Skip to main content
Homepage
Full 18-step deep-dive · ~20–30 min · a member feature.
AGING Analysis Report
Jul 30, 2026
24 days ago · 100% complete
NOT DEPENDABLE This report predates a filing — its financial basis has been replaced.
Report generated: Jul 30, 2026 · Filing on record since: Aug 19, 2026 · 19 days after
For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page

What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for Adobe Inc. (ADBE) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.

Our current read (analysis of 2026-08-23): Designation Watch · Gem Score +17 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality 90 · Value -43 · Sentiment -49 (timing only, not weighted) · Composite fair value $268.44 vs $247.91 at analysis

Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable reference-name attribute you can cite):

  • profile-header / price-overview — company profile, live quote, market cap
  • extended-analysisthe core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memo
  • future-predictions — our forward price-band predictions
  • market-narrative / ai-findings / gpt-critique — narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)
  • Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers): price-history, income-trend, key-metrics, financials (statement tables), insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.

More for machine readers: site briefing at /llms.txt · any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER · raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds); every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.

Adobe Inc.

ADBE NASDAQ
Technology · Software - Application
San Jose, CA 95110-2704, United States adobe.com Updated Jul 30, 5:04pm
Price
$247.90
Market Cap
$98.5B
Employees
31,360
Beta
1.43
Avg Volume
6,689,990
Last Dividend
$0.03
CEO
Mr. Shantanu Narayen

Adobe Inc. is a global technology company that provides digital marketing, media solutions, and content creation software. It operates through three primary segments: Digital Media, Digital Experience, and Publishing and Advertising. The Digital Media segment delivers products and services empowering individuals, teams, businesses, and enterprises to create, publish, promote, and collaborate on creative content, documents, and media across various platforms. This includes tools for photographers, video editors, graphic designers, game developers, and content creators to enhance productivity and transform how content is viewed, shared, and engaged with. The Digital Experience segment offers an integrated platform for businesses to manage, execute, measure, optimize, and monetize customer experiences, spanning analytics, commerce, and personalized interactions. The Publishing and Advertising segment covers legacy solutions like eLearning, document publishing, web conferencing, forms platforms, web app development, high-end printing, and advertising services. Adobe Inc. distributes its offerings through distributors, retailers, software developers, mobile app stores, systems integrators, and hardware manufacturers, serving creative professionals, marketers, businesses, and consumers worldwide. Founded in 1982 and headquartered in San Jose, California, Adobe Inc. plays a pivotal role in the software industry, setting standards in content creation and digital experience management.

Runs with full report Generated: Jul 30, 2026 6:34pm
Price Overview
Price at report time
$247.91
as of Jul 30, 6:46pm (24d ago)
Change · Jul 30
-15.52 (-5.89%)
Day Range
$242.42 – $255.30
52-Week Range
$190.12 – $370.86
50-Day MA
$228.43
200-Day MA
$276.89
Volume
10,978,594.00
Right now · live
Log in to get the live feed
Members see the real-time price and the move since this report (over 24d).
Share Structure
Outstanding 399,000,000.00
Float 396,228,000.00
Free Float 99.3%
High free float — 99.3% of shares trade freely, ~0.7% held by insiders/institutions
Very liquid — most shares trade freely. Low insider ownership can mean less management alignment, but makes large position sizing straightforward.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Jul 30, 2026 6:46pm (24d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Jul 30, 2026 6:46pm (24d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
TD Twelve Data statement HEX SEC filing
Industry comparison last run: Jul 30, 2026 6:33pm
P/E Ratio (Price per dollar of earnings)
HEX
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
14.84
Stock Price: $247.90
EPS (Diluted): 16.70
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
HEX
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
9.11
Stock Price: $247.90
Total Equity: $11.62B
Shares: 427,000,000
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
HEX
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
11.18
Market Cap: $98.54B
Total Debt: $6.21B
Cash: $5.43B
EBITDA: $9.52B
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
HEX
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$106.4B
Market Cap: $98.54B
Total Debt: $6.21B
Cash: $5.43B
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
HEX
Gross Profit / Revenue
89.3%
Gross Profit: $21.22B
Revenue: $23.77B
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
HEX
Operating Income / Revenue
36.6%
Operating Income: $8.71B
Revenue: $23.77B
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
HEX
Net Income / Revenue
30.0%
Net Income: $7.13B
Revenue: $23.77B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
HEX
Net Income / Total Equity
61.3%
Net Income: $7.13B
Total Equity: $11.62B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
HEX
NOPAT / Invested Capital
57.3%
Operating Income: $8.71B
Tax Rate: 18.4%
Equity: $11.62B
Total Debt: $6.21B
Cash: $5.43B
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
HEX
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
1.00
Current Assets: $10.16B
Current Liabilities: $10.20B
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
HEX
Total Debt / Total Equity
0.53
Short-Term Debt: $0.00
Long-Term Debt: $6.21B
Total Debt: $6.21B
Total Equity: $11.62B
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
HEX
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$55.67
Revenue: $23.77B
Shares: 427,000,000
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
HEX
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
$27.22
Total Equity: $11.62B
Shares: 427,000,000
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
HEX
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$23.07
Operating CF: $10.03B
CapEx: -$179.00M
Shares: 427,000,000
CapEx is negative (outflow) — added to OCF to get FCF
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
TD
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
0.0%
Last Dividend: $0.03
Stock Price: $247.90
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
HEX
Dividends Paid / Net Income
Dividends Paid: N/A
Net Income: $7.13B
Dividends paid not available in cash flow statement
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Jul 30, 2026 6:33pm
Compares ADBE against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Jul 30, 2026 6:46pm (24d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue $15.8B $17.6B $19.4B $21.5B $23.8B
Cost of Revenue $1.9B $2.2B $2.4B $2.4B $2.6B
Gross Profit $13.9B $15.4B $17.1B $19.1B $21.2B
Operating Expenses $8.1B $9.3B $10.4B $12.4B $12.5B
Operating Income $5.8B $6.1B $6.7B $6.7B $8.7B
Net Income $4.8B $4.8B $5.4B $5.6B $7.1B
EBITDA $6.6B $7.0B $7.5B $7.6B $9.5B
EPS $10.10 $10.13 $11.87 $12.43 $16.73
EPS (Diluted) $10.02 $10.10 $11.82 $12.36 $16.70
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Jul 30, 2026 6:26pm (24d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Cash & Equivalents $3.8B $4.2B $7.1B $7.6B $5.4B
Total Current Assets $8.7B $9.0B $11.1B $11.2B $10.2B
Total Assets $27.2B $27.2B $29.8B $30.2B $29.5B
Current Liabilities $6.9B $8.1B $8.3B $10.5B $10.2B
Long-Term Debt $4.1B $3.6B $3.6B $4.1B $6.2B
Total Liabilities $12.4B $13.1B $13.3B $16.1B $17.9B
Total Equity $14.8B $14.1B $16.5B $14.1B $11.6B
Retained Earnings $23.9B $28.3B $33.3B $38.5B $45.4B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Jul 30, 2026 6:46pm (24d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Operating Cash Flow $7.2B $7.8B $7.3B $8.1B $10.0B
Capital Expenditure -$348.0M -$442.0M -$360.0M -$183.0M -$179.0M
Free Cash Flow $6.9B $7.4B $6.9B $7.9B $9.9B
Acquisitions (net) -$2.7B -$126.0M $0 $0 -$17.0M
Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) $0 $0 -$500.0M $2.0B $497.0M
Dividends Paid
Stock Buybacks -$4.0B -$6.6B -$4.4B -$9.5B -$11.3B
Net Change in Cash -$634.0M $392.0M $2.9B $472.0M -$2.2B
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Jul 30, 2026 6:46pm (24d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue Growth +11.5% +10.2% +10.8% +10.5%
Gross Profit Growth +10.9% +10.5% +12.3% +10.8%
Operating Income Growth +5.1% +9.1% +1.4% +29.1%
Net Income Growth -1.4% +14.1% +2.4% +28.2%
EBITDA Growth +5.5% +8.2% +1.0% +25.3%
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Jul 30, 2026 6:26pm (24d ago)
Date Dividend Declaration Record Payment
2005-03-24 $0.00
2004-12-23 $0.00
2004-09-24 $0.00
2004-06-25 $0.00
2004-03-26 $0.00
2004-01-07 $0.00
2003-09-19 $0.00
2003-06-19 $0.00
2003-03-20 $0.01
2003-01-07 $0.01
2002-09-20 $0.01
2002-06-21 $0.01
2002-03-21 $0.01
2001-12-31 $0.01
2001-09-21 $0.01
2001-06-22 $0.01
2001-03-22 $0.01
2001-01-02 $0.01
2000-09-28 $0.01
2000-06-30 $0.01
0Company Classification 1Industry Landscape 2Company Momentum 3Forward Projection 4aDCF Valuation 4bEarnings Power Value 4cAnchored PE 4dReverse DCF 4eRevenue-Based DCF 4fAnchored P/S 4gScenario Analysis 4hDividend Discount Model 4iBook Value Analysis 4jInsider Activity 4fCash Flow Quality 4gDebt Maturity Risk 4hMacro Environment 4iSector Intelligence 4jRevenue Confidence 4kSensitivity Analysis 4lSector Demand Cycle 5AI Investigation 5bThesis Evaluation 6Valuation Synthesis
computed not applicable 18 computed · 6 not applicable
Risk : Reward — if the last quarter repeats
Live · as of 2026-08-19 08:27
-0.3 : 1 recovery upside vs repeat-quarter downside
Even the bull case prices 10% below today — the ratio here measures the model-vs-market gap, not payoff odds. Another quarter like the worst recent one costs 36%.
CaseGrowthMarginFair valuevs price ($247.91)
Bull — recovery +17% 33.0% $223.17 -10%
Base — stabilizes +12% 28.7% $166.30 -33%
Bear — keeps slipping +6% 24.4% $121.62 -51%
Stress — last quarter repeats +11% 28.3% $159.65 -36%
The next quarters keep the trajectory of the worst recent matched quarter (ending 2025-08-29) — growth stays at 10.7% and margins bend by the same profit-vs-revenue ratio (×0.99). Stress is a trajectory, not a prediction — it answers "what if the ship's current heading simply continues," which history says is the case to respect.
Why this is appearing: this company files quarterly, so its recent trajectory could be measured rather than assumed — the engine matched May 2026, Feb 2026 against the same quarters one year earlier and found revenue +12.3% · operating income +9.0% · net income +2.8% year-over-year. That measured heading is what the stress case extends forward. Of those, the stress case extends the worst matched quarter — the one ending Aug 29, 2025 (revenue +10.7%, operating income +9.1% YoY) — not the average. Data measured through May 29, 2026 — this card recalculates automatically when the next quarterly filing is ingested. Companies without quarterly filings (many foreign listings) never show this card: with no measured trajectory, there is nothing honest to repeat.
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for ADBE — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
Claude Reading
Independent analyst synthesis · claude-opus-4-7 · generated 2026-07-30 18:45:35
Verdict Modestly undervalued at $248 — fair value $285-300 on 17-18x normalized earnings; starter position warranted, add on margin recovery, exit thesis if net margin stays sub-27% for two more quarters.

Starting with the raw tape: revenue has walked from $5.41B (Aug '24) to $6.62B (May '26) — roughly 22% over seven quarters, a clean ~11% annualized clip with zero sequential misses. That's not a decelerating franchise; that's a metronome. But net income tells a subtler story: NI peaked at $1.89B in Feb '26 and dropped to $1.71B in May '26 despite record revenue, compressing net margin from 31.7% (Feb '25) to 25.9% (May '26) — a 580bp erosion in five quarters. That's the AI capex/Firefly compute bill showing up, or it's aggressive R&D reinvestment, or it's discounting to defend against Canva/Midjourney. Nobody flagged this cleanly. FCF of $9.85B against a $98.5B market cap is a 10% FCF yield on a business still growing double-digits with 89% gross margins and 57% ROIC. Those are extraordinary numbers hiding inside a "utility" multiple.

Where I break with the prior stack: the Market Forces model calling this "Market Headwinds / avoid at current levels" is inconsistent with every other signal in the file — synthesis says fair value, narrative says durable platform monopoly at only 4% premium, insider activity is net buying, sector benchmarks are above, and the growth rates (rev CAGR 10.7%, earnings CAGR 14.6%, FCF CAGR 19.1%) are objectively strong. Market Forces appears to be pattern-matching on the ~33% drawdown from highs and importing a bearish narrative that the numbers don't support. Meanwhile the Synthesis "fair value at $237.73 vs $247.91" is doing exactly what a DCF anchor should do on a mature compounder and I largely trust it — but it's likely under-weighting the buyback optionality (Adobe historically retires 2-3% of shares annually, which the FCF easily funds alongside the $6.2B debt load that's trivially covered).

The contrarian case worth taking seriously isn't the moat-erosion story (open-source alternatives have existed for 20 years and Adobe's ARPU keeps rising) — it's the margin compression I flagged above. If May '26's 25.9% net margin is the new normal rather than a one-quarter blip, then forward earnings power is closer to $6.8B than the $7.5-8B run-rate implied by trailing, and the P/E is really 14.5-15x on normalized numbers rather than the headline 14.8x. That still isn't expensive, but it eliminates the "cheap" thesis. The second contrarian angle: current ratio of 0.996 with $6.2B debt against $5.4B cash is thinner liquidity than people assume for a "fortress balance sheet" software name — not dangerous, but not the Microsoft-style cash mountain the narrative implies. The insider data is nearly useless — all option exercises and in-kind tax withholdings on the same day (July 15, 2026), which is routine vesting, not conviction buying. The "Net Insider Buying" tag is misleading.

Committing: I dissent partially with the synthesis "fair value" verdict — I think this is modestly undervalued, not fairly valued, but only modestly. A business compounding revenue at 10-11%, earnings at 14%+, generating $10B FCF with 57% ROIC, trading at 10x FCF and 14.8x earnings deserves at least a 17-18x multiple absent proof that AI is structurally impairing the franchise. That gets you to $285-300 fair value versus $247.90, a ~15-20% upside plus the FCF yield while you wait. The key risk that would kill this thesis is if the Q3/Q4 '26 prints show net margin staying at 25-26% rather than reverting toward 29-30% — that would confirm structural cost creep and justify the current multiple. I'd size this as a starter position now and add on any print that shows margin recovery, or trim if two more quarters below 27% net margin confirm the compression is permanent. Market Forces is wrong; Synthesis is directionally right but slightly too cautious; Narrative layer nailed it.

GPT Reading
Independent reading · gpt-5.4 · generated 2026-07-30 18:45:52
Verdict Undervalued at $248 — the market is pricing Adobe like a stagnating incumbent despite 10% revenue growth, 30% net margins, and nearly $10B of free cash flow; fair value looks closer to $300.

Adobe looks mispriced on the cheap side to me, and the biggest reason is that the raw financials do not match the market’s apparent fear of a broken moat. Revenue has climbed from $15.79B in 2021 to $23.77B in 2025, a 10.7% CAGR, while net income rose from $4.82B to $7.13B and free cash flow to $9.85B. That is not a business in decline; it is a software franchise still compounding at a very respectable clip with extraordinary unit economics. Gross margin is 89.3%, operating margin 36.6%, net margin 30.0%, and operating cash flow of $10.03B exceeds reported earnings comfortably. Even on the quarterly cadence, the trend is solid: the latest quarter at $6.62B was up 10.5% year over year from $5.99B, and net income of $1.71B was up from $1.77B against a seasonally different comparison but still well above the $1.68B-$1.69B range seen a year earlier. At $98.5B market cap, investors are paying roughly 10x trailing FCF and 4.5x sales for a dominant software platform with recurring revenue and high retention. That is closer to a mediocre enterprise software asset than to one earning 57% ROIC.

What stands out most is the tension between absolute quality and compressed valuation. A trailing P/E of 14.8x and EV/EBITDA of 11.2x for a business still growing double digits is unusually low unless the market expects growth to stall or margins to crack. But the recent numbers show neither. Quarterly revenue has risen sequentially from $5.41B in Aug-2024 to $6.62B in May-2026 without interruption. Yes, net margin dipped to 25.9% in the latest quarter from 29%-31% in prior quarters, but that looks more like spending or mix than structural impairment when the annual operating margin in 2025 still reached 36.6%, up from 31.3% in 2024. In other words, Adobe is simultaneously accelerating operating profit at the annual level and being valued like a no-growth incumbent. The balance sheet is also fine: $5.43B cash against $6.21B debt leaves net debt de minimis relative to a near-$10B FCF base.

The strongest bear case is not hard to articulate: the market may be correctly discounting an earnings peak before generative AI commoditizes parts of creative software. If Adobe’s product advantage narrows while creator pricing gets challenged, then today’s 30% net margin and 90% gross margin could be the high-water mark. There is also evidence to support caution in the latest quarter: net income fell from $1.89B in Feb-2026 to $1.71B in May-2026 even as revenue increased, which implies incremental margins softened materially. The current ratio at 1.0 is not a problem for software, but it does reinforce that this is no fortress cash pile story. And if you distrust the reported P/E because buybacks or accounting effects flatter per-share economics, then 4.5x sales is not absurdly cheap for a mature application software vendor facing open-source and AI-native alternatives. A smart skeptic would say the market is not calling Adobe broken; it is pricing in erosion from “great” to merely “good.”

I weigh that bear case less heavily because the actual income statement still shows a company converting disruption into monetization rather than surrendering to it. From 2023 to 2025, revenue added $4.36B while operating income added $2.06B, a very healthy drop-through for a supposedly weakening moat. Free cash flow at $9.85B versus net income at $7.13B suggests the economics are not low-quality or propped up by accruals. The market narrative seems to be stuck on the possibility that AI attacks Adobe’s core, while the observed data say Adobe remains the one collecting the toll on professional creative workflows. If that remains true, then a multiple closer to 18x earnings or 13x-14x EBITDA would still be conservative and would imply a stock comfortably above current levels, more in the $300 range than $250.

What would change my mind is straightforward. If revenue growth slips from roughly 10%-11% to mid-single digits for two or three quarters while net margin stays sub-27%, then the “cheap quality” thesis is wrong and the market is correctly anticipating structural pressure. I would also turn cautious if annual FCF falls materially below $9B despite revenue growth, because that would indicate Adobe is having to spend much more aggressively just to defend the base. Conversely, if the next few quarters sustain revenue above $6.7B, restore net margin toward 29%-30%, and keep annualized FCF near or above $10B, then the stock is plainly too cheap here.

Grok Reading
Independent reading · grok-4.5 · generated 2026-07-30 18:46:29
Verdict Undervalued cash compounder at $248 — 10% FCF yield, 15x earnings, still growing 10%+; AI fears overplowed relative to $9.85B FCF reality

The numbers on Adobe tell a story the market refuses to hear. Revenue has compounded at 10.7% annually to $23.77B, with the latest quarter still printing $6.62B — up from $5.87B a year earlier — and free cash flow of $9.85B on a $98.5B market cap delivers a roughly 10% FCF yield. Net margins sit at 30%, gross margins at 89%, ROE at 61%, and ROIC at 57%. A software franchise converting nearly every incremental dollar of revenue into cash, growing double-digits, and trading at 14.8x earnings and 4.5x sales is not priced like a platform monopoly; it is priced like a utility in secular decline. The 14.6% earnings CAGR and the jump from $5.56B to $7.13B in annual net income last year make the multiple look even more disconnected. The AI panic — Firefly supposedly cannibalized by Midjourney, Gen-Z abandoning Creative Cloud — has not shown up in the P&L. Subscription lock-in across Creative Cloud, Document Cloud, and Experience Cloud continues to compound, and the balance sheet (net debt under $1B, $10B operating cash flow) gives management every tool to defend the franchise.

What stands out most is the gap between cash generation quality and the multiple the market assigns it. EV/EBITDA of 11.2x and EV/revenue of 4.5x for 37% operating margins and decelerating-but-still-solid 10.5% revenue growth is the kind of setup that appears when a narrative overruns the fundamentals. The pre-flight intelligence correctly flags the three fears — AI substitution, Digital Media saturation, Experience Cloud budget cuts — yet none of those fears have cracked the recurring revenue engine. Quarterly revenue has risen every single period in the dataset, from $5.41B to $6.62B without a stutter. The valuation synthesis composite at $261 and signal-adjusted $238 brackets the current $248 almost perfectly, which the engine reads as fair value; I read it as the market anchoring too hard to disruption optionality that remains theoretical while underweighting a $10B FCF run-rate that is already real.

The strongest case against this read is straightforward and worth taking seriously. Revenue confidence is flagged as decelerating, the most recent quarter saw net margin compress to 25.9% from the 29–30% range that had been durable, and the Market Forces layer explicitly calls out structural disruption and an eroding moat. If open-source and generative tools continue closing the gap, and if Adobe’s price increases breed the resentment the bear narrative describes, then 10% growth becomes 5% and the 15x multiple is no bargain — it is a value trap. The composite fair-value exercise already haircuts to $238 after signal adjustment, implying limited upside even on bullish math, and a current ratio of 0.996 leaves little working-capital cushion. A smart opponent would also note that insider activity is pure option exercise and tax withholding, not conviction buying, and that the entire software cohort has re-rated lower for a reason. I weigh these differently because the margin dip is one quarter against years of 30% net margins, FCF conversion remains pristine at nearly 100% of operating cash flow, and the competitive moat in professional creative workflows has historically proven far stickier than retail-creator chatter suggests. The deceleration is real but from a high base; it has not yet invalidated the cash machine.

I would flip to neutral or bearish if two consecutive quarters show revenue growth below 6%, if net margins settle sustainably under 25%, or if Digital Media subscriber net adds turn negative on a trailing twelve-month basis. A sustained break below $210 without a corresponding collapse in FCF would also force a reassessment that the multiple compression has further to run.

Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Each AI above independently stated a direction (undervalued, fairly valued, or overvalued) and how strongly it believes it (conviction, 0–5). We combine those into a Bull-Bear Index on a 0–10 scale: 5 is neutral, 10 is maximum bullish (undervalued at full conviction), 0 is maximum bearish. We compute the score ourselves with the same arithmetic for every seat — the models never grade their own bullishness — so the three are directly comparable. Δ shows how far each seat sits from the panel average of 8.7; a large Δ marks the dissenting voice, usually the one worth reading.
Claude claude-opus-4-7 8.0
undervalued · conviction 3/5 · Δ -0.7 vs panel · self: 7.0
GPT gpt-5.4 9.0
undervalued · conviction 4/5 · Δ +0.3 vs panel · self: 8.0
Grok grok-4.5 9.0
undervalued · conviction 4/5 · Δ +0.3 vs panel · self: 7.0
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
Separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-07-30 18:53:22
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Quality — starter now, scale on weakness 7/10
Fortress business (+90 quality) at a fair-not-cheap price (-43 value) into a headwind tape (-49 sentiment) — this is a starter-position-and-wait setup, not a table-pounder.
The cruxWhether the risk-off tape and Morgan Stanley Underweight drag ADBE into the $200-215 zone where quality and price finally align with a real margin of safety.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from ADBE's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwaySelf-Funding
DilutionShare Count Shrinking
Earnings QualityHigh Earnings Quality
The four lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
+90
Fortress
edge √Σ 189 · risk √Σ 44 · conf 9/10

Adobe grew revenue from 15.79B in 2021 to 23.77B in 2025 (roughly 11% CAGR) while gross margin expanded from 88.2% to 89.3% and operating margin re-accelerated to 36.6% in 2025 after dipping to 31.3% in 2024. Net income jumped 28% to 7.13B and free cash flow hit 9.85B (41% FCF margin), with OCF/NI at 1.47x confirming that reported earnings convert cleanly to cash. Accruals at -8.9% of assets, Beneish M of -2.84, and Altman Z of 7.24 all point to clean, high-integrity earnings with no manipulation flags. Balance sheet is self-funding: 6.6B liquid cash, net cash positive, no dependence on capital markets. Capital return is disciplined - diluted shares fell from 481M to 427M (-2.9% CAGR) with buybacks running 446% of SBC, so the 8.2% SBC/revenue is more than offset and per-share value is concentrating. The insider tape is mostly option exercises and tax withholdings (M/F codes), not directional selling; the net-buying flag is minor in dollar terms and not a strong signal either way. The one soft spot worth flagging is the 2024 operating margin dip to 31.3% before rebounding, which suggests some investment/integration friction (the Figma deal era) but was clearly transitory given the 2025 snap-back. Durability is implied by the sustained 87%-plus gross margins, a subscription franchise across Creative Cloud, Document Cloud and Experience Cloud, and the ability to grow revenue 50% over four years without margin erosion.

Strengths 6
m90
Elite cash generation
9.85B FCF on 23.77B revenue is a 41% FCF margin, with OCF/NI at 1.47x confirming earnings are backed by cash.
m85
Gross margin above 89% sustained
Gross margin expanded from 88.2% in 2021 to 89.3% in 2025, implying strong pricing power and a software-economics moat.
m80
Per-share value concentrating
Diluted shares dropped from 481M to 427M (-2.9% CAGR); buybacks at 446% of SBC mean net shrinkage despite 8.2% SBC/revenue.
m78
Clean earnings-quality diagnostics
Accruals -8.9% of assets, Beneish M -2.84, Altman Z 7.24 - no mechanical red flags across manipulation, accrual, or solvency checks.
m70
Operating leverage restored in 2025
Op margin recovered from a 31.3% trough in 2024 to 36.6% in 2025, and net income jumped 28% to 7.13B - the dip was transitory.
m55
Self-funding fortress balance sheet
6.6B liquid cash, net cash positive, Altman Z 7.24 - no capital-markets dependency.
Concerns 3
m30
Elevated SBC despite buybacks
SBC at 8.2% of revenue (~1.95B) is meaningful in absolute dollars; buybacks are effectively spending real cash to sterilize compensation dilution.
m25
2024 operating margin compression
Op margin fell from 36.8% (2021) to 31.3% (2024) before rebounding - suggests periodic investment/integration drag; worth tracking whether 2025 strength persists.
m20
Revenue growth decelerating from historic pace
11%-ish top-line growth is healthy but below the SaaS-era Adobe; sustaining growth against Canva/Figma/generative-AI entrants is the durability question.
This is a fortress software business. 89% gross margins that keep drifting up, 41% FCF margins, a net-cash balance sheet, a share count shrinking ~3% a year, and clean forensic diagnostics across the board - there is very little to pick at operationally. The only real question marks are strategic rather than financial: whether generative AI and Figma-class competitors eventually pressure the moat, and whether the 2024 margin dip was a one-off or a preview. On the current data, Adobe is clearly in the top decile of public-company business quality; I would not push it into the 92-plus generational tier only because the growth line is decelerating and SBC is still meaningful in absolute dollars.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Segment-level growth: is Digital Media (Creative + Document) still growing double digits or is Experience Cloud carrying the mix?
  • AI/Firefly monetization traction and any disclosed impact on ARR/net-new subscriptions
  • Customer concentration and any change in retention/NRR disclosure
  • Cause of the 2024 operating margin dip - was it Figma-related, restructuring, or ongoing R&D step-up?
  • Guidance/commentary on competitive pressure from Figma, Canva, and open-source generative tools
Valuation / Mispricing
-43
Fairly Valued
edge √Σ 50 · risk √Σ 96 · conf 7/10
Price $247.91 vs signal-adjusted deserved ~$238 and composite ~$261 - roughly a 4-5% band around fair; no exploitable gap. attractive below $205.00

The composite fair value of $261.03 and the signal-adjusted $237.73 bracket today's $247.91 price within a few percent in either direction - the definition of fairly valued. The DCF ($272.90) implies ~10% upside, the anchored P/E ($373.11) looks like a runaway multiple output that assumes historical premium multiples persist and should be discounted heavily, and the EPV floor at $125.19 is a reminder that if growth optionality evaporates, downside is real. Averaging the credible methods (DCF and signal-adjusted composite) lands squarely around the current price.

Cheap signals 2
m40
DCF suggests modest upside
DCF pegs value at $272.90, ~10% above price - real but not a margin of safety once you haircut for AI/Figma competitive risk cited in the bear case.
m30
Buyback tailwind priced in but real
~3% annual share count reduction plus 41% FCF margins mean per-share value compounds even at flat revenue - supports the deserved value but does not create a gap at today's price.
Rich / priced-in 3
m55
Signal-adjusted FV below price
Signal-adjusted fair value $237.73 sits ~4% below the $247.91 price, meaning the disciplined composite view sees mild overvaluation, not a bargain.
m70
EPV floor far below price
EPV floor of $125.19 is roughly half the current price - if growth stalls or pricing power cracks, the no-growth intrinsic value is dramatically lower, capping how cheap this can be called.
m35
Anchored P/E is unreliable
The $373.11 anchored-PE output implies a 50% premium to today; that number relies on Adobe retaining peak historical multiples and should be treated as a runaway input, not evidence of cheapness.
This is a fortress business trading at a fair price - which is what the market usually does with businesses this good. Signal-adjusted FV $237.73 is below spot $247.91; the DCF gives you ~10% and the EPV floor reminds you the downside if the AI/competition bear case bites is severe. I'd want a real margin of safety - roughly $205 or lower, a ~15% discount to signal-adjusted FV - before this is an interesting valuation call. At $248, I'm paying for the quality and getting no gap.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Net new Digital Media ARR trajectory vs guidance (Figma/AI substitution test)
  • Any pricing action or bundling changes signaling defense vs offense
  • Gen-AI monetization contribution disclosed in segment detail
  • Buyback pace vs guidance - dilution or acceleration would move deserved value
  • One-time restructuring or Figma-termination-fee tail impacts on FCF
General Sentiment
-49
Headwind
tail √Σ 47 · head √Σ 101 · conf 6/10

The tape is hostile: VIX 20.7 in the top 3% of the year, Nasdaq in correction, and a Fed-day risk-off shock. With beta 1.43, ADBE takes more than its share of that pressure - high-beta large-cap software is exactly the cohort getting sold when the macro turns. That is the dominant force on the stock this week, not anything company-specific. Narratively, Adobe is stuck in an awkward middle: still a platform-monopoly story but with only moderate intensity and thin narrative premium (about 4% over DCF). There is no euphoria to defend it, no cult to buy the dip, and the AI-disruption bear case (open source, Gen-Z piracy, Figma-style encroachment) is the quieter but more dangerous background hum in creative-software sentiment. Analyst tone tilted negative recently: Morgan Stanley's Underweight on July 21 explicitly flagged execution risk through transitions and pointed capital elsewhere in software - a real, cited driver of a prior down move. Offsetting that mildly: the FTC's early clearance of the Topaz Labs deal gave a one-day AI-flavored pop, and the stock trades at a discount to the market on earnings, which the press is starting to notice. Net: a modest but real headwind - macro pressure amplified by beta, narrative on the back foot, sell-side turning cooler, with small AI-deal tailwinds not enough to offset.

Tailwinds 2
m40
Topaz Labs FTC clearance
Early antitrust green light gave a fresh AI-acquisition talking point and pushed the stock to near two-month highs intraday - a small, concrete positive catalyst against the macro.
m25
Discount-to-market framing emerging
Coverage is starting to lean into ADBE trading below the market on earnings and cash flow - a mild value-narrative undertow that could catch a bid if the tape stabilizes.
Headwinds 4
m62
Risk-off tape amplified by 1.43 beta
VIX in the 97th percentile, Nasdaq in correction, and a hawkish Fed reaction hit high-beta large-cap software hardest. ADBE mechanically absorbs more of this drawdown than the average name.
m55
Morgan Stanley Underweight still fresh
The July 21 downgrade cited execution risk through 'multiple strategic transitions' and steered capital to cleaner software growth stories - it directly triggered a prior big down move and reframes sell-side tone from grudging bull to skeptical.
m45
Platform-monopoly narrative quietly eroding
Intensity is only moderate and the story premium is a thin 4% - there is no cult bid or euphoria to defend the stock. The bear thread (open source, Gen-Z, AI disruption of creative workflows) is gaining more airtime than the bull thread.
m35
Growth-engine-being-rebuilt framing
Press narrative has shifted to 'discounted for a reason - management is rebuilding growth' which reframes the P/E discount as warning rather than opportunity, capping multiple expansion in the near term.
This is a headwind, not a disaster. The macro tape is doing most of the damage and ADBE's 1.43 beta means it wears it harder than a defensive compounder would. Layer on a fresh Morgan Stanley Underweight, a narrative that has slipped from platform-monopoly certainty to 'growth engine being rebuilt,' and no cult bid to catch the knife, and the sentiment pressure clearly leans down. The Topaz clearance and the emerging 'cheaper than the market' framing are real but modest offsets. I would call this a genuine crosswind of magnitude 55-60 - persistent enough to matter for weeks, not a story-collapse.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Whether other sell-side desks follow Morgan Stanley to Underweight or defend the name - a second downgrade would harden the narrative
  • VIX cooling back below 18 and Nasdaq exiting correction - would relieve the beta-driven pressure fastest
  • Firefly / AI monetization data points in the next print - the story needs a proof to reclaim intensity
  • Any Figma or open-source competitive headline that would harden the disruption bear thread
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
Growth Outlook
not run

This lens hasn't been run for this ticker yet.

The forward growth verdict — is the business itself likely to grow (next 2 quarters / year 1 / years 2–3), judged against its category and against printed expectations. The full horizon ladder + creme renders on the Growth Outlook card above. Not a call on the price (Valuation owns that) or the tape (Sentiment owns that).
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure), and Growth Outlook (the forward growth verdict). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Price Prediction
Higher +6.0% v0.6.0 View full prediction →

When we made this prediction on Aug 1, 2026, ADBE was $250.41. We expect it to be $265.50 by Feb 2027, and we consider it great value under $205.00. This is an early model (v0.6.0) — the direction is more reliable than the exact price. Made Aug 1, 2026.

Price when predicted$250.41
Our estimate for Feb 2027$265.50+6.0%
Great value below$205.00
Price history shown (6 Months)

Blue is our prediction, starting the day we made it. Grey is a slower route to the same place — the same destination, taking longer. Black is the actual price, so you can see how we are doing.

Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for ADBE. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
v1.1.562 · 9b2927c4 · 2026-08-22 16:52:06