The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change-14.0% to $102.00
Predicted High$128.00at 2 months
Predicted Low$102.00at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)-14.0%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 30, 2026 1:03 pm
Bear
INSM trends lower to
$102.00
(-14.0% from $118.54)
by Mar 2027.
ride-then-fade
ThesisINSM is a pre-profit biotech riding a strengthening Brinsupri launch narrative into a risk-on tape, so near-term momentum likely extends before value gravity and stretched-macro undertow reassert. Expect a modest ride higher into Q4 catalysts, then a fade as fundamentals and the deep negative value/quality read pull the tape back toward the $95-105 zone by spring.
Invalidated ifA close below $95 in the next month, or Brinsupri launch disappointment, would break the momentum leg; a decisive close above $140 on volume would invalidate the fade.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $118.54 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 30, 2026
—
$118.54at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Sep 13, 2026
$101.40–$135.68typical range · internal point $121.50
—
±14.5%
6/10
Risk-on regime and Brinsupri momentum extend near-term drift
What actually happened:
closed $129.41
on Sep 11, 2026 = +9.2% vs the call
(predicted +2.5%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was up)
· off by 6.7 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±14.5%:
inside the band
· S&P -0.7%
over the same window — beat it
1 month
Sep 30, 2026
$93.70–$143.38typical range · internal point $124.00
—
±21.0%
5/10
Sentiment tailwind persists into month-end positioning
What actually happened:
closed $115.63
on Sep 29, 2026 = -2.5% vs the call
(predicted +4.6%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 7.1 pp
· accuracy 7/10
· typical range ±21.0%:
inside the band
· S&P -0.5%
over the same window — lagged it
2 months
Oct 30, 2026
$128.00
—
+8.0%
4/10
Q3 print anticipation and launch update lift narrative
3 months
Nov 30, 2026
$125.00
—
+5.4%
4/10
Post-earnings digestion; value lens starts to weigh
January reset; quality and forensic drags reassert
6 months
Mar 2, 2027
$102.00
—
-14.0%
3/10
Drift toward attractive-below-80 zone as momentum fades
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$0.00
(+0.0%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.