The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change-28.1% to $62.00
Predicted High$88.50in 2 weeks
Predicted Low$62.00at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)-28.1%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Sep 1, 2026 1:07 pm
Bear
ECHO trends lower to
$62.00
(-28.1% from $86.28)
by Mar 2027.
ride-then-fade
ThesisECHO carries brutal quality (-86) and value (-68) scores with a heavy leverage overhang and a fragile turnaround narrative, offset short-term only by a risk-on tape. Expect a modest relief bounce to fade as fundamentals reassert, drifting down toward the attractive-below zone of $55 over the six-month window, with high beta amplifying every leg.
Invalidated ifA sustained close above $100 on positive guidance or credit-quality upgrade would falsify the fade thesis; conversely a break below $50 would mean bear-case acceleration.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $86.28 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Sep 1, 2026
—
$86.28at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Sep 15, 2026
$77.22–$95.34typical range · internal point $88.50
—
±10.5%
6/10
Risk-on tape lifts high-beta name near-term
What actually happened:
closed $93.89
on Sep 14, 2026 = +8.8% vs the call
(predicted +2.6%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was up)
· off by 6.3 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±10.5%:
inside the band
· S&P -0.2%
over the same window — beat it
1 month
Oct 1, 2026
$73.15–$99.41typical range · internal point $85.00
—
±15.2%
5/10
Bounce stalls as no catalyst appears
What actually happened:
closed $89.41
on Sep 30, 2026 = +3.6% vs the call
(predicted -1.5%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 5.1 pp
· accuracy 8/10
· typical range ±15.2%:
inside the band
· S&P +0.3%
over the same window — lagged it
2 months
Nov 1, 2026
$78.00
—
-9.6%
5/10
Quality and leverage concerns resurface
3 months
Dec 1, 2026
$72.00
—
-16.5%
4/10
Year-end tax-loss selling pressures losers
4 months
Jan 1, 2027
$70.00
—
-18.9%
4/10
January reset, no fundamental improvement
5 months
Feb 1, 2027
$65.00
—
-24.7%
3/10
Drift toward value-attractive zone continues
6 months
Mar 1, 2027
$62.00
—
-28.1%
3/10
Approaching $55 value threshold, high uncertainty
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$0.00
(+0.0%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.