For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page
What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for PPL Corporation (PPL) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.
Our current read (analysis of 2026-09-11): Designation Low · Gem Score -27 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality -2 · Value -44 · Sentiment 17 (timing only, not weighted) · Composite fair value $12.18 vs $34.13 at analysis
Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable
reference-name attribute you can cite):
profile-header/price-overview— company profile, live quote, market capextended-analysis— the core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memofuture-predictions— our forward price-band predictionsmarket-narrative/ai-findings/gpt-critique— narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)- Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers):
price-history,income-trend,key-metrics,financials(statement tables),insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.
More for machine readers: site briefing at
/llms.txt ·
any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER ·
raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds);
every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.
PPL Corporation
PPL NYSEPPL Corporation is a regulated utility company that provides electricity and natural gas services to customers in the United States. The company operates through regulated business segments in Pennsylvania, Kentucky, and Rhode Island, where it manages electric transmission, distribution, and generation activities, along with natural gas distribution in select markets. PPL Corporation serves residential, commercial, and industrial customers through infrastructure that supports reliable power delivery and essential energy services. Its operations center on regulated utility networks, making it a key provider in local energy markets and a significant participant in the U.S. utilities sector. Headquartered in Allentown, Pennsylvania, PPL Corporation focuses on core utility services that underpin everyday energy use across its service territories.
Price Overview
Price History (1 Year)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
| Period | Revenue | Net Income | Net Margin | YoY/QoQ |
|---|
Key Metrics
EPS (Diluted): 1.59
Total Equity: $14.88B
Shares: 743,348,000
Total Debt: $19.35B
Cash: $1.07B
EBITDA: $3.44B
Total Debt: $19.35B
Cash: $1.07B
Revenue: $9.04B
Revenue: $9.04B
Revenue: $9.04B
Total Equity: $14.88B
Tax Rate: 19.8%
Equity: $14.88B
Total Debt: $19.35B
Cash: $1.07B
Current Liabilities: $4.55B
Long-Term Debt: $17.99B
Total Debt: $19.35B
Total Equity: $14.88B
Shares: 743,348,000
Shares: 743,348,000
CapEx: -$4.03B
Shares: 743,348,000
Stock Price: $34.13
Net Income: $1.18B
Industry Benchmarks
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Sep 1, 2026 1:08am (19d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.8B | $7.9B | $8.3B | $8.5B | $9.0B |
| Cost of Revenue | — | — | — | — | — |
| Gross Profit | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Expenses | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Income | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.6B | $1.7B | $2.1B |
| Net Income | -$1.5B | $756.0M | $740.0M | $888.0M | $1.2B |
| EBITDA | $2.5B | $2.6B | $2.9B | $3.0B | $3.4B |
| EPS | $-1.93 | $1.03 | $1.00 | $1.20 | $1.60 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-1.93 | $1.02 | $1.00 | $1.20 | $1.59 |
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Sep 1, 2026 1:00am (19d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash & Equivalents | $3.6B | $356.0M | $331.0M | $306.0M | $1.1B |
| Total Current Assets | $5.0B | $2.8B | $2.9B | $2.9B | $3.9B |
| Total Assets | $33.2B | $37.8B | $39.2B | $41.1B | $45.2B |
| Current Liabilities | $2.3B | $3.8B | $3.3B | $3.3B | $4.5B |
| Long-Term Debt | $10.7B | $12.9B | $14.6B | $16.0B | $18.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $19.5B | $23.9B | $25.3B | $27.0B | $30.4B |
| Total Equity | $13.7B | $13.9B | $13.9B | $14.1B | $14.9B |
| Retained Earnings | $2.6B | $2.7B | $2.7B | $2.8B | $3.2B |
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Sep 1, 2026 1:23am (19d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $2.3B | $1.7B | $1.8B | $2.3B | $2.6B |
| Capital Expenditure | -$2.0B | -$2.2B | -$2.4B | -$2.8B | -$4.0B |
| Free Cash Flow | $297.0M | -$425.0M | -$632.0M | -$465.0M | -$1.4B |
| Acquisitions (net) | $0 | -$3.7B | $0 | $0 | — |
| Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) | -$4.0B | $586.0M | $1.4B | $1.9B | $2.4B |
| Dividends Paid | -$1.3B | -$787.0M | -$704.0M | -$747.0M | -$794.0M |
| Stock Buybacks | -$1.0B | $0 | $0 | — | — |
| Net Change in Cash | $3.1B | -$3.2B | $25.0M | -$43.0M | $747.0M |
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Sep 1, 2026 1:08am (19d ago)| Metric | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | +36.6% | +5.2% | +1.8% | +6.9% |
| Gross Profit Growth | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Income Growth | -3.5% | +18.6% | +6.7% | +22.4% |
| Net Income Growth | +151.1% | -2.1% | +20.0% | +33.0% |
| EBITDA Growth | +2.0% | +12.9% | +4.7% | +14.0% |
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Sep 1, 2026 1:00am (19d ago)| Date | Dividend | Declaration | Record | Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-10 | $0.29 | — | — | — |
| 2026-03-10 | $0.29 | — | — | — |
| 2025-12-10 | $0.27 | — | — | — |
| 2025-09-10 | $0.27 | — | — | — |
| 2025-06-10 | $0.27 | — | — | — |
| 2025-03-10 | $0.27 | — | — | — |
| 2024-12-10 | $0.26 | — | — | — |
| 2024-09-10 | $0.26 | — | — | — |
| 2024-06-10 | $0.26 | — | — | — |
| 2024-03-07 | $0.26 | — | — | — |
| 2023-12-07 | $0.24 | — | — | — |
| 2023-09-07 | $0.24 | — | — | — |
| 2023-06-08 | $0.24 | — | — | — |
| 2023-03-09 | $0.24 | — | — | — |
| 2022-12-08 | $0.23 | — | — | — |
| 2022-09-08 | $0.23 | — | — | — |
| 2022-06-17 | $0.23 | — | — | — |
| 2022-03-09 | $0.20 | — | — | — |
| 2021-12-09 | $0.42 | — | — | — |
| 2021-09-09 | $0.42 | — | — | — |
Deep Analysis
Risk : Reward — upside vs downside from this company's own quarters
Computed 2026-09-06 19:25A +1σ run of quarters pays +8%; a −1σ run costs 50%. Ratio 0.2:1 (μ 7.4%, σ 9.4% , 16 pairs).
Older method (repeat-worst-quarter): 0.6 : 1
| Case | Growth | Margin | Fair value | vs price ($34.13) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bull — recovery | +13% | 18.3% | $40.79 | +20% |
| Base — stabilizes | +9% | 15.9% | $31.20 | -9% |
| Bear — keeps slipping | +4% | 13.5% | $23.35 | -32% |
| Stress — last quarter repeats | +3% | 14.4% | $23.60 | -31% |
| Upside — a +1σ run of quarters (v2) | +17% | 14.4% | $36.79 | +8% |
| Stress — a −1σ run of quarters (v2) | -2% | 12.1% | $17.12 | -50% |
Narrative Economics
market-narrative step).
Growth Outlook
Analyzed 2026-09-01 01:31The question every valuation on this page silently assumes: is this company likely to grow? Judged forward — the business, its category, the world — against what's already printed.
Claude Reading
The raw numbers tell a coherent regulated-utility story that's being distorted by the DCF-based synthesis. Revenue is compounding at ~4.3% (5.78B→9.04B over five years, though 2021's -$1.48B NI includes the WPD divestiture noise), and the last four quarters show genuine acceleration: $2.03B → $2.24B → $2.27B → $2.77B, with NI expanding from $183M to $452M. Trailing margins in the 11-16% range are consistent with a rate-base earner where regulators have been constructive. Operating margin at 23.5% and ROE at 7.9% are unremarkable but exactly what a PA/KY/RI-regulated integrated utility should print. This is not a business in distress; it's a business consuming $4B/yr of capex against $2.6B of operating cash flow — which is the entire regulated utility playbook, not a red flag. Every large-cap regulated utility has negative FCF during rate-base build phases; that's how they earn their allowed return.
The synthesis verdict — $12.02 fair value, 65% overvalued — is almost certainly wrong, and I'd dissent hard. A DCF on a regulated utility with -$1.4B FCF will always produce garbage because the model punishes the very capex that creates the future earnings stream on which the allowed ROE is earned. The correct valuation frame is P/E vs peers and dividend discount on rate-base growth. At 21.5x earnings, 1.7x book, and 3.27% yield with 67% payout, PPL trades roughly in line with SO (~20x), DUK (~19x), and slightly below AEP — not at a "148% premium." The Market Narrative section's claim that "$34 is 184% above fair value" is the DCF tail wagging the utility dog. The Market Forces "financially stressed utility using accounting engineering" language is inflammatory and unsupported — 1.30 debt/equity is normal for the sector (DUK is ~1.6, SO is ~1.8), and the 33% recent earnings YoY is driven by rate case outcomes in Kentucky and Pennsylvania, not accounting games.
That said, the contrarian case against my defense is real and worth stating. Interest coverage is genuinely tight — $19.35B of debt against $2.13B of operating income implies ~3.5x EBIT/interest at best, and refinancing that stack at 5-6% versus the legacy 3-4% will compress earnings by $100-200M/yr over the next 3-4 years unless rate cases fully recover it (they usually do, with a lag). The 0.86 current ratio is thin. Pennsylvania's regulatory environment has been getting incrementally more contentious around distribution rate cases, and the electrification/data center demand tailwind that bulls invoke is more concentrated in Dominion/AEP territory than PPL's footprint. If you stripped out the recent margin expansion and modeled PPL at a more normalized 10-11% net margin, forward EPS drops to ~$1.40 and the multiple balloons to 24x — expensive for 4-5% growth. Stock near 52-week lows ($34 vs $40 high) suggests the market is already pricing some of this.
Net: the synthesis models are anchoring on the wrong framework and the "overvalued by 65%" number is not defensible. But PPL isn't cheap either. Fair value on a peer-multiple basis is probably $32-38 depending on how you treat the rate-case pipeline and refinancing headwind — meaning the stock is roughly fairly valued at $34, with a 3.3% dividend providing carry while you wait. The archetype call of "mature_earner" and pre-flight "dividend-income" are correct; the valuation synthesis and market-forces layers are wrong in opposite directions from a bearish bias. I'd own this for the yield and rate-base compounding, not chase it, and I'd want to see the Q2/Q3 2026 prints confirm the margin expansion isn't a one-time regulatory true-up before adding aggressively. The bull-vs-bear thesis score of -7 (near neutral) is the closest of any of the model outputs to reality.
GPT Reading
PPL looks like a fairly conventional regulated utility that is being judged too harshly by some of the automated outputs. The raw operating trend is plainly improving, not deteriorating. Revenue rose from $8.46B in 2024 to $9.04B in 2025, up 6.9%, while operating income jumped from $1.74B to $2.13B, up 22%, and net income climbed from $888M to $1.18B, up 33%. That is not “accounting engineering”; it is visible margin expansion, with annual operating margin moving to 23.6% and net margin to 13.1%. The quarterly sequence supports that improvement rather than contradicting it: Q1 2026 revenue of $2.77B was up from $2.50B a year earlier, and net income increased to $452M from $414M. Even the weaker quarters are still profitable, with quarterly net margins generally running 9%-16%. For a regulated electric utility, those are healthy economics.
The biggest mistake in the bearish model stack is treating negative free cash flow as if it were a distress signal in isolation. PPL generated $2.63B of operating cash flow in 2025 and spent $4.03B on capex, producing -$1.40B of FCF. For a regulated utility, that is often the business model: spend heavily into the rate base today, earn an allowed return on that asset base later. Debt is elevated at $19.35B against $14.88B of equity, with debt/equity of 1.30x and a current ratio below 1, but those are not abnormal numbers for the sector. What matters is whether the earnings and cash-from-operations trajectory is keeping pace with the capital program, and right now it is moving in the right direction. A 21.5x P/E is not cheap, but against a business growing EPS faster than revenue through rate recovery and operating leverage, it is nowhere near the absurdity implied by the $12 fair value output. At $34.13, the market cap is $25.7B; against $1.18B of earnings, that is a normal utility premium, not a bubble.
What stands out to me is that PPL is in the middle of a quality improvement story more than a pure dividend-income story. The annual numbers show a business that has rebuilt earnings power since 2021’s loss, with net income going from $740M in 2023 to $888M in 2024 to $1.18B in 2025. ROE at 7.9% and ROIC at 5.2% are not exciting, but they are acceptable for a regulated asset-heavy franchise. The 3.3% dividend yield with a 67% payout ratio also looks supportable from earnings, even if not covered by free cash flow after capex. If anything, the stock’s current price suggests the market is valuing PPL like a decent utility with visible rate-base growth and not giving it much benefit of the doubt beyond that. I do not see evidence here for a dramatic de-rating unless rates move materially higher or regulators push back on returns.
The best bear case is straightforward: the valuation already embeds a lot of execution confidence while the balance sheet leaves little room for mistakes. EV/EBITDA of 12.6x and P/B of 1.70x are not bargain levels for a utility earning sub-8% ROE. Capex at $4.03B versus operating cash flow of $2.63B means recurring external financing needs, and with only $1.07B of cash, PPL is dependent on debt and equity markets staying open at tolerable costs. If rate cases disappoint in Pennsylvania, Kentucky, or Rhode Island, the current margin expansion could stall quickly. A skeptic can also point to quarterly volatility: Q4 2025 net margin was 11.7% after just 8.0% in Q4 2024, and Q2 2025 was only 9.0%, so there is still some lumpiness beneath the annual trend. If long rates stay higher for longer, income investors may stop paying 21x earnings for a 3.3% yielder.
What would change my mind is not another generic warning about leverage; it would be evidence that the capex program is failing to translate into recoverable earnings. If operating cash flow stalls around $2.6B while capex remains above $4B and net income stops growing from the current $1.18B run rate, then the “rate-base growth” defense weakens fast. Likewise, a meaningful drop in quarterly net margin back toward the 8%-10% range without offsetting revenue acceleration would suggest the 2025 improvement was temporary. On the other hand, if 2026 can sustain revenue growth near 5%-7% and push annual net income toward $1.25B-$1.30B while holding the payout ratio near current levels, then today’s multiple is defensible and probably modestly attractive.
Grok Reading
The raw numbers tell a coherent regulated-utility growth story that the mechanical DCF completely misreads. Revenue climbed from $8.46B in 2024 to $9.04B in 2025 (+6.9%), with operating income expanding from $1.74B to $2.13B and net income from $888M to $1.18B—a 33% earnings jump that continues a multi-year trajectory (earnings CAGR ~26% off the post-2021 base). Quarterly pattern is seasonal but constructive: the latest March 2026 quarter printed $2.77B revenue and 16.3% net margin, bookending a year of steadily improving profitability. Operating cash flow of $2.63B easily funds the ~$790M implied dividend (67% payout on $1.18B NI, 3.3% yield), so the headline –$1.40B free cash flow is almost entirely the $4.03B capex program, not a coverage crisis. That is rate-base investment, not distress. At $34.13 the stock trades 21.5× earnings, 1.7× book, 12.6× EV/EBITDA—elevated versus deep-value history but consistent with a mid-single-digit rate-base compounder rather than a broken utility. The $12 “fair value” spit out by the synthesis is an artifact of treating growth-capex FCF as terminal value; it implies roughly 10× forward earnings, a multiple no regulated electric name has sustained in a decade of constructive rate environments.
Debt of $19.35B against $14.88B equity (D/E 1.30) and a sub-1 current ratio are real constraints, and ROE/ROIC of 7.9%/5.2% are only adequate, not excellent. Yet the operating margin expansion to 23.6% and net margin to 13.1% show regulators have so far allowed recovery of the capital program. Revenue confidence is high and the trend is accelerating; this is not a company whose top line is eroding under distributed generation. The market narrative of “steady compounder near 52-week lows” fits the data better than the bear framing of accounting engineering and structural underperformance.
The strongest counter-case is straightforward: you are paying a premium multiple for a capital-hungry balance sheet that must keep refinancing in a still-elevated rate world, while rate-case outcomes in Pennsylvania and Kentucky are never guaranteed. A smart opponent would note that negative FCF will persist as long as the grid-modernization cycle runs, that interest coverage and refinancing risk are flagged as elevated, that sector multiples have compressed when the 10-year has spiked, and that a 21.5× P/E leaves little room if allowed ROEs compress or if earnings growth reverts to the 4% revenue CAGR instead of the recent 26% earnings surge. Those points have weight; I simply do not let them dominate because OCF coverage of the dividend remains comfortable, leverage is typical for the industry rather than outlier, and the earnings trajectory has already demonstrated regulatory momentum. The $12 DCF anchor is the least credible input in the briefing and should be discarded for decision-making.
What would flip the view is concrete: a Pennsylvania or Kentucky rate order that freezes or cuts allowed returns enough to stall the 2026–27 earnings path below high-single-digit growth; a sustained rise in the utility cost of capital that forces equity issuance dilutive enough to break the 3%+ yield story; or two consecutive quarters of operating-margin compression back toward the 2024 low-teens. Conversely, a clean multi-year rate settlement plus FCF inflection once the current capex peak rolls off would justify re-rating toward the prior $40 area.
Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
PPL is a classic regulated-utility profile: revenue climbed from 5.78B in 2021 to 9.04B in 2025, operating margin expanded back to 23.5%, and net income scaled from 756M (2022) to 1.18B (2025). OCF/NI of 1.6x and accruals of -4.6% of assets indicate the reported earnings are cash-backed at the operating line, and the share count is actually shrinking modestly (-0.7% CAGR) with buybacks running ~5x SBC — per-share value is being protected, not eroded. The forensic module flags Critical Runway and an Altman Z of 0.95, but this is largely an artifact of applying a general model to a regulated utility: 18.3B net debt is the normal capital structure for a rate-base business funded on long-dated debt, and the 1.36B of short-term debt is routinely rolled in the utility debt market. The real quality concern is genuine: FCF has been negative every year since 2022 and worsened to -1.40B in 2025, meaning growth in the rate base is being funded by ongoing debt issuance (and to a lesser extent equity). That is standard utility mechanics, but it caps the quality grade — the business does not self-fund. No directional insider activity to read; the sole print is a small award.
Verify before trusting this (5)
- Regulatory jurisdictions and recent rate-case outcomes (KY, PA, RI) — allowed ROE and rate-base growth
- Capex plan and expected timeline until FCF turns positive (or explicit commitment that it will not)
- Debt maturity ladder and weighted-average interest rate, particularly on the 1.36B short-term stack
- Dividend policy and payout vs cash generation — is the dividend funded by debt at the margin?
- Any planned equity issuance in the ATM program that would offset the reported buyback
The e2e composite fair value of $12.55 (and signal-adjusted $12.02) implying -65% is almost certainly a runaway output - EPV floor of $0.06 is nonsense for a rate-base utility with steady earnings, and even the anchored-PE of $25.03 looks conservative for a regulated electric with a growing rate base and mid-single-digit EPS growth. I discount the composite and anchor instead on the anchored-PE plus a utility-appropriate cross-check: at roughly $1.75-1.80 in normalized EPS and a fair 18-20x multiple for a solid regulated name, deserved value lands in the $32-36 range. Against the $34.13 price, that is essentially fair to modestly rich. What is priced in: continued rate-base growth, constructive PA/KY regulation, and the dividend as a bond-proxy at current rates. The bear case (rising capital costs, structurally negative FCF funded by debt/equity issuance, and any regulatory friction) is not really in the price. Margin of safety is thin-to-nonexistent; you are paying for the quality, not getting a discount for it.
Verify before trusting this (4)
- Latest PA and KY rate case outcomes and allowed ROEs
- Updated multi-year capex plan and financing mix (debt vs equity issuance)
- Normalized EPS guidance and any one-time items in recent quarters
- Sensitivity of dividend coverage to rising interest expense
The tape is modestly risk-on but PPL's 0.59 beta means the macro regime barely touches it directly. What matters more is the sentiment cohort PPL sits in: regulated utilities have been re-rated by the AI/data-center power-demand narrative, and PPL is being pulled along. The steady-compounder archetype with strong intensity is doing the heavy lifting - dividend-chasers and electrification-TAM believers are treating this name as a safe way to play grid modernization, and the price action reflects that (148% premium to DCF anchor is pure narrative, not fundamentals).
Verify before trusting this (4)
- Whether utility-sector rotation flows persist if VIX pushes above 20
- Any PA PUC rate-case headlines that could crack the regulatory-safety narrative
- Data-center power-demand narrative durability - watch for any AI-capex slowdown chatter
- Analyst target revisions relative to FE and other regulated peers
The world is handing regulated electric utilities the first real volume growth in two decades: AI data centers, electrification of heat and transport, and reshored industry are converting flat load forecasts into multi-year interconnection queues. That converts the sector from a bond proxy into a capital-deployment story, and PPL's PA/KY footprint — low-cost generation, transmission headroom — is a credible beneficiary. The offsetting force is the cost of money: a 4.73% 10y and flat curve make each dollar of rate base more expensive to fund, and regulators reprice allowed returns with a lag. Distributed generation is a real long-run erosion vector but operates on a decade-plus clock and is currently swamped by large-load additions.
When we made this prediction on Sep 1, 2026, PPL was $34.10. We expect it to be $31.20 by Mar 2027. This is an early model (v0.6.0) — the direction is more reliable than the exact price. Made Sep 1, 2026.
Blue is our prediction, starting the day we made it. Grey is a slower route to the same place — the same destination, taking longer. Black is the actual price, so you can see how we are doing.