Consumer Defensive · Household & Personal Products
Made onAug 24, 2026
Price at call$19.30
6-month call Bear -6.2%
Target by Feb 2027$18.10
Great value below$15.50
Modelv0.6.0
Projection vs Actual
(6M history + forecast)
The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change-6.2% to $18.10
Predicted High$19.25in 2 weeks
Predicted Low$18.10at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)-6.2%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 24, 2026 1:12 pm
Bear
KVUE trends lower to
$18.10
(-6.2% from $19.30)
by Feb 2027.
decay
ThesisKVUE trades slightly above composite fair value with negative value/quality/sentiment lenses and a defensive low-beta profile. Expect a gentle drift toward the $18 fair-value anchor over months, with modest chop from the risk-on tape favoring higher-beta names over this quiet defensive.
Invalidated ifA sustained break above $20.50 on positive catalyst, or a drop below $17 signaling faster de-rating toward bear scenario.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $19.30 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 24, 2026
—
$19.30at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Sep 7, 2026
$18.39–$20.21typical range · internal point $19.25
—
±4.7%
7/10
Low-beta drift, no catalyst, risk-on rotates elsewhere
What actually happened:
closed $18.74
on Sep 4, 2026 = -2.9% vs the call
(predicted -0.3%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 2.6 pp
· accuracy 9/10
· typical range ±4.7%:
inside the band
· S&P +0.9%
over the same window — beat it
1 month
Sep 24, 2026
$17.98–$20.62typical range · internal point $19.10
—
±6.8%
6/10
Mild fade as defensives lag risk-on tape
What actually happened:
closed $17.67
on Sep 23, 2026 = -8.5% vs the call
(predicted -1.0%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 7.4 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±6.8%:
OUTSIDE the band
· S&P +0.7%
over the same window — beat it
2 months
Oct 24, 2026
$18.80
—
-2.6%
6/10
Gradual pull toward composite fair value anchor
3 months
Nov 24, 2026
$18.50
—
-4.1%
5/10
Value gravity dominates, no earnings catalyst nearby
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$18.70
(-3.1%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$19.30
Composite fair value
$18.06
Signal-adjusted fair value
$17.89
DCF fair value
$18.24
Anchored-PE fair value
$24.84
Buy-below (value lens)
$15.50
Value net score
-37
Value confidence
7 / 10
Quality net score
-13
Memo confidence
7 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)