Homepage
AGING Analysis Report
Jun 16, 2026
11 days ago · 96% complete · +8 refreshed

Amkor Technology, Inc.

AMKR NASDAQ Categories PDF
Technology · Semiconductors
Tempe, AZ 85284, United States IPO 1998 amkor.com Updated Jun 16, 3:00am
Price
$85.44
Market Cap
$21.2B
Employees
28,300
Beta
2.26
Avg Volume
4,664,787
CEO
Kevin K. Engel
Business Description

Amkor Technology, Inc. operates internationally, delivering external semiconductor packaging and testing solutions across North America, Japan, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the broader Asia Pacific region. Their comprehensive, end-to-end offerings encompass a range of processes, including semiconductor wafer bumping, probing, back-grinding, package conceptualization, final packaging, testing, and direct shipment services. The company's product portfolio features flip-chip scale packages, critical for devices like smartphones, tablets, and other portable consumer electronics. They also provide flip-chip stacked chip-scale packages, designed for layering memory atop digital basebands and as application processors in mobile units. Flip-chip ball grid array packages cater to diverse applications in networking, data storage, computing, and general consumer products. Wafer-level CSP packages find use in power management systems, transceivers, sensors, wireless charging technologies, codecs, radar systems, and specialized silicon components. Their wafer-level fan-out packages are integral for integrated circuits, alongside silicon wafer integrated fan-out technology, which offers a thinner alternative to traditional laminate substrates. Additionally, Amkor supplies lead frame packages, commonly employed in electronic devices requiring low to medium pin count analog and mixed-signal functionalities. Substrate-based wirebond packages facilitate the connection of a die to its substrate. Micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) packages involve miniature mechanical and electromechanical components. Furthermore, their advanced system-in-package (SiP) modules are vital for a broad array of applications, including radio frequency and front-end modules, basebands, connectivity solutions, fingerprint sensors, display and touchscreen drivers, various sensors and MEMS, and NAND memory and solid-state drives. The company primarily serves a clientele comprising integrated device manufacturers, fabless semiconductor enterprises, original equipment manufacturers, and contract foundries. Established in 1968, Amkor Technology, Inc. maintains its corporate headquarters in Tempe, Arizona.

Business History
Generated: Jun 16, 2026 3:02am
Price Overview
Last updated: Jun 16, 2026 3:00am (11d ago)
$85.44
+2.66 (+3.21%)
Day Range
$82.61 – $88.64
52-Week Range
$19.79 – $88.64
50-Day MA
$69.33
200-Day MA
$46.85
Volume
6,072,405.00
Analyst Price Targets
Low $65.00
Consensus $76.00
High $90.00
(25 analysts)
Share Structure
Outstanding 247,872,518.00
Float 135,529,257.00
Free Float 54.7%
Normal free float — 54.7% of shares trade freely, ~45.3% held by insiders/institutions
Healthy float typical of established companies. Good liquidity for entering and exiting positions without major price impact.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Jun 16, 2026 3:05am (11d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Jun 16, 2026 3:05am (11d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
API Direct from provider CALC Derived from statements
Industry comparison last run: Jun 16, 2026 3:01am
P/E Ratio (Price per dollar of earnings)
API
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
48.50
Stock Price: $85.44
EPS (Diluted): 1.51
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
API
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
2.18
Stock Price: $85.44
Total Equity: $4.47B
Shares: 248,302,000
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
API
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
17.26
Market Cap: $21.18B
Total Debt: $1.52B
Cash: $1.38B
EBITDA: $1.16B
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
API
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$9.9B
Market Cap: $21.18B
Total Debt: $1.52B
Cash: $1.38B
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
API
Gross Profit / Revenue
14.0%
Gross Profit: $938.60M
Revenue: $6.71B
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
API
Operating Income / Revenue
7.0%
Operating Income: $467.39M
Revenue: $6.71B
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
API
Net Income / Revenue
5.6%
Net Income: $373.90M
Revenue: $6.71B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
API
Net Income / Total Equity
10.0%
Net Income: $373.90M
Total Equity: $4.47B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
API
NOPAT / Invested Capital
6.9%
Operating Income: $467.39M
Tax Rate: 15.4%
Equity: $4.47B
Total Debt: $1.52B
Cash: $1.38B
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
API
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
2.27
Current Assets: $3.88B
Current Liabilities: $1.71B
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
CALC
Total Debt / Total Equity
0.34
Short-Term Debt: $185.57M
Long-Term Debt: $1.33B
Total Debt: $1.52B
Total Equity: $4.47B
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
CALC
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$27.02
Revenue: $6.71B
Shares: 248,302,000
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
CALC
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
$18.01
Total Equity: $4.47B
Shares: 248,302,000
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
CALC
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$0.77
Operating CF: $1.10B
CapEx: -$904.61M
Shares: 248,302,000
CapEx is negative (outflow) — added to OCF to get FCF
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
API
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
0.8%
Last Dividend: N/A
Stock Price: $85.44
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
Dividends Paid / Net Income
Dividends Paid: N/A
Net Income: $373.90M
Dividends paid not available in cash flow statement
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Jun 16, 2026 3:01am
Compares AMKR against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · three lenses
Three separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-06-16 03:11:36
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Pass — revisit in the mid-$50s 8/10
Solid second-tier business (+14 quality) priced for a permanent AI-packaging supercycle (-87 value) — I'm not paying $85 for a $55-at-best OSAT.
The cruxWhether advanced-packaging margins inflect back toward 2021 peaks and stay there — that's the entire bull case, and it's already in the price.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from AMKR's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwaySelf-Funding
DilutionStable Share Count
Earnings QualityHigh Earnings Quality
The three lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
+14
Solid
edge √Σ 118 · risk √Σ 104 · conf 7/10

Amkor is a mature OSAT (outsourced assembly & test) operator with genuinely clean financials: OCF/NI of 2.54x, accruals of -9.1% of assets, Beneish M -2.5 and Altman Z of 5.29 all point to high earnings integrity. The balance sheet is in good shape — $1.99B liquid cash, $474.5M net cash, and diluted shares essentially flat (0.3% CAGR) with SBC running at ~0% of revenue, which is unusual discipline for a tech-classified name and means per-share economics aren't being quietly eroded.

The business-quality concern is the earnings trajectory, not the accounting. Gross margin compressed from 20% (2021) → 18.8% → 14.5% → 14.8% → 14.0% (2025), and operating margin nearly halved from 12.4%/12.7% to ~7%. Net income fell from $765.8M (2022) to $373.9M (2025) on roughly flat revenue (~$6.3–7.1B band), and FCF has whipsawed ($341M → $190M → $520M → $345M → $191M) — symptomatic of heavy, cyclical capex inherent to advanced packaging. That's the OSAT reality: capital-intensive, customer-concentrated, with limited pricing power versus fabs.

Insider tape is neutral-to-slightly-negative: zero open-market buys, 13 sales (~$10.3M), but most named insider activity is routine award/exercise/sale mechanics, not a flight. Net: real business, clean books, durable but not dominant — quality is solid, not elite.

Strengths 3
m78
Elite earnings quality
OCF/NI 2.54x, accruals -9.1% of assets, Beneish M -2.5, Altman Z 5.29. The reported earnings are clearly backed by cash and there are no mechanical red flags.
m70
No dilution, no SBC drag
Diluted shares 245.7M → 248.3M over 5 years (0.3% CAGR), SBC ~0% of revenue. Per-share value is genuinely protected — rare for a tech-classified name.
m55
Net cash balance sheet
$1.99B liquid cash and $474.5M net cash on a capex-heavy business gives real cushion through cycle troughs; self-funding without external capital.
Concerns 4
m72
Structural margin step-down
Gross margin 20% → 14% and operating margin 12.4% → ~7% over 2021–2025. Net income roughly halved ($765.8M → $373.9M) on flat revenue — this is not a one-quarter blip, it's a new baseline.
m55
Lumpy, capex-constrained FCF
FCF swings $191M–$521M with no clear trend on $6–7B revenue. Advanced packaging is capital-intensive and cyclical; 2025 FCF of $191M on $6.71B revenue is a ~2.8% FCF margin — thin.
m45
OSAT structural position
Inferred: Amkor is a service/capacity provider downstream of fabs and design houses, exposed to customer concentration (Apple-tier) and limited pricing power. The margin compression is consistent with that structural weakness.
m25
Insider sales, no buys
13 sells / $10.3M and zero open-market buys in 12 months. Most are routine award-related, but the directional absence of any insider conviction buying is worth noting.
This is a clean, well-run, second-tier-quality industrial. The accounting is genuinely trustworthy — high OCF conversion, negligible SBC, flat share count — and the balance sheet is sturdy. But the business itself has lost a meaningful step: gross margin compressing 600bps and operating margin halving on flat revenue tells me the OSAT model is structurally squeezed, probably by customer pricing power and capex intensity for advanced nodes. It's not a fortress and it's not fragile — it's a solid, honest, capital-intensive cyclical with clean books and disciplined share-count management. Quality grade: Solid, not Strong.
Verify before trusting this (6)
  • Customer concentration in the 10-K — what % of revenue is Apple and top-5 customers, and is the trend rising?
  • Capex outlook for advanced packaging (2.5D/3D, CoWoS-competitive capacity) — is the FCF compression driven by growth capex or maintenance?
  • Segment mix: communications vs. compute vs. automotive — is the GM erosion mix-driven or pricing-driven?
  • Long-term debt structure and maturity ladder beyond the $474.5M net cash figure
  • Arizona facility ramp progress and any CHIPS Act funding terms/conditions
  • Whether margin floor at ~14% GM / 7% OpM has stabilized or is still drifting down in quarterly trend
Valuation / Mispricing
-87
Rich
edge √Σ 32 · risk √Σ 119 · conf 6/10
Price $85.44 vs composite deserved ~$16 (model) / generously ~$55 (bull-adjusted) — no margin of safety on either anchor. attractive below $55.00

The e2e composite fair value of $16.05 (DCF $16.53, EPV floor $15.08) implies an absurd -82% downside vs the $85.44 price. I won't take that literally — a 5x gap usually means the cash-flow methods are anchored on trailing/normalized OSAT margins that have stepped down (gross margin compressed ~600bps, op margin roughly halved) and on a heavy capex profile that suppresses near-term FCF. The market is clearly underwriting a different business: an advanced-packaging beneficiary of AI/chiplet/HBM with structurally higher through-cycle margins and utilization.

Even giving the bull case meaningful credit, deserved value here is hard to push above the $50-65 range without assuming the cycle peak becomes the new baseline. Earnings quality is genuinely high (clean OCF conversion, flat share count, no SBC games), so I don't haircut further — but high quality of a structurally squeezed OSAT doesn't justify paying ~$21B market cap for a business whose own EPV floor sits near $15. The margin of safety isn't just absent; price is leaning hard on a heroic, sustained advanced-packaging supercycle.

Net: this is a Rich print. Not a screaming short — the secular packaging story is real and capacity is tight — but you're paying full freight plus an AI premium on a cyclical, capex-heavy, pricing-pressured OSAT.

Cheap signals 2
m25
Books are clean, balance sheet sturdy
High OCF conversion, negligible SBC, flat share count, fortress-ish balance sheet — supports a higher deserved value than the raw EPV floor, but not 5x higher.
m20
Structural demand tailwind is real
Chiplet/HBM/advanced packaging capacity is genuinely tight; this lifts deserved value above the $16 model anchor toward the $40-55 zone — still below price.
Rich / priced-in 4
m70
Price 5x model fair value
Composite FV $16.05 vs $85.44 = -82% implied downside. Even discounting the DCF as cycle-trough-anchored, the gap is too large to hand-wave away.
m65
Margins have structurally stepped down
Gross margin -600bps and operating margin roughly halved on flat revenue — deserved value should be falling, yet the stock is priced as if margins are about to inflect to a new high.
m55
Priced for an AI-packaging supercycle that must persist
Bull case requires advanced packaging tightness, premium mix, and utilization to compound for years. That's the consensus — meaning it's in the price, not an edge.
m45
Capex-heavy, lumpy FCF — quality of earnings ≠ quality of cash returns
OSATs reinvest aggressively; FCF lumpiness limits the multiple a disciplined buyer should pay, regardless of clean accounting.
I can't get to today's price without assuming the advanced-packaging boom is permanent and margins reinflate to prior peaks. The model says $16, my generous bull-adjusted deserved value tops out around $55, and I'm being asked to pay $85. That's not a setup with edge — that's paying full price plus an AI tax on a cyclical, margin-squeezed OSAT. I'd want it in the mid-$50s before the valuation gets interesting; until then it's a pass, not a short.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Advanced packaging mix as % of revenue and its gross margin vs mainstream OSAT work
  • 2024/2025 capex guidance and resulting FCF trajectory — is reinvestment producing incremental ROIC or just defending share?
  • Customer concentration disclosures (Apple exposure) and pricing terms in long-term agreements
  • Utilization rates and any commentary on advanced packaging capacity adds (Vietnam, Arizona) coming online
  • Through-cycle margin commentary on the call — management's own normalized op margin assumption
General Sentiment
-60
Headwind
tail √Σ 65 · head √Σ 125 · conf 6/10

The macro tape is officially neutral but leans defensive: VIX in the upper half of its yearly range, 10y at 4.47%, and the S&P off its highs. That regime is barely a breeze on a low-beta defensive, but AMKR carries a 2.26 beta in a cyclical semi-cap-adjacent name, so any risk-off twitch is amplified roughly 2x into this stock. The narrative is the dominant force here: a strong but fragile cyclical-late-stage AI-packaging story with low cult support, meaning there is no diamond-hands base to defend the tape on a wobble. Price at $86.66 sits dramatically above what DCF supports, so the entire premium is narrative-funded - exactly the kind of setup that bleeds fastest when sentiment shifts. Analyst tone confirms the divergence: consensus Hold, target $76 (12% below spot), and the most recent revision came in at $80 - sell-side is not chasing the narrative, they are quietly anchoring lower. That gap between a hot story and cool analyst tone is a classic headwind tell. Offsetting tailwinds: the AI/HBM/chiplet narrative remains live and intense, momentum is not breaking, and the regime is not actually risk-off yet. Net read: more forces pressing down than up, but no crisis - a moderate headwind, not a strong one.

Tailwinds 2
m55
AI/HBM/chiplet narrative still live
Strong-intensity packaging narrative continues to attract capital to the advanced-packaging cohort; until that story breaks, dips get bought.
m35
Regime not actually risk-off
Tape is neutral with low conviction risk-off signals; absent a real stress event, the macro is not actively selling this name, just failing to push it higher.
Headwinds 4
m70
Analyst targets 12% below spot
Consensus $76 vs $86.66 with a fresh revision at $80 signals sell-side is not validating the narrative premium; that anchor caps upside and invites downgrades on any miss.
m65
High beta into a jittery neutral tape
Beta 2.26 means any uptick in VIX or risk-off rotation gets amplified into AMKR; with VIX already above its yearly median, the asymmetry is unfavorable.
m60
Fragile narrative, no cult floor
Cyclical-late-stage archetype with fragile durability and low cult coefficient - the story carries the price but has no loyal holder base to defend a crack.
m55
Rates and cyclical semi exposure
10y at 4.47% pressures long-duration AI capex narratives, and OSATs are the most cyclical link in the chain - first to get re-rated when memory/logic capex talk softens.
The non-fundamental pressure on AMKR leans negative but not catastrophic. The AI-packaging narrative is the only thing holding this price up, analysts quietly disagree (target 12% under spot), the cult coefficient is low so there is no fanbase to defend it, and a 2.26 beta means a neutral tape with elevated VIX still presses down harder here than on most names. Until the story breaks or a real risk-off event hits, this drifts and grinds rather than collapses - call it a moderate headwind with asymmetric downside if the narrative cracks.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Any HBM/AI capex commentary from TSMC, ASE, or hyperscalers that confirms or cracks the advanced-packaging demand story
  • Further analyst target revisions - another cut would confirm sell-side capitulation away from the narrative
  • VIX break above 20 or S&P drawdown past 5% - would convert the 2.26 beta from latent to active headwind
  • Memory cycle commentary from Micron/SK Hynix that could swing the cyclical-late-stage read
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Three lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), and General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Deep Analysis
Last run: Jun 16, 2026 3:04:48 am

Pre-flight intelligence scans the company first, then routes to the right analytical methods.

0 Company Classification — What type of company is this?
1 Industry Landscape — Where is the industry headed?
2 Company Momentum — Where is this company trending?
3 Forward Projection — 1Y & 2Y projected metrics (requires Layer 1 + 2)
4a DCF Valuation — Present value of future cash flows
4b Earnings Power Value — Floor value — worth with zero growth
4c Anchored PE — Industry PE adjusted for growth differential
4d Reverse DCF — What growth is the market pricing in?
4e Revenue-Based DCF — For growth/narrative companies (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4f Anchored P/S — Price-to-Sales peer comparison (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4g Scenario Analysis — Bull / Base / Bear (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4h Dividend Discount Model — For dividend/income stocks only
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4i Book Value Analysis — For deep value / turnaround stocks only
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4j Insider Activity — Are insiders buying or selling?
4f Cash Flow Quality — How trustworthy is the FCF?
4g Debt Maturity Risk — Can it handle its debt?
4h Macro Environment — Rates, market valuation, volatility
4i Sector Intelligence — How does this company compare within its sector?
4j Revenue Confidence — How reliable is the growth projection?
4k Sensitivity Analysis — How fragile is the fair value estimate?
4l Sector Demand Cycle — Is the sector in a boom, steady state, or contraction?
5 AI Investigation — Adaptive research engine (Claude)
5b Thesis Evaluation — What does the market believe? (narrative/platform stocks only)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
6 Valuation Synthesis — Weighted verdict from all methods (requires Layer 4)
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 16, 2026 3:05am (11d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue $6.1B $7.1B $6.5B $6.3B $6.7B
Cost of Revenue $4.9B $5.8B $5.6B $5.4B $5.8B
Gross Profit $1.2B $1.3B $943.2M $933.2M $938.6M
Operating Expenses $462.1M $432.8M $472.9M $494.8M $471.2M
Operating Income $763.4M $897.2M $470.3M $438.5M $467.4M
Net Income $643.0M $765.8M $359.8M $354.0M $373.9M
EBITDA $1.3B $1.5B $1.1B $1.1B $1.2B
EPS $2.64 $3.13 $1.46 $1.44 $1.51
EPS (Diluted)
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 16, 2026 3:00am (11d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Cash & Equivalents $826.7M $959.1M $1.1B $1.1B $1.4B
Total Current Assets $2.9B $3.3B $3.2B $3.1B $3.9B
Total Assets $6.0B $6.8B $6.8B $6.9B $8.1B
Current Liabilities $1.7B $1.7B $1.4B $1.5B $1.7B
Long-Term Debt $1.1B $1.2B $1.1B $981.4M $1.3B
Total Liabilities $3.1B $3.1B $2.8B $2.8B $3.6B
Total Equity $2.9B $3.7B $4.0B $4.1B $4.5B
Retained Earnings $1.2B $1.9B $2.2B $2.3B $2.6B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 16, 2026 3:05am (11d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Operating Cash Flow $1.1B $1.1B $1.3B $1.1B $1.1B
Capital Expenditure -$779.8M -$908.3M -$749.5M -$743.8M -$904.6M
Free Cash Flow $341.5M $190.5M $520.6M $345.1M $191.0M
Acquisitions (net) $3.2M $3.1M $8.4M $4.0M $110.3M
Debt Repayment
Dividends Paid
Stock Buybacks $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Net Change in Cash $129.3M $130.9M $158.2M $13.7M $311.8M
Analyst Estimates (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 16, 2026 3:00am (11d ago)
Metric 2026 2027 2028 2029
Revenue $7.6B
$7.6B – $7.7B
$8.4B
$8.1B – $8.7B
$9.1B
$9.1B – $9.1B
$10.3B
$9.9B – $10.7B
EBITDA $1.4B
$1.4B – $1.5B
$1.6B
$1.5B – $1.7B
$1.7B
$1.7B – $1.7B
$2.0B
$1.9B – $2.0B
Net Income $516.4M
$513.9M – $518.9M
$565.6M
$520.5M – $610.7M
$716.9M
$712.7M – $721.1M
$903.8M
$862.7M – $948.1M
EPS
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Jun 16, 2026 3:05am (11d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue Growth +15.5% -8.3% -2.9% +6.2%
Gross Profit Growth +8.5% -29.1% -1.1% +0.6%
Operating Income Growth +17.5% -47.6% -6.8% +6.6%
Net Income Growth +19.1% -53.0% -1.6% +5.6%
EBITDA Growth +14.9% -25.8% -3.9% +6.6%
Insider Trading (Recent)
Last updated: Jun 16, 2026 3:04am (11d ago)
Type codes PPurchase SSale AAward / grant MOption exercise FIn-kind (tax) CConversion GGift DReturn to issuer
All SEC Form 4 codes
Open market
P Purchase
Open-market or private purchase of shares.
S Sale
Open-market or private sale of shares.
Compensation (Rule 16b-3)
A Award / grant
Grant or award of securities (RSUs, options, etc.) under Rule 16b-3.
D Return to issuer
Securities disposed back to the company under Rule 16b-3.
F In-kind (tax)
Shares withheld or delivered to pay the option-exercise price or tax — not an open-market sale.
I Discretionary
Discretionary transaction under an employee plan — Rule 16b-3(f).
M Option exercise
Exercise or conversion of a derivative (option/RSU) into shares — exempt.
Derivatives
C Conversion
Conversion of a derivative security into the underlying shares.
E Short expiration
Expiration of a short derivative position.
H Long expiration
Expiration or cancellation of a long derivative position with value received.
O OTM exercise
Exercise of an out-of-the-money derivative.
X ITM exercise
Exercise of an in-the-money or at-the-money derivative.
Other exempt
G Gift
Bona fide gift of securities.
L Small acquisition
Small acquisition under Rule 16a-6.
W Inheritance
Acquisition or disposition by will or the laws of descent.
Z Voting trust
Deposit into or withdrawal from a voting trust.
Other
J Other
Other acquisition or disposition (explained in a Form 4 footnote).
K Equity swap
Transaction in an equity swap or similar instrument.
U Tender / buyout
Disposition via tender of shares in a change-of-control transaction.

Compensation-plan codes (A, D, F, M) are routine and rarely directional. Open-market P (buy) and S (sale) carry the most signal.

Date Insider Type Shares Price Value
2026-06-23 KIM SUSAN Y A-Award 2.52 $0.00 $0
2026-06-23 WATSON DAVID N A-Award 2.52 $0.00 $0
2026-06-23 Tily Gil C. A-Award 2.52 $0.00 $0
2026-06-23 Rutten Guillaume Marie Jean A-Award 2.52 $0.00 $0
2026-06-23 Morse Robert Randolph A-Award 9.43 $0.00 $0
2026-06-23 Morse Robert Randolph A-Award 8.17 $0.00 $0
2026-06-23 Morse Robert Randolph A-Award 2.52 $0.00 $0
2026-06-23 McCourt MaryFrances A-Award 8.17 $0.00 $0
2026-06-23 McCourt MaryFrances A-Award 2.52 $0.00 $0
2026-06-23 Liao Daniel JL A-Award 9.43 $0.00 $0
2026-06-23 Liao Daniel JL A-Award 2.52 $0.00 $0
2026-06-23 CHURCHILL WINSTON J A-Award 2.52 $0.00 $0
2026-06-23 Carolin Roger Anthony A-Award 9.43 $0.00 $0
2026-06-23 Carolin Roger Anthony A-Award 8.17 $0.00 $0
2026-06-23 Carolin Roger Anthony A-Award 2.52 $0.00 $0
2026-06-23 ALEXANDER DOUGLAS A A-Award 9.43 $0.00 $0
2026-06-23 ALEXANDER DOUGLAS A A-Award 8.38 $0.00 $0
2026-06-23 ALEXANDER DOUGLAS A A-Award 8.17 $0.00 $0
2026-06-23 ALEXANDER DOUGLAS A A-Award 2.52 $0.00 $0
2026-06-16 ROGERS MARK N M-Exempt 5,000.00 $7.40 $37,000
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Jun 16, 2026 3:00am (11d ago)
Date Dividend Declaration Record Payment
2026-06-03 $0.08 2026-05-13 2026-06-03 2026-06-23
2026-03-12 $0.08 2026-02-19 2026-03-12 2026-03-31
2025-12-03 $0.08 2025-11-12 2025-12-03 2025-12-23
2025-09-03 $0.08 2025-08-13 2025-09-03 2025-09-23
2025-06-05 $0.08 2025-05-15 2025-06-05 2025-06-25
2025-03-13 $0.08 2025-02-20 2025-03-13 2025-04-02
2024-12-04 $0.49 2024-11-13 2024-12-04 2024-12-23
2024-09-03 $0.08 2024-08-13 2024-09-03 2024-09-23
2024-06-04 $0.08 2024-05-14 2024-06-04 2024-06-24
2024-03-11 $0.08 2024-02-20 2024-03-12 2024-04-01
2023-12-04 $0.08 2023-11-14 2023-12-05 2023-12-26
2023-09-01 $0.08 2023-08-15 2023-09-05 2023-09-25
2023-06-05 $0.08 2023-05-16 2023-06-06 2023-06-26
2023-02-27 $0.08 2023-02-07 2023-02-28 2023-03-20
2022-12-05 $0.08 2022-11-15 2022-12-06 2022-12-27
2022-09-02 $0.05 2022-08-16 2022-09-06 2022-09-26
2022-06-06 $0.05 2022-05-17 2022-06-07 2022-06-27
2022-02-28 $0.05 2022-02-08 2022-03-01 2022-03-21
2021-12-06 $0.05 2021-11-16 2021-12-07 2021-12-28
2021-09-03 $0.04 2021-08-17 2021-09-07 2021-09-30
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for AMKR — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
Delvantic AI Findings
Independent analyst synthesis · Delvantic - Cairn AI · generated 2026-06-16 03:05:25
Reviews the pipeline's own verdicts
Verdict Overvalued but the $15.80 DCF anchor is wrong — fair value $50-60 on normalized 2027 earnings; wait for a pullback below $65 or margin confirmation before buying.

The raw quarterly tape tells a more nuanced story than either the synthesis or the narrative layer admits. Q1 2026 revenue of $1.68B is up 27% YoY from Q1 2025's $1.32B, and net income of $83.4M is up 4x from $21.1M — that's not a "decelerating" trend, that's a cyclical inflection. Full-year 2025 revenue ($6.71B) and NI ($373.9M) finally exceeded 2024, breaking a three-year slide from the 2022 peak ($7.09B rev, $765.8M NI). But — and this is what bulls miss — 2025 net margin was 5.6% versus 10.8% in 2022. Even with revenue back near peak, earnings are half. The 2022 cycle peak was the anomaly, not a baseline. So when the narrative engine says "$65-70 of price is story," it's directionally right but the math needs sharpening: a normalized through-cycle NI of ~$450M gets you a 47x P/E at $85, or if you give it 2022-peak earnings power ($765M), it's 27x. Neither is cheap for a capex-heavy OSAT.

The DCF-derived $15.80 fair value the synthesis cites is almost certainly garbage, and I'd push back hard on parading it as a usable anchor. FCF CAGR of -39% is being driven by $904M of capex against $1.10B of operating cash flow — that's a deliberate capacity buildout for advanced packaging (CHIPS Act Arizona facility, HBM/2.5D capacity), not a deteriorating business. Using trailing FCF in a DCF when the company is mid-investment-cycle produces nonsense. The right question isn't "what is steady-state FCF today" but "what does FCF look like in 2027-2028 when Arizona stops eating cash and starts producing it." If you believe management's capacity additions monetize at even 15% gross margin (current is 14%), incremental revenue of $1.5-2B at maturity drops $200-300M to operating income. That gets you to a fair value range of $45-60, not $16 and not $85.

Where I agree with the prior models: the insider activity is mildly concerning but not damning — A-Awards and M-Exempts dominate, with only modest open-market sales (~7,000 shares total). The "Neutral Insider Activity" tag is correct; this is routine equity comp recycling, not informed selling. The market-forces "Neutral" call is closer to right than the synthesis "overvalued" verdict. Where the contrarian case bites: AMKR's customer concentration with Apple (~20%+ of revenue historically) means a single iPhone cycle miss craters a year. The 14% gross margin floor is structurally low versus TSMC's 50%+ or even ASE's 16-17%, meaning AMKR is the price-taker in OSAT, not the price-maker. Intel Foundry's in-housing of advanced packaging is a real long-term threat the bear story correctly flags. And the 2022 cycle "proved" margin upside was 19% gross — so even peak isn't great.

My read: the synthesis verdict of "overvalued, fair value $15.80" is wrong by a wide margin — it's using a broken DCF on a mid-cycle capex story. The narrative layer's "fragile" durability tag is right directionally but overstated; chiplet/advanced packaging demand is more structural than memory-cycle exposure suggests. But the stock at $85 with a 48x TTM P/E, 5.6% net margins, negative FCF growth, and a sector tagged as "lagging peers" is pricing in a clean execution of the Arizona ramp plus sustained AI packaging tightness through 2027. That's a lot to underwrite. I'd anchor fair value at $50-60 based on normalized 2027 earnings of ~$500-600M at a 20x multiple — meaning the stock is ~40% overvalued, not 80%. I dissent from the synthesis's magnitude but agree with its direction. Wait for either a cyclical pullback to the $55-65 range or a Q2/Q3 2026 print confirming the margin trajectory before committing.

GPT Critique
Second-opinion review · gpt-4o · generated 2026-06-16 03:05:38
Reviews the Opus findings above
Verdict I agree with Opus — overvalued at $85.44, with a more realistic fair value in the range of $50-60, reflecting the risks and potential of Amkor's current strategic trajectory.

In examining Amkor Technology, the raw data tells a story of a company that is navigating through a cyclical recovery but still grappling with significant challenges. Revenue has demonstrated variability over recent quarters, with notable increases such as the 27% year-over-year rise to $1.68 billion in Q1 2026. However, margins remain a critical concern, dropping from a historical high of 10.8% in 2022 to just 5.6% in 2025, suggesting that while revenue might be rebounding, profitability lags. This disparity underscores the capital-intensive nature of Amkor's operations, as evidenced by their substantial capital expenditures ($904.6 million) heavily impacting free cash flow, which has notably contracted by 39.4% CAGR.

I find myself in agreement with Opus on several fronts, particularly regarding the flawed application of a DCF model that produces a $15.80 fair value estimate, which is indeed overly pessimistic given the ongoing investment cycle aimed at future growth. Opus rightly points out that trailing FCF is inappropriate for a company in the midst of a strategic capacity buildout. The prospect of future cash flows post-investment in advanced packaging facilities, notably in Arizona, could indeed shift the company's financial trajectory significantly by 2027-2028. I also concur with Opus's assessment that the current stock price of $85.44 reflects an optimistic narrative premium rather than fundamental reality, bolstered by the speculative belief in structural demand for advanced packaging.

Where I diverge from Opus is on the matter of insider activity. While they downplay its significance, the pattern of sales, albeit small, combined with the broader context of a high P/E ratio (48.5) and low net margins warrants more caution. This insider behavior might suggest a lack of confidence in the immediate realization of the bullish narrative driving the current valuation. Furthermore, the company's reliance on a concentrated customer base such as Apple introduces volatility risk that the market may not be adequately pricing.

A skeptic might argue that both Opus and I are overly focused on the potential upside of Amkor's strategic investments without adequately accounting for execution risks and competitive pressures. The semiconductor industry is subject to rapid technological shifts and pricing pressures, and Amkor's comparatively low gross margins (14%) indicate vulnerability to these factors. Additionally, the narrative surrounding AI and chiplet demand, while compelling, remains speculative and contingent on broader industry trends that could easily reverse.

Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for AMKR. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
Data via Financial Modeling Prep · Cached for performance · fmp
v1.1.352 · d1100787 · 2026-06-26 11:39:30