For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page
What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for XPO, Inc. (XPO) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.
Our current read (analysis of 2026-09-22): Designation Low · Gem Score -49 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality -5 · Value -78 · Sentiment 28 (timing only, not weighted) · Composite fair value $64.59 vs $184.80 at analysis
Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable
reference-name attribute you can cite):
profile-header/price-overview— company profile, live quote, market capextended-analysis— the core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memofuture-predictions— our forward price-band predictionsmarket-narrative/ai-findings/gpt-critique— narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)- Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers):
price-history,income-trend,key-metrics,financials(statement tables),insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.
More for machine readers: site briefing at
/llms.txt ·
any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER ·
raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds);
every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.
XPO, Inc.
XPO NYSEXPO, Inc. is a transportation and logistics company focused on asset-based less-than-truckload freight services in North America. The company helps businesses move large and time-sensitive shipments through a network of owned trucks, terminals, and service centers, supported by proprietary technology designed to improve routing, visibility, and operational efficiency. XPO serves a wide range of customers across consumer, trade, and industrial markets, offering domestic and cross-border freight transportation into the United States, Canada, Mexico, and the Caribbean. Its business is centered on freight movement that requires flexible handling, coordinated delivery, and dense network coverage, making it an important provider within the commercial shipping and supply chain market. XPO is headquartered in Greenwich, Connecticut.
Price Overview
Price History (1 Year)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
| Period | Revenue | Net Income | Net Margin | YoY/QoQ |
|---|
Key Metrics
EPS (Diluted): 2.64
Total Equity: $1.86B
Shares: 119,000,000
Total Debt: $3.45B
Cash: $310.00M
EBITDA: $1.12B
Total Debt: $3.45B
Cash: $310.00M
Revenue: $8.16B
Revenue: $8.16B
Revenue: $8.16B
Total Equity: $1.86B
Tax Rate: 27.7%
Equity: $1.86B
Total Debt: $3.45B
Cash: $310.00M
Current Liabilities: $1.56B
Long-Term Debt: $3.45B
Total Debt: $3.45B
Total Equity: $1.86B
Shares: 119,000,000
Shares: 119,000,000
CapEx: -$657.00M
Shares: 119,000,000
Stock Price: $184.80
Net Income: $316.00M
Industry Benchmarks
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Sep 4, 2026 4:17am (18d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.8B | $7.7B | $7.7B | $8.1B | $8.2B |
| Cost of Revenue | — | — | — | — | — |
| Gross Profit | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Expenses | $1.3B | $678.0M | — | — | — |
| Operating Income | $616.0M | $377.0M | $438.0M | $660.0M | $656.0M |
| Net Income | $336.0M | $666.0M | $189.0M | $387.0M | $316.0M |
| EBITDA | $1.0B | $713.0M | $814.0M | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| EPS | $2.99 | $5.79 | $1.64 | $3.33 | $2.69 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $2.93 | $5.76 | $1.60 | $3.23 | $2.64 |
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Sep 4, 2026 4:00am (18d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash & Equivalents | $260.0M | $460.0M | $412.0M | $246.0M | $310.0M |
| Total Current Assets | $2.7B | $1.6B | $1.6B | $1.5B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $8.7B | $6.3B | $7.5B | $7.7B | $8.2B |
| Current Liabilities | $2.5B | $1.5B | $1.6B | $1.4B | $1.6B |
| Long-Term Debt | $3.7B | $2.6B | $3.5B | $3.5B | $3.4B |
| Total Liabilities | $7.6B | $5.3B | $6.2B | $6.1B | $6.3B |
| Total Equity | $1.1B | $1.0B | $1.3B | $1.6B | $1.9B |
| Retained Earnings | $43.0M | -$4.0M | $185.0M | $572.0M | $888.0M |
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Sep 4, 2026 4:35am (18d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $490.0M | $824.0M | $694.0M | $808.0M | $986.0M |
| Capital Expenditure | -$313.0M | -$521.0M | -$1.5B | -$789.0M | -$657.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $177.0M | $303.0M | -$839.0M | $19.0M | $329.0M |
| Acquisitions (net) | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) | — | $0 | $3.0B | $0 | $0 |
| Dividends Paid | — | — | — | — | — |
| Stock Buybacks | — | — | $0 | $0 | -$125.0M |
| Net Change in Cash | -$1.8B | $197.0M | -$51.0M | -$120.0M | $31.0M |
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Sep 4, 2026 4:17am (18d ago)| Metric | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -39.7% | +0.3% | +4.2% | +1.1% |
| Gross Profit Growth | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Income Growth | -38.8% | +16.2% | +50.7% | -0.6% |
| Net Income Growth | +98.2% | -71.6% | +104.8% | -18.3% |
| EBITDA Growth | -29.0% | +14.2% | +34.2% | +2.8% |
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Sep 1, 2026 10:42am (21d ago)| Date | Dividend | Declaration | Record | Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-02 | $21.81 | — | — | — |
Deep Analysis
Risk : Reward — upside vs downside from this company's own quarters
Computed 2026-09-15 02:02A +1σ run of quarters pays -83%; a −1σ run costs 91%. Ratio -0.9:1 (μ 4.6%, σ 8.5% , 16 pairs).
Older method (repeat-worst-quarter): -0.8 : 1
| Case | Growth | Margin | Fair value | vs price ($184.80) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bull — recovery | +10% | 9.2% | $47.64 | -74% |
| Base — stabilizes | +6% | 8.0% | $38.05 | -79% |
| Bear — keeps slipping | +3% | 6.8% | $29.84 | -84% |
| Stress — last quarter repeats | +3% | 4.3% | $19.96 | -89% |
| Upside — a +1σ run of quarters (v2) | +13% | 5.2% | $31.85 | -83% |
| Stress — a −1σ run of quarters (v2) | -4% | 4.3% | $16.37 | -91% |
Narrative Economics
market-narrative step).
Growth Outlook
Analyzed 2026-09-04 04:49The question every valuation on this page silently assumes: is this company likely to grow? Judged forward — the business, its category, the world — against what's already printed.
Claude Reading
Looking at the raw quarterly trajectory first: revenue has climbed from $1.92B (Q4'24) to $2.36B (Q2'26) — a 23% jump in six quarters — and net margin has expanded from 2.9% (Q4'25) to 6.9% (Q2'26). That's not a mature earner treading water; that's operational leverage kicking in hard. Q2'26 alone printed $162M NI, so annualizing recent quarters gives roughly $500-600M run-rate earnings vs. the $316M trailing figure the 70x PE is calculated on. Recalculated on forward run-rate, PE compresses to ~36-42x. Still not cheap for a trucker, but a very different picture than the synthesis "63.9% overvalued" verdict implies. The models are anchoring on stale TTM.
That said, the balance sheet is genuinely ugly: $3.45B debt against $310M cash and $1.86B equity (D/E 1.85), and FCF of only $329M against $657M capex means the deleveraging path is slow. ROIC of 9.5% is below what a $21.6B market cap demands — you need mid-teens ROIC to justify 11.8x book. The 2021 revenue of $12.81B vs. 2025's $8.16B reflects the GXO spinoff, so comp-year growth analysis is contaminated; the 2.6% "revenue CAGR" is a garbage number. Insider activity is neutral-to-mildly-negative (small sales, routine option exercises) — no conviction buying near $185, which matters when management is selling the turnaround story.
Where I part company with the synthesis: a $64 fair value is too punitive because it treats trailing NI as steady-state when the quarterly trajectory clearly shows inflection. Where I part company with the bulls and the narrative layer: the freight cycle is the swing variable, and Q2'26 strength may itself be cyclical — LTL pricing tends to peak-to-trough by 30-40%, and if industrial demand rolls over in 2027 the 6.9% margin evaporates back to 3-4%. The Yellow bankruptcy capacity absorption is a one-time gift that's already largely in the numbers. A careful contrarian would note that XPO's margin expansion coincided precisely with a competitor exit, not with structural network improvement, and would demand to see 6%+ margins hold through a demand-weak quarter before paying up.
My fair value math: on normalized $450M earnings (splitting the difference between trough $316M and run-rate $600M) at 25x — a fair multiple for a cyclical with genuine execution and #2 market position — you get ~$11.25B equity value, or ~$96/share. At 30x if you credit Jacobs' track record, $135. To justify $185 you need $600M+ sustainable earnings at 31x, which requires both current margins to hold AND continued growth — a double bet. I dissent partially from the synthesis: overvalued yes, but $64 is wrong; the honest fair value band is $95-135, making current price a 35-50% premium, not 180%. Not a short (Jacobs premium is real, execution has been credible), but not a buy near $185. Wait for a freight-cycle scare that pulls it into the $110s.
GPT Reading
At $184.8, XPO is being valued like a best-in-class industrial compounder, but the reported business still looks like a cyclical LTL carrier earning mid-single-digit margins on barely growing revenue. The last eight quarters show improvement, especially in profitability, yet the scale of the re-rating is disconnected from the underlying base. Revenue went from $2.05 billion in 2024-09 to $2.36 billion in 2026-06, a solid but not transformative increase, while net margin moved from 4.6% to 6.9%. On an annual basis, 2025 revenue was $8.16 billion versus $8.07 billion in 2024, effectively flat, and operating income was actually slightly lower at $656 million versus $660 million. The market cap is $21.6 billion for a company that earned $316 million in 2025 and generated $329 million of free cash flow after $657 million of capex. That is a demanding multiple not just on trailing earnings, but on what the business has concretely delivered through a difficult cycle.
What stands out most is that the bull case requires investors to look through current economics and capitalize a much better future margin structure as if it is close at hand. I can see why: quarterly net income has stepped up from $59 million in 2025-12 to $101 million in 2026-03 and $162 million in 2026-06, which annualizes to a run rate far above 2025 levels. If I take the last two quarters together, XPO earned $263 million on $4.46 billion of revenue, a 5.9% net margin, clearly ahead of the 3.9% full-year 2025 net margin. But even granting that trajectory, the stock still looks stretched. If the company can earn, say, $550 million to $650 million in normalized net income over the next year or two, the current market cap still implies roughly 33x-39x earnings for a trucking business with leverage. EV/revenue above 3.0x and EV/EBITDA above 22x are not “good company” multiples; they are “perfection required” multiples. Meanwhile the balance sheet is not trivial: $3.45 billion of debt against $310 million of cash and only $1.86 billion of equity leaves little room for operational disappointment.
The cash flow profile also argues against paying this kind of price. Operating cash flow of $986 million is healthy, but it is flattered by a business that still needs heavy reinvestment; $657 million of capex reduced free cash flow to $329 million. For an asset-heavy carrier, capex is not optional in the way growth investors sometimes treat it. Price-to-book near 11.8x is especially revealing here because this is not a software platform with negligible incremental capital needs; it is a network business whose returns on capital need to materially improve from the reported 9.5% ROIC to justify today’s valuation. The strongest operational data point is the margin ramp in the most recent two quarters, and if that proves durable then 2025 was a trough. But the stock is not priced for “trough recovery”; it is priced for a sustained march toward much higher earnings power, closer to elite LTL operators than to a merely improved cyclical carrier.
The best argument against my skepticism is that the numbers may be understating inflection. Quarterly revenue has moved from $1.92 billion in 2024-12 to $2.36 billion in 2026-06, and net income over the same stretch more than doubled from $75 million to $162 million. If network density, pricing discipline, and service metrics have structurally improved, then annual comparisons anchored on 2025 miss the point because the exit rate is what matters. On that view, the trailing P/E of 70 is simply stale, capex is front-loaded, and 2026 or 2027 free cash flow could snap much higher once the network investment base is in place. A smart bull would also note that 2023 to 2025 operating income went from $438 million to $656 million even in a mixed freight environment, suggesting the business has already become more efficient. I weigh those facts differently because revenue growth remains modest, leverage remains meaningful, and trucking history is full of “this cycle is different” margin stories that faded once pricing softened or costs re-accelerated. XPO may be better than it was, but the stock already assumes it will be much better than the numbers yet prove.
What would change my mind is not another quarter of modest revenue growth with a narrative-heavy explanation, but evidence that the new earnings level is both real and capital-light. Specifically, if XPO can sustain quarterly revenue above $2.3 billion while keeping net margins at 6% or better for several quarters, convert that into annual free cash flow comfortably above $700 million, and reduce net debt materially from the current roughly $3.14 billion level, then today’s valuation would start to look less fanciful. Conversely, if full-year 2026 revenue is only around $8.8 billion to $9.0 billion and net income lands below roughly $500 million, the multiple should compress hard because the market is currently capitalizing a much stronger business than that.
Grok Reading
XPO at $184.80 is a $21.6B trucking company that earned $316M in 2025 and generated $329M of free cash flow, which puts the stock at roughly 70× trailing earnings, 22× EV/EBITDA, and a 1.5% FCF yield. Those are software multiples on an asset-heavy LTL network carrying $3.45B of debt against $310M of cash and only $1.86B of equity. Revenue has essentially flat-lined for years—$7.72B in 2022, $8.07B in 2024, $8.16B in 2025—for a 2.6% CAGR, while annual net income actually fell from $387M to $316M. The market is not paying for the business that exists; it is paying for a full ODFL-style margin miracle that has not yet arrived. Operating margin sits at 8.0% and net margin at 3.9%. Even the cleanest reading of the balance sheet and cash-flow statement cannot stretch a mature, capital-intensive carrier into a 70× earner without heroic assumptions.
The recent quarters do show real operational progress and that is the only data that keeps this from being a pure short. Revenue stepped from $1.95B to $2.36B over the last six reported periods, and the June 2026 quarter delivered $162M of net income at a 6.9% margin—the best print in the set. Operating cash flow of $986M against $657M of capex confirms the network is throwing off cash once maintenance spending is covered, and ROE of 17% is respectable for the sector. The Yellow bankruptcy tailwind and Jacobs’ historical playbook of density-plus-tech are visible in the sequential margin climb from the 2.9–3.9% range back toward 5–7%. That is genuine execution, not accounting fiction. But sequential improvement off a cyclical bottom does not rewrite the valuation math: annualizing the best quarter still leaves you with mid-single-digit hundreds of millions of earnings against a $22B enterprise, and the heavy capex run-rate keeps FCF constrained.
The valuation models that spit out ~$65–67 fair value are directionally correct even if their precision is false comfort. At 11.8× book and 2.7× sales for 1% revenue growth and declining annual profits, the stock is priced for a multi-year compounding story that the income statement has so far refused to deliver. Insider activity is noise—option exercises and small sales—and does not signal either panic or conviction. Macro headwinds in freight plus a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.85 mean any stall in the margin trajectory turns the leverage from asset into liability fast. The narrative layer is doing almost all the work: a 177% premium to fundamentals anchored on one founder’s ability to push ROIC from 9.5% into the high teens while the cycle cooperates. That is a brittle setup.
The strongest counter-argument is straightforward and I take it seriously. The June quarter’s $2.36B / $162M print, if sustained and expanded, implies the earnings power the market is capitalizing is already emerging; revenue confidence is flagged as high and accelerating, earnings CAGR of 29% over the longer window shows operating leverage when volume cooperates, and a freight up-cycle plus continued network density could push operating margins toward the low-to-mid teens within two years. In that world, $600–800M of net income becomes plausible and a mid-20s multiple on forward earnings could justify something closer to current levels. I weigh this lower because it requires the best recent quarter to become the new floor, the cycle to turn on schedule, and capex intensity to moderate—all simultaneously—while today’s buyers are already paying as if those outcomes are certain. Hope is not a margin of safety at 70×.
I would reverse course if two consecutive quarters print net margins sustainably above 8% with revenue growth above 8% year-on-year, or if free-cash-flow run-rate clears $700M while net debt declines, demonstrating that the capex cycle is truly behind them and the Jacobs operating thesis is converting into cash rather than just story.
Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
XPO has meaningfully improved its operating profile since the 2022 spin activity: operating margin expanded from 4.8% in 2021 to 8.0-8.2% in 2024-2025, on a smaller but more focused revenue base ($8.16B in 2025 vs $12.81B in 2021). Earnings quality on the mechanical checks looks clean — accruals of -4.9% of assets, OCF/NI of 2.32x, and an Altman Z of 3.47 (safe zone). Dilution is contained: diluted share count grew from 114M to 119M over five years (~1.1% CAGR) and SBC is only 0.9% of revenue, though buybacks only offset 35% of SBC. FCF is where the story wobbles: $177M (2021), $303M (2022), $-839M (2023), $19M (2024), $329M (2025). Reported cash conversion is inconsistent and heavily influenced by capex cycles typical of LTL, which is why the e2e tag flags weak cash flow quality despite a healthy 2025 print. Balance sheet is the main constraint: net debt of roughly $3.14B against only $310M liquid cash and $329M annual FCF implies ~10x FCF to net debt — serviceable but not a cushion. Insider tape is neutral-to-slightly-negative: four sales totaling ~$1.5M, no open-market buys, and large option exercises with in-kind tax withholding at Harik ($33.9M) reflect comp mechanics rather than conviction. Overall this reads as a competently run, cyclically exposed transport operator executing on margin expansion, not a fortress.
Verify before trusting this (5)
- Debt maturity schedule and covenant headroom given $3.14B net debt
- Capex trajectory and whether 2023 FCF drawdown was a one-off fleet/terminal investment cycle
- LTL pricing and tonnage trends vs peers to test whether margin gains are structural or cyclical
- Customer concentration and share of revenue exposed to industrial/retail cycles
- Nature of the $33.9M Harik in-kind withholding event and any 10b5-1 plans covering the Brown/Landry sales
The e2e composite pins fair value at $64.39 and the signal-adjusted FV at $66.64, implying roughly -64% downside from $184.80. Even generously anchoring on the PE-based estimate of $128.35 (the most forgiving method), the stock still trades ~44% above deserved value. The EPV floor of $0.43 is a runaway output I discard — it reflects depressed trough earnings in a cyclical trucker and shouldn't anchor anything. Adjusting upward for the Solid quality grade (margin expansion from ~5% to ~8%, clean earnings) still doesn't close a gap this wide. What's priced in at $184.80 is a full LTL cycle recovery, sustained margin expansion toward best-in-class peers (Old Dominion-like), and continued deleveraging of the $3.14B net debt — essentially the Jacobs turnaround fully delivered. That's a heroic setup, not a discount. Earnings quality is high so no haircut is warranted, but high-quality earnings on a cyclical trough don't justify paying 2-3x deserved value. The margin of safety is negative; you're paying for the bull narrative in full.
Verify before trusting this (4)
- LTL tonnage and yield trends in the next quarterly print
- Operating ratio trajectory versus ODFL/SAIA benchmarks
- FCF conversion and debt paydown pace
- Any guidance on normalized through-cycle margin target
XPO sits inside a strong-intensity turnaround narrative built around Brad Jacobs' consolidation playbook, and at beta 1.72 it is precisely the kind of name that a mildly risk-on tape (VIX 14.3, S&P near highs) amplifies. The market is not in stress, so the leveraged belief-driven pricing (roughly 177% above fundamental anchor) is not being punished right now, which is itself a tailwind for a story stock. Durability of the narrative is only moderate and the cult is medium, so this is a supportive backdrop rather than a mania. The near-term news flow is helpful: August LTL operating metrics were released and framed as on-track with Q3 guidance, which removes an immediate crack-in-the-story risk and lets the turnaround thesis keep breathing. Momentum readings (leverage falling from 2.78 to 1.85, low revenue-growth volatility) reinforce the 'cycle-trough, self-help working' framing that bulls need. Offsetting this, the macro backdrop of 10y at 4.79% and a 25.8 market PE is a genuine headwind for a high-beta, high-multiple, belief-priced trucking name - any risk-off flinch hits XPO harder than the tape. Analyst tone is not flagged as diverging, so the pressure is net positive but not decisive.
Verify before trusting this (4)
- Whether Q3 print actually lands in guidance range - the immediate narrative test
- Any sell-side target revisions or downgrades on freight-cycle timing
- VIX regime persistence - a spike back above 20 would hit XPO disproportionately
- LTL tonnage/yield trend in September metrics for continuation vs crack
Freight is in the late stage of a prolonged industrial/goods slowdown: soft manufacturing shipments, cautious restocking, and cross-border tariff uncertainty into Mexico and Canada keep tonnage flat. The differentiator across the world's trucking landscape is capacity — truckload remains oversupplied and commoditized, while LTL's terminal-based structure has kept post-consolidation capacity tighter, so pricing has held up better than volume. XPO's exposure sits in the better half of that split, but it is still levered to industrial production it cannot influence; the growth it produces in this environment is operational, not demand-fed.
When we made this prediction on Sep 4, 2026, XPO was $190.40. We expect it to be $155.00 by Mar 2027, and we consider it great value under $110.00. This is an early model (v0.6.0) — the direction is more reliable than the exact price. Made Sep 4, 2026.
Blue is our prediction, starting the day we made it. Grey is a slower route to the same place — the same destination, taking longer. Black is the actual price, so you can see how we are doing.