The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change+26.1% to $70.00
Predicted High$70.00at 6 months
Predicted Low$52.80at 1 month
Max Drawdown (predicted)-4.9%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 14, 2026 3:25 am
Bull
FISV trends higher to
$70.00
(+26.1% from $55.50)
by Feb 2027.
dip-then-recover
ThesisFISV trades at a deep discount to fair value with quality intact, but a hardening fallen-angel narrative and guidance-cut chatter will keep pressure on shares near-term. Absent an earnings catalyst on the calendar, sentiment likely bleeds further before value buyers and a risk-on tape enable a partial mean-reversion into early 2027.
Invalidated ifA break below $48 on further guidance cuts or unit divestiture confirmation, or conversely a decisive reclaim of $65 that voids the fallen-angel narrative.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $55.50 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 14, 2026
—
$55.50at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 28, 2026
$50.49–$60.51typical range · internal point $54.20
—
±9.0%
7/10
Sentiment overhang and negative beta keep drift lower
What actually happened:
closed $52.58
on Aug 27, 2026 = -5.3% vs the call
(predicted -2.3%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 2.9 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±9.0%:
inside the band
· S&P -0.7%
over the same window — beat it
1 month
Sep 14, 2026
$48.24–$62.76typical range · internal point $52.80
—
±13.1%
6/10
Fallen-angel narrative peaks, value buyers begin nibbling
What actually happened:
closed $51.58
on Sep 11, 2026 = -7.1% vs the call
(predicted -4.9%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 2.2 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±13.1%:
inside the band
· S&P -1.7%
over the same window — beat it
2 months
Oct 14, 2026
$53.50
—
-3.6%
5/10
Basing near $60 attractive zone, no catalyst yet
Matured — awaiting scoring. This checkpoint's date has passed; the next scorer run
(score-outcomes.php) records what actually happened.
3 months
Nov 14, 2026
$57.00
—
+2.7%
5/10
Q3 print reminds market of earnings beat streak
4 months
Dec 14, 2026
$61.50
—
+10.8%
5/10
Value gravity engages as regime remains risk-on
5 months
Jan 14, 2027
$66.00
—
+18.9%
4/10
Multiple recovery toward anchored-PE fair value
6 months
Feb 14, 2027
$70.00
—
+26.1%
4/10
Partial convergence toward composite fair value zone
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$76.16
(+37.2%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$55.50
Composite fair value
$97.18
Signal-adjusted fair value
$95.25
DCF fair value
$101.92
Anchored-PE fair value
$100.90
Buy-below (value lens)
$60.00
Value net score
+56
Value confidence
7 / 10
Quality net score
+60
Memo confidence
7 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)