The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change-6.4% to $316.00
Predicted High$338.50in 2 weeks
Predicted Low$316.00at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)-6.4%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 7, 2026 1:11 am
Bear
SYK trends lower to
$316.00
(-6.4% from $337.43)
by Feb 2027.
decay
ThesisSYK trades well above composite fair value ($196) with a strongly negative value signal, but quality is solid and sentiment/regime are constructive with no near-term earnings catalyst. Path drifts modestly lower as valuation gravity slowly asserts itself, with mild near-term stability from risk-on tape.
Invalidated ifA break above $355 on strong volume or a broad market regime shift to risk-off accelerating the decline below $310 early
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $337.43 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 7, 2026
—
$337.43at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 21, 2026
$311.30–$363.56typical range · internal point $338.50
—
±7.7%
6/10
Risk-on tape and no catalyst keep price steady
What actually happened:
closed $327.70
on Aug 20, 2026 = -2.9% vs the call
(predicted +0.3%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 3.2 pp
· accuracy 9/10
· typical range ±7.7%:
inside the band
· S&P -1.5%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Sep 7, 2026
$299.57–$375.29typical range · internal point $335.00
—
±11.2%
6/10
Mild drift as momentum fades without catalyst
What actually happened:
closed $303.13
on Sep 4, 2026 = -10.2% vs the call
(predicted -0.7%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 9.4 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±11.2%:
inside the band
· S&P -0.5%
over the same window — beat it
2 months
Oct 7, 2026
$330.00
—
-2.2%
5/10
Q3 print approaches, valuation concerns re-emerge
What actually happened:
closed $278.20
on Oct 6, 2026 = -17.6% vs the call
(predicted -2.2%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 15.4 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· S&P +0.8%
over the same window — beat it
3 months
Nov 7, 2026
$326.00
—
-3.4%
5/10
Earnings likely fine but rich multiple caps upside
4 months
Dec 7, 2026
$322.00
—
-4.6%
4/10
Year-end rebalancing trims extended quality names
5 months
Jan 7, 2027
$319.00
—
-5.5%
4/10
Value gravity continues pulling toward deserved value
6 months
Feb 7, 2027
$316.00
—
-6.4%
4/10
Converges near deterministic baseline endpoint
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$316.91
(-6.1%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$337.43
Composite fair value
$195.98
Signal-adjusted fair value
$179.29
DCF fair value
$212.10
Anchored-PE fair value
$250.74
Buy-below (value lens)
$235.00
Value net score
-79
Value confidence
7 / 10
Quality net score
+64
Memo confidence
8 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)