Homepage
FRESH Analysis Report
Jun 24, 2026
3 days ago · 100% complete · +8 refreshed

Morgan Stanley

MS NYSE Categories PDF
Financial Services · Financial - Capital Markets
New York City, NY 10036, United States IPO 1993 morganstanley.com Updated Jun 23, 11:25pm
Price
$226.03
Market Cap
$356.5B
Employees
81,000
Beta
1.22
Avg Volume
6,339,594
CEO
Edward N. Pick
Business Description

Morgan Stanley operates as a prominent financial holding company, delivering a comprehensive suite of financial solutions and services. Its diverse clientele spans major corporations, governmental bodies, financial institutions, and individual clients across various global regions, including the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia. The firm's operations are structured into three primary divisions: Institutional Securities, Wealth Management, and Investment Management. Within the Institutional Securities segment, Morgan Stanley provides crucial capital-raising and strategic financial advisory services. This includes underwriting activities for debt, equity, and other financial instruments, alongside expert counsel on mergers and acquisitions, corporate reorganizations, real estate transactions, and project financing. Furthermore, this division is a key player in sales and trading, offering services like sales execution, financing solutions, prime brokerage, and market-making across equity and fixed-income products, encompassing foreign exchange and commodities. It also extends corporate and commercial real estate loans, furnishes secured lending facilities, supports sales and trading clients with financing, and engages in asset-backed and mortgage lending. Investment and research services, along with specific wealth management offerings, are also part of this segment. The Wealth Management segment caters to individual investors, as well as small to medium-sized enterprises and institutions. It offers a broad spectrum of services, from financial advisor-led and self-directed brokerage and investment guidance to comprehensive financial and wealth planning. This segment also delivers workplace solutions, such as stock plan administration, and provides annuity and insurance products. Lending options include securities-backed loans, residential real estate mortgages, and other credit facilities, complemented by banking and retirement plan services. Finally, the Investment Management segment is dedicated to providing specialized investment products, including equity, fixed income, liquidity, and alternative strategies. These offerings are distributed through institutional and intermediary channels to a sophisticated client base that features benefit and defined contribution plans, foundations, endowments, governmental entities, sovereign wealth funds, insurance companies, and corporate and third-party fund sponsors. Morgan Stanley's origins trace back to its founding in 1924, and its global headquarters are situated in New York, New York.

Business History
Generated: Jun 24, 2026 3:02am
Price Overview
Last updated: Jun 24, 2026 3:00am (3d ago)
$226.03
-1.06 (-0.47%)
Day Range
$222.12 – $227.95
52-Week Range
$135.26 – $230.47
50-Day MA
$199.13
200-Day MA
$175.94
Volume
4,367,798.00
Analyst Price Targets
Low $187.00
Consensus $201.25
High $211.00
(81 analysts)
Share Structure
Outstanding 1,577,284,817.00
Float 1,196,323,215.00
Free Float 75.8%
Normal free float — 75.8% of shares trade freely, ~24.2% held by insiders/institutions
Healthy float typical of established companies. Good liquidity for entering and exiting positions without major price impact.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Jun 24, 2026 3:06am (3d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Jun 24, 2026 3:03am (3d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
API Direct from provider CALC Derived from statements
Industry comparison last run: Jun 24, 2026 3:02am
P/E Ratio (Price per dollar of earnings)
API
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
19.53
Stock Price: $226.03
EPS (Diluted): 10.34
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
API
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
2.50
Stock Price: $226.03
Total Equity: $111.63B
Shares: 1,593,000,000
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
API
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
22.10
Market Cap: $356.51B
Total Debt: $471.38B
Cash: $111.70B
EBITDA: $26.61B
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
API
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$642.8B
Market Cap: $356.51B
Total Debt: $471.38B
Cash: $111.70B
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
API
Gross Profit / Revenue
57.1%
Gross Profit: $65.62B
Revenue: $114.98B
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
API
Operating Income / Revenue
19.1%
Operating Income: $21.95B
Revenue: $114.98B
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
API
Net Income / Revenue
14.7%
Net Income: $16.86B
Revenue: $114.98B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
API
Net Income / Total Equity
16.4%
Net Income: $16.86B
Total Equity: $111.63B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
API
NOPAT / Invested Capital
1.9%
Operating Income: $21.95B
Tax Rate: 22.5%
Equity: $111.63B
Total Debt: $471.38B
Cash: $111.70B
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
API
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
1.17
Current Assets: $654.69B
Current Liabilities: $559.57B
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
CALC
Total Debt / Total Equity
4.22
Short-Term Debt: $144.05B
Long-Term Debt: $327.33B
Total Debt: $471.38B
Total Equity: $111.63B
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
CALC
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$72.18
Revenue: $114.98B
Shares: 1,593,000,000
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
CALC
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
$70.08
Total Equity: $111.63B
Shares: 1,593,000,000
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
CALC
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$28.94
Operating CF: $49.00B
CapEx: -$2.90B
Shares: 1,593,000,000
CapEx is negative (outflow) — added to OCF to get FCF
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
API
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
2.4%
Last Dividend: N/A
Stock Price: $226.03
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
Dividends Paid / Net Income
Dividends Paid: N/A
Net Income: $16.86B
Dividends paid not available in cash flow statement
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Jun 24, 2026 3:02am
Compares MS against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · three lenses
Three separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-06-24 03:10:09
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Quality - wait for a dip 7/10
Top-tier franchise (quality +41) but the stock is rich (value -74) with a flat tape (sentiment -4) - hold if you own it, wait for sub-$190 to buy.
The cruxEntry price. The business is genuinely strong and the tape is neutral; the only thing standing between me and a position is the 15-16x forward / 2.3x TBV multiple that prices in cycle continuation.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from MS's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwayFortress Balance Sheet
DilutionShare Count Shrinking
Earnings QualityPoor — Multiple Red Flags
The three lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
+41
Strong
edge √Σ 110 · risk √Σ 69 · conf 7/10

Morgan Stanley is a mature, scaled capital-markets and wealth-management franchise. Revenue has compounded from $57.8B in 2021 to $115.0B in 2025 (roughly 18% CAGR), net income recovered from a $9.1B trough in 2023 to $16.9B in 2025, and operating margin rebounded from 13.4% to 19.1%. The wealth and investment-management businesses provide a fee-based ballast that softens the cyclicality of trading and M&A, and the brand/scale moat in global capital markets is genuine.

Strengths 3
m70
Per-share value compounding
Diluted share count down from 1.81B (2021) to 1.59B (2025), about -3.2% CAGR, with buybacks 4.25x SBC. Net buyer of its own stock.
m65
Revenue and earnings re-acceleration
Revenue $57.8B to $115.0B over 2021-2025; net income recovered to $16.9B in 2025 with op margin back to 19.1% from a 13.4% trough.
m55
Franchise scale and mix
Global IB plus wealth management at this scale is a genuine moat; fee-based wealth revenue dampens trading cyclicality.
Concerns 4
m45
Cash-flow signal is noisy
FCF swung from +$31.7B to -$37.0B to -$2.1B to +$46.1B across 2022-2025. Bank cash flow is dominated by trading book and financing flows, so OCF/NI of 0.2x is not a clean quality read but it does mean owner-earnings are hard to verify.
m35
Inherent leverage and cyclicality
Altman Z of 0.49 reflects the bank model (heavy assets, thin equity layer) rather than distress, but it correctly flags that MS is a leveraged, market-sensitive entity vulnerable to credit and trading shocks.
m25
Insider tape is awards/withholding only
Last 12 months: 0 open-market buys, 28 sells totaling $42.9M. Recent tape is dominated by A-Award and F-InKind (non-directional). No conviction signal either way.
m30
Gross margin compression
Reported GM% fell from 97.6% (2021) to 55.6-57.1% (2024-2025), reflecting mix shift toward interest-expense-heavy businesses and likely reclassification; worth understanding rather than alarming on its own.
This is a high-quality franchise: a top-tier global investment bank and wealth manager that has scaled revenue meaningfully, restored margins, and is genuinely shrinking its share count via disciplined buybacks. The forensic flags (Altman Z in distress, OCF/NI 0.2x) are mostly the wrong tool applied to a bank - those models break on financial-institution balance sheets. The real, residual concerns are the ones inherent to the business model: leverage, cyclicality, and the fact that 'true' owner earnings are hard to triangulate from reported cash flow. I'd call it Strong rather than Fortress because banks are never truly fortresses - they are leveraged on customer trust and market conditions - but as banks go, MS is among the better-run, better-capitalized operators.
Verify before trusting this (7)
  • Segment-level results: wealth management vs institutional securities vs investment management revenue and margin trajectory.
  • Capital ratios (CET1, SLR) and stress-test results to confirm balance-sheet resilience.
  • Composition of the $540B liquid cash figure - how much is firm liquidity vs customer/segregated assets.
  • Loan book credit quality, allowance coverage, and any concentration in commercial real estate or leveraged lending.
  • Drivers of the gross-margin step-down from 97.6% to ~56% - is this reclassification of interest expense or genuine margin erosion.
  • Long-term debt maturity ladder and reliance on wholesale funding.
  • Detail on buyback authorization vs SBC issuance going forward.
Valuation / Mispricing
-74
Rich
edge √Σ 25 · risk √Σ 99 · conf 7/10
Price $226 vs deserved ~$195-210 - roughly 8-15% above fair, no margin of safety. attractive below $185.00

Morgan Stanley at $226 carries a ~$357B market cap and trades around 15-16x forward earnings and roughly 2.3-2.4x tangible book - well above its historical 11-13x P/E and ~1.7x TBV range. The e2e synthesis flags the price as 'disconnected from fundamentals,' and while I would discount any model output that prints a wildly higher fair value (DCFs on banks routinely run away), the direction is clear: this is not a cheap stock. The wealth-management re-rating thesis is well known and largely in the price; the bull case requires sustained mid-teens ROTCE, benign credit, and a healthy capital-markets cycle to justify today's multiple.

Cheap signals 1
m25
Quality franchise deserves a premium
Top-tier wealth and IB franchise with shrinking share count justifies trading above book - but a premium is not the same as being undervalued.
Rich / priced-in 4
m60
Premium multiple vs history
~15-16x forward EPS and ~2.3x TBV are at the high end of MS's 10-year range; the wealth-management re-rating is already paid for.
m55
Priced for cycle continuation
Current multiple assumes mid-teens ROTCE persists; a normal capital-markets slowdown or NIM compression would compress both earnings and the multiple.
m45
E2E flags disconnect from fundamentals
Synthesis label 'Disconnected from Fundamentals' combined with a poor earnings-quality hint argues deserved value sits below price, not above.
m35
Bear case has teeth
Leverage-dependent earnings, regulatory capital creep, and no secular moat outside scale mean the deserved multiple should not expand from here.
I think this is fully valued bordering on rich. It's a great franchise, but a 15-16x multiple and 2.3x TBV mean I'm paying for the bull case with no cushion. I want it 15-18% lower - call it sub-$190 - before I find the risk/reward interesting. Today, fine to hold if you own it; not a place I'd put fresh money on a valuation thesis.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Forward ROTCE guidance and wealth-management net new asset growth
  • Basel III endgame capital impact on buyback capacity
  • Investment banking backlog commentary and NII trajectory
  • Any one-off legal/regulatory charges distorting reported EPS
General Sentiment
-4
Balanced
tail √Σ 42 · head √Σ 47 · conf 6/10

The macro tape is neutral with VIX at 19.5 and the S&P only 3.2% off highs, so there is no risk-off mauling to amplify through MS's 1.22 beta. As a diversified capital-markets and wealth franchise, MS is moderately tape-sensitive but not a high-beta story stock - the regime is a mild drag at best, not a directional force. Higher 10y at 4.5% is a generic headwind for financials' valuations but the curve is positively sloped, which is constructive for the business mix the market actually cares about here.

Tailwinds 3
m30
Franchise-positive news flow
Headlines feature MS as the trusted analyst voice (SanDisk repricing call, CDW upgrade) and as the chosen sell-side advisor (SPSC mandate), reinforcing the wealth/capital-markets brand without creating controversy.
m22
Crypto/ETF product expansion
Filing 0.14% spot ETH and SOL ETFs with 95% staking pass-through is a low-key narrative add - keeps MS in the modern-product conversation without forcing a story-stock multiple.
m20
Low-intensity, durable narrative
Minimal narrative intensity and moderate durability mean there is nothing fragile to crack - no euphoric story to de-rate, which insulates MS from sentiment-driven drawdowns other capital-markets names face.
Headwinds 3
m35
Price above analyst consensus
Stock at $226 vs $201 consensus target and a fresh revision at $187 - sell-side is lagging the rally, which caps near-term upgrade-driven momentum and invites downgrade risk if the tape softens.
m25
Rates backdrop a mild drag
10y at 4.5% and stretched market multiples are a generic valuation headwind for financials; with beta 1.22, MS will feel any risk-off rotation more than a defensive name but the current tape is only neutral.
m18
Momentum-vs-story gap
Stock has run hard (14% CAGR, +4.4pp over 3y) while the narrative is described as minimal-intensity - price is doing the work without a fresh story to defend gains if the tape turns.
Net read: flat. The tape is neutral, the narrative is low-intensity and fundamentals-anchored, and news flow is quietly franchise-positive - there is simply no strong sentiment force acting on this name in either direction. The only real friction is that price has outrun analyst targets, which is a soft cap, not a story breaking. I lean balanced with a faint headwind tilt only because of the target gap and rates backdrop; if the tape turned risk-off, the 1.22 beta would start to bite, but right now sentiment is a non-event for MS.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Whether sell-side targets get revised up toward the $226 print or the gap widens
  • VIX behavior and any move from neutral toward risk-off, which would hit beta-1.22 financials harder
  • Any narrative shift around capital-markets activity (deal flow, IPO window) that could inject intensity
  • Crypto-ETF launch reception as a possible narrative add
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Three lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), and General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Deep Analysis
Last run: Jun 24, 2026 3:05:44 am

Pre-flight intelligence scans the company first, then routes to the right analytical methods.

0 Company Classification — What type of company is this?
1 Industry Landscape — Where is the industry headed?
2 Company Momentum — Where is this company trending?
3 Forward Projection — 1Y & 2Y projected metrics (requires Layer 1 + 2)
4a DCF Valuation — Present value of future cash flows
4b Earnings Power Value — Floor value — worth with zero growth
4c Anchored PE — Industry PE adjusted for growth differential
4d Reverse DCF — What growth is the market pricing in?
4e Revenue-Based DCF — For growth/narrative companies (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4f Anchored P/S — Price-to-Sales peer comparison (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4g Scenario Analysis — Bull / Base / Bear (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4h Dividend Discount Model — For dividend/income stocks only
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4i Book Value Analysis — For deep value / turnaround stocks only
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4j Insider Activity — Are insiders buying or selling?
4f Cash Flow Quality — How trustworthy is the FCF?
4g Debt Maturity Risk — Can it handle its debt?
4h Macro Environment — Rates, market valuation, volatility
4i Sector Intelligence — How does this company compare within its sector?
4j Revenue Confidence — How reliable is the growth projection?
4k Sensitivity Analysis — How fragile is the fair value estimate?
4l Sector Demand Cycle — Is the sector in a boom, steady state, or contraction?
5 AI Investigation — Adaptive research engine (Claude)
5b Thesis Evaluation — What does the market believe? (narrative/platform stocks only)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
6 Valuation Synthesis — Weighted verdict from all methods (requires Layer 4)
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 24, 2026 3:03am (3d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue $57.8B $62.5B $88.3B $103.1B $115.0B
Cost of Revenue $1.4B $12.5B $38.2B $45.8B $49.4B
Gross Profit $56.4B $49.9B $50.1B $57.4B $65.6B
Operating Expenses $36.7B $35.8B $38.3B $39.8B $43.7B
Operating Income $19.7B $14.1B $11.8B $17.6B $22.0B
Net Income $15.0B $11.0B $9.1B $13.4B $16.9B
EBITDA $23.9B $18.1B $16.1B $22.8B $26.6B
EPS $8.16 $6.23 $5.24 $8.04 $10.34
EPS (Diluted)
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 24, 2026 3:02am (3d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Cash & Equivalents $86.8B $92.7B $58.7B $75.7B $111.7B
Total Current Assets $596.4B $546.4B $542.0B $487.7B $654.7B
Total Assets $1.2T $1.2T $1.2T $1.2T $1.4T
Current Liabilities $772.5B $756.8B $747.8B $739.5B $559.6B
Long-Term Debt $232.8B $241.1B $267.5B $288.8B $327.3B
Total Liabilities $1.1T $1.1T $1.1T $1.1T $1.3T
Total Equity $105.4B $100.1B $99.0B $104.5B $111.6B
Retained Earnings $89.4B $94.9B $98.0B $105.0B $115.1B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 24, 2026 3:02am (3d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Operating Cash Flow $34.0B -$6.4B -$33.5B $1.4B $49.0B
Capital Expenditure -$2.3B -$3.1B -$3.4B -$3.5B -$2.9B
Free Cash Flow $31.7B -$9.5B -$36.9B -$2.1B $46.1B
Acquisitions (net) -$2.6B $0 $0 $0 $0
Debt Repayment
Dividends Paid
Stock Buybacks -$12.1B -$10.9B -$6.2B -$4.2B -$5.8B
Net Change in Cash $22.1B $402.0M -$38.9B $16.2B $6.3B
Analyst Estimates (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 24, 2026 3:00am (3d ago)
Metric 2026 2027 2028 2029
Revenue $77.5B
$75.7B – $79.0B
$81.7B
$78.7B – $84.6B
$86.5B
$85.2B – $87.8B
$93.9B
$91.0B – $96.2B
EBITDA $20.7B
$20.2B – $21.1B
$21.8B
$21.0B – $22.6B
$23.1B
$22.8B – $23.5B
$25.1B
$24.3B – $25.7B
Net Income $18.6B
$18.1B – $19.9B
$20.4B
$19.8B – $20.9B
$20.3B
$18.9B – $24.6B
$24.5B
$23.5B – $25.3B
EPS
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Jun 24, 2026 3:03am (3d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue Growth +8.1% +41.3% +16.8% +11.5%
Gross Profit Growth -11.5% +0.4% +14.4% +14.4%
Operating Income Growth -28.4% -16.2% +49.0% +24.8%
Net Income Growth -26.6% -17.6% +47.4% +25.9%
EBITDA Growth -24.3% -11.2% +41.6% +16.9%
Insider Trading (Recent)
Last updated: Jun 24, 2026 3:03am (3d ago)
Type codes PPurchase SSale AAward / grant MOption exercise FIn-kind (tax) CConversion GGift DReturn to issuer
All SEC Form 4 codes
Open market
P Purchase
Open-market or private purchase of shares.
S Sale
Open-market or private sale of shares.
Compensation (Rule 16b-3)
A Award / grant
Grant or award of securities (RSUs, options, etc.) under Rule 16b-3.
D Return to issuer
Securities disposed back to the company under Rule 16b-3.
F In-kind (tax)
Shares withheld or delivered to pay the option-exercise price or tax — not an open-market sale.
I Discretionary
Discretionary transaction under an employee plan — Rule 16b-3(f).
M Option exercise
Exercise or conversion of a derivative (option/RSU) into shares — exempt.
Derivatives
C Conversion
Conversion of a derivative security into the underlying shares.
E Short expiration
Expiration of a short derivative position.
H Long expiration
Expiration or cancellation of a long derivative position with value received.
O OTM exercise
Exercise of an out-of-the-money derivative.
X ITM exercise
Exercise of an in-the-money or at-the-money derivative.
Other exempt
G Gift
Bona fide gift of securities.
L Small acquisition
Small acquisition under Rule 16a-6.
W Inheritance
Acquisition or disposition by will or the laws of descent.
Z Voting trust
Deposit into or withdrawal from a voting trust.
Other
J Other
Other acquisition or disposition (explained in a Form 4 footnote).
K Equity swap
Transaction in an equity swap or similar instrument.
U Tender / buyout
Disposition via tender of shares in a change-of-control transaction.

Compensation-plan codes (A, D, F, M) are routine and rarely directional. Open-market P (buy) and S (sale) carry the most signal.

Date Insider Type Shares Price Value
2026-06-01 NALLY DENNIS M A-Award 345.30 $209.96 $72,500
2026-06-01 NALLY DENNIS M A-Award 1,309.78 $0.00 $0
2026-06-01 WILKINS RAYFORD JR A-Award 1,309.78 $0.00 $0
2026-06-01 BUTLER MEGAN A-Award 1,309.78 $0.00 $0
2026-06-01 BUTLER MEGAN F-InKind 190.00 $209.96 $39,892
2026-06-01 James Erika H A-Award 1,309.78 $0.00 $0
2026-06-01 GOOD LYNN J A-Award 273.86 $209.96 $57,500
2026-06-01 GOOD LYNN J A-Award 1,309.78 $0.00 $0
2026-06-01 TRAQUINA PERRY M A-Award 369.12 $209.96 $77,500
2026-06-01 TRAQUINA PERRY M A-Award 1,309.78 $0.00 $0
2026-06-01 Peterson Douglas L. A-Award 273.86 $209.96 $57,500
2026-06-01 Peterson Douglas L. A-Award 1,309.78 $0.00 $0
2026-06-01 Miscik Judith A A-Award 1,309.78 $0.00 $0
2026-06-01 Herz Robert H A-Award 1,309.78 $0.00 $0
2026-06-01 Leibowitz Shelley B A-Award 1,309.78 $0.00 $0
2026-06-01 GLOCER THOMAS H A-Award 512.00 $209.96 $107,500
2026-06-01 GLOCER THOMAS H A-Award 1,309.78 $0.00 $0
2026-06-01 SCHAPIRO MARY L A-Award 1,309.78 $0.00 $0
2026-05-14 Itagaki Yasushi 0.00 $0.00 $0
2026-04-20 GROSSMAN ERIC F S-Sale 5,559.00 $190.00 $1.1M
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Jun 21, 2026 6:37pm (5d ago)
Date Dividend Declaration Record Payment
2026-04-30 $1.00 2026-04-15 2026-04-30 2026-05-15
2026-01-30 $1.00 2026-01-15 2026-01-30 2026-02-13
2025-10-31 $1.00 2025-10-15 2025-10-31 2025-11-14
2025-07-31 $1.00 2025-07-16 2025-07-31 2025-08-15
2025-04-30 $0.93 2025-04-11 2025-04-30 2025-05-15
2025-01-31 $0.93 2025-01-16 2025-01-31 2025-02-14
2024-10-31 $0.93 2024-10-16 2024-10-31 2024-11-15
2024-07-31 $0.93 2024-07-16 2024-07-31 2024-08-15
2024-04-29 $0.85 2024-04-16 2024-04-30 2024-05-15
2024-01-30 $0.85 2024-01-16 2024-01-31 2024-02-15
2023-10-30 $0.85 2023-10-18 2023-10-31 2023-11-15
2023-07-28 $0.85 2023-07-18 2023-07-31 2023-08-15
2023-04-28 $0.78 2023-04-19 2023-05-01 2023-05-15
2023-01-30 $0.78 2023-01-17 2023-01-31 2023-02-15
2022-10-28 $0.78 2022-10-14 2022-10-31 2022-11-15
2022-07-28 $0.78 2022-07-14 2022-07-29 2022-08-15
2022-04-28 $0.70 2022-04-14 2022-04-29 2022-05-13
2022-01-28 $0.70 2022-01-19 2022-01-31 2022-02-15
2021-10-28 $0.70 2021-10-14 2021-10-29 2021-11-15
2021-07-29 $0.70 2021-07-15 2021-07-30 2021-08-13
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for MS — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
Delvantic AI Findings
Independent analyst synthesis · Delvantic - Cairn AI · generated 2026-06-24 03:06:18
Reviews the pipeline's own verdicts
Verdict Fairly valued at peak earnings — fair value $210-235 on through-cycle math; dissent from the synthesis "disconnected" verdict (wrong framework for a bank), but no edge buying at $226 after a 67% rally into cyclical peak margins.

Looking at the raw trajectory first: Morgan Stanley printed $33.15B in Q1'26 revenue with a 17% net margin — that's the best quarter in the dataset and shows real acceleration, not deceleration as one of the secondary signals claims. Sequential quarterlies went $25.5B → $26.3B → $26.0B → $27.9B → $28.2B → $30.1B → $28.9B → $33.2B. That's roughly 30% revenue growth from mid-2024 to early 2026, with margins expanding from ~12% to ~17%. Full-year 2025 came in at $115B rev / $16.9B NI vs. 2023's $88B / $9.1B — earnings essentially doubled in two years. The 36% earnings CAGR and 14% revenue CAGR are real, driven by wealth management AUM growth on the back of a strong equity market plus an IB/trading recovery off the 2022-23 trough.

Now the prior models. The Valuation Synthesis verdict — "Disconnected from Fundamentals" predicated on a "60% implied FCF growth rate" — is, frankly, nonsense for a bank. You cannot run a reverse-DCF on a capital-markets firm and treat the output as meaningful; banks aren't valued on FCF because operating cash flow is dominated by changes in trading assets/liabilities and deposit flows. The $46B "FCF" figure is a balance-sheet artifact, not distributable cash. MS trades at 19.5x TTM earnings, 2.5x book, with a 16.4% ROE and a 2.4% dividend yield — those are the right anchors, and on those anchors the stock is fully-priced but not absurd. The synthesis model applied the wrong framework and arrived at a wrong-headed verdict; the Market Narrative section actually gets it right ("anchored to fundamentals... rational assessment"). These two prior outputs directly contradict each other and the narrative read is the credible one.

The Market Forces "cyclical peak amplified by leverage" critique deserves more weight, though. MS earnings are genuinely cyclical: 2021 NI was $15.0B at the SPAC/IPO peak, collapsed to $9.1B in 2023, and has now surged to $16.9B in 2025 with TTM tracking higher. At 19.5x peak-ish earnings and 2.5x book, you're paying a premium multiple for what may be peak earnings power. A normalized mid-cycle ROE for MS is probably 13-14%, not 16.4%; on normalized earnings of ~$14B, the multiple stretches to ~25x. The contrarian case writes itself: wealth management fees are tied to AUM which is tied to the S&P; a 20% equity drawdown takes fee revenue down meaningfully while comp ratios stay sticky; IB pipelines evaporate when volatility spikes. The 67% rally off the lows is the warning, not the validation. Insider activity is all awards/in-kind, not informative either direction — the "heavy insider selling" claim in Market Forces isn't supported by the rows shown.

My read: this is a high-quality franchise printing genuinely strong numbers, but the price reflects it. The "Disconnected from Fundamentals" verdict is methodologically wrong — MS is not 60% FCF-growth-priced, it's priced at a reasonable 19.5x earnings for a 16% ROE bank with a real wealth franchise. The honest concern is cyclical: you're buying at peak margins and a peak multiple simultaneously. Fair value on through-cycle earnings of ~$14B at 15x is ~$210, roughly 7% below current; on current run-rate earnings of ~$18-19B at 17x, fair value is ~$260, 15% upside. So the stock is approximately fairly valued in a base case, expensive in a normalization case, cheap only if you believe the new margin profile is structural (plausible for wealth, not for ISG). I dissent from the synthesis verdict's reasoning but partially agree with its directional caution; I agree with the Market Narrative framing. Not a short, not a buy here — a hold for owners, wait-for-pullback for non-owners.

GPT Critique
Second-opinion review · gpt-4o · generated 2026-06-24 03:06:28
Reviews the Opus findings above
Verdict I agree with Opus — fairly valued at $226, but with downside risk to $210 on normalized earnings, balancing cyclical peaks against structural franchise strength.

Upon analyzing Morgan Stanley's recent financials, several points stand out to me. Notably, there's a clear trajectory of revenue and net income growth over the past few years, with revenue increasing from $57.78 billion in 2021 to $114.98 billion in 2025 and a corresponding rise in net income from $15.03 billion to $16.86 billion. This growth is corroborated by their quarterly performance, showing a steady increase in both revenue and net income, particularly in the latest quarter, which saw $33.15 billion in revenue with a 17% margin. Such figures suggest a strong operational foundation, especially in the wealth management sector, which likely benefited from robust market conditions.

I find myself agreeing with Claude Opus's assertion that the "Disconnected from Fundamentals" verdict in the Valuation Synthesis is misguided when applied to Morgan Stanley. As Opus points out, the valuation metrics of a bank cannot be equated to those of non-financial firms due to the nature of their cash flows and balance sheet dynamics. I concur that the bank's price-to-earnings ratio of 19.5x, combined with a return on equity of 16.4%, does not suggest an overvaluation based on typical banking metrics. Opus's critique of the synthesis's reliance on a "60% implied FCF growth rate" as a valuation anchor is valid; this approach misinterprets the financial structure of banks, where free cash flow isn't a primary valuation measure.

However, I diverge slightly on Opus's optimism regarding the recent rally. While I agree that Morgan Stanley is a high-quality franchise, I am more cautious about the sustainability of its margins and earnings at these levels. The earnings surge aligns with a cyclical peak, amplified by favorable market conditions, as Opus acknowledges. The stock's current valuation seems to factor in peak earnings, and with historical earnings volatility — such as the drop from $15.0 billion in 2021 to $9.1 billion in 2023 — there's a risk that a market downturn could significantly impact profitability. Therefore, I am inclined to weigh the cyclical peak critique more heavily, considering potential downside risks if market conditions shift unfavorably.

A careful skeptic might argue that both my analysis and Opus's underestimate the potential for structural changes in Morgan Stanley's business model, particularly in wealth management, to sustain higher margins and returns. They might point out that the bank's diversification across segments could offer resilience against cyclical downturns, suggesting that current valuations could be justified if these changes prove durable.

Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for MS. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
Data via Financial Modeling Prep · Cached for performance · fmp
v1.1.352 · d1100787 · 2026-06-26 11:39:30