The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change+6.5% to $238.20
Predicted High$238.20at 6 months
Predicted Low$221.80in 2 weeks
Max Drawdown (predicted)-0.8%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 3, 2026 12:36 am
Bull
IBM trends higher to
$238.20
(+6.5% from $223.65)
by Feb 2027.
dip-then-recover
ThesisIBM trades below composite fair value with a beaten-down 6mo tape and negative sentiment, but 5-of-5 EPS beats and a benign neutral regime support gradual mean-reversion toward the signal-adjusted anchor. Near-term drift is muted by the fading-legacy narrative; value gravity asserts over months toward the deterministic endpoint.
Invalidated ifA close below $200 on fresh guide-down, or failure to reclaim $230 by m3, would break the recovery thesis.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $223.65 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 3, 2026
—
$223.65at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 17, 2026
$188.55–$258.75typical range · internal point $221.80
—
±15.7%
6/10
sentiment overhang, low beta, minor drift lower
What actually happened:
closed $234.32
on Aug 14, 2026 = +4.8% vs the call
(predicted -0.8%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 5.6 pp
· accuracy 8/10
· typical range ±15.7%:
inside the band
· S&P +2.4%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Sep 3, 2026
$172.79–$274.51typical range · internal point $224.50
—
±22.7%
5/10
stabilization near composite fair value
What actually happened:
closed $231.70
on Sep 2, 2026 = +3.6% vs the call
(predicted +0.4%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 3.2 pp
· accuracy 9/10
· typical range ±22.7%:
inside the band
· S&P +0.9%
over the same window — lagged it
2 months
Oct 3, 2026
$228.90
—
+2.3%
5/10
pre-earnings positioning, beat streak recognized
What actually happened:
closed $222.67
on Oct 2, 2026 = -0.4% vs the call
(predicted +2.4%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 2.8 pp
· accuracy 9/10
· S&P +1.6%
over the same window — lagged it
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$238.66
(+6.7%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$223.65
Composite fair value
$216.80
Signal-adjusted fair value
$234.15
DCF fair value
$276.34
Anchored-PE fair value
$188.96
Buy-below (value lens)
$185.00
Value net score
-33
Value confidence
7 / 10
Quality net score
+36
Memo confidence
7 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)