book, the stock is not expensive if Dominion can sustain something close to $3B of earnings and mid-single-digit rate base growth.

The issue is that this is not a clean compounding story; it is a leveraged infrastructure build story wearing a utility multiple. Debt is $48.79B against just $250M of cash and $33.42B of equity, with debt-to-equity at 1.46 and a current ratio below 0.8. Operating cash flow of $5.36B sounds fine in isolation, but the missing free cash flow number matters a lot for a utility in a heavy capex cycle. The model’s negative FCF CAGR is the clue here: accounting earnings are improving faster than actual owner cash generation. That matters because Dominion is paying a 3.9% dividend with a 76% payout ratio, so there is not much room for self-funding growth, deleveraging, and dividend support all at once. EV/EBITDA at 15.8x is also rich for a business with a lot of financing and execution risk embedded in the asset base. My read is that the market is giving Dominion credit for earnings visibility without fully discounting how much of that visibility depends on regulators continuing to validate a very large investment program.

I therefore land slightly negative at $68.50. The valuation is not absurd, but it already assumes the 2025 earnings step-up is durable and that financing costs, regulatory treatment, and project execution do not bite. A $60.3B market cap on $3.0B of net income and sub-10% ROE is not a bargain, especially when ROIC is only 4.6%. Utilities can deserve premium multiples when balance sheets are cleaner or when growth is visibly accretive; Dominion has growth, but it comes with enough leverage that equity holders are effectively subordinated to capex discipline. If this were in the low $60s, the 3.9% yield plus earnings recovery would look more compelling. Near $68-70, I think investors are paying close to full price for a business that still needs to prove its cash conversion.

The best counterargument is straightforward: the market should look through free cash flow pressure because regulated utilities are built on rate base expansion, not near-term FCF, and Dominion’s recent annual and quarterly data show that this expansion is already translating into materially higher earnings. On that view, the move from $2.12B to $3.00B in net income in one year, plus 14.2% recent revenue growth and 41.2% recent earnings growth, deserves a premium to slower, more static utilities. The latest quarter’s 23% revenue growth year over year also suggests there is real demand and rate recovery behind the story. If allowed returns remain intact and large projects enter the rate base on schedule, today’s 20x P/E may ultimately prove reasonable. I weigh that less heavily because regulated earnings can look smooth right up until financing needs force equity issuance, asset sales, or slower dividend growth, and Dominion’s balance sheet leaves less margin for error than the bull case wants to admit.

What would change my mind is simple. I would turn more constructive if the next few quarters show revenue staying above roughly 10% year-over-year while net margin holds in the mid-teens or better, and if management demonstrates operating cash flow tracking comfortably above $6B annualized without a corresponding blowout in leverage. Evidence that the dividend payout ratio is drifting lower, not higher, would also matter. On the other side, if earnings flatten back toward the 2024 level, if interest burden starts eating into margins, or if project-related spending pushes financing needs materially higher, then the stock deserves to trade closer to the low $60s.

Grok Reading
Independent reading · grok-4.5 · generated 2026-08-15 00:32:50
Verdict Fairly valued near $68.50; quality regulated earner with leverage and FCF drag capping upside to low-teens total return

Dominion’s 2025 numbers show a real earnings step-up rather than a one-quarter fluke. Full-year revenue climbed to $16.51B from $14.46B (+14%), operating income jumped to $4.41B from $3.25B, and net income reached $3.00B versus $2.12B the year before. Recent quarters reinforce the trajectory: the March 2026 quarter delivered $5.02B revenue and $621M net income at a 12.4% margin, while the prior three quarters posted net margins between 14% and 22%. Operating margin for the year sits at a healthy 26.7%, and the 7.1% revenue CAGR plus 22.6% earnings CAGR over the measured period confirm the regulated rate-base engine is expanding. At $68.50 the stock trades at 19.9× earnings, 1.76× book and a 3.9% dividend yield—standard mature-utility multiples that already embed modest growth rather than a speculative premium.

The balance sheet, however, is the clear constraint. Total debt of $48.79B against only $250M cash and $33.42B of equity produces a 1.46 debt-to-equity ratio and a current ratio of 0.77. ROIC of 4.6% and ROE of 9.0% are mediocre for the capital intensity involved; free-cash-flow CAGR is negative 9.7%, which is exactly what heavy offshore-wind and grid capex looks like before rate recovery fully catches up. The 76% payout ratio leaves limited internal cushion if regulatory lag or construction overruns appear. The secondary signal labeling “significant insider buying” is simply wrong—every recent filing is an A-Award grant, not open-market accumulation—so that bullish cue should be discarded.

The strongest counter-argument is that the market is already correctly discounting execution risk on Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind and the AI-driven load thesis, and that a 20× multiple plus 3.9% yield is fair compensation for a leveraged utility whose ROIC barely clears its cost of capital. A skeptic would also note that 2022’s collapse in operating income to $1.60B and net income to $994M shows how quickly results can reverse when commodity or regulatory variables move against Dominion, and that the composite fair-value work itself only reaches $66–$76 with mixed methods. I weigh those points as real but already visible in the price: the stock sits near the lower end of that band, the core regulated franchise is generating rising absolute earnings, and the narrative layer is minimal and cash-flow-anchored rather than story-driven.

What flips the view is straightforward. Sustained free-cash-flow inflection after the current capex peak, or a clear regulatory order that locks in higher allowed returns on the offshore-wind rate base, would push me to undervalued. Conversely, a material cost overrun or adverse rate decision that compresses the 2026–27 earnings trajectory below the mid-teens growth already embedded would make $68.50 look expensive.

Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Each AI above independently stated a direction (undervalued, fairly valued, or overvalued) and how strongly it believes it (conviction, 0–5). We combine those into a Bull-Bear Index on a 0–10 scale: 5 is neutral, 10 is maximum bullish (undervalued at full conviction), 0 is maximum bearish. We compute the score ourselves with the same arithmetic for every seat — the models never grade their own bullishness — so the three are directly comparable. Δ shows how far each seat sits from the panel average of 3.0; a large Δ marks the dissenting voice, usually the one worth reading.
Claude claude-opus-4-7 2.0
overvalued · conviction 3/5 · Δ -1.0 vs panel · self: 4.0
GPT gpt-5.4 2.0
overvalued · conviction 3/5 · Δ -1.0 vs panel · self: 4.0
Grok grok-4.5 5.0
fairly valued · conviction 3/5 · Δ +2.0 vs panel · self: 5.0
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
Separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), plus AI Impact (how the AI wave reshapes it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-08-15 15:30:07
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Quality — wait for a dip, starter only here 7/10
Dominion is a fair-priced fortress utility with a genuine AI-demand tailwind — hold if owned, but wait for high-$50s to build a real position.
The cruxWhether the Virginia data-center load growth translates into per-share value or gets diluted away by equity issuance and regulator-imposed sharing with ratepayers.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from D's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwaySelf-Funding
DilutionStable Share Count
Earnings QualityGood Earnings Quality
The four lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
+9
Solid
edge √Σ 93 · risk √Σ 84 · conf 6/10

Dominion is a mature regulated utility throwing off consistent free cash flow ($5.36B TTM, $3.7B-$6.57B range over five years) against revenue that has oscillated between $13.96B and $17.17B without clear growth. Operating margin has recovered from a 9.3% trough in 2022 to 26.7% in 2025, and net income rebuilt to $3.0B — respectable but still below the 2021 baseline of $3.29B on a larger share count. OCF/NI of 2.48x and accruals of -2.5% of assets indicate reported earnings are backed by cash, which is the norm for a rate-regulated business. Balance sheet is the defining constraint: $250M liquid cash against $48.5B net debt and $2.46B of short-term maturities exceeding cash. Altman Z at 0.71 flags 'distress' mechanically, but the model is unreliable for regulated utilities whose leverage is structurally high and backed by regulated rate base cash flows — I do not read this as genuine bankruptcy risk. Share count crept from 808.5M to 855.3M (1.4% CAGR), a mild but real per-share drag typical of capex-heavy utilities. Insider tape is almost entirely stock awards; the single small ($250K) open-market buy is a weak positive signal, not a conviction event.

Strengths 3
m60
Consistent FCF generation
Free cash flow of $3.7B-$6.57B every year 2021-2025, with $5.36B most recent — the business self-funds operations even if it relies on debt markets for growth capex.
m55
Clean earnings quality
OCF/NI 2.48x and accruals -2.5% of assets indicate cash strongly supports reported earnings; no accrual manipulation signature.
m45
Margin recovery
Operating margin rebuilt from 9.3% in 2022 to 26.7% in 2025, and net income tripled from $994M to $3.0B over the same span.
Concerns 4
m65
Heavy leverage
$48.5B net debt against $250M liquid cash; short-term debt of $2.46B exceeds cash, creating ongoing refinancing dependence on credit markets.
m35
Persistent share issuance
Diluted shares grew from 808.5M to 855.3M (+5.8% cumulative, 1.4% CAGR) — modest but a real per-share headwind alongside heavy debt use.
m30
No revenue growth
Revenue $13.96B in 2021 vs $16.51B in 2025 with volatility in between — the top line is not compounding, so quality rests entirely on rate-base return mechanics.
m25
Altman Z in distress zone
Z-score 0.71 flags distress mechanically, but this model overstates risk for regulated utilities with structurally high leverage; still worth flagging.
This is a textbook mid-tier regulated utility: cash-generative, earnings-quality clean, and structurally levered. The Altman Z distress flag is a false positive for the business model, but the underlying reality — $48.5B net debt, negligible cash cushion, no organic revenue growth, and a slow drip of share issuance — means quality depends heavily on continued regulatory constructiveness and access to capital markets. Insider tape is unremarkable (mostly awards; one small buy). I read this as a solid, unglamorous mature earner — not fragile, not fortress. Somewhere in the mid-50s on the frame.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Regulated vs unregulated earnings mix and pending rate case outcomes
  • Debt maturity ladder and weighted average cost of debt vs allowed ROE
  • Capex plan and expected external financing needs (equity issuance guidance)
  • Dividend coverage from FCF after growth capex
  • Any pending asset sales or restructuring following recent portfolio review
Valuation / Mispricing
-24
Fairly Valued
edge √Σ 46 · risk √Σ 71 · conf 6/10
Price $68.77 vs deserved ~$65-72 - essentially fair; no meaningful margin of safety either way. attractive below $58.00

No e2e fair-value synthesis was provided, so I anchor on first principles: Dominion is a regulated electric utility with ~5-6% allowed ROEs, ~$60.5B market cap, and ~$48.5B net debt (EV ~$109B). At $68.77 the stock trades at a mid-teens P/E on normalized utility earnings and roughly 1.6-1.8x rate base equity - squarely in the typical regulated-utility band. That is neither a bargain nor a bubble; it is the market paying a fair multiple for boring, essential cash flows. The bull case (offshore wind, clean-energy tailwind, Virginia regulatory constructiveness) is largely offset by the bear case already visible in the price: heavy capex intensity, thin FCF after dividends, negligible cash cushion, and continued equity drip funding the transition.

Cheap signals 2
m35
Regulated cash flows deserve their multiple
Solid quality score (9) and clean earnings quality mean the deserved P/E is at the higher end of the utility band - the $68.77 print is defensible, just not a discount.
m30
Modest discount to premium utility peers
D trades at a slight multiple discount to best-in-class regulated names, reflecting past strategic missteps; if execution stays clean, that gap can close 5-10%.
Rich / priced-in 2
m55
Leverage already carried at full price
$48.5B net debt against $60.5B equity means EV ~$109B - you are paying a full utility multiple on a balance sheet with no cushion, which caps upside if rates stay elevated or ROE authorizations tighten.
m45
Capex-heavy transition dilutes FCF
Offshore wind and grid modernization consume cash faster than regulated returns compound; slow share issuance is the tell that the current price does not embed a free-cash inflection.
This is a fair price for a fair business - the classic 'nothing to do' utility print. I would need it in the high $50s (roughly 15% lower, ~$58) before the margin of safety compensates for the leverage and capex drag. Above $70 I would trim; here at $68.77 I hold if I own it, and I do not chase it if I do not.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Virginia regulatory rulings on rate cases and ROE authorizations
  • Updated offshore wind capex and in-service timing
  • FFO/debt trajectory and any rating agency commentary
  • Equity issuance pace vs guidance
  • Dividend coverage on normalized FCF
General Sentiment
+29
Tailwind
tail √Σ 76 · head √Σ 47 · conf 6/10

The macro tape is mildly risk-on with VIX at 14.3 and the S&P near highs, which is a neutral-to-slightly-positive backdrop for a low-beta (0.63) regulated utility like Dominion. The name will not scream higher in a risk-on rip - it barely participates in beta chases - but it also is not being sold to fund risk trades, and the 14.2% recent run vs 7.1% long-term CAGR shows the tape is actually bidding it. The 10y at 4.63% is the one real crosswind - utilities are rate-sensitive bond proxies - but that pressure is being neutralized by a much more powerful emerging narrative. That narrative is the AI-power-demand story: the freshest news frame explicitly pitches utility ETFs as an AI-buildout play, and Dominion, sitting on top of the Virginia data-center corridor, is one of the cleanest pure-plays on that theme in the regulated space. Narrative intensity is still tagged as minimal and durability as durable, meaning this is a slow-burn re-rating rather than a mania - exactly the kind of quiet tailwind that persists. Analyst tone and story-vs-fundamentals gap look benign; no cracking bear narrative, no downgrade cycle visible.

Tailwinds 3
m55
AI power-demand narrative attaching to utilities
Fresh news frames utilities as an AI-buildout beneficiary, and Dominion's Virginia data-center exposure makes it one of the more direct names to inherit that story. A slow, durable re-rating force rather than a mania.
m35
Risk-on, low-VIX tape
VIX 14.3 and S&P near highs mean no forced selling of defensives. Low beta (0.63) mutes the upside from risk-on but keeps the name stable and bid.
m40
Momentum confirming the bid
Recent 14.2% run vs 7.1% long-term CAGR and +4.3pp over 3 years shows the tape is actively favoring this name, not just tolerating it.
Headwinds 2
m40
10y at 4.63% pressures bond-proxy utilities
Regulated utilities are duration-sensitive; a stubbornly high long end caps the multiple expansion that the AI narrative would otherwise deliver. Real but ordinary crosswind.
m25
Latent capex/regulatory bear frame
The bear story - capex-heavy renewable pivot, regulatory friction - sits dormant and could reactivate on a bad rate case or wind-project cost overrun, but it is not pressing the tape today.
Net tailwind, but a quiet one. The AI-power-demand story is exactly the kind of durable, low-intensity narrative that suits a fortress utility, and Dominion has the Virginia exposure to be a first-order beneficiary; the risk-on tape and confirming momentum add gentle support. The 4.63% 10y is the real offset and it keeps this from being a strong tailwind - utilities cannot fully rerate against a stubborn long end. On balance the pressure leans up, and I would lean into weakness rather than chase strength.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Whether the AI-utility narrative broadens (more sell-side notes naming D specifically as a data-center power play)
  • Direction of the 10y - a move back toward 4% would materially amplify the tailwind; a push to 5% would flip the net read
  • Any Virginia SCC rate case headlines or offshore-wind cost updates that could revive the bear frame
  • Analyst target revisions - a wave of upward revisions would confirm the narrative is being underwritten
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
AI Impact
+52
Favorable — AI load growth lands directly in the rate base
opp √Σ 139 · thr √Σ 0 · conf 7/10

AI reaches Dominion on the demand side, not the cost side: intelligence gets cheap but the electrons, transformers, transmission rights and firm capacity feeding it get scarcer, and Dominion holds a regulated monopoly on delivering them into the highest-density AI compute geography in the US. The monetized unit — kWh delivered plus allowed return on invested capital — is untouched by automation; AI's effect is to raise the volume of capital Dominion can deploy at an authorized spread, which is why revenue grew 14.2% YoY versus 7.4% for the industry and operating margin reached 26.7%. The offsets are structural to regulation rather than to technology: internal AI-driven O&M savings mostly flow to ratepayers at the next rate case, growth capex needs external equity that dilutes per-share capture, and the political economy of residential bills rising because of hyperscaler load is the live risk. Behind-the-meter generation and hyperscaler nuclear/on-site gas deals are the only genuine bypass channel, and even those usually still need Dominion's wires and backup service.

AI opportunities 7
m85
Underlying Need Persistence
Electricity demand is the most AI-proof need in the pool and AI increases it.
m54
Solution Persistence
Grid-delivered regulated power remains the default way AI campuses get electricity.
m9
Intelligence Commoditization
Cheap AI improves grid operations but cannot replicate a franchised wires network.
m19
Responsibility Transfer
Dominion is paid to carry reliability and compliance obligations no hyperscaler wants to own.
m72
Scarcity Migration
AI makes interconnection capacity, transformers and firm clean generation dramatically scarcer.
m46
Revenue Unit Durability
The monetized unit — kWh plus return on rate base — is expanding, though rate design is contested.
m38
Entrant Compression
Cheap software does not create a competing regulated utility.
AI threats 0

None surfaced.

Dominion is one of the purest ways to own the physical bottleneck of the AI buildout, with the caveat that regulators and equity issuance decide how much of it reaches a share. Exposure is high (80) and the direction is favorable (74): scarcity migration scores 91 because AI made interconnection and firm power the binding constraint, and Dominion's franchise sits on the densest data-center corridor in the world — already visible in 14.2% revenue growth versus 7.4% industry and 26.7% operating margin. What kills it is not technology but ratemaking: ai_margin_conversion at 45 says efficiency gains flow to ratepayers, and share count rose 808M→855M funding the capex, so the load boom can arrive without per-share capture. Watch large-load tariff cost-allocation rulings and the signed-contract share of the interconnection queue before the market reprices the difference between forecast load and contracted load.
Verify before trusting this (8)
  • Virginia peak load forecast revisions
  • data-center MW energized per year
  • residential vs large-load demand mix
  • interconnection queue length and pricing
  • transmission project approvals
  • nuclear uprate and co-location filings
  • large-load tariff cost allocation
  • rate case revenue requirement outcomes
The structural effect of the AI wave on this specific business over the next ~5 years — demand, cost leverage, moat, barriers to entry, position in the AI stack. The reality beneath the AI story, not the story's market pressure (General Sentiment owns that) — and not a call on the business today or the price.
Growth Outlook
+9
Growing
edge √Σ 116 · risk √Σ 107 · conf 8/10

The world is re-electrifying: AI/data-center compute, electrification of heat and transport, and onshoring are turning a decades-flat load curve upward, and regulated utilities are the tollbooth. Dominion sits on the single densest data-center corridor in the world, so it captures this shift structurally rather than speculatively. The offset is that this era's growth is capital-hungry at a time when the 10y sits at 4.63% — the constraint on utility growth is no longer demand, it is the cost and political tolerance of the capital required to serve it. Dominion's direction is therefore set by two things outside its control: regulators' willingness to let bills rise to fund investment, and its own ability to build offshore wind near budget.

Growth drivers 4
m77
Virginia data-center load growth
Dominion's electric service territory contains the densest concentration of US data centers; the resulting load-growth pipeline converts directly into transmission/distribution and generation rate base. This is the clearest company-specific demand mechanism in regulated electric and is why the company's recent 14.2% YoY revenue print exceeds the 7.4% industry pace.
m63
Rate-base/capex-to-earnings machine
For a regulated utility, approved capex compounds allowed-return earnings. Elevated spend (grid, solar, CVOW offshore wind entering service) mechanically lifts rate base for years, supporting the company's long-standing 5-7% EPS growth framework regardless of volume swings.
m49
Sector in confirmed boom phase
Category median recent growth 9.1%, industry 3-yr revenue CAGR 5.4%, and industry operating margins +2.1pp over three years. A rising category means constructive regulatory posture toward recovery of investment — the tide is with the business, not against it.
m33
Execution track record vs estimates
Five consecutive EPS beats (+12%, +1%, +40%, +4%, +18%) after the post-restructuring reset suggests the simplified, regulated-only portfolio is delivering at or above the guided cadence — evidence the earnings base is real, not accounting drift.
Growth risks 5
m64
Negative free cash flow / funding drag
FCF CAGR of -9.7% against +7.1% revenue CAGR is the signature of capex intensity outrunning operating cash. Growth must be financed with debt and equity; every equity block issued dilutes the per-share growth the EPS framework promises.
m53
Offshore wind execution and cost risk
CVOW is a multi-billion, single-project concentration. Cost overruns, supply-chain/tariff exposure or schedule slippage would be recovered only partially and slowly, and could trigger regulatory pushback that caps the return on the largest single addition to rate base.
m50
Regulatory/rate-case dependency
All earnings growth is permissioned. Virginia's biennial review structure and political sensitivity to residential bills rising because of data-center-driven investment create a real risk that allowed ROE or cost-recovery timing is trimmed.
m36
Rate/financing backdrop
10y at 4.63% with a macro-headwind read raises the cost of the debt that funds the capex program; utilities' earnings growth is levered to spread between allowed ROE and marginal financing cost, and that spread is narrower than in the last decade.
m28
Headline growth partly pass-through
Reported revenue for a regulated utility includes fuel and purchased-power pass-throughs, so the 14.2% YoY figure overstates true share/volume gain. The economic growth rate is closer to rate-base growth than to the top-line print.
vs expectations: ~6m above · 1y inline · 2-3y above
The forward growth verdict — is the business itself likely to grow (next 2 quarters / year 1 / years 2–3), judged against its category and against printed expectations. The full horizon ladder + creme renders on the Growth Outlook card above. Not a call on the price (Valuation owns that) or the tape (Sentiment owns that).
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure), AI Impact (structural ~5yr AI exposure), and Growth Outlook (the forward growth verdict). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Price Prediction
Unavailable View weakness chain →

Prediction unavailable. The value lens (ext-lens-value) has not run for D — needed for buy-below + conviction.

Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for D. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
v1.1.562 · 9b2927c4 · 2026-08-22 16:52:06