The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change+11.9% to $120.00
Predicted High$120.00at 6 months
Predicted Low$106.00at 1 month
Max Drawdown (predicted)-1.2%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 4, 2026 2:48 am
Bull
EPAM trends higher to
$120.00
(+11.9% from $107.26)
by Feb 2027.
dip-then-recover
ThesisEPAM is a beaten-down IT-services name (-48.6% 6mo) with modest sentiment healing and value gravity toward a $125-$140 fair-value zone. Expect a choppy recovery: near-term drift as fallen-angel bid stabilizes, then gradual convergence toward the deterministic $119 endpoint as regime stays risk-on, with an earnings-driven inflection possible mid-window.
Invalidated ifBreak below $95 support or regime flip to risk-off with services sector underperforming would falsify recovery path.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $107.26 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 4, 2026
—
$107.26at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 18, 2026
$94.98–$119.54typical range · internal point $108.50
—
±11.4%
6/10
Stabilization near current after prolonged drawdown
What actually happened:
closed $98.73
on Aug 17, 2026 = -8.0% vs the call
(predicted +1.2%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 9.1 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±11.4%:
inside the band
· S&P +0.6%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Sep 4, 2026
$89.47–$125.05typical range · internal point $106.00
—
±16.6%
5/10
Consolidation as fallen-angel bid tested
What actually happened:
closed $119.88
on Sep 3, 2026 = +11.8% vs the call
(predicted -1.2%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was up)
· off by 12.9 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±16.6%:
inside the band
· S&P -0.9%
over the same window — lagged it
2 months
Oct 4, 2026
$110.50
—
+3.0%
5/10
Sentiment healing supports modest lift
3 months
Nov 4, 2026
$114.00
—
+6.3%
5/10
Q3 print potential catalyst, beat cadence
4 months
Dec 4, 2026
$116.50
—
+8.6%
4/10
Value gravity pulls toward composite fair value
5 months
Jan 4, 2027
$118.00
—
+10.0%
4/10
Year-end positioning in oversold names
6 months
Feb 4, 2027
$120.00
—
+11.9%
4/10
Convergence toward deterministic endpoint
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$119.36
(+11.3%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$107.26
Composite fair value
$125.50
Signal-adjusted fair value
$134.11
DCF fair value
$140.13
Anchored-PE fair value
$140.63
Buy-below (value lens)
$95.00
Value net score
+14
Value confidence
6 / 10
Quality net score
+37
Memo confidence
6 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)
Realized volatility (annualized)
1m 48.4% 3m 57.5% 6m 60.0%
Daily σ (realism noise)
3.6%
Beta vs S&P 500
1m -1.50 3m -0.86 5m -0.46
Trailing 6-month return
-48.6%
Knobs (equation params)
ladder
Array
llm_model
claude-opus-4-7
max_tokens
3000
control_knobs
Array
Neutral band (%)
5
earnings_brief
v1
prompt_version
p1
control_version
v0.3.0
Version & Tech Chain
What produced this prediction — stamped on the record so versions can be compared by success rate later.
Modelv0.6.0#271041f8fcd5
Tech composition (what this version is built from)
#
Process
Kind
Group
1
Synthesisvaluation-synthesis
deterministic
final
2
Scenario Analysisscenario-valuation
deterministic
valuation
3
Valuation / Mispricingext-lens-value
llm
extended
4
Company Qualityext-lens-quality
llm
extended
5
Forensic Memo (combiner)ext-forensic-memo
llm
extended
6
Classificationcompany-classification
llm
foundation
7
Live Quotefmp-quote
data
market-data
Inputs used (the runs that fed this prediction)
Upstream process
Ran
Lag
Run id
company-classification
Aug 3, 2026
freshest
EPAM-20260803-164946-600b
ext-forensic-memo
Aug 3, 2026
freshest
ext-EPAM-20260803-175115-2480
ext-lens-quality
Aug 3, 2026
freshest
ext-EPAM-20260803-175115-2480
ext-lens-sentiment
Aug 3, 2026
freshest
ext-EPAM-20260803-175115-2480
ext-lens-value
Aug 3, 2026
freshest
ext-EPAM-20260803-175115-2480
scenario-valuation
Aug 3, 2026
freshest
EPAM-20260803-164946-600b
valuation-synthesis
Aug 3, 2026
freshest
EPAM-20260803-164946-600b
Inputs flagged 7d+ behind the freshest one may be stale relative to the rest of the analysis.
Saved History
2 frozen snapshots — the record we score once predictions mature.