Made on
Aug 26, 2026
Price at call
$62.07
6-month call
Bear -16.2%
Target by Feb 2027
$52.00
Great value below
$45.00
Model
v0.6.0
Projection vs Actual (6M history + forecast)
Forecast Change
-16.2% to $52.00
Predicted High
$63.50
at 1 month
Predicted Low
$52.00
at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)
-16.2%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded. Predicted Aug 26, 2026 1:09 pm
Bear
RPRX trends lower to
$52.00
(-16.2% from $62.07)
by Feb 2027.
ride-then-fade
ThesisRPRX rides fresh Ziihera approval and 52-week high momentum near-term, supported by low-beta defensive profile and risk-on regime, but the massive gap between price and fair value plus a bearish deterministic baseline pulls it lower over the six-month horizon as narrative fades.
Invalidated ifA break above $68 on new pipeline catalyst, or conversely a break below $55 in the first month, would falsify this glide path.
| Checkpointtime after the call | Datewhen it gets graded | Predictedthe claim: closing price | Current priceactual close — fills in over time | Predicted returnpredicted vs $62.07 at call | Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10 | Driverwhy the brain put the point here |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prediction made | Aug 26, 2026 | — | $62.07 at call | — | — | The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date. |
| 2 weeks | Sep 9, 2026 | $58.98–$65.16 typical range · internal point $63.20 | — | ±5.0% | 7/10 | Ziihera momentum and 52-week high extension continue |
| What actually happened: closed $60.59 on Sep 8, 2026 = -2.4% vs the call (predicted +1.8%) · direction HIT (called flat, was flat) · off by 4.2 pp · accuracy 8/10 · typical range ±5.0%: inside the band · S&P 0.0% over the same window — lagged it | ||||||
| 1 month | Sep 26, 2026 | $57.59–$66.55 typical range · internal point $63.50 | — | ±7.2% | 6/10 | Narrative tailwind persists, defensive bid holds |
| What actually happened: closed $58.21 on Sep 25, 2026 = -6.2% vs the call (predicted +2.3%) · direction MISS (called flat, was down) · off by 8.5 pp · accuracy 4/10 · typical range ±7.2%: inside the band · S&P +0.9% over the same window — lagged it | ||||||
| 2 months | Oct 26, 2026 | $61.80 | — | -0.4% | 5/10 | Momentum digestion, initial mean reversion begins |
| 3 months | Nov 26, 2026 | $59.50 | — | -4.1% | 5/10 | Value gravity emerges as narrative cools |
| 4 months | Dec 26, 2026 | $57.00 | — | -8.2% | 4/10 | Year-end rebalancing pressures overextended name |
| 5 months | Jan 26, 2027 | $54.50 | — | -12.2% | 4/10 | Valuation concerns dominate, deterministic drift lower |
| 6 months | Feb 26, 2027 | $52.00 | — | -16.2% | 3/10 | Continued convergence toward fair value anchor |
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets $46.73 (-24.7%) — both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it. Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
0 blocking · 0 degraded · 2 notes — follow the chain top-down (cause → effect).-
Note
Valuation anchor absent: dcf.
-
Note
Valuation anchor absent: anchored_pe.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.Value anchors (from deep analysis)
| Price at call | $62.07 |
| Composite fair value | $17.31 |
| Signal-adjusted fair value | $16.32 |
| DCF fair value | — |
| Anchored-PE fair value | — |
| Buy-below (value lens) | $45.00 |
| Value net score | -59 |
| Value confidence | 5 / 10 |
| Quality net score | -3 |
| Memo confidence | 7 / 10 |
| Deserved value (base) | — |
| Quality tilt | — |
| Deserved value (used) | — |
| Coherence (value × quality) | — |
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)
| Realized volatility (annualized) | 1m 22.1% 3m 25.0% 6m 23.2% |
| Daily σ (realism noise) | 1.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1m -0.02 3m -0.24 5m 0.21 |
| Trailing 6-month return | 37.5% |
Knobs (equation params)
| ladder | ["w2","m1","m2","m3","m4","m5","m6"] |
| llm_model | claude-opus-4-7 |
| max_tokens | 3000 |
| control_knobs | {"w_dcf":0.5,"k_qual":0.200000000000000011102230246251565404236316680908203125,"reach_6m":0.450000000000000011102230246251565404236316680908203125,"coh_floor":0.5,"conf_gain":0.059999999999999997779553950749686919152736663818359375,"noise_phi":0.84999999999999997779553950749686919152736663818359375,"conf_floor":0.40000000000000002220446049250313080847263336181640625,"w_composite":0.5,"noise_window":"3m","flat_band_pct":5,"horizon_months":6,"noise_sigma_fallback":0.01499999999999999944488848768742172978818416595458984375} |
| Neutral band (%) | 5 |
| earnings_brief | v1 |
| prompt_version | p1 |
| control_version | v0.3.0 |
Version & Tech Chain
What produced this prediction — stamped on the record so versions can be compared by success rate later.
Model
v0.6.0
#271041f8fcd5 Tech composition (what this version is built from)
| # | Process | Kind | Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Synthesis valuation-synthesis |
deterministic | final |
| 2 | Scenario Analysis scenario-valuation |
deterministic | valuation |
| 3 | Valuation / Mispricing ext-lens-value |
llm | extended |
| 4 | Company Quality ext-lens-quality |
llm | extended |
| 5 | Forensic Memo (combiner) ext-forensic-memo |
llm | extended |
| 6 | Classification company-classification |
llm | foundation |
| 7 | Live Quote fmp-quote |
data | market-data |
Inputs used (the runs that fed this prediction)
| Upstream process | Ran | Lag | Run id |
|---|---|---|---|
company-classification |
Aug 26, 2026 | freshest | RPRX-20260826-003001-9ee8 |
ext-forensic-memo |
Aug 26, 2026 | freshest | ext-RPRX-20260826-010110-90a4 |
ext-lens-quality |
Aug 26, 2026 | freshest | ext-RPRX-20260826-010110-90a4 |
ext-lens-sentiment |
Aug 26, 2026 | freshest | ext-RPRX-20260826-010110-90a4 |
ext-lens-value |
Aug 26, 2026 | freshest | ext-RPRX-20260826-010110-90a4 |
scenario-valuation |
Aug 26, 2026 | freshest | RPRX-20260826-003001-9ee8 |
valuation-synthesis |
Aug 26, 2026 | freshest | RPRX-20260826-003001-9ee8 |
Inputs flagged 7d+ behind the freshest one may be stale relative to the rest of the analysis.
Saved History
1 frozen snapshot — the record we score once predictions mature.| Made | Model | Call | At call | Target | Exp. | Eval due | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2026 | v0.6.0 | Bear | $62.07 | $52.00 | -16.2% | Feb 2027 | viewing |
Not Yet Modeled
What this v0.6.0 forecast deliberately ignores — the work ahead, in plain sight.- Scenario probabilities — one path, no bull/bear split (base_prob = 1.0).
- Intraday / sub-2-week behaviour — the first claim is at 14 days by design (EOD product).
- Position sizing / portfolio context — the path is a price claim only.