The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change+20.5% to $16.60
Predicted High$16.60at 6 months
Predicted Low$13.30at 1 month
Max Drawdown (predicted)-3.4%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 31, 2026 1:03 pm
Bull
TTD trends higher to
$16.60
(+20.5% from $13.78)
by Mar 2027.
dip-then-recover
ThesisTTD is deeply discounted vs fair value but weighed by a fresh earnings-blowup scar and negative sentiment. Near-term drift stays heavy as the fallen-angel narrative lingers; over months, value gravity and a risk-on tape pull it toward the mid-$16s, with modest overshoot possible as the scar fades.
Invalidated ifA close below $9.50 or failure to reclaim $14.50 by m3 would falsify the recovery thesis; a guide-down at next print also invalidates.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $13.78 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 31, 2026
—
$13.78at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Sep 14, 2026
$11.81–$15.75typical range · internal point $13.55
—
±14.3%
7/10
Sentiment scar keeps drift heavy near current levels
What actually happened:
closed $14.34
on Sep 11, 2026 = +4.1% vs the call
(predicted -1.7%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 5.7 pp
· accuracy 8/10
· typical range ±14.3%:
inside the band
· S&P -0.4%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Oct 1, 2026
$10.93–$16.63typical range · internal point $13.30
What actually happened:
closed $12.17
on Sep 30, 2026 = -11.7% vs the call
(predicted -3.5%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 8.2 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±20.7%:
inside the band
· S&P -0.5%
over the same window — beat it
2 months
Oct 31, 2026
$13.90
—
+0.9%
5/10
Oversold bounce as risk-on regime persists
3 months
Dec 1, 2026
$14.75
—
+7.1%
5/10
Value buyers step in below fair-value anchors
4 months
Dec 31, 2026
$15.40
—
+11.8%
4/10
Year-end positioning, tax-loss selling exhausts
5 months
Jan 31, 2027
$16.10
—
+16.9%
4/10
Fresh year rotation into beaten-down quality names
6 months
Mar 3, 2027
$16.60
—
+20.5%
4/10
Convergence toward composite fair value anchor
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$16.39
(+19.0%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$13.78
Composite fair value
$17.39
Signal-adjusted fair value
$23.69
DCF fair value
$19.60
Anchored-PE fair value
$22.04
Buy-below (value lens)
$15.00
Value net score
+37
Value confidence
7 / 10
Quality net score
+64
Memo confidence
7 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)