Made on
Aug 26, 2026
Price at call
$14.26
6-month call
Bear -14.4%
Target by Feb 2027
$12.20
Great value below
$9.00
Model
v0.6.0
Projection vs Actual (6M history + forecast)
Forecast Change
-14.4% to $12.20
Predicted High
$15.40
at 1 month
Predicted Low
$12.20
at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)
-14.4%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded. Predicted Aug 26, 2026 1:08 pm
Bear
VG trends lower to
$12.20
(-14.4% from $14.26)
by Feb 2027.
ride-then-fade
ThesisVG rides the LNG-growth narrative and risk-on tape near-term as sentiment and momentum dominate, but weak quality/value fundamentals and a stretched story create fade risk over months as the narrative cools without a catalyst.
Invalidated ifBreak below $11.50 near-term or a sustained close above $17 with fresh contract catalyst would invalidate the fade thesis.
| Checkpointtime after the call | Datewhen it gets graded | Predictedthe claim: closing price | Current priceactual close — fills in over time | Predicted returnpredicted vs $14.26 at call | Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10 | Driverwhy the brain put the point here |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prediction made | Aug 26, 2026 | — | $14.26 at call | — | — | The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date. |
| 2 weeks | Sep 9, 2026 | $12.30–$16.22 typical range · internal point $14.85 | — | ±13.8% | 6/10 | risk-on tape and LNG momentum extend recent uptrend |
| What actually happened: closed $14.73 on Sep 8, 2026 = +3.3% vs the call (predicted +4.1%) · direction HIT (called flat, was flat) · off by 0.8 pp · accuracy 10/10 · typical range ±13.8%: inside the band · S&P 0.0% over the same window — beat it | ||||||
| 1 month | Sep 26, 2026 | $11.42–$17.10 typical range · internal point $15.40 | — | ±20.0% | 5/10 | narrative bid persists, no earnings catalyst yet |
| What actually happened: closed $12.62 on Sep 25, 2026 = -11.5% vs the call (predicted +8.0%) · direction MISS (called up, was down) · off by 19.5 pp · accuracy 4/10 · typical range ±20.0%: inside the band · S&P +0.9% over the same window — lagged it | ||||||
| 2 months | Oct 26, 2026 | $15.10 | — | +5.9% | 4/10 | momentum plateaus as valuation gravity begins |
| 3 months | Nov 26, 2026 | $14.20 | — | -0.4% | 4/10 | story fatigue, quality concerns re-emerge in tape |
| 4 months | Dec 26, 2026 | $13.30 | — | -6.7% | 4/10 | year-end profit-taking, regime shift risk grows |
| 5 months | Jan 26, 2027 | $12.60 | — | -11.6% | 3/10 | fundamentals reassert, forensic red flags weigh |
| 6 months | Feb 26, 2027 | $12.20 | — | -14.4% | 3/10 | value gravity toward attractive-below-9 zone continues |
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets $0.00 (+0.0%) — both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it. Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
0 blocking · 3 degraded · 2 notes — follow the chain top-down (cause → effect).-
Degraded
[critical] High debt risk — interest coverage dangerously low or refinancing needed
-
Degraded
[critical] Revenue is volatile and unreliable — growth projections are speculative
-
Degraded
No usable fair-value anchor — brain-only (anchorless) mode: no v0.3 control line, prediction reasons from lenses/sentiment/regime/price behaviour.
-
Note
Valuation anchor absent: dcf.
-
Note
Valuation anchor absent: anchored_pe.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.Value anchors (from deep analysis)
| Price at call | $14.26 |
| Composite fair value | $-0.04 |
| Signal-adjusted fair value | $-0.04 |
| DCF fair value | — |
| Anchored-PE fair value | — |
| Buy-below (value lens) | — |
| Value net score | -57 |
| Value confidence | 6 / 10 |
| Quality net score | -75 |
| Memo confidence | — / 10 |
| Deserved value (base) | — |
| Quality tilt | — |
| Deserved value (used) | — |
| Coherence (value × quality) | — |
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)
| Realized volatility (annualized) | 1m 62.2% 3m 69.1% 6m 82.8% |
| Daily σ (realism noise) | 4.4% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1m -1.79 3m -1.58 5m -2.60 |
| Trailing 6-month return | 53.1% |
Knobs (equation params)
| ladder | ["w2","m1","m2","m3","m4","m5","m6"] |
| llm_model | claude-opus-4-7 |
| max_tokens | 3000 |
| control_knobs | {"w_dcf":0.5,"k_qual":0.200000000000000011102230246251565404236316680908203125,"reach_6m":0.450000000000000011102230246251565404236316680908203125,"coh_floor":0.5,"conf_gain":0.059999999999999997779553950749686919152736663818359375,"noise_phi":0.84999999999999997779553950749686919152736663818359375,"conf_floor":0.40000000000000002220446049250313080847263336181640625,"w_composite":0.5,"noise_window":"3m","flat_band_pct":5,"horizon_months":6,"noise_sigma_fallback":0.01499999999999999944488848768742172978818416595458984375} |
| Neutral band (%) | 5 |
| earnings_brief | v1 |
| prompt_version | p1 |
| control_version | v0.3.0 |
Version & Tech Chain
What produced this prediction — stamped on the record so versions can be compared by success rate later.
Model
v0.6.0
#8eb3df85c300 Tech composition (what this version is built from)
| # | Process | Kind | Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Synthesis valuation-synthesis |
deterministic | final |
| 2 | Scenario Analysis scenario-valuation |
deterministic | valuation |
| 3 | Valuation / Mispricing ext-lens-value |
llm | extended |
| 4 | Company Quality ext-lens-quality |
llm | extended |
| 5 | Forensic Memo (combiner) ext-forensic-memo |
llm | extended |
| 6 | Classification company-classification |
llm | foundation |
| 7 | Live Quote fmp-quote |
data | market-data |
Inputs used (the runs that fed this prediction)
| Upstream process | Ran | Lag | Run id |
|---|---|---|---|
company-classification |
Aug 25, 2026 | freshest | VG-20260825-060001-0af8 |
ext-forensic-memo |
Aug 26, 2026 | freshest | ext-VG-20260826-001739-8581 |
ext-lens-quality |
Aug 26, 2026 | freshest | ext-VG-20260826-001739-8581 |
ext-lens-sentiment |
Aug 26, 2026 | freshest | ext-VG-20260826-001739-8581 |
ext-lens-value |
Aug 26, 2026 | freshest | ext-VG-20260826-001739-8581 |
scenario-valuation |
Aug 26, 2026 | freshest | VG-20260826-000001-7be2 |
valuation-synthesis |
Aug 26, 2026 | freshest | VG-20260826-000001-7be2 |
Inputs flagged 7d+ behind the freshest one may be stale relative to the rest of the analysis.
Saved History
1 frozen snapshot — the record we score once predictions mature.| Made | Model | Call | At call | Target | Exp. | Eval due | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2026 | v0.6.0 | Bear | $14.26 | $12.20 | -14.4% | Feb 2027 | viewing |
Not Yet Modeled
What this v0.6.0 forecast deliberately ignores — the work ahead, in plain sight.- Scenario probabilities — one path, no bull/bear split (base_prob = 1.0).
- Intraday / sub-2-week behaviour — the first claim is at 14 days by design (EOD product).
- Position sizing / portfolio context — the path is a price claim only.