The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change-13.2% to $240.00
Predicted High$295.00at 1 month
Predicted Low$240.00at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)-13.2%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 24, 2026 1:07 pm
Bear
ALAB trends lower to
$240.00
(-13.2% from $276.66)
by Feb 2027.
ride-then-fade
ThesisALAB is a high-beta AI-plumbing momentum name with no valuation anchor and extreme richness on value lens (attractive only below $150). Near-term risk-on tape and narrative keep it bid or push it modestly higher, but 3m vol of 6.8% daily and beta 5 mean any regime wobble triggers sharp mean-reversion; over 6 months gravity pulls back toward the 200-250 zone as the AI-plumbing trade cools.
Invalidated ifA close above 340 on sustained volume, or a break below 230 that fails to recover within two weeks, invalidates the fade thesis; a regime flip to risk_off would accelerate downside.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $276.66 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 24, 2026
—
$276.66at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Sep 7, 2026
$217.05–$336.27typical range · internal point $288.00
—
±21.5%
6/10
Risk-on regime and AI momentum extend the ride
What actually happened:
closed $310.40
on Sep 4, 2026 = +12.2% vs the call
(predicted +4.1%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was up)
· off by 8.1 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±21.5%:
inside the band
· S&P +0.9%
over the same window — beat it
1 month
Sep 24, 2026
$190.28–$363.04typical range · internal point $295.00
—
±31.2%
5/10
Narrative bid persists, beta amplifies chip tape
What actually happened:
closed $360.46
on Sep 23, 2026 = +30.3% vs the call
(predicted +6.6%)
· direction HIT
(called up, was up)
· off by 23.7 pp
· accuracy 3/10
· typical range ±31.2%:
inside the band
· S&P +0.7%
over the same window — beat it
2 months
Oct 24, 2026
$278.00
—
+0.5%
4/10
First profit-taking wave, high-beta digestion
3 months
Nov 24, 2026
$265.00
—
-4.2%
4/10
Momentum cools without earnings catalyst
4 months
Dec 24, 2026
$255.00
—
-7.8%
4/10
Year-end de-risking in crowded AI names
5 months
Jan 24, 2027
$248.00
—
-10.4%
3/10
Value gravity toward attractive-below-150 anchor
6 months
Feb 24, 2027
$240.00
—
-13.2%
3/10
Richness unwinds as AI-plumbing trade matures
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$0.00
(+0.0%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.