Skip to main content
Homepage
AGING Analysis Report
Aug 24, 2026
29 days ago · 100% complete
For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page

What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for WEC Energy Group Inc. (WEC) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.

Our current read (analysis of 2026-09-22): Designation Low · Gem Score -27 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality 32 · Value -66 · Sentiment 26 (timing only, not weighted) · Composite fair value $51.87 vs $106.01 at analysis

Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable reference-name attribute you can cite):

  • profile-header / price-overview — company profile, live quote, market cap
  • extended-analysisthe core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memo
  • future-predictions — our forward price-band predictions
  • market-narrative / ai-findings / gpt-critique — narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)
  • Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers): price-history, income-trend, key-metrics, financials (statement tables), insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.

More for machine readers: site briefing at /llms.txt · any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER · raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds); every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.

WEC Energy Group Inc.

WEC NYSE
Utilities · Utilities - Regulated Electric
Milwaukee, WI 53201, United States wecenergygroup.com Updated Aug 24, 2:25am
Price
$106.01
Market Cap
$34.5B
Employees
7,000
Beta
0.46
Avg Volume
2,301,540
Last Dividend
$3.75
CEO
Mr. Scott J. Lauber CPA

WEC Energy Group Inc. is a utility holding company that provides electric and natural gas services across the Midwest. The company operates regulated utility businesses serving residential, commercial, and industrial customers through electricity generation, power distribution, natural gas delivery, and related energy infrastructure. Its operations are organized across Wisconsin, Illinois, and other regional service territories, along with electric transmission and non-utility energy infrastructure activities. WEC Energy Group Inc. also participates in renewable energy and LNG-related operations, adding to its broader energy portfolio. Headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, the company plays a central role in delivering essential energy services and supporting the reliability of local power and gas networks.

Runs with full report Generated: Aug 24, 2026 6:10am
Price Overview
Price at report time
$106.01
as of Aug 24, 6:00am (29d ago)
Change · Aug 24
-2.50 (-2.30%)
Day Range
$105.94 – $108.69
52-Week Range
$102.95 – $119.91
50-Day MA
$112.76
200-Day MA
$112.00
Volume
2,929,900.00
Right now · live
Log in to get the live feed
Members see the real-time price and the move since this report (over 29d).
Share Structure
Outstanding 325,849,383.00
Float 324,917,454.00
Free Float 99.7%
High free float — 99.7% of shares trade freely, ~0.3% held by insiders/institutions
Very liquid — most shares trade freely. Low insider ownership can mean less management alignment, but makes large position sizing straightforward.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Aug 24, 2026 6:18am (29d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Aug 24, 2026 6:18am (29d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
TD Twelve Data statement HEX SEC filing
Industry comparison last run: Aug 24, 2026 6:07am
P/E · trailing (TTM) (Price per dollar of earnings over the past year — not a run-rate or forward P/E)
HEX
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
22.04
Stock Price: $106.01
EPS (Diluted): 4.81
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
HEX
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
2.44
Stock Price: $106.01
Total Equity: $14.05B
Shares: 323,800,000
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
HEX
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
14.53
Market Cap: $34.54B
Total Debt: $20.02B
Cash: $27.60M
EBITDA: $3.72B
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
HEX
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$54.1B
Market Cap: $34.54B
Total Debt: $20.02B
Cash: $27.60M
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
HEX
Gross Profit / Revenue
66.7%
Gross Profit: $6.53B
Revenue: $9.80B
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
HEX
Operating Income / Revenue
22.9%
Operating Income: $2.24B
Revenue: $9.80B
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
HEX
Net Income / Revenue
15.9%
Net Income: $1.56B
Revenue: $9.80B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
HEX
Net Income / Total Equity
11.1%
Net Income: $1.56B
Total Equity: $14.05B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
HEX
NOPAT / Invested Capital
6.1%
Operating Income: $2.24B
Tax Rate: 7.1%
Equity: $14.05B
Total Debt: $20.02B
Cash: $27.60M
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
HEX
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
0.59
Current Assets: $3.28B
Current Liabilities: $5.59B
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
HEX
Total Debt / Total Equity
1.42
Short-Term Debt: $1.52B
Long-Term Debt: $18.50B
Total Debt: $20.02B
Total Equity: $14.05B
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
HEX
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$30.27
Revenue: $9.80B
Shares: 323,800,000
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
HEX
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
$43.40
Total Equity: $14.05B
Shares: 323,800,000
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
HEX
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$10.44
Operating CF: $3.38B
CapEx: $0.00
Shares: 323,800,000
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
TD
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
3.5%
Last Dividend: $3.75
Stock Price: $106.01
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
HEX
Dividends Paid / Net Income
73.8%
Dividends Paid: -$1.15B
Net Income: $1.56B
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Aug 24, 2026 6:07am
Compares WEC against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 24, 2026 6:18am (29d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue $8.3B $9.6B $8.9B $8.6B $9.8B
Cost of Revenue $3.3B $4.4B $3.2B $2.7B $3.3B
Gross Profit $5.0B $5.2B $5.7B $5.9B $6.5B
Operating Expenses $3.3B $3.3B $3.8B $3.8B $4.3B
Operating Income $1.7B $1.9B $1.9B $2.2B $2.2B
Net Income $1.3B $1.4B $1.3B $1.5B $1.6B
EBITDA $2.8B $3.0B $3.2B $3.5B $3.7B
EPS $4.12 $4.46 $4.22 $4.83 $4.84
EPS (Diluted) $4.11 $4.45 $4.22 $4.83 $4.81
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 24, 2026 6:00am (29d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Cash & Equivalents $16.3M $28.9M $42.9M $9.8M $27.6M
Total Current Assets $2.7B $3.2B $2.8B $2.9B $3.3B
Total Assets $39.0B $41.9B $43.9B $47.4B $51.5B
Current Liabilities $3.8B $4.6B $5.1B $4.8B $5.6B
Long-Term Debt $13.5B $14.7B $15.4B $17.2B $18.5B
Total Liabilities $27.9B $30.3B $31.9B $34.6B $37.5B
Total Equity $11.1B $11.6B $12.1B $12.8B $14.1B
Retained Earnings $6.8B $7.3B $7.6B $8.1B $8.5B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 24, 2026 6:18am (29d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Operating Cash Flow $2.0B $2.1B $3.0B $3.2B $3.4B
Capital Expenditure -$2.4B -$2.7B
Free Cash Flow -$340.0M -$636.2M
Acquisitions (net) $0
Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) $1.1B $1.9B $1.2B $2.3B $1.1B
Dividends Paid -$854.8M -$917.9M -$984.2M -$1.1B -$1.1B
Stock Buybacks -$33.1M -$69.2M -$16.6M -$3.2M -$1.3M
Net Change in Cash $14.9M $94.7M -$17.0M -$123.0M $28.7M
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Aug 24, 2026 6:18am (29d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue Growth +15.4% -7.3% -3.3% +14.0%
Gross Profit Growth +4.7% +8.8% +4.2% +9.9%
Operating Income Growth +12.2% -0.8% +12.8% +4.3%
Net Income Growth +8.6% -5.5% +14.5% +2.0%
EBITDA Growth +9.2% +4.1% +10.6% +6.2%
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Aug 24, 2026 6:00am (29d ago)
Date Dividend Declaration Record Payment
2026-08-14 $0.95
2026-05-14 $0.95
2026-02-13 $0.95
2025-11-14 $0.89
2025-08-14 $0.89
2025-05-14 $0.89
2025-02-14 $0.89
2024-11-14 $0.84
2024-08-14 $0.84
2024-05-13 $0.84
2024-02-13 $0.84
2023-11-13 $0.78
2023-08-11 $0.78
2023-05-11 $0.78
2023-02-13 $0.78
2022-11-10 $0.73
2022-08-11 $0.73
2022-05-12 $0.73
2022-02-11 $0.73
2021-11-10 $0.68
0Company Classification 1Industry Landscape 2Company Momentum 3Forward Projection 4aDCF Valuation 4bEarnings Power Value 4cAnchored PE 4dReverse DCF 4eRevenue-Based DCF 4fAnchored P/S 4gScenario Analysis 4hDividend Discount Model 4iBook Value Analysis 4jInsider Activity 4fCash Flow Quality 4gDebt Maturity Risk 4hMacro Environment 4iSector Intelligence 4jRevenue Confidence 4kSensitivity Analysis 4lSector Demand Cycle 5AI Investigation 5bThesis Evaluation 6Valuation Synthesis
computed not applicable not yet run 16 computed · 6 not applicable · 2 not yet run
Risk : Reward — upside vs downside from this company's own quarters
Not computed yet
Why there is no ratio: Risk:reward has not been computed for this name yet — its report predates the mechanical valuation chain. It is added, at $0, the next time a report or the nightly touches this ticker.
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for WEC — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
Growth Outlook
Analyzed 2026-08-24 06:29

The question every valuation on this page silently assumes: is this company likely to grow? Judged forward — the business, its category, the world — against what's already printed.

Growing A regulated Midwest utility compounding earnings power off a large rate-base capital plan now supercharged by Wisconsin data-center load — durable mid-single-digit growth, not a breakout. conf 7/10
Inline with category Category growing · Company revenue +13.6% YoY versus category median +13.8% — essentially matching the sector's expansion, driven by the same forces (capex recovery, load growth, fuel/rate pass-throughs). Earnings growth of ~2% lags the top line, reflecting financing drag rather than lost customers; utilities do not lose share in a franchised territory.
Next 2 quarters
Growing
Recovery of recently approved capex plus normal-course rate relief and continued load additions should keep EPS above prior-year comparables. Quarterly shape is weather-dependent and Q3/Q4 mix matters, but the print direction is up.
≈ inline with expectations
Year 1
Growing
The fiscal-year path is anchored to the company's own EPS growth algorithm off a rising rate base, with revenue tailwinds from capex recovery and new large-load interconnections. Interest expense and equity funding trim the flow-through, keeping the year in the mid-single digits rather than the low teens.
≈ inline with expectations
Years 2–3
Growing
Structural earnings power rises as the capital plan lands: new generation, transmission and LNG assets enter rate base, and large-load contracts underwrite the spend. That is a real, mechanism-backed compounding path — but the allowed-ROE ceiling and funding costs prevent it from becoming acceleration.
≈ inline with expectations
The creme: each rung's call measured against what's already printed (vs analyst estimates · vs guidance / FY consensus · vs price-implied growth) — expectations in print are already in the price, so only the variant margin can pay. Hover a rung's chip for the margin read.
Growth drivers
74 Rate-base capital plan — Growth here is mechanical, not commercial: approved capex converts to rate base, and rate base times allowed ROE is earnings. WEC's multi-year plan (generation replacement, LNG/gas peakers, renewables, distribution hardening, ATC transmission) supports the long-standing 6.5-7% EPS growth algorithm. Revenue +13.6% YoY confirms recovery mechanisms and volume are flowing through.
58 Large-load/data-center demand in Wisconsin — Southeast Wisconsin hyperscale development (Mount Pleasant campus and adjacent projects) is a company-specific load driver, not a generic AI slogan: it adds firm, contracted MW to a service territory that had flat weather-normalized demand for a decade, justifying incremental generation capex and spreading fixed costs across more kWh. This is the single credible source of upward revision to the capex plan.
47 Constructive Wisconsin regulation — Wisconsin's PSC has historically granted timely rate relief with forward test years and fuel/capex recovery, limiting regulatory lag. That is what turns an approved capital plan into realized earnings growth rather than an under-earning asset base.
35 Category in expansion — Regulated electric peers show 7% three-year revenue CAGR accelerating to ~13.8% recently with industry operating margins up ~2.3pp — a rising tide of load growth and capex cycles that WEC participates in with above-average visibility.
Growth risks
60 Financing cost and equity dilution — With the 10-year at 4.69%, a capex-heavy utility funds growth with debt and equity. Higher interest expense and share issuance can consume much of the rate-base earnings uplift — visible already in earnings YoY of just ~2% against revenue up 13.6%. This is the main reason net income growth trails the top line.
51 Structurally capped upside — Allowed ROE caps the return on every incremental dollar; there is no operating leverage story and no pricing power beyond what a commission grants. Even flawless execution produces mid-single-digit EPS growth, so the growth call has a hard ceiling regardless of demand strength.
34 Execution/regulatory risk on the capex build — Cost overruns on new generation, contested CPCNs, or disallowed spend would push growth to the low end of the algorithm. Large-load tariffs must also be structured so existing ratepayers are protected — a political process that can delay projects.
20 Weather and volume variability — Quarterly prints swing on heating/cooling degree days; revenue volatility of ~8.6% and 'not all years positive' history show earnings are less linear than the utility narrative implies.
The world is handing regulated electrics their first real load-growth cycle in twenty years — electrification plus hyperscale compute — and WEC sits in one of the more concentrated data-center build zones in the Midwest. That converts a defensive, GDP-ish business into a legitimate capex-compounder. The offset is the cost of capital: a 4.69% 10-year with a modestly positive curve makes each funded dollar of rate base less accretive, and regulators, not markets, decide how fast the recovery arrives. Net: the demand backdrop has improved structurally, the financing backdrop has worsened, and the two largely fight to a mid-single-digit outcome.
Growth position composite +22
ShrinkingStallingHoldingGrowingAccelerating
70Next 2 quarters · Growing
70Year 1 · Growing
70Years 2–3 · Growing
+22Composite (−100…+100)
A research prediction, not advice. Forward-graded: each rung is scored against the prints that follow it. Not an input to the GEM designation — track record first.
Claude Reading
Independent analyst synthesis · claude-opus-4-7 · generated 2026-08-24 06:18:07
Verdict Fully priced with modest downside — fair value $92-95 vs $106 today; hold if owned for the 3.5% yield, but new capital should wait for a pullback below $98 or rotate to cheaper regulated peers.

The raw numbers tell a clean story: WEC is a regulated utility doing exactly what regulated utilities do. 2025 revenue of $9.80B vs 2021's $8.32B is a 4.2% CAGR, net income $1.56B vs $1.30B is 4.7% CAGR — the "8.1% earnings CAGR" the momentum model cites is cherry-picked from a weak 2023 base. The seasonal quarterly pattern (Q1 always ~$3.2-3.4B and 23% margins from winter heating demand, Q2/Q3 ~$2B at 12-13%) is intact, and the "accelerating quarterly trend" flag from Revenue Confidence is a misread — the 14% YoY recent revenue is a weather/rate-case artifact, not a step-change. Operating CF of $3.38B against $20B of debt (D/E 1.42, current ratio 0.59, cash of $27.6M against a $34.5B market cap) is standard utility capital structure, but ROIC of 6.13% barely clears WACC in a 4-5% risk-free world. This is a bond proxy, full stop.

On valuation, the synthesis's $88.71 DCF fair value and $94.56 signal-adjusted number look about right to me, maybe slightly harsh. At 22x earnings and 3.5x sales, WEC trades at the upper end of its historical band and at a premium to peers like DUK (~19x) and SO (~20x). The 3.54% dividend yield with a 73.8% payout ratio means dividend growth is mechanically tied to rate-base growth of ~6-7%, so total return math is roughly 3.5% yield + 5-6% EPS growth = 8.5-9.5% — respectable but not compelling when 10-year Treasuries offer 4%+ risk-free. The synthesis's "high debt risk" flag I'd push back on: utilities carry high leverage by design, coverage ratios are fine, and regulated ROE recovery mechanisms make refinancing risk overstated. But the "market prices in more growth than projected" critique is fair — at 22x, you're paying for the electrification/data-center narrative that hasn't materially shown up in the numbers yet.

Where I'd push a contrarian angle: the bull case that nobody's articulating clearly is data-center load growth in WEC's Wisconsin territory (Microsoft's $3.3B Mount Pleasant campus, Meta, Google interest). If load growth surprises to 2-3% annually vs the utility industry's historical ~0.5%, rate base compounds faster and EPS growth moves from 6% to 8-9%, which mathematically justifies today's 22x multiple. That said, this is speculative — no visible acceleration in the actual revenue trajectory yet, and Wisconsin PSC allowed ROEs (9.8-10%) cap the upside. Insider activity is genuinely neutral-to-mildly-negative (net sales of ~4,700 shares vs modest awards) but the volumes are trivial for a $34B company — I'd not read into it. The narrative model's "minimal intensity, durable, anchored" read is exactly right: this isn't a story stock, it's a spreadsheet stock, and spreadsheets say 22x is 10-15% rich.

I agree with the synthesis verdict of fully_priced, but I'd frame it more precisely than the models do. Fair value in the $90-95 range, current $106 = a 10-15% overpay that will be corrected either by (a) a 12-18 month sideways grind while earnings catch up, or (b) a rate-driven repricing if the 10-year moves back above 4.5%. This is not a short — regulated utilities don't collapse, and the dividend provides a floor around $95-98 (where yield hits ~3.9%). But it's also not a buy at $106; income investors are better served waiting for a pullback or rotating to lower-P/E peers. The market-forces "neutral" and pre-flight "dividend-income" tags are appropriately calibrated. My one dissent from the prior stack: the "critical flag: high debt risk" language overstates the case for a regulated utility — this isn't a leverage-driven blowup risk, it's a valuation-driven mean-reversion risk, and those are very different things to communicate to a client.

GPT Reading
Independent reading · gpt-5.4 · generated 2026-08-24 06:18:24
Verdict Overvalued at $106 — this is a dependable regulated utility, but fair value is closer to $90-95 unless earnings growth steps up meaningfully.

WEC looks like exactly what it is: a high-quality regulated utility that the market is paying a premium for, but the premium is now ahead of the underlying earnings power. The raw numbers show a business with respectable but not exciting growth. Revenue went from $8.32B in 2021 to $9.80B in 2025, a roughly 4% annualized climb, while net income rose from $1.30B to $1.56B, about 5% annualized. That is decent utility compounding, not a step-change story. Even the recent quarterly acceleration needs context: the latest quarter was $2.06B of revenue versus $2.01B a year earlier, only about 2.5% growth, and net income was $301M versus $243M, a stronger 24% gain helped by margin expansion from 12.1% to 14.6%. The March quarter was similarly solid at $806M of net income on $3.43B of revenue, but seasonality is doing a lot of work here; this is not a linear high-growth profile. What stands out to me is stability, not upside surprise.

Profitability is good for a regulated utility, but valuation already reflects that. On 2025 numbers, WEC earned $1.56B and trades at about 22x earnings, 3.5x sales, and 14.5x EV/EBITDA. For a company with ROIC of 6.1%, ROE of 11.1%, and a dividend payout ratio near 74%, that is a full multiple. Yes, operating margin of 22.9% and net margin of 15.9% are attractive, and 2025 operating income of $2.24B was the best in the five-year set. But there is no evidence in these figures of an economic engine suddenly deserving a re-rating. In fact, 2024 revenue was only $8.60B after $8.89B in 2023 and $9.60B in 2022, which tells you top-line growth is partly weather and rate-case noise rather than a smooth structural climb. A premium multiple can make sense for consistency; it is harder to justify at $106 when consistency is all you are getting.

The balance sheet is the real limiter on upside. Total debt of $20.02B against just $27.6M of cash is normal-ish for a utility in structure but still leaves little room for complacency when the stock is priced richly. Debt-to-equity at 1.42x and a current ratio of 0.59 are not signs of distress in this sector, yet they do matter when investors are accepting only a 3.54% dividend yield. Operating cash flow of $3.38B is healthy, but without free cash flow disclosure here, I have to assume the usual utility pattern: heavy capex consumes much of it, leaving equity holders reliant on steady access to debt and equity markets plus favorable regulation. That is fine at a fair price; it is less attractive when investors are treating the shares almost like a bond proxy while long-duration assets remain rate-sensitive. At $106, the stock looks priced for lower rates, smooth rate recovery, and no execution hiccups.

The best counterargument is straightforward: WEC deserves to trade rich because it has actually delivered steady earnings growth despite revenue volatility, and the latest data support that. Net income rose from $1.52B in 2024 to $1.56B in 2025 even as the revenue base normalized, suggesting rate base growth and cost discipline are working. Quarterly earnings in the first half of 2026 were $1.11B versus about $969M in the first half of 2025, up roughly 14%, which is better than the sleepy image implies. For many investors, that plus a 3.5% yield from a regulated franchise is enough to justify paying 22x earnings, especially if Treasury yields fall and defensives come back into favor. I weigh that differently because utilities rarely sustain premium expansion unless growth clearly accelerates, and here the improvement is incremental, not transformative. With payout already high, there is not much internal reinvestment optionality, and with leverage already substantial, the stock needs valuation support from income scarcity more than from business acceleration.

What would change my mind is not another quarter of “good enough” earnings. I would turn more constructive if WEC shows a clean path to sustained EPS growth materially above the historical 5-6% range without leverage worsening — for example, annual net income pushing toward $1.70B-$1.75B while keeping debt-to-equity stable and converting operating cash flow into visibly stronger post-capex coverage. I would also reassess if the stock derates into the low $90s, where a 19x-ish earnings multiple and a yield closer to 4% would better compensate for the capped growth and financing risk. Absent that, I see a very solid utility wrapped in too expensive a stock.

Grok Reading
Independent reading · grok-4.5 · generated 2026-08-24 06:18:58
Verdict Overvalued at $106; fair value nearer $92–98 on 18–19× earnings and full utility leverage risk

WEC’s numbers describe a regulated utility doing exactly what the model says it should: grinding out mid-single-digit earnings growth behind a heavy capital structure and a dividend that absorbs nearly three-quarters of profits. Annual revenue climbed from $8.32B in 2021 to $9.80B in 2025, but the path was jagged—$9.60B in 2022, a retreat to $8.60–8.89B, then a 14% rebound in 2025 that lifted net income only modestly to $1.56B from $1.52B the prior year and $1.30B four years earlier. That implies an earnings CAGR closer to the high single digits the momentum tape prints, yet the incremental dollar of revenue is not dropping hard to the bottom line. Operating margin held near 23% and net margin near 16% in the latest annual print, which is respectable for the sector, but the balance sheet is the real constraint: $20.02B of debt against $27.6M of cash, a current ratio of 0.59, and debt-to-equity of 1.42. Operating cash flow of $3.38B covers the franchise, yet free-cash-flow data is blank and the payout ratio sits at 74%, so virtually every incremental dollar is spoken for by capex and the dividend. At $106 the stock clears 22× trailing earnings, 2.44× book, and 14.5× EV/EBITDA for a business whose ROIC is 6.1% and ROE 11%—allowed returns, not economic moats. The recent quarterly run-rate (Q1 2026 revenue $3.43B and NI $806M versus $3.15B/$726M a year earlier) confirms weather- and rate-driven seasonality is intact, not a structural re-rating catalyst.

The valuation synthesis calling the name fully priced near $95 is directionally right; the market is paying a flight-to-safety premium on top of already full utility multiples. Revenue confidence is only moderate and the acceleration is concentrated in cold-weather quarters that will normalize. Insider activity is noise—small awards and routine sales, nothing that signals conviction either way. Macro headwinds (higher-for-longer rates) bite a 3.5% yielder with refinancing needs harder than the narrative admits.

The strongest counter-case is straightforward: regulated utilities are meant to look expensive on growth metrics because the product is duration and predictability. Believers will note that 2025 revenue and the early-2026 winter quarter both beat the prior-year comps, ROE at 11% sits at or above many authorized returns, and $3.38B of operating cash flow dwarfs reported net income, supporting the 3.54% dividend that has compounded for decades. Electrification and grid modernization expand rate base; if WEC executes its capex plan and commissions allow timely recovery, the 5% revenue and 8% earnings CAGRs can persist and the 22× multiple becomes a fair price for bond-like equity rather than a stretch. The narrative layer is thin but durable—no cult, just income mandates and index flows—so the premium need not collapse. I weigh this less heavily because the same cash-flow strength is already capitalized at a 12% premium to the composite fair-value work, leverage leaves little cushion if allowed ROEs compress or rates stay elevated, and there is no evidence of outsized rate-base growth that would justify paying up further from here.

I would flip to neutral or constructive on two concrete developments: a multi-year rate-case outcome that visibly lifts earned ROE above 11% with clearer recovery of the capex pipeline, or a sustained stretch of mid-single-digit EPS growth that drives the payout ratio back under 65% while debt-to-equity trends lower. A decisive break below the mid-$90s on rising Treasury yields without fundamental deterioration would confirm the overvaluation thesis rather than reverse it.

Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Each AI above independently stated a direction (undervalued, fairly valued, or overvalued) and how strongly it believes it (conviction, 0–5). We combine those into a Bull-Bear Index on a 0–10 scale: 5 is neutral, 10 is maximum bullish (undervalued at full conviction), 0 is maximum bearish. We compute the score ourselves with the same arithmetic for every seat — the models never grade their own bullishness — so the three are directly comparable. Δ shows how far each seat sits from the panel average of 1.7; a large Δ marks the dissenting voice, usually the one worth reading.
Claude claude-opus-4-7 2.0
overvalued · conviction 3/5 · Δ +0.3 vs panel · self: 4.0
GPT gpt-5.4 1.0
overvalued · conviction 4/5 · Δ -0.7 vs panel · self: 3.0
Grok grok-4.5 2.0
overvalued · conviction 3/5 · Δ +0.3 vs panel · self: 3.0
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
Separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-08-24 06:30:35
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Quality - wait for a dip 7/10
Solid regulated utility trading 11-16% above deserved value - fine business, wrong price.
The cruxThe gap between $106 spot and a low-to-mid-$90s deserved value; nothing about the business justifies closing that gap, so entry price is the whole ballgame.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from WEC's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwaySelf-Funding
DilutionStable Share Count
Earnings QualityGood Earnings Quality
The four lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
+32
Solid
edge √Σ 112 · risk √Σ 79 · conf 7/10

WEC is a classic regulated electric utility profile: revenue grew from $8.32B (2021) to $9.80B (2025), operating margin expanded from 20.6% to 22.9%, and net income climbed steadily to $1.56B. Cash conversion is genuine — OCF/NI of 1.91x and accruals of -2.9% of assets indicate reported earnings translate into cash, with FCF running $3.38B in 2025 (up from negative in 2021-2022 as capex cycles normalized in the reported figure). Beneish M of -2.45 shows no manipulation flags. Share count is essentially flat (0.6% CAGR), so per-share value is protected. The concern is structural leverage: net debt of ~$20B against $27.6M liquid cash, $1.52B short-term debt exceeding cash on hand, and Altman Z of 1.06 in the distress zone. For a regulated utility with rate-based recovery and reliable cash flows, this leverage is normal industry practice, but it does mean the business is dependent on continued capital-market access and regulatory cooperation. Insider tape is unremarkable: 10 small sales, zero open-market buys, mostly routine option-exercise and award-related disposals. Nothing in the pattern signals concern or conviction.

Strengths 4
m70
Strong cash conversion
OCF/NI 1.91x and accruals -2.9% of assets; FCF reached $3.38B in 2025 versus $1.56B net income — earnings quality is genuine.
m55
Margin expansion
Operating margin rose from 20.6% (2021) to 25% (2024), settling at 22.9% (2025); gross margin expanded from 60.2% to 66.7%.
m50
Minimal dilution
Diluted share count went from 316.3M to 323.8M over five years (0.6% CAGR) — per-share value not eroded.
m45
Clean forensic screens
Beneish M of -2.45 well below manipulation threshold; earnings quality score of 1 (good).
Concerns 3
m65
Heavy leverage / Altman Z distress
Net debt ~$20B, Altman Z of 1.06 in distress zone. Typical for regulated utility but leaves no balance-sheet cushion.
m40
Near-term refinancing exposure
Short-term debt of $1.52B far exceeds $27.6M liquid cash; dependent on continued debt-market access.
m20
Insider selling with no buying
10 sells ($3.5M) versus zero open-market buys over 12 months, though mostly routine option-related — mild negative signal at most.
This is a textbook regulated utility: predictable, cash-generative, modestly growing, with the leverage profile that comes with rate-base economics. The Altman Z flag looks scary in isolation but is largely a model artifact for asset-heavy regulated businesses — the real question is whether regulators keep allowing rate recovery on the capex, and the data here is consistent with that continuing. Earnings integrity looks clean, dilution is negligible, and margins are trending the right way. I would call it Solid — not Strong because there is genuinely no balance-sheet cushion, and not Mixed because operationally there is nothing broken.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Regulatory rate case outcomes and allowed ROE across WEC's utility subsidiaries
  • Debt maturity ladder and weighted-average cost of debt
  • Capex program magnitude and how much is rate-base eligible
  • Pension and OPEB obligations not visible in the summary
  • Any customer or regional concentration in Wisconsin service territory
Valuation / Mispricing
-66
Rich
edge √Σ 15 · risk √Σ 94 · conf 7/10
price $106.01 vs deserved ~$89-95, roughly 11-16% overpriced - no margin of safety.

The composite FV of $88.71 and signal-adjusted FV of $94.56 both sit below the $106.01 price, implying roughly 11% downside to fair value. The anchored-PE model at $104.80 essentially matches spot, and the EPV floor at $72.62 warns that on a no-growth basis the business is worth ~30% less than today's price. The market is paying a premium for regulated-utility safety and a ~3.5% dividend, but nothing in the fair-value stack says this is cheap. Quality is Solid, which supports a deserved value in the low-to-mid $90s, not $106. The bear case is directly reflected in the math: you are paying ~12% over deserved value for predictability, and the leverage profile (Altman Z in distress zone, typical for rate-base utilities) argues against stretching the multiple further. This is a fine business at a full price; the mispricing edge is absent or slightly negative.

Cheap signals 1
m15
Quality supports deserved value in low-$90s
Solid regulated utility with predictable rate-base earnings justifies pricing near the signal-adjusted $94.56 FV, but not above it.
Rich / priced-in 4
m55
Price above composite FV
Composite FV $88.71 vs price $106.01 = ~16% overvalued on the blended method; signal-adjusted FV $94.56 still implies ~11% downside.
m45
Anchored-PE at spot
Anchored-PE FV of $104.80 essentially matches the $106 print, meaning today's multiple already fully capitalizes the current earnings power - no cushion.
m50
EPV floor well below price
EPV floor of $72.62 is ~32% under spot; a no-growth earnings power view says a lot of rate-base growth is already priced in.
m35
Priced for safety premium
3.5% yield and defensive bid have pulled the multiple above deserved value; capped regulated growth limits any upside surprise to justify the premium.
Fully priced verging on rich. The composite says $89, the signal-adjusted says $95, and I am being asked to pay $106 for a business whose growth is capped by regulators. I need this in the high-$80s to low-$90s before the price-vs-value gap turns in my favor; below $90 it starts to look like a defensive compounder with a real margin of safety. Today it is a fine business at a full price - I pass on valuation.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Approved ROE and rate-case outcomes in Wisconsin/Illinois service territories
  • Updated 5-year capex plan and rate-base growth guidance
  • Interest expense trajectory given leverage and refinancing schedule
  • Any regulatory lag or disallowance risk on recent capital deployments
General Sentiment
+26
Tailwind
tail √Σ 74 · head √Σ 47 · conf 6/10

The macro tape is nominally risk-on but fragile (VIX 15, market just off highs, 10y at 4.69%, market PE 25.8). That mixed backdrop tends to keep a low-beta (0.46) regulated utility like WEC bid by default: when equity investors get nervous they rotate toward predictable dividend streams, and when they get greedy WEC just lags quietly rather than getting sold. The active narrative here is the steady-compounder / bond-proxy story, and while intensity is minimal, durability is high and the story is currently working - recent 14% momentum versus a 5% long-term CAGR confirms flows are finding this cohort. The pressure is not decisive. Rates at 4.69% are a structural cap on how far the bond-proxy trade can run, and the bear framing (12% premium to fair value, paying up for safety) is exactly the kind of thing that limits further multiple expansion. Analyst tone on the group is constructive but unexciting - no upgrade cycle, no target-price stampede. Net: a genuine but ordinary tailwind, not a mania. The stock is being gently pushed up by narrative and defensive positioning, with no visible headline risk pressing the other way.

Tailwinds 3
m55
Defensive-bid narrative is working
The 'boring dividend compounder' archetype is durable and currently in favor as macro hedges; recent 14% run vs 5% long-term CAGR shows the flow is real, even if narrative intensity is low.
m45
Low beta insulates from tape wobble
Beta 0.46 means the fragile-but-risk-on tape barely touches this name on down days while it participates modestly on up days - an asymmetric cushion.
m20
Risk-on regime is nascent and shallow
Regime is only 1 day old with medium confidence and S&P already 1.6% off highs; that fragility keeps defensive names like WEC quietly bid as a hedge.
Headwinds 2
m40
10y at 4.69% caps the bond-proxy trade
Regulated utilities compete with Treasuries for income flows; with the long end sticky-high, there is a ceiling on how much further the defensive multiple can expand.
m25
No narrative catalyst, no analyst momentum
Minimal narrative intensity and no visible upgrade cycle means nothing is here to push the stock beyond drift - the tailwind is passive, not active.
The pressure on WEC leans mildly positive but is far from dominant. The tape is jittery enough to keep the defensive-compounder narrative quietly working, and the low beta means downside tape days barely register here. But this is drift, not momentum: no analyst upgrade cycle, no catalyst, and a 4.69% 10y that caps how far the bond-proxy trade can extend. Net a modest tailwind - the stock is being gently carried, not launched, and would only turn into a headwind if rates spike further or the market rips risk-on and money rotates out of safety.
Verify before trusting this (3)
  • Whether the 10y breaks meaningfully above 4.75% (would pressure the utility bid)
  • Any sector rotation signal - if risk-on regime deepens and holds, WEC likely lags
  • Analyst target revisions post next earnings - flat revisions confirm the drift; cuts would break the defensive premium
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
Growth Outlook
+22
Growing
edge √Σ 111 · risk √Σ 88 · conf 7/10

The world is handing regulated electrics their first real load-growth cycle in twenty years — electrification plus hyperscale compute — and WEC sits in one of the more concentrated data-center build zones in the Midwest. That converts a defensive, GDP-ish business into a legitimate capex-compounder. The offset is the cost of capital: a 4.69% 10-year with a modestly positive curve makes each funded dollar of rate base less accretive, and regulators, not markets, decide how fast the recovery arrives. Net: the demand backdrop has improved structurally, the financing backdrop has worsened, and the two largely fight to a mid-single-digit outcome.

Growth drivers 4
m74
Rate-base capital plan
Growth here is mechanical, not commercial: approved capex converts to rate base, and rate base times allowed ROE is earnings. WEC's multi-year plan (generation replacement, LNG/gas peakers, renewables, distribution hardening, ATC transmission) supports the long-standing 6.5-7% EPS growth algorithm. Revenue +13.6% YoY confirms recovery mechanisms and volume are flowing through.
m58
Large-load/data-center demand in Wisconsin
Southeast Wisconsin hyperscale development (Mount Pleasant campus and adjacent projects) is a company-specific load driver, not a generic AI slogan: it adds firm, contracted MW to a service territory that had flat weather-normalized demand for a decade, justifying incremental generation capex and spreading fixed costs across more kWh. This is the single credible source of upward revision to the capex plan.
m47
Constructive Wisconsin regulation
Wisconsin's PSC has historically granted timely rate relief with forward test years and fuel/capex recovery, limiting regulatory lag. That is what turns an approved capital plan into realized earnings growth rather than an under-earning asset base.
m35
Category in expansion
Regulated electric peers show 7% three-year revenue CAGR accelerating to ~13.8% recently with industry operating margins up ~2.3pp — a rising tide of load growth and capex cycles that WEC participates in with above-average visibility.
Growth risks 4
m60
Financing cost and equity dilution
With the 10-year at 4.69%, a capex-heavy utility funds growth with debt and equity. Higher interest expense and share issuance can consume much of the rate-base earnings uplift — visible already in earnings YoY of just ~2% against revenue up 13.6%. This is the main reason net income growth trails the top line.
m51
Structurally capped upside
Allowed ROE caps the return on every incremental dollar; there is no operating leverage story and no pricing power beyond what a commission grants. Even flawless execution produces mid-single-digit EPS growth, so the growth call has a hard ceiling regardless of demand strength.
m34
Execution/regulatory risk on the capex build
Cost overruns on new generation, contested CPCNs, or disallowed spend would push growth to the low end of the algorithm. Large-load tariffs must also be structured so existing ratepayers are protected — a political process that can delay projects.
m20
Weather and volume variability
Quarterly prints swing on heating/cooling degree days; revenue volatility of ~8.6% and 'not all years positive' history show earnings are less linear than the utility narrative implies.
vs expectations: ~6m inline · 1y inline · 2-3y inline
The forward growth verdict — is the business itself likely to grow (next 2 quarters / year 1 / years 2–3), judged against its category and against printed expectations. The full horizon ladder + creme renders on the Growth Outlook card above. Not a call on the price (Valuation owns that) or the tape (Sentiment owns that).
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure), and Growth Outlook (the forward growth verdict). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Price Prediction
Lower -8.3% v0.6.0 View full prediction →

When we made this prediction on Aug 24, 2026, WEC was $107.42. We expect it to be $98.50 by Feb 2027. This is an early model (v0.6.0) — the direction is more reliable than the exact price. Made Aug 24, 2026.

Price when predicted$107.42
Our estimate for Feb 2027$98.50-8.3%
Price history shown (6 Months)

Blue is our prediction, starting the day we made it. Grey is a slower route to the same place — the same destination, taking longer. Black is the actual price, so you can see how we are doing.

Post-Report Due Diligence UNSETTLED
The report is written. This is what its valuation stands on.
Analyzed Sep 18, 2026 · 02:45 4d ago
Read epv-floor ext-gem-composite anchored-pe · FY income statement, balance sheet
1 finding · 1 material · $0, re-derived on each view

Evidence for a closer look, not a verdict — no score or designation on this page has been changed by it. Items marked material are ones where a conclusion above moves to the other side of the price.

anchored-pe — the "fair value above price" reading turns on 2 inputs MATERIAL found by sensitivity, not by rule
Published $107.54 vs price $106.01. Nudging `trailing_eps` (down 5%), `adjusted_pe` (down 5%) moves the fair value to the other side of the price. This does not say those inputs are wrong — it says they are where to look first.
trailing_eps flips down 5% adjusted_pe flips down 5%
Price at analysis $106.01. This is where an investigation should start — it is not where one ends. Nothing here was checked against the filings, the tape, or the news; that is the investigator's job.
Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for WEC. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
v1.1.657 · d9811940 · 2026-09-22 17:11:24