The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change+10.5% to $34.20
Predicted High$34.20at 6 months
Predicted Low$30.50at 1 month
Max Drawdown (predicted)-1.5%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Jul 28, 2026 12:52 am
Bull
JD trends higher to
$34.20
(+10.5% from $30.95)
by Jan 2027.
flat-then-break
ThesisJD trades near multi-year lows with a bearish scenario anchor far above spot ($157) suggesting deep value, but no catalyst on the calendar and risk-off tape keep it range-bound near-term; slow drift higher as value lens (attractive below $28) and low beta cushion downside, with gradual mean-reversion toward low-to-mid $30s over six months.
Invalidated ifA break below $27 on heavy volume, or a China consumer/regulatory shock, would falsify the slow-recovery thesis.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $30.95 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Jul 28, 2026
—
$30.95at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 11, 2026
$28.98–$32.92typical range · internal point $30.80
—
±6.4%
7/10
Risk-off drift, low beta dampens moves, no catalyst
What actually happened:
closed $33.47
on Aug 10, 2026 = +8.1% vs the call
(predicted -0.5%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was up)
· off by 8.6 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±6.4%:
OUTSIDE the band
· S&P +4.4%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Aug 28, 2026
$28.09–$33.81typical range · internal point $30.50
—
±9.2%
6/10
Sideways chop, sentiment neutral, tape still cautious
What actually happened:
closed $28.49
on Aug 27, 2026 = -8.0% vs the call
(predicted -1.5%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 6.5 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±9.2%:
inside the band
· S&P +4.1%
over the same window — beat it
2 months
Sep 28, 2026
$31.20
—
+0.8%
5/10
Possible Q2 print window, value buyers nibble
What actually happened:
closed $26.51
on Sep 25, 2026 = -14.4% vs the call
(predicted +0.8%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 15.2 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· S&P +4.2%
over the same window — beat it
3 months
Oct 28, 2026
$32.00
—
+3.4%
5/10
Mean reversion begins as regime normalizes
4 months
Nov 28, 2026
$32.80
—
+6.0%
4/10
Value gravity pulls toward fair-value zone
5 months
Dec 28, 2026
$33.50
—
+8.2%
4/10
Year-end positioning, oversold China names bid
6 months
Jan 28, 2027
$34.20
—
+10.5%
3/10
Gradual re-rating toward composite value anchor
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$0.00
(+0.0%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.