The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change+10.4% to $80.00
Predicted High$80.00at 6 months
Predicted Low$69.50at 1 month
Max Drawdown (predicted)-4.1%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 4, 2026 2:47 am
Bull
BLDR trends higher to
$80.00
(+10.4% from $72.48)
by Feb 2027.
dip-then-recover
ThesisBLDR trades well below composite fair value but sentiment is decisively negative amid a rolling-over housing narrative and high beta. Expect near-term drift lower or sideways as tape pressure dominates, then a partial mean-reversion toward the low-80s as value gravity reasserts over months, though not a full close of the gap.
Invalidated ifA break below $60 on housing-data deterioration, or conversely a decisive move above $88 negating the bearish sentiment overhang, invalidates this path.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $72.48 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 4, 2026
—
$72.48at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 18, 2026
$64.15–$80.81typical range · internal point $71.20
—
±11.5%
6/10
negative sentiment and housing rollover pressure dominate near-term
What actually happened:
closed $70.21
on Aug 17, 2026 = -3.1% vs the call
(predicted -1.8%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 1.4 pp
· accuracy 10/10
· typical range ±11.5%:
inside the band
· S&P +0.6%
over the same window — beat it
1 month
Sep 4, 2026
$60.40–$84.56typical range · internal point $69.50
—
±16.7%
6/10
high-beta cyclical drifts lower absent catalyst
What actually happened:
closed $64.18
on Sep 3, 2026 = -11.5% vs the call
(predicted -4.1%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 7.3 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±16.7%:
inside the band
· S&P -0.9%
over the same window — beat it
2 months
Oct 4, 2026
$71.00
—
-2.0%
5/10
value buyers begin nibbling below fair-value anchor
What actually happened:
closed $56.25
on Oct 2, 2026 = -22.4% vs the call
(predicted -2.0%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 20.4 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· S&P -0.2%
over the same window — beat it
3 months
Nov 4, 2026
$74.50
—
+2.8%
5/10
earnings print potential and mean-reversion kick in
4 months
Dec 4, 2026
$77.00
—
+6.2%
4/10
value gravity pulls toward composite fair value
5 months
Jan 4, 2027
$78.50
—
+8.3%
4/10
gradual convergence continues if regime stays risk-on
6 months
Feb 4, 2027
$80.00
—
+10.4%
4/10
partial close of gap toward deterministic baseline
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$80.35
(+10.9%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$72.48
Composite fair value
$86.75
Signal-adjusted fair value
$86.00
DCF fair value
$99.37
Anchored-PE fair value
$57.82
Buy-below (value lens)
$65.00
Value net score
+22
Value confidence
6 / 10
Quality net score
+13
Memo confidence
6 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)