Healthcare · Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Made onAug 26, 2026
Price at call$78.03
6-month call Bull +9.1%
Target by Feb 2027$85.10
Great value below$68.00
Modelv0.6.0
Projection vs Actual
(6M history + forecast)
The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change+9.1% to $85.10
Predicted High$85.30at 5 months
Predicted Low$78.60in 2 weeks
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 26, 2026 1:01 pm
Bull
ZTS trends higher to
$85.10
(+9.1% from $78.03)
by Feb 2027.
dip-then-recover
ThesisZTS trades well below composite fair value after a punishing 40% drawdown, with sentiment stabilizing around FDA wins and a Burry disclosure. Low beta and no near-term earnings catalyst suggest a slow grind higher toward the deterministic $85 baseline as value gravity works, with modest early drift.
Invalidated ifBreak below $68 on renewed guide cut, or failure to reclaim $82 by m3 would falsify the recovery path.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $78.03 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 26, 2026
—
$78.03at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Sep 9, 2026
$72.97–$83.09typical range · internal point $78.60
—
±6.5%
7/10
Low-beta drift, neutral tape, no catalyst near-term
What actually happened:
closed $73.56
on Sep 8, 2026 = -5.7% vs the call
(predicted +0.7%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 6.5 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±6.5%:
inside the band
· S&P 0.0%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Sep 26, 2026
$70.69–$85.37typical range · internal point $79.40
What actually happened:
closed $71.05
on Sep 25, 2026 = -9.0% vs the call
(predicted +1.8%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 10.7 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±9.4%:
inside the band
· S&P +0.9%
over the same window — lagged it
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$84.86
(+8.7%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$78.03
Composite fair value
$97.86
Signal-adjusted fair value
$94.37
DCF fair value
$74.35
Anchored-PE fair value
$170.26
Buy-below (value lens)
$68.00
Value net score
+3
Value confidence
6 / 10
Quality net score
+69
Memo confidence
6 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)