The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change+22.1% to $172.00
Predicted High$172.00at 6 months
Predicted Low$142.50in 2 weeks
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Jul 22, 2026 6:51 am
Bull
ACN trends higher to
$172.00
(+22.1% from $140.86)
by Jan 2027.
flat-then-break
ThesisACN trades deeply below composite fair value ($179) after a punishing 50% 6-month drawdown, but sentiment is negative and the narrative stale. Expect a slow grind higher as value gravity works, with a potential inflection around the late-September earnings print given 8/8 beat history, then modest continuation toward the anchored PE zone.
Invalidated ifA miss or guidance cut at the Sept 24 print, or a break below $128 on volume, invalidates the recovery thesis.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $140.86 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Jul 22, 2026
—
$140.86at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 5, 2026
$124.21–$157.51typical range · internal point $142.50
—
±11.8%
6/10
Oversold bounce stalls in neutral regime tape
What actually happened:
closed $170.43
on Aug 4, 2026 = +21.0% vs the call
(predicted +1.2%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was up)
· off by 19.8 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±11.8%:
OUTSIDE the band
· S&P +3.2%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Aug 22, 2026
$116.73–$164.99typical range · internal point $145.00
—
±17.1%
5/10
Drift up toward anchored-PE as sellers exhaust
What actually happened:
closed $185.26
on Aug 21, 2026 = +31.5% vs the call
(predicted +2.9%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was up)
· off by 28.6 pp
· accuracy 2/10
· typical range ±17.1%:
OUTSIDE the band
· S&P +2.3%
over the same window — beat it
What actually happened:
closed $186.11
on Sep 21, 2026 = +32.1% vs the call
(predicted +5.1%)
· direction HIT
(called up, was up)
· off by 27.1 pp
· accuracy 3/10
· S&P +3.5%
over the same window — beat it
3 months
Oct 22, 2026
$158.00
—
+12.2%
5/10
Earnings beat likely, guide reset lifts narrative
Matured — awaiting scoring. This checkpoint's date has passed; the next scorer run
(score-outcomes.php) records what actually happened.
4 months
Nov 22, 2026
$163.00
—
+15.7%
4/10
Post-print follow-through toward composite fair value
5 months
Dec 22, 2026
$168.00
—
+19.3%
4/10
Value convergence continues, year-end rotation into quality
6 months
Jan 22, 2027
$172.00
—
+22.1%
3/10
Grind toward baseline endpoint as narrative rebuilds
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$175.52
(+24.6%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$140.86
Composite fair value
$179.20
Signal-adjusted fair value
$204.40
DCF fair value
$222.06
Anchored-PE fair value
$145.04
Buy-below (value lens)
$128.00
Value net score
+29
Value confidence
6 / 10
Quality net score
+94
Memo confidence
7 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)