The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change-5.8% to $40.40
Predicted High$42.75in 2 weeks
Predicted Low$40.40at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)-5.8%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 26, 2026 1:18 pm
Bear
CHT trends lower to
$40.40
(-5.8% from $42.89)
by Feb 2027.
decay
ThesisCHT is a low-beta Taiwan telecom utility with a defensive bid in a mildly risk-on tape; no near-term catalyst and stretched valuation anchors argue for slow drift lower, but the low volatility and defensive demand cap downside well above the deterministic fair-value endpoint.
Invalidated ifA close above $45 on rising volume, or a sharp break below $40 on Taiwan macro shock, would invalidate the slow-drift thesis.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $42.89 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 26, 2026
—
$42.89at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Sep 9, 2026
$41.46–$44.32typical range · internal point $42.75
—
±3.3%
7/10
Low beta, no catalyst, defensive bid holds
What actually happened:
closed $44.23
on Sep 8, 2026 = +3.1% vs the call
(predicted -0.3%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 3.5 pp
· accuracy 9/10
· typical range ±3.3%:
inside the band
· S&P 0.0%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Sep 26, 2026
$40.81–$44.97typical range · internal point $42.50
—
±4.8%
6/10
Risk-on tape slowly pulls capital elsewhere
What actually happened:
closed $46.15
on Sep 25, 2026 = +7.6% vs the call
(predicted -0.9%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was up)
· off by 8.5 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±4.8%:
OUTSIDE the band
· S&P +0.9%
over the same window — lagged it
2 months
Oct 26, 2026
$42.10
—
-1.8%
6/10
Mild drift as valuation gravity begins
3 months
Nov 26, 2026
$41.60
—
-3.0%
5/10
Continued rotation from defensives to growth
4 months
Dec 26, 2026
$41.20
—
-3.9%
5/10
Year-end tax positioning, muted flows
5 months
Jan 26, 2027
$40.80
—
-4.9%
4/10
Value anchors weigh, no earnings catalyst
6 months
Feb 26, 2027
$40.40
—
-5.8%
4/10
Slow convergence toward deterministic endpoint
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$35.66
(-16.9%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$42.89
Composite fair value
$2.93
Signal-adjusted fair value
$2.55
DCF fair value
$3.57
Anchored-PE fair value
$2.55
Buy-below (value lens)
$36.00
Value net score
-46
Value confidence
7 / 10
Quality net score
+68
Memo confidence
7 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)