The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change-5.4% to $175.00
Predicted High$199.00at 2 months
Predicted Low$175.00at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)-5.4%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 28, 2026 1:01 pm
Bear
ZS trends lower to
$175.00
(-5.4% from $184.99)
by Feb 2027.
ride-then-fade
ThesisZS is riding a cybersecurity re-rating and risk-on tape with sentiment turning positive after prolonged punishment, but negative value lens and stretched quality suggest momentum fades into year-end as value gravity reasserts. Expect a near-term ride higher, consolidation, then modest give-back toward the $170s.
Invalidated ifBreak below $165 support or regime flip to risk-off would invalidate the early upside; sustained close above $210 would invalidate the fade.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $184.99 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 28, 2026
—
$184.99at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Sep 11, 2026
$163.40–$206.58typical range · internal point $190.50
—
±11.7%
7/10
Risk-on tape and sector bid extend momentum near-term
What actually happened:
closed $163.48
on Sep 10, 2026 = -11.6% vs the call
(predicted +3.0%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 14.6 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±11.7%:
inside the band
· S&P -1.6%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Sep 28, 2026
$153.70–$216.28typical range · internal point $196.00
—
±16.9%
6/10
Sentiment tailwind and short-covering push higher
What actually happened:
closed $193.05
on Sep 25, 2026 = +4.4% vs the call
(predicted +6.0%)
· direction MISS
(called up, was flat)
· off by 1.6 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±16.9%:
inside the band
· S&P +0.4%
over the same window — beat it
2 months
Oct 28, 2026
$199.00
—
+7.6%
5/10
Peak enthusiasm meets valuation resistance
3 months
Nov 28, 2026
$192.00
—
+3.8%
4/10
Consolidation as narrative digestion begins
4 months
Dec 28, 2026
$185.00
—
+0.0%
4/10
Year-end profit-taking, value lens weighs
5 months
Jan 28, 2027
$178.00
—
-3.8%
4/10
Fade continues as risk-on fades, valuation gravity
6 months
Feb 28, 2027
$175.00
—
-5.4%
3/10
Drift toward attractive-below level as momentum exhausts
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$0.00
(+0.0%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.