The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change-12.0% to $76.00
Predicted High$95.00at 1 month
Predicted Low$74.00at 5 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)-14.3%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 24, 2026 1:08 pm
Bear
CRWV trends lower to
$76.00
(-12.0% from $86.38)
by Feb 2027.
ride-then-fade
ThesisCRWV is a high-beta neocloud narrative name with no fair-value anchor, hot sentiment, and a risk-on regime, but weak quality and 'capital-destruction' skepticism cap upside. Expect an initial momentum push, then choppy fade as scrutiny returns and beta amplifies any regime softening.
Invalidated ifA break below $60 on heavy volume, or a sector-wide neocloud rerating (peer guide-downs, hyperscaler capex cut), would falsify the ride-then-fade thesis toward a sharper decay.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $86.38 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 24, 2026
—
$86.38at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Sep 7, 2026
$68.33–$104.43typical range · internal point $92.50
—
±20.9%
6/10
Risk-on regime plus hot neocloud narrative lifts beta
What actually happened:
closed $89.36
on Sep 4, 2026 = +3.5% vs the call
(predicted +7.1%)
· direction MISS
(called up, was flat)
· off by 3.6 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±20.9%:
inside the band
· S&P +0.9%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Sep 24, 2026
$60.22–$112.54typical range · internal point $95.00
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$0.00
(+0.0%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.