Skip to main content
Homepage
AGING Analysis Report
Aug 30, 2026
22 days ago · 100% complete
For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page

What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for Corpay Inc. (CPAY) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.

Our current read (analysis of 2026-09-21): Designation Watch · Gem Score +3 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality 34 · Value -17 · Sentiment -5 (timing only, not weighted) · Composite fair value $465.44 vs $407.88 at analysis

Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable reference-name attribute you can cite):

  • profile-header / price-overview — company profile, live quote, market cap
  • extended-analysisthe core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memo
  • future-predictions — our forward price-band predictions
  • market-narrative / ai-findings / gpt-critique — narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)
  • Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers): price-history, income-trend, key-metrics, financials (statement tables), insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.

More for machine readers: site briefing at /llms.txt · any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER · raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds); every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.

Corpay Inc.

CPAY NYSE
Technology · Software - Infrastructure
Atlanta, GA 30305, United States corpay.com Updated Aug 30, 5:30am
Price
$407.88
Market Cap
$26.8B
Employees
11,800
Beta
0.87
Avg Volume
525,546
CEO
Mr. Ronald F. Clarke

Corpay Inc. is a global corporate payments company that provides specialized payment and expense management solutions for businesses and consumers. Corpay’s current offerings center on helping organizations control and automate spending across vehicle-related expenses, corporate payables, lodging, and cross-border transactions. Its product suite includes commercial cards, accounts payable automation, virtual cards, invoice and payment tools, foreign exchange and currency risk management, and mobility-focused payment solutions such as fuel, toll, parking, and EV charging payments. The company serves a wide range of industries that rely on controlled spending, streamlined vendor payments, and international money movement. Corpay Inc. also supports travel and workforce lodging needs through dedicated payment solutions. Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, Corpay plays a significant role in the business payments market by combining digital workflows, payments infrastructure, and spend controls to simplify how organizations manage everyday financial operations.

Runs with full report Generated: Aug 30, 2026 5:38am
Price Overview
Price at report time
$407.88
as of Aug 30, 5:30am (22d ago)
Change · Aug 30
+4.21 (+1.04%)
Day Range
$401.52 – $409.26
52-Week Range
$252.84 – $425.95
50-Day MA
$377.23
200-Day MA
$333.71
Volume
242,600.00
Right now · live
Log in to get the live feed
Members see the real-time price and the move since this report (over 22d).
Share Structure
Outstanding 65,659,599.00
Float 63,092,965.00
Free Float 96.1%
High free float — 96.1% of shares trade freely, ~3.9% held by insiders/institutions
Very liquid — most shares trade freely. Low insider ownership can mean less management alignment, but makes large position sizing straightforward.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Aug 30, 2026 5:50am (22d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Aug 30, 2026 5:38am (22d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
TD Twelve Data statement HEX SEC filing
Industry comparison last run: Aug 30, 2026 5:35am
P/E · trailing (TTM) (Price per dollar of earnings over the past year — not a run-rate or forward P/E)
HEX
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
27.14
Stock Price: $407.88
EPS (Diluted): 15.03
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
HEX
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
6.85
Stock Price: $407.88
Total Equity: $4.23B
Shares: 71,058,000
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
HEX
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
15.16
Market Cap: $26.78B
Total Debt: $10.00B
Cash: $2.41B
EBITDA: $2.39B
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
HEX
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$36.2B
Market Cap: $26.78B
Total Debt: $10.00B
Cash: $2.41B
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
HEX
Gross Profit / Revenue
Gross Profit: N/A
Revenue: $4.53B
Missing from API: Gross Profit
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
HEX
Operating Income / Revenue
44.0%
Operating Income: $1.99B
Revenue: $4.53B
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
HEX
Net Income / Revenue
23.6%
Net Income: $1.07B
Revenue: $4.53B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
HEX
Net Income / Total Equity
25.3%
Net Income: $1.07B
Total Equity: $4.23B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
HEX
NOPAT / Invested Capital
11.7%
Operating Income: $1.99B
Tax Rate: 30.5%
Equity: $4.23B
Total Debt: $10.00B
Cash: $2.41B
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
HEX
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
0.98
Current Assets: $13.96B
Current Liabilities: $14.30B
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
HEX
Total Debt / Total Equity
2.37
Short-Term Debt: $3.35B
Long-Term Debt: $6.66B
Total Debt: $10.00B
Total Equity: $4.23B
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
HEX
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$63.73
Revenue: $4.53B
Shares: 71,058,000
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
HEX
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
$59.51
Total Equity: $4.23B
Shares: 71,058,000
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
HEX
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$18.28
Operating CF: $1.50B
CapEx: -$200.76M
Shares: 71,058,000
CapEx is negative (outflow) — added to OCF to get FCF
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
TD
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
Last Dividend: $0.00
Stock Price: $407.88
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
HEX
Dividends Paid / Net Income
Dividends Paid: N/A
Net Income: $1.07B
Dividends paid not available in cash flow statement
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Aug 30, 2026 5:35am
Compares CPAY against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 30, 2026 5:38am (22d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue $2.8B $3.4B $3.8B $4.0B $4.5B
Cost of Revenue
Gross Profit
Operating Expenses $485.8M $584.1M $603.4M $616.9M $733.0M
Operating Income $1.2B $1.4B $1.7B $1.8B $2.0B
Net Income $839.5M $954.3M $981.9M $1.0B $1.1B
EBITDA $1.5B $1.8B $2.0B $2.1B $2.4B
EPS $10.23 $12.62 $13.42 $14.27 $15.23
EPS (Diluted) $9.99 $12.42 $13.20 $13.97 $15.03
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 30, 2026 5:30am (22d ago)
Metric 2023 2023 2024 2024 2025
Cash & Equivalents $1.4B $1.6B $2.4B
Total Current Assets $7.3B $7.1B $8.7B $14.0B
Total Assets $15.7B $15.5B $18.0B $26.4B
Current Liabilities $7.1B $6.8B $8.7B $14.3B
Long-Term Debt $4.6B $5.2B $6.7B
Total Liabilities $12.2B $14.8B $22.2B
Total Equity $3.3B $3.1B $4.2B
Retained Earnings $7.9B $8.2B $9.2B $10.3B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 30, 2026 5:50am (22d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Operating Cash Flow $1.2B $754.8M $2.1B $1.9B $1.5B
Capital Expenditure -$111.5M -$151.4M -$153.8M -$175.2M -$200.8M
Free Cash Flow $1.1B $603.4M $1.9B $1.8B $1.3B
Acquisitions (net) -$602.1M -$216.9M -$428.3M -$821.9M $1.9B
Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) $1.9B $3.0B $0 $825.0M $1.7B
Dividends Paid
Stock Buybacks -$1.4B -$1.4B -$686.9M -$1.3B -$782.8M
Net Change in Cash $774.1M $38.5M $852.4M $1.3B $4.5B
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Aug 30, 2026 5:38am (22d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue Growth +20.9% +9.6% +5.8% +13.9%
Gross Profit Growth
Operating Income Growth +16.4% +14.5% +7.9% +11.6%
Net Income Growth +13.7% +2.9% +2.2% +6.6%
EBITDA Growth +15.9% +12.7% +7.3% +11.7%
0Company Classification 1Industry Landscape 2Company Momentum 3Forward Projection 4aDCF Valuation 4bEarnings Power Value 4cAnchored PE 4dReverse DCF 4eRevenue-Based DCF 4fAnchored P/S 4gScenario Analysis 4hDividend Discount Model 4iBook Value Analysis 4jInsider Activity 4fCash Flow Quality 4gDebt Maturity Risk 4hMacro Environment 4iSector Intelligence 4jRevenue Confidence 4kSensitivity Analysis 4lSector Demand Cycle 5AI Investigation 5bThesis Evaluation 6Valuation Synthesis
computed not applicable 18 computed · 6 not applicable
Risk : Reward — upside vs downside from this company's own quarters
Computed 2026-09-18 02:42
-0.3 : 1 +1σ upside vs −1σ downside, from this company's own quarterly history
A +1σ run of quarters pays -15%; a −1σ run costs 55%. Ratio -0.3:1 (μ 16.2%, σ 7.5% , 16 pairs).
Older method (repeat-worst-quarter): 0.3 : 1
CaseGrowthMarginFair valuevs price ($407.88)
Bull — recovery +31% 26.1% $453.09 +11%
Base — stabilizes +21% 22.7% $296.52 -27%
Bear — keeps slipping +10% 19.3% $187.94 -54%
Stress — last quarter repeats +14% 22.3% $238.60 -42%
Upside — a +1σ run of quarters (v2) +24% 24.4% $347.28 -15%
Stress — a −1σ run of quarters (v2) +9% 19.8% $183.31 -55%
The next quarters keep the trajectory of the worst recent matched quarter (ending 2025-09-30) — growth stays at 13.9% and margins bend by the same profit-vs-revenue ratio (×0.98). Stress is a trajectory, not a prediction — it answers "what if the ship's current heading simply continues," which history says is the case to respect.
Why this is appearing: this company files quarterly, so its recent trajectory could be measured rather than assumed — the engine matched Jun 2026, Mar 2026 against the same quarters one year earlier and found revenue +23.4% · operating income +22.3% · net income +13.5% year-over-year. That measured heading is what the stress case extends forward. Of those, the stress case extends the worst matched quarter — the one ending Sep 30, 2025 (revenue +13.9%, operating income +11.8% YoY) — not the average. Data measured through Jun 30, 2026 — this card recalculates automatically when the next quarterly filing is ingested. Companies without quarterly filings (many foreign listings) never show this card: with no measured trajectory, there is nothing honest to repeat.
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for CPAY — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
Growth Outlook
Analyzed 2026-08-30 05:58

The question every valuation on this page silently assumes: is this company likely to grow? Judged forward — the business, its category, the world — against what's already printed.

Growing Corpay is compounding low-double-digit top line — mid-to-high single-digit organic plus a steady bolt-on M&A engine (Alpha, AvidXchange, cross-border) — with the reported +23% YoY flattered by acquisitions and net income lagging on funding and dilution. conf 7/10
Share gain Category growing · Category (Software - Infrastructure / corporate payments) is compounding ~10-12% with margins expanding industry-wide; Corpay's 13.9% trailing YoY sits ~3.6pp ahead of the 10.4% industry rate, and the matched-quarter +23.4% is further ahead — though a meaningful part of that lead is purchased, not won.
Next 2 quarters
Growing
Acquired revenue is still in the comparison base and the organic payments legs are growing; the two prints should show double-digit reported revenue growth with operating income roughly tracking, while net income continues to lag on interest and integration.
≈ inline with expectations
Year 1
Growing
Full-year reported growth stays low-double-digit to high-teens as the deal contribution annualizes, but the exit rate steps down toward organic high-single-digits as acquisitions lap. Margin expansion resumes once integration costs roll off, so EPS should grow faster than the underlying organic top line.
≈ inline with expectations
Years 2–3
Growing
Structural earnings power grows: mission-critical AP/virtual-card/FX workflows with high switching cost compound mid-to-high single digits organically, operating leverage adds a few points to EPS, and buyback plus continued bolt-ons layer on top. The vehicle/fuel leg is a drag, not a solvent — it dilutes blended growth without reversing it.
↑ above expectations
The creme: each rung's call measured against what's already printed (vs analyst estimates · vs guidance / FY consensus · vs price-implied growth) — expectations in print are already in the price, so only the variant margin can pay. Hover a rung's chip for the margin read.
Growth drivers
61 Acquisition engine converting to revenue — The step from ~13.9% trailing YoY to +23.4% matched-quarter revenue is too large to be organic given a 9.8% multi-year CAGR and 4.1% volatility; it reflects consolidated cross-border/AP acquisitions. That inorganic layer is contracted and mechanically carries into the next several prints before lapping.
51 Corporate payments digitization in fragmented spend pools — AP automation, virtual cards and cross-border FX for mid-market corporates remain under-penetrated versus check/wire baselines. These are mission-critical, embedded-in-ERP workflows with high switching cost, which underwrites recurring volume growth independent of any single macro quarter.
44 Share gain inside a healthy category — Recent YoY 13.9% versus industry 10.4% is a +3.6pp gap, with industry operating margins expanding +3.6pp over three years. Corpay is growing faster than its own category rather than merely riding it.
34 Operating leverage on a fixed processing base — Operating income +22.3% roughly tracked revenue +23.4% even while absorbing deal integration — the platform absorbs added volume without proportional cost, which supports EPS growth exceeding revenue growth once deal costs anniversary.
Growth risks
60 Underlying organic deceleration — Quarterly trend is flagged decelerating and the multi-year earnings CAGR is only 4.4% against a 9.8% revenue CAGR. Strip acquisitions and the core is likely high-single-digit, meaning the headline growth rate steps down materially when the deal contribution laps.
50 Cash conversion deterioration — FCF CAGR of -18% against positive revenue and earnings growth is the single ugliest number in the file — working capital in payments float/receivables, integration cash costs and interest are consuming the earnings. Acquisition-funded growth is only durable if it self-funds.
40 Net income lagging the top line — Net income +13.5% versus revenue +23.4% signals interest expense on deal leverage and minority/JV structures diluting the flow-through. EPS growth can undershoot revenue growth for several more quarters.
28 Vehicle/fuel segment secular drag — The legacy fuel-card business carries fuel-price and spread sensitivity plus a slow EV-transition erosion of per-transaction economics. It is the slowest-growing leg and dilutes blended growth even as payments segments compound.
21 Macro headwinds on SMB spend — 10y at 4.67% with a flagged headwind backdrop pressures mid-market customer spend volumes and raises the cost of the debt funding the M&A cadence.
B2B payments is in the middle innings of a decades-long migration from checks, wires and manual AP to embedded card and virtual-account rails; the demand signal is steady rather than cyclical, which favors incumbents with distribution and ERP integration over point solutions. The competitive threat is real but mis-specified in the bear case: Stripe and network verticals attack consumer-adjacent and enterprise-API flows, while Corpay's defensibility sits in unglamorous mid-market workflow lock-in and FX hedging relationships. The genuine structural questions are whether the vehicle/fuel leg erodes faster than payments compounds, and whether serial M&A keeps producing accretive assets at reasonable cost with rates near 4.7%.
Growth position composite +3
ShrinkingStallingHoldingGrowingAccelerating
70Next 2 quarters · Growing
70Year 1 · Growing
70Years 2–3 · Growing
+3Composite (−100…+100)
A research prediction, not advice. Forward-graded: each rung is scored against the prints that follow it. Not an input to the GEM designation — track record first.
Claude Reading
Independent analyst synthesis · claude-opus-4-7 · generated 2026-08-30 05:49:25
Verdict Fair value with asymmetric downside risk — $408 offers no margin of safety; wait for Q3'26 margin print to confirm Q2 dip was transient, otherwise fair value is $360-380, not $435.

Looking at the raw quarterly tape first: revenue climbed from $1.03B (Q3'24) to $1.34B (Q2'26) — roughly 30% over seven quarters, or ~15% annualized, with sequential acceleration in the last two prints ($1.25B → $1.26B → $1.34B). That's not deceleration, that's re-acceleration. But net income is choppy: $350M in Q1'26 collapsed to $248M in Q2'26 despite revenue *growing* $80M sequentially. Margin compressed from 27.8% to 18.5% in one quarter — that's a 930bp drop on rising revenue, which is either a one-time charge, integration cost, or something uglier. TTM NI is roughly $1.14B; at $26.78B market cap that's ~23.5x earnings, not 27x. EV including $10B debt net of $2.4B cash gets you ~$34.4B EV, ~17x TTM EBIT of ~$2B. Not cheap for 10% revenue CAGR and mid-single-digit earnings CAGR, not egregious either.

The prior models are internally inconsistent and I want to flag it. Pre-flight calls it "decelerating growth and margin compression" — the recent-YoY revenue is +13.9% and the sequential Q2'26 print accelerated, so "decelerating" is stale framing from the annual lens. Market Forces goes nuclear ("destroying shareholder value... aggressive accounting... growth-at-any-cost") which is wildly inconsistent with FCF Quality flagged as "Strong" in the same output block and with $1.30B FCF on $4.53B revenue (28.7% FCF margin — elite). You can't have "aggressive accounting masking weakness" and "strong cash flow quality" simultaneously; one of these signals is garbage. I'd trust the cash number. However, fcf_cagr of -18.3% is real and matters — FCF has deteriorated from prior peaks even as reported earnings held up, which suggests working capital absorption from float/receivables in the payments book, or acquisition-related cash drag. That deserves scrutiny before dismissing the Market Forces alarm entirely.

The contrarian case worth taking seriously: debt/equity of 2.37, $10B gross debt against $4.23B equity and ~$2B operating income means interest coverage is likely 4-5x — adequate but not comfortable in a higher-for-longer rate regime. ROA of 4.05% versus ROE of 25.3% is pure leverage arithmetic; strip the leverage and this is a mid-teens returns business trading at 6.85x book. The insider tape on 8/18/2026 is textbook option-exercise-and-sell (matched share counts: 9,600 exercised → 9,600 sold; 2,463 → 2,463) — mechanical, not a signal. But zero open-market buying across the window is its own tell for a "steady compounder" narrative — insiders aren't accumulating at $408 either. Bear case for real: if the Q2'26 margin compression is structural (competition from Stripe verticals eating vehicle/fleet, FX spreads compressing), then 18.5% net margin is the new baseline and forward EPS is closer to $14-15, putting fair PE-25x value at $350-375, not $445.

I partially dissent from the synthesis "fair value $435" verdict — the composite feels anchored to a DCF that likely assumes margin normalization back to 24-26%, which the Q2'26 print calls into question. The narrative layer nailed it: this is a boring compounder where the absence of story is the story, and that caps multiple expansion. My read: at $408 you're paying ~18x forward EBIT for 10-12% revenue growth, mid-single-digit earnings growth, elite FCF conversion (when it shows up), and meaningful balance sheet leverage. That's fair, maybe modestly cheap if the margin dip reverses next quarter, modestly expensive if it doesn't. The synthesis's +6.8% upside is within noise. I wouldn't chase here; I'd want either (a) Q3'26 margin recovery back above 22% confirming Q2 was one-time, or (b) a pullback to $360-370 which would compress the multiple to a genuine margin of safety. The FCF trajectory is the key thing to watch — if -18.3% CAGR persists another year, the whole compounder thesis breaks.

GPT Reading
Independent reading · gpt-5.4 · generated 2026-08-30 05:49:39
Verdict Fairly valued around $408 — excellent business, but the combination of 27x earnings, margin wobble, and $7.6B net debt caps upside; I’d need sub-$380 for a clear bargain or proof of margin re-acceleration for $450+.

What jumps out first is that Corpay is still executing like a high-quality compounder operationally, but the stock is no bargain because the market already pays for most of that quality. Revenue has stepped up from $3.97B in 2024 to $4.53B in 2025, a solid 14% annual increase, and the quarterly run-rate has kept improving into 2026: $1.26B in Q1 and $1.34B in Q2 versus $1.01B and $1.10B in the comparable 2025 quarters. That is 24.8% and 21.8% year-over-year growth in the first half, stronger than the “mature earner” label suggests. Operating profit also expanded from $1.79B to $1.99B in 2025, keeping operating margin at an elite 44.0%. This is not a business masking weak economics with top-line growth; it is a genuinely high-margin payments/software hybrid with real scale advantages and good conversion of earnings into cash.

But the part that keeps me from calling it clearly undervalued is that the earnings quality is good, not pristine, and the valuation is not cheap enough to forgive that. Net income growth has lagged revenue growth: from $1.00B in 2024 to $1.07B in 2025, only 7%, and the quarterly margin trend in 2026 is wobblier than the revenue trend. Net margin was 25.8% in Q2 2025 and fell to 18.5% in Q2 2026; even if Q1 2026 was unusually strong at 27.8%, the two-quarter picture says revenue acceleration is not dropping through cleanly to the bottom line. At $26.8B market cap and 27.1x earnings, 6.4x sales, and 15.2x EV/EBITDA, the stock is priced for continued low-double-digit earnings compounding and stable margins. That is plausible, but not obviously conservative when free cash flow was $1.30B in 2025 against $10.0B of debt and only $2.41B of cash. Net debt of roughly $7.6B is manageable for this margin structure, yet it meaningfully reduces room for error if rates stay high or acquisition integration disappoints.

The raw cash numbers are supportive but also expose the limit of the bull case. Operating cash flow of $1.50B and free cash flow of $1.30B are strong in absolute terms, implying about a 4.9% FCF yield on market cap, respectable but hardly distressed. Return metrics are good where they should be good—25.3% ROE and 11.7% ROIC—but the balance sheet is doing some of that work, with debt/equity at 2.37x and a current ratio just under 1.0. For a stable payments platform, that leverage is acceptable; for a 27x earnings stock, it matters. I read Corpay as a very good business trading around fair value, maybe a touch rich if one assumes 2026 margin pressure is structural rather than temporary. The numbers support a stock somewhere around the high $300s to low $400s, not a big rerating vehicle from here.

The best counterargument is straightforward: the market may still be underestimating how much growth is left. If you annualize the first half of 2026, Corpay is tracking near $5.2B in revenue, which would be roughly 15% above 2025 even before considering any seasonal strength. A company growing 15%-plus with 44% operating margins, $1B-plus annual net income, and sticky B2B payment flows often deserves a premium multiple. On that framing, 15x EV/EBITDA is not demanding, especially if acquisitions and cross-sell in AP, travel, and FX keep organic growth elevated. I also would not lean too heavily on the insider sales; most of the disclosed activity looks like option exercise-related disposals rather than discretionary open-market dumping. If margins normalize back toward the 23%-26% quarterly net margin range seen through most of 2025, the current multiple could look undemanding.

What would change my mind is fairly specific. If the next two quarters show revenue still above 15% year-over-year while net margin recovers back above 23% and free cash flow tracks toward $1.5B-$1.6B annualized, then today’s price would look too low and I would move bullish, with upside into the mid-$400s justified. On the other hand, if revenue growth slips back toward high single digits while quarterly net income stays stuck near the Q2 2026 level of 18%-19% margin, then 27x earnings is too full and I would want the stock closer to $340-$360 to compensate for leverage and maturing growth.

Grok Reading
Independent reading · grok-4.5 · generated 2026-08-30 05:50:19
Verdict Fairly valued near $408; quality franchise but 27× PE and 15× EV/EBITDA already price the story with FCF declining and $10B debt overhang—upside capped near mid-$430s unless margins and cash conversion re-accelerate.

The numbers describe a high-quality payments franchise that is still compounding revenue but is no longer compounding free cash the way a mature earner should. Annual revenue climbed from $2.83B in 2021 to $4.53B in 2025, a 9.8% CAGR, and the last two reported quarters ($1.26B then $1.34B) imply recent YoY revenue growth near 14%—faster than the multi-year trend. Operating margin sits at a formidable 44% and net margin around 24% on the annual print, with $1.50B of operating cash and $1.30B of FCF against only $201M of capex. That is the attractive core: sticky B2B spend infrastructure throwing off real cash at scale. What stands out against that surface strength is the disconnect between revenue and cash earnings power. Earnings CAGR is only 4.4%, FCF CAGR is −18.3%, and the June 2026 quarter delivered $248M of net income on $1.34B of revenue—an 18.5% net margin that is a sharp step-down from the mid-20s that dominated the prior seven quarters (including 27.8% in the immediately preceding quarter). ROIC of 11.7% and ROA of 4.0% are mediocre once you notice $10.0B of total debt against $4.23B of equity and a current ratio of 0.98; net leverage is roughly 5–6× FCF. At $407.88 the stock screens at 27× earnings, 6.4× sales and 15× EV/EBITDA—full for a business whose cash generation is deteriorating even as top-line growth remains respectable.

I read this as a competent, slightly boring compounder that the market has correctly refused to award a growth multiple. The pre-flight and narrative layers call it a steady-compounder with minimal cult energy trading a few percent below composite fair value near $435–445; that math is plausible on trailing margins and a mid-teens growth fade, but it underweights the FCF slope and the balance-sheet load. A 27× PE on 4–7% earnings growth with negative FCF CAGR and refinancing risk on $10B of debt is not a bargain—it is a fair-to-full price for quality that is no longer expanding economic profit. Insider activity on the latest tape is almost entirely option exercise followed by sale, which is not catastrophic but fits a picture of management not leaning into undervaluation. Sector leadership and good revenue confidence keep a floor under the name; they do not justify re-rating from here unless margins and FCF re-accelerate.

The strongest case against this caution is straightforward and quantitative. Trailing operating margin of 44% and net margin of 23.6% remain elite for infrastructure software; ROE of 25% shows equity holders are still earning well despite leverage; recent revenue YoY of 13.9% beats the 9.8% CAGR, so the growth engine has not stalled; and the valuation synthesis’s own composite ($435–445) implies roughly 7% upside from $407.88 with methods only “mixed,” not broken. A bull can also argue the June margin dip is noise—seasonality, FX, or a one-time item—while the secular B2B digitization TAM and high switching costs support mid-teens EV/EBITDA indefinitely. I weigh that less heavily because FCF is the binding constraint for a levered mature earner: a −18% FCF CAGR, interest-coverage flags already raised by the models, and a sub-1.0 current ratio mean the quality of those 44% operating margins is not fully converting to unlevered owner earnings. Paying 27× for decelerating cash conversion is the wrong side of the trade even if revenue stays double-digit for a few more quarters.

I would flip toward a clear undervalued call if the next two quarters restore net margins above 23% and FCF converts back above ~90% of net income while net debt/FCF trends down through $5B, or if management guides organic revenue sustainably above 12% with stable unit economics. I would flip decisively overvalued on another quarter of sub-20% net margin, FCF below $250M, or any refinance that pushes interest expense enough to cut EPS mid-teens without offsetting growth.

Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Each AI above independently stated a direction (undervalued, fairly valued, or overvalued) and how strongly it believes it (conviction, 0–5). We combine those into a Bull-Bear Index on a 0–10 scale: 5 is neutral, 10 is maximum bullish (undervalued at full conviction), 0 is maximum bearish. We compute the score ourselves with the same arithmetic for every seat — the models never grade their own bullishness — so the three are directly comparable. Δ shows how far each seat sits from the panel average of 5.0; a large Δ marks the dissenting voice, usually the one worth reading.
Claude claude-opus-4-7 5.0
fairly valued · conviction 3/5 · Δ +0.0 vs panel · self: 5.0
GPT gpt-5.4 5.0
fairly valued · conviction 4/5 · Δ +0.0 vs panel · self: 5.0
Grok grok-4.5 5.0
fairly valued · conviction 3/5 · Δ +0.0 vs panel · self: 5.0
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
Separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-08-30 06:01:12
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Quality - wait for a dip 7/10
Corpay is a genuinely good payments compounder trading right on top of fair value - a hold-quality name at a hold-quality price, not an opportunity.
The cruxWhether Q3/Q4 confirms the margin wobble was transient or the start of a real deceleration - that single print decides if $408 is fair or expensive.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from CPAY's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwaySelf-Funding
DilutionShare Count Shrinking
Earnings QualityGood Earnings Quality
The four lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
+34
Strong
edge √Σ 118 · risk √Σ 83 · conf 7/10

Corpay is a mature, high-margin payments/software business: revenue has compounded from $2.83B (2021) to $4.53B (2025) - roughly 12% CAGR - while operating margin held in a tight 42-45% band and net income grew from $840M to $1.07B. FCF is consistently strong at $1.30B in 2025 with OCF/NI of 1.54x, indicating reported earnings convert to cash cleanly. Diluted share count has fallen from 84.1M to 71.1M (-4.1% CAGR) and buybacks are 1,028% of SBC (SBC only 2.3% of revenue), so per-share value is being concentrated rather than diluted - a genuine mark of capital discipline. The clear soft spot is the balance sheet: net debt of roughly $7.6B against $2.4B liquid cash, with $3.35B of short-term debt exceeding cash on hand. That drives the Altman Z of 1.67 into the 'distress' zone, though the model is poorly calibrated for asset-light, fee-based financial platforms - the $1.3B annual FCF makes covering and refinancing the near-term stack very manageable in normal credit markets, but not costless. Insider behavior is a yellow flag rather than red: 15 sells and 0 buys over 12 months ($45.7M), with recent Alan King activity being option-exercise-and-sell (mechanical), while CEO Clarke received a 100K share award. Nothing screams distress, but there are no conviction buys either.

Strengths 3
m78
Consistent high-margin cash engine
Operating margin 42-45% across five years and FCF of $1.09B/$0.60B/$1.95B/$1.77B/$1.30B - a durable, cash-rich business model with OCF/NI of 1.54x in 2025.
m70
Real per-share value concentration
Diluted shares down from 84.1M to 71.1M (-15% over four years); buybacks 1,028% of SBC with SBC only 2.3% of revenue - genuinely shareholder-friendly capital allocation.
m55
Steady top-line compounding
Revenue grew from $2.83B to $4.53B (2021-2025), ~12% CAGR, with net income rising to $1.07B - evidence of a mature earner with real growth still attached.
Concerns 4
m62
Leverage and near-term refinancing exposure
Net debt of ~$7.6B; short-term debt of $3.35B exceeds liquid cash of $2.41B. Manageable given $1.3B FCF, but constrains flexibility and raises sensitivity to credit conditions.
m40
Altman Z in distress band
Z-score of 1.67 flags balance-sheet stress; model is less reliable for asset-light fintech but still signals the capital structure is aggressive relative to book assets.
m30
One-sided insider tape
15 sells / 0 open-market buys totaling $45.7M in 12 months; most recent King activity is option-exercise-and-sell (mechanical), but the absence of any conviction buying is notable.
m25
FCF volatility year to year
FCF swung from $603M (2022) to $1.95B (2023) to $1.30B (2025), suggesting working-capital/float timing effects deserve scrutiny even though multi-year conversion looks strong.
This is a genuinely good business - the kind of high-margin, cash-spinning payments platform that quietly compounds. Margins are stable in the mid-40s, FCF is real (OCF/NI above 1x), and management is actually shrinking the share count rather than papering over dilution. What keeps me from calling it a fortress is the balance sheet: they run with real leverage, short-term debt tops the cash pile, and the Altman Z sits in distress territory. In benign credit conditions that's a feature (juicing returns); in a squeeze it's a constraint. Insider tape is mildly negative but mostly mechanical. Net: a Strong business with a leveraged capital structure - not a Fortress, and not close to Shaky.
Verify before trusting this (6)
  • Debt maturity schedule and covenants on the $3.35B short-term stack
  • Composition of customer float vs corporate cash within the $2.41B liquid balance
  • Recent M&A activity that may explain 2022 FCF dip and current leverage
  • Segment mix (Vehicle/Corporate Payments/Lodging) and any customer concentration
  • Whether recent insider sells are 10b5-1 scheduled or discretionary
  • Organic vs acquired revenue growth to gauge underlying business momentum
Valuation / Mispricing
-17
Fairly Valued
edge √Σ 52 · risk √Σ 70 · conf 7/10
Price $408 vs deserved ~$435-445, roughly 7-9% upside - inside the error bars, call it fair. attractive below $355.00

The e2e synthesis lands at a composite FV of $445 and signal-adjusted $435 against a $408 price - a 7% upside that is well inside noise for a levered payments compounder. The anchored-PE method ($444) is the cleanest anchor and essentially agrees with the composite; the DCF at $622 looks like a runaway terminal-value output I would not lean on, and the EPV floor of $91 is a reminder that if growth truly stalled the downside is not trivial. Averaging the credible signals, deserved value sits in the low-to-mid $400s, right where the stock trades. What is priced in: continued mid-single-digit organic growth, stable mid-40s margins, ongoing buybacks, and successful bolt-on M&A. That is a reasonable base case for this business, not a heroic one - but it is also not being handed to you at a discount. For a Strong (not Fortress) business carrying real leverage, a 7% notional upside is not a margin of safety.

Cheap signals 3
m35
Modest discount to composite FV
At $408 the stock sits about 7% below the $435 signal-adjusted FV and 9% below the $445 composite - a small cushion, not a real margin of safety.
m30
Anchored-PE supports current zone
The $444 anchored-PE output implies the market multiple is close to historical norms for this earnings stream; no obvious multiple compression baked in.
m25
Buybacks provide a per-share tailwind
Genuine share-count shrinkage supports EPS compounding even at modest revenue growth, which helps close the small gap to FV over time.
Rich / priced-in 3
m40
DCF of $622 is not credible standalone
A DCF that prints 50%+ above price on a mature payments business is likely leaning on generous terminal assumptions; discount it heavily rather than treat it as upside.
m45
EPV floor of $91 flags fragility if growth stalls
The gap between $408 price and a $91 no-growth EPV means ~78% of the equity value is growth-and-M&A dependent - fine while it works, but leaves little cushion.
m35
Leverage limits the deserved multiple
Real balance-sheet leverage with short-term debt above cash argues against paying a fortress-quality multiple; deserved value should sit at, not above, the composite.
This is fairly valued and I am comfortable saying so. A 7% notional upside on a levered compounder with an EPV floor near $91 is not a setup that pays me for the risk. The business deserves to trade here; the market has done its job. I would want it in the mid-$350s before it is genuinely interesting on price alone - a ~15% pullback that would give me a real cushion against the leverage and any growth wobble. Until then, it is a hold-quality name at a hold-quality price.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Organic revenue growth ex-M&A and ex-FX in the next print
  • Take-rate trends in Vehicle and Corporate Payments segments
  • Net leverage trajectory and any refinancing at higher rates
  • M&A cadence and multiples paid on recent bolt-ons
  • Any change to buyback pace vs deleveraging priority
General Sentiment
-5
Balanced
tail √Σ 37 · head √Σ 43 · conf 6/10

Corpay sits in a rare spot: the market has essentially no story on it. Narrative intensity is minimal, cult factor is low, and the archetype is 'steady compounder' - meaning there is no euphoric bid to fade and no collapsing thesis to punish. With beta 0.87 and a boring fintech-infrastructure profile, the risk-on tape (+35) offers only a mild lift, and the macro headwind from 4.67% 10y / 25.9 market PE is similarly muted here versus higher-multiple software peers.

Tailwinds 2
m30
Mildly supportive news flow
CFO reiterating growth momentum into H2 and a 4.5% post-Q2 gain give a small positive drift, but at minimal narrative intensity it does not compound into a real bid.
m22
Risk-on tape, low-beta name
The +35 risk-on regime is a light tailwind, but with beta 0.87 and no story to lever, CPAY captures only a fraction of the market's animal spirits.
Headwinds 3
m28
No narrative to lift the multiple
'The story is no story' - in a tape that rewards AI and growth narratives, a boring payments utility gets ignored and drifts, which is why it trades slightly below DCF.
m25
Macro rate / multiple pressure
4.67% 10y and stretched market PE weigh on all equities; for a mid-multiple fintech with weakening cash generation flagged in momentum, it is a modest but real crosswind.
m20
Momentum quietly fading
3-year deceleration of 2.5pp and softening cash generation give bears a slow-drip talking point, even if it has not become a narrative yet.
This is as close to a neutral sentiment read as I write. There is no active narrative pressing on CPAY in either direction - no mania to fade, no thesis breaking. The tape is mildly friendly and news flow is mildly positive, but a low-beta boring name in a market chasing stories gets no lift from either. Net: essentially balanced, with a very faint negative tilt because 'boring' does not win in a stretched-multiple, high-rate environment. The stock will move on fundamentals, not sentiment.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Whether any bolt-on M&A or Corporate Payments segment print sparks an actual narrative upgrade
  • Signs of Stripe or Mastercard vertical encroachment that could seed a bear story
  • Analyst target revision cadence post-Q2 - divergence would matter more than absolute tone
  • 10y yield behavior - a break below 4.25% would meaningfully lift low-narrative compounders
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
Growth Outlook
+3
Growing
edge √Σ 97 · risk √Σ 94 · conf 7/10

B2B payments is in the middle innings of a decades-long migration from checks, wires and manual AP to embedded card and virtual-account rails; the demand signal is steady rather than cyclical, which favors incumbents with distribution and ERP integration over point solutions. The competitive threat is real but mis-specified in the bear case: Stripe and network verticals attack consumer-adjacent and enterprise-API flows, while Corpay's defensibility sits in unglamorous mid-market workflow lock-in and FX hedging relationships. The genuine structural questions are whether the vehicle/fuel leg erodes faster than payments compounds, and whether serial M&A keeps producing accretive assets at reasonable cost with rates near 4.7%.

Growth drivers 4
m61
Acquisition engine converting to revenue
The step from ~13.9% trailing YoY to +23.4% matched-quarter revenue is too large to be organic given a 9.8% multi-year CAGR and 4.1% volatility; it reflects consolidated cross-border/AP acquisitions. That inorganic layer is contracted and mechanically carries into the next several prints before lapping.
m51
Corporate payments digitization in fragmented spend pools
AP automation, virtual cards and cross-border FX for mid-market corporates remain under-penetrated versus check/wire baselines. These are mission-critical, embedded-in-ERP workflows with high switching cost, which underwrites recurring volume growth independent of any single macro quarter.
m44
Share gain inside a healthy category
Recent YoY 13.9% versus industry 10.4% is a +3.6pp gap, with industry operating margins expanding +3.6pp over three years. Corpay is growing faster than its own category rather than merely riding it.
m34
Operating leverage on a fixed processing base
Operating income +22.3% roughly tracked revenue +23.4% even while absorbing deal integration — the platform absorbs added volume without proportional cost, which supports EPS growth exceeding revenue growth once deal costs anniversary.
Growth risks 5
m60
Underlying organic deceleration
Quarterly trend is flagged decelerating and the multi-year earnings CAGR is only 4.4% against a 9.8% revenue CAGR. Strip acquisitions and the core is likely high-single-digit, meaning the headline growth rate steps down materially when the deal contribution laps.
m50
Cash conversion deterioration
FCF CAGR of -18% against positive revenue and earnings growth is the single ugliest number in the file — working capital in payments float/receivables, integration cash costs and interest are consuming the earnings. Acquisition-funded growth is only durable if it self-funds.
m40
Net income lagging the top line
Net income +13.5% versus revenue +23.4% signals interest expense on deal leverage and minority/JV structures diluting the flow-through. EPS growth can undershoot revenue growth for several more quarters.
m28
Vehicle/fuel segment secular drag
The legacy fuel-card business carries fuel-price and spread sensitivity plus a slow EV-transition erosion of per-transaction economics. It is the slowest-growing leg and dilutes blended growth even as payments segments compound.
m21
Macro headwinds on SMB spend
10y at 4.67% with a flagged headwind backdrop pressures mid-market customer spend volumes and raises the cost of the debt funding the M&A cadence.
vs expectations: ~6m inline · 1y inline · 2-3y above
The forward growth verdict — is the business itself likely to grow (next 2 quarters / year 1 / years 2–3), judged against its category and against printed expectations. The full horizon ladder + creme renders on the Growth Outlook card above. Not a call on the price (Valuation owns that) or the tape (Sentiment owns that).
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure), and Growth Outlook (the forward growth verdict). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Price Prediction
Higher +9.1% v0.6.0 View full prediction →

When we made this prediction on Aug 30, 2026, CPAY was $407.88. We expect it to be $445.00 by Mar 2027, and we consider it great value under $355.00. This is an early model (v0.6.0) — the direction is more reliable than the exact price. Made Aug 30, 2026.

Price when predicted$407.88
Our estimate for Mar 2027$445.00+9.1%
Great value below$355.00
Price history shown (6 Months)

Blue is our prediction, starting the day we made it. Grey is a slower route to the same place — the same destination, taking longer. Black is the actual price, so you can see how we are doing.

Post-Report Due Diligence NOTES
The report is written. This is what its valuation stands on.
Analyzed Sep 18, 2026 · 02:42 3d ago
Read epv-floor ext-gem-composite anchored-pe · FY income statement, balance sheet
1 finding · $0, re-derived on each view

Evidence for a closer look, not a verdict — no score or designation on this page has been changed by it. Items marked material are ones where a conclusion above moves to the other side of the price.

anchored-pe — the "fair value above price" reading turns on 2 inputs NOTE found by sensitivity, not by rule
Published $445.94 vs price $407.88. Nudging `trailing_eps` (down 10%), `adjusted_pe` (down 10%) moves the fair value to the other side of the price. This does not say those inputs are wrong — it says they are where to look first.
trailing_eps flips down 10% adjusted_pe flips down 10%
Price at analysis $407.88. This is where an investigation should start — it is not where one ends. Nothing here was checked against the filings, the tape, or the news; that is the investigator's job.
Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for CPAY. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
v1.1.647 · fdb9d9c9 · 2026-09-21 02:01:21