Homepage
FRESH Analysis Report
Jun 23, 2026
4 days ago · 96% complete · +8 refreshed

Applied Materials, Inc.

AMAT NASDAQ Categories PDF
Technology · Semiconductors
Santa Clara, CA 95052-3299, United States IPO 1980 appliedmaterials.com Updated Jun 23, 3:00am
Price
$640.18
Market Cap
$508.3B
Employees
36,000
Beta
1.67
Avg Volume
7,537,466
CEO
Gary E. Dickerson
Business Description

Applied Materials, Inc. is a prominent provider of crucial manufacturing equipment, associated services, and software solutions. These offerings primarily cater to the semiconductor, display, and related high-technology industries. The company organizes its activities into three principal business segments: 1. Semiconductor Systems: This division is dedicated to the development, production, and sale of sophisticated manufacturing tools essential for fabricating semiconductor chips, also known as integrated circuits. Its comprehensive suite of technologies includes epitaxy, ion implantation, oxidation/nitridation, rapid thermal processing, physical vapor deposition, chemical vapor deposition, chemical mechanical planarization, electrochemical deposition, atomic layer deposition, etching, and selective deposition and removal processes, in addition to precision metrology and inspection instruments. 2. Applied Global Services: This segment delivers integrated solutions aimed at maximizing the performance and productivity of manufacturing facilities and their equipment. Its services encompass providing spare parts, system upgrades, maintenance support, refurbished older-generation equipment, and advanced factory automation software for semiconductor, display, and other product lines. 3. Display and Adjacent Markets: This unit focuses on supplying products for the creation of various display technologies. This includes manufacturing solutions for liquid crystal displays (LCDs), organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), and other display types, which are integral to a broad spectrum of consumer electronics such as televisions, computer monitors, laptops, personal computers, electronic tablets, and smartphones. Founded in 1967, Applied Materials, Inc. maintains its corporate headquarters in Santa Clara, California. The company boasts a significant international presence, conducting operations across the United States, China, Korea, Taiwan, Japan, Southeast Asia, and Europe.

Business History
Generated: Jun 23, 2026 3:02am
Price Overview
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:00am (4d ago)
$640.18
+23.07 (+3.74%)
Day Range
$620.42 – $641.18
52-Week Range
$154.47 – $641.18
50-Day MA
$450.52
200-Day MA
$320.24
Volume
10,445,873.00
Analyst Price Targets
Low $425.00
Consensus $542.13
High $715.00
(169 analysts)
Share Structure
Outstanding 793,959,430.00
Float 790,529,525.00
Free Float 99.6%
High free float — 99.6% of shares trade freely, ~0.4% held by insiders/institutions
Very liquid — most shares trade freely. Low insider ownership can mean less management alignment, but makes large position sizing straightforward.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:05am (4d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:02am (4d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
API Direct from provider CALC Derived from statements
Industry comparison last run: Jun 23, 2026 3:01am
P/E Ratio (Price per dollar of earnings)
API
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
59.74
Stock Price: $640.18
EPS (Diluted): 8.71
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
API
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
9.11
Stock Price: $640.18
Total Equity: $20.42B
Shares: 808,000,000
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
API
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
45.63
Market Cap: $508.28B
Total Debt: $6.56B
Cash: $7.24B
EBITDA: $9.65B
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
API
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$185.8B
Market Cap: $508.28B
Total Debt: $6.56B
Cash: $7.24B
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
API
Gross Profit / Revenue
48.7%
Gross Profit: $13.81B
Revenue: $28.37B
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
API
Operating Income / Revenue
29.2%
Operating Income: $8.29B
Revenue: $28.37B
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
API
Net Income / Revenue
24.7%
Net Income: $7.00B
Revenue: $28.37B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
API
Net Income / Total Equity
39.8%
Net Income: $7.00B
Total Equity: $20.42B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
API
NOPAT / Invested Capital
21.6%
Operating Income: $8.29B
Tax Rate: 24.5%
Equity: $20.42B
Total Debt: $6.56B
Cash: $7.24B
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
API
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
2.61
Current Assets: $20.88B
Current Liabilities: $8.00B
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
CALC
Total Debt / Total Equity
0.32
Short-Term Debt: $100.00M
Long-Term Debt: $6.46B
Total Debt: $6.56B
Total Equity: $20.42B
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
CALC
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$35.11
Revenue: $28.37B
Shares: 808,000,000
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
CALC
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
$25.27
Total Equity: $20.42B
Shares: 808,000,000
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
CALC
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$7.05
Operating CF: $7.96B
CapEx: -$2.26B
Shares: 808,000,000
CapEx is negative (outflow) — added to OCF to get FCF
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
API
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
0.7%
Last Dividend: N/A
Stock Price: $640.18
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
Dividends Paid / Net Income
Dividends Paid: N/A
Net Income: $7.00B
Dividends paid not available in cash flow statement
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Jun 23, 2026 3:01am
Compares AMAT against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · three lenses
Three separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-06-23 03:11:56
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Great business, wrong price - wait for a real dip 8/10
Fortress-quality business (+100) trading at roughly 2x any defensible fair value (-100), with an AI-capex tailwind (+35) that is the only thing justifying today's print - pass at $640, build a list for the $300s.
The cruxWhether the AI-capex narrative holds long enough to keep a $640 price aloft that even a quality-adjusted DCF struggles to get above $300 - when narrative cracks, a 1.67-beta name unwinds fast.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from AMAT's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwaySelf-Funding
DilutionShare Count Shrinking
Earnings QualityHigh Earnings Quality
The three lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
+100
Fortress
edge √Σ 172 · risk √Σ 47 · conf 9/10

AMAT is a structurally advantaged business: revenue grew from $23.1B (2021) to $28.4B (2025), gross margin expanded from 47.3% to 48.7%, and operating margin held near 29% through a cyclical semi capex environment. Net income rose from $5.89B to $7.00B while diluted share count shrank from 919M to 808M (about -3.2% CAGR), so per-share earnings power compounds faster than headline growth. Buybacks exceeded SBC by 837%, meaning management is a genuine net buyer, not a dilution machine. Earnings integrity is excellent: OCF/NI of 1.07x, accruals at -1.4% of assets, Beneish M of -2.18, and an Altman Z of 23.29 all point to clean, cash-backed earnings. Liquidity is ample with $8.57B cash, $2.02B net cash, and $5.70B FCF in 2025 (down from $7.49B in 2024 - worth watching but still robust). The franchise is self-funding with no reliance on capital markets. The only soft spots: FCF dipped roughly 24% year-over-year in 2025 despite revenue growth, suggesting working-capital build or capex step-up; and net income ticked down slightly off 2024's peak. Insider tape is all sales (39 sells, 0 buys, $120.7M) including the CEO, but this is typical 10b5-1 behavior for a mature large-cap and not a quality red flag on its own.

Strengths 5
m90
Per-share value compounding
Diluted shares down from 919M to 808M (-12% in 4 years), buyback-to-SBC ratio 837%. Management is genuinely returning capital, not diluting holders.
m85
Pristine earnings quality
OCF/NI 1.07x, accruals -1.4% of assets, Beneish M -2.18, Altman Z 23.29. Mechanical checks find zero red flags - reported earnings are cash-backed and real.
m75
Margin expansion through cycle
Gross margin rose 47.3% to 48.7% and operating margin held near 29% from 2021-2025, evidence of pricing power and operating discipline in a cyclical industry.
m70
Fortress balance sheet
$8.57B liquid cash, $2.02B net cash, Altman Z 23.29. Zero solvency risk; can fund R&D, M&A, and buybacks through any downturn.
m60
Durable structural position
Revenue grew every year 2021-2025 ($23.1B to $28.4B) through a semi capex cycle that hit peers harder. Implies deep tool-of-record positioning at leading-edge fabs.
Concerns 3
m35
FCF stepped down in 2025
FCF fell from $7.49B (2024) to $5.70B (2025), about -24%, even as revenue grew and margins expanded. Suggests working-capital build or capex acceleration - needs explanation.
m25
Net income off 2024 peak
Net income slipped from $7.18B (2024) to $7.00B (2025) despite revenue growth - small but worth tracking whether mix or tax-related.
m20
Insider selling only
39 sells totaling $120.7M including CEO Dickerson, zero buys. Likely 10b5-1 scheduled, but no insider is signaling conviction with open-market buys.
This is a high-quality compounder by any honest read. The numbers line up the way they should at a great business: margins expanding, share count shrinking faster than SBC issuance, earnings cash-backed, balance sheet unbreakable. The only thing that nags me is the 24% FCF drop in 2025 while revenue and margins went up - that is either working-capital noise or a capex cycle, and I want to see which before calling it nothing. Insider selling is loud in dollar terms but normal for a mature large-cap with appreciated equity comp. Net-net: a genuine fortress-tier operator in an oligopoly with structural tailwinds, and management is treating shareholders well.
Verify before trusting this (6)
  • Cause of 2025 FCF drop ($7.49B to $5.70B) - inventory/receivables build, capex step-up, or one-time items in cash flow statement
  • Customer concentration disclosure in 10-K (TSMC, Samsung, Intel exposure) and China revenue mix given export-control risk
  • Segment detail on Applied Global Services vs Semiconductor Systems - services recurring-revenue mix supports durability thesis
  • Whether insider sales are pre-arranged 10b5-1 plans versus discretionary
  • R&D intensity trend and any capitalized-software accounting that could flatter operating income
  • Backlog and bookings trajectory to confirm the 2025 revenue/margin expansion is not a peak
Valuation / Mispricing
-100
Rich
edge √Σ 25 · risk √Σ 125 · conf 6/10
Price $640 vs deserved value I'd peg around $300 even after a quality uplift - roughly 50%+ overvalued on a skeptical read. attractive below $380.00

Price is $640.18 against an e2e composite FV of $127.25 and signal-adjusted FV of $123.45 - implying ~80% downside if you take those models straight. I do not. A 5x gap usually means one or more methods are runaway: the EPV floor at $69.52 is a no-growth liquidation-ish read that is clearly too punitive for a Fortress-grade franchise with secular tailwinds, and the anchored-PE at $217 is the only method that even pretends to value future growth - and it still sits at one-third of the current price. DCF at $111 is the most balanced of the three and it is also far below today's quote.

Cheap signals 1
m25
Fortress quality deserves a premium over models
Quality score 100, pristine earnings, shrinking share count - a fair quality uplift of 2-3x over composite is defensible, but that only gets to ~$300, not $640.
Rich / priced-in 4
m80
Price 5x composite fair value
Composite FV $127 and signal-adjusted $123 vs $640 price implies -81% upside. Even discounting EPV as too low, the DCF at $111 says the cash-flow math does not support this quote.
m70
Even anchored-PE sits one-third of price
Anchored-PE of $217 is the most growth-friendly of the three methods and still 66% below $640 - the multiple-expansion piece of the move is doing nearly all the work.
m55
Priced for perpetual super-cycle
Justifying $640 requires sustained mid-teens topline growth and no China/export disruption - a stack of optimistic assumptions with no margin for cycle digestion.
m35
FCF dropped 24% in 2025 while price ripped
Cash generation went the wrong way last year even as the multiple expanded - decoupling of price from the cash that ultimately backs it.
I love the business, I do not love the price. A Fortress-grade franchise deserves a premium to the DCF, but not a 5x one - my honest deserved-value range is $250-350 and the stock is $640. This is the textbook case of a wonderful company the market has already figured out, and then some. I would need to see it in the high $300s before I get interested on valuation alone; until then it is a hold-your-nose for owners and a no-touch for new money.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • FY26 capex guidance from major foundry customers (TSMC, Samsung, Intel)
  • AMAT's own services revenue mix and growth - the recurring piece supporting any premium multiple
  • China revenue exposure and export-license trajectory
  • Whether the 2025 FCF dip is working-capital timing or a structural capex step-up
  • Backlog and book-to-bill in leading-edge vs trailing-edge segments
General Sentiment
+35
Tailwind
tail √Σ 99 · head √Σ 64 · conf 7/10

AMAT is riding a strong, medium-cult platform-monopoly narrative tied to the AI-chip capex supercycle. News flow is overtly bullish (target hikes, EssilorLuxottica deal, 'dot-com peak valuation justified by AI' framing), and the active story is doing the heavy lifting - buyers are pricing a 10-15 year structural tailwind, not current cash flow. That is textbook positive sentiment pressure, regardless of whether the fundamentals support it. The neutral-to-mildly-positive macro tape (VIX 16.8, S&P near highs) is not fighting the move, though AMAT's 1.67 beta means any risk-off lurch would hit it hard. Analyst tone is the one clear divergence: consensus Buy but target $542 sits ~15% BELOW the $640 spot, and only 7 modest revisions this month - the sell-side has not chased the rally. That is a latent headwind if momentum stalls, because price is leaning on narrative alone with analysts visibly uncomfortable. Net: the live narrative and news flow are a clear tailwind right now; the macro and analyst-target gap are background risks, not active pressure.

Tailwinds 3
m72
AI-capex narrative in full force
Strong-intensity platform-monopoly story with explicit AI-chip-supercycle framing in headlines. This is the dominant force on the tape and it is pushing AMAT specifically because it sits at the narrative's center.
m55
Positive news cluster
Citi target raise, EssilorLuxottica long-term deal, multiple 'rally has legs / AI justifies valuation' pieces in a 72h window. Flow is uniformly constructive.
m40
Calm macro tape not fighting the move
VIX 16.8 and S&P near highs let a high-beta semi cap-eq name keep running; in a stress tape AMAT's 1.67 beta would be punished, but right now the regime is permissive.
Headwinds 3
m45
Price above consensus target
Targets average $542 vs $640 spot - analysts have not chased. Only 7 revisions this month at $612 avg. Tone is backward-looking but signals sell-side discomfort that could cap upside or trigger downgrades.
m35
Dot-com-peak valuation framing
Even bullish articles lead with 'more expensive than dot-com peak' - that framing plants a reflexive doubt that can flip fast if any AI-capex data point disappoints.
m30
High beta into rising rates
10y at 4.51% is a slow grind against long-duration AI growth names; AMAT's 1.67 beta means it absorbs any rate or risk-off shock disproportionately.
Net pressure leans tailwind. The AI-capex narrative is loud, durable enough for now, and news flow is one-sided positive - that is real, active upward pressure on this specific name. The honest worry is the analyst-target gap: price is $100 above consensus and sell-side has not capitulated, so the cushion is narrative alone. In this calm tape that is fine; in a 1.67-beta name it becomes dangerous fast if the AI story takes any hit. For now, tailwind - but a fragile one.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Whether analyst targets get revised up toward spot in next 2-4 weeks (confirms narrative) or stay stuck (latent downgrade risk)
  • Any TSMC/Samsung/Intel capex guidance shift - the single biggest narrative crack point
  • China export-control headlines - easing would gut the 'geopolitical chokepoint' premium
  • VIX break above 20 or sector rotation out of semis - would hit this beta hard
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Three lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), and General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Deep Analysis
Last run: Jun 23, 2026 3:04:43 am

Pre-flight intelligence scans the company first, then routes to the right analytical methods.

0 Company Classification — What type of company is this?
1 Industry Landscape — Where is the industry headed?
2 Company Momentum — Where is this company trending?
3 Forward Projection — 1Y & 2Y projected metrics (requires Layer 1 + 2)
4a DCF Valuation — Present value of future cash flows
4b Earnings Power Value — Floor value — worth with zero growth
4c Anchored PE — Industry PE adjusted for growth differential
4d Reverse DCF — What growth is the market pricing in?
4e Revenue-Based DCF — For growth/narrative companies (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4f Anchored P/S — Price-to-Sales peer comparison (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4g Scenario Analysis — Bull / Base / Bear (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4h Dividend Discount Model — For dividend/income stocks only
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4i Book Value Analysis — For deep value / turnaround stocks only
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4j Insider Activity — Are insiders buying or selling?
4f Cash Flow Quality — How trustworthy is the FCF?
4g Debt Maturity Risk — Can it handle its debt?
4h Macro Environment — Rates, market valuation, volatility
4i Sector Intelligence — How does this company compare within its sector?
4j Revenue Confidence — How reliable is the growth projection?
4k Sensitivity Analysis — How fragile is the fair value estimate?
4l Sector Demand Cycle — Is the sector in a boom, steady state, or contraction?
5 AI Investigation — Adaptive research engine (Claude)
5b Thesis Evaluation — What does the market believe? (narrative/platform stocks only)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
6 Valuation Synthesis — Weighted verdict from all methods (requires Layer 4)
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:02am (4d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue $23.1B $25.8B $26.5B $27.2B $28.4B
Cost of Revenue $12.1B $13.8B $14.1B $14.3B $14.6B
Gross Profit $10.9B $12.0B $12.4B $12.9B $13.8B
Operating Expenses $4.0B $4.2B $4.7B $5.0B $5.5B
Operating Income $6.9B $7.8B $7.7B $7.9B $8.3B
Net Income $5.9B $6.5B $6.9B $7.2B $7.0B
EBITDA $7.4B $8.3B $8.5B $8.8B $9.7B
EPS $6.47 $7.49 $8.16 $8.68 $8.71
EPS (Diluted)
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:00am (4d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Cash & Equivalents $5.0B $2.0B $6.1B $8.0B $7.2B
Total Current Assets $16.1B $15.9B $19.1B $21.2B $20.9B
Total Assets $25.8B $26.7B $30.7B $34.4B $36.3B
Current Liabilities $6.3B $7.4B $7.4B $8.5B $8.0B
Long-Term Debt $5.5B $5.5B $5.5B $5.5B $6.5B
Total Liabilities $13.6B $14.5B $14.4B $15.4B $15.9B
Total Equity $12.2B $12.2B $16.3B $19.0B $20.4B
Retained Earnings $32.2B $37.9B $43.7B $49.7B $55.2B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 22, 2026 3:04am (5d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Operating Cash Flow $5.4B $5.4B $8.7B $8.7B $8.0B
Capital Expenditure -$668.0M -$787.0M -$1.1B -$1.2B -$2.3B
Free Cash Flow $4.8B $4.6B $7.6B $7.5B $5.7B
Acquisitions (net) -$12.0M -$441.0M -$25.0M $0 $4.0M
Debt Repayment
Dividends Paid
Stock Buybacks -$3.8B -$6.1B -$2.2B -$3.8B -$4.9B
Net Change in Cash -$365.0M -$3.0B $4.1B $1.9B -$781.0M
Analyst Estimates (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:00am (4d ago)
Metric 2026 2027 2028 2029
Revenue $33.4B
$33.0B – $33.8B
$42.3B
$37.0B – $44.6B
$49.5B
$49.2B – $49.8B
$53.2B
$48.9B – $56.0B
EBITDA $12.0B
$11.9B – $12.2B
$15.3B
$13.3B – $16.1B
$17.9B
$17.8B – $18.0B
$19.2B
$17.6B – $20.2B
Net Income $9.8B
$9.4B – $10.1B
$13.0B
$10.4B – $14.3B
$15.6B
$11.8B – $21.3B
$17.7B
$15.8B – $18.9B
EPS
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:02am (4d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue Growth +11.8% +2.8% +2.5% +4.4%
Gross Profit Growth +9.9% +3.3% +4.1% +7.1%
Operating Income Growth +13.0% -1.7% +2.8% +5.4%
Net Income Growth +10.8% +5.1% +4.7% -2.5%
EBITDA Growth +11.8% +2.4% +4.0% +9.8%
Insider Trading (Recent)
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:02am (4d ago)
Type codes PPurchase SSale AAward / grant MOption exercise FIn-kind (tax) CConversion GGift DReturn to issuer
All SEC Form 4 codes
Open market
P Purchase
Open-market or private purchase of shares.
S Sale
Open-market or private sale of shares.
Compensation (Rule 16b-3)
A Award / grant
Grant or award of securities (RSUs, options, etc.) under Rule 16b-3.
D Return to issuer
Securities disposed back to the company under Rule 16b-3.
F In-kind (tax)
Shares withheld or delivered to pay the option-exercise price or tax — not an open-market sale.
I Discretionary
Discretionary transaction under an employee plan — Rule 16b-3(f).
M Option exercise
Exercise or conversion of a derivative (option/RSU) into shares — exempt.
Derivatives
C Conversion
Conversion of a derivative security into the underlying shares.
E Short expiration
Expiration of a short derivative position.
H Long expiration
Expiration or cancellation of a long derivative position with value received.
O OTM exercise
Exercise of an out-of-the-money derivative.
X ITM exercise
Exercise of an in-the-money or at-the-money derivative.
Other exempt
G Gift
Bona fide gift of securities.
L Small acquisition
Small acquisition under Rule 16a-6.
W Inheritance
Acquisition or disposition by will or the laws of descent.
Z Voting trust
Deposit into or withdrawal from a voting trust.
Other
J Other
Other acquisition or disposition (explained in a Form 4 footnote).
K Equity swap
Transaction in an equity swap or similar instrument.
U Tender / buyout
Disposition via tender of shares in a change-of-control transaction.

Compensation-plan codes (A, D, F, M) are routine and rarely directional. Open-market P (buy) and S (sale) carry the most signal.

Date Insider Type Shares Price Value
2026-06-18 Raja Prabu G. S-Sale 10,000.00 $633.53 $6.3M
2026-06-16 Iannotti Thomas J S-Sale 9,250.00 $599.77 $5.5M
2026-06-16 Iannotti Thomas J G-Gift 750.00 $0.00 $0
2026-06-15 Nalamasu Omkaram S-Sale 6,938.00 $590.20 $4.1M
2026-06-15 Nalamasu Omkaram S-Sale 3,799.00 $595.14 $2.3M
2026-06-16 Nalamasu Omkaram S-Sale 3,515.00 $590.48 $2.1M
2026-06-16 Nalamasu Omkaram S-Sale 4,782.00 $591.53 $2.8M
2026-06-16 Nalamasu Omkaram S-Sale 2,412.00 $592.40 $1.4M
2026-06-16 Nalamasu Omkaram S-Sale 4,726.00 $593.58 $2.8M
2026-06-16 Nalamasu Omkaram S-Sale 1,125.00 $594.85 $669,206
2026-06-16 Nalamasu Omkaram S-Sale 4,028.00 $595.50 $2.4M
2026-06-16 Nalamasu Omkaram S-Sale 3,675.00 $596.52 $2.2M
2026-06-15 DICKERSON GARY E S-Sale 11,273.00 $590.03 $6.7M
2026-06-16 DICKERSON GARY E S-Sale 15,755.00 $590.52 $9.3M
2026-06-16 DICKERSON GARY E S-Sale 9,186.00 $591.40 $5.4M
2026-06-16 DICKERSON GARY E S-Sale 10,411.00 $592.18 $6.2M
2026-06-16 DICKERSON GARY E S-Sale 4,682.00 $593.51 $2.8M
2026-06-16 DICKERSON GARY E S-Sale 4,535.00 $594.74 $2.7M
2026-06-16 DICKERSON GARY E S-Sale 5,933.00 $595.59 $3.5M
2026-06-16 DICKERSON GARY E S-Sale 13,505.00 $596.82 $8.1M
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Jun 20, 2026 11:53am (6d ago)
Date Dividend Declaration Record Payment
2026-08-20 $0.53 2026-06-09 2026-08-20 2026-09-10
2026-05-21 $0.53 2026-03-12 2026-05-21 2026-06-11
2026-02-19 $0.46 2025-12-11 2026-02-19 2026-03-12
2025-11-20 $0.46 2025-09-11 2025-11-20 2025-12-11
2025-08-21 $0.46 2025-06-10 2025-08-21 2025-09-11
2025-05-22 $0.46 2025-03-10 2025-05-22 2025-06-12
2025-02-20 $0.40 2024-12-13 2025-02-20 2025-03-13
2024-11-21 $0.40 2024-09-12 2024-11-21 2024-12-12
2024-08-22 $0.40 2024-06-13 2024-08-22 2024-09-12
2024-05-22 $0.40 2024-03-08 2024-05-23 2024-06-13
2024-02-21 $0.32 2023-12-07 2024-02-22 2024-03-14
2023-11-22 $0.32 2023-09-07 2023-11-24 2023-12-14
2023-08-23 $0.32 2023-06-08 2023-08-24 2023-09-14
2023-05-24 $0.32 2023-03-13 2023-05-25 2023-06-15
2023-02-22 $0.26 2022-12-12 2023-02-23 2023-03-16
2022-11-23 $0.26 2022-09-08 2022-11-25 2022-12-15
2022-08-24 $0.26 2022-06-09 2022-08-25 2022-09-15
2022-05-25 $0.26 2022-03-11 2022-05-26 2022-06-16
2022-02-22 $0.24 2021-12-02 2022-02-23 2022-03-16
2021-11-24 $0.24 2021-09-02 2021-11-26 2021-12-16
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for AMAT — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
Delvantic AI Findings
Independent analyst synthesis · Delvantic - Cairn AI · generated 2026-06-23 03:05:23
Reviews the pipeline's own verdicts
Verdict Overvalued but the synthesis's $127 fair value is wrong — true normalized fair value is $300-350; trim into strength, re-enter below $400, don't short a structurally advantaged oligopolist mid-cycle.

The numbers tell a more bullish story than several of the prior models acknowledge. Quarterly revenue went from $6.78B (Jul-2024) to $7.91B (Apr-2026), and net income ramped from $1.71B to $2.81B over the same window — the latest quarter at 35.5% net margin is a step-change, not a continuation of trend. Annualizing the last two quarters ($14.92B H1 → ~$30B+ run-rate) puts FY26 revenue roughly 6-8% above FY25's $28.37B, with net income tracking toward $9-10B versus FY25's $7.0B. That's not a "mature earner growing 1%" — the earnings_cagr of 1% is a backward-looking artifact dragged down by the noisy Jan-2025 quarter ($1.19B NI, 16.5% margin, likely a China export-control charge or tax item). Strip that and the trajectory is clearly accelerating.

The Valuation Synthesis claim of $127 fair value (-80% downside) is almost certainly broken. At $640 and ~$9B forward NI, the forward P/E is ~56 on the headline market cap of $508B — but the market cap implies ~794M shares, and AMAT's actual share count is closer to 800M, so that math roughly checks. EV/EBITDA of 45x and trailing P/E of 60x are genuinely rich for a cyclical, but a $127 DCF would imply the market is mispricing by 5x, which would require a near-term collapse in WFE spending of 60%+. Nothing in the quarterly cadence supports that. Either the DCF is using draconian terminal assumptions or an inappropriate cyclical-trough normalization. I'd anchor fair value at 25-30x normalized earnings of ~$8.5B = $210-255B EV, or roughly $270-320/share — rich-but-not-absurd downside of 50-60%, not 80%.

The Market Forces "losing competitive battle / deteriorating cash flows" signal contradicts the raw data: OCF $7.96B and FCF $5.70B in FY25 are healthy, and revenue YoY accelerated to +4.4% with margin expansion. The fcf_cagr of -13.4% likely reflects working-capital timing and elevated capex for capacity, not structural decay — gross margin held at 48.7% and operating margin at 29.2%. Insider selling is real (10 sales in mid-June 2026, zero buys) but at $640 near all-time highs after a massive run, programmatic 10b5-1 selling by executives is the rational baseline; calling it "unanimous structural signal" overreads it. The Narrative layer's framing — that this is an AI-capex mega-cycle bet, not a meme — is the most honest model output here.

The contrarian case I'd actually take seriously isn't the $127 DCF. It's that WFE is notoriously cyclical: 2018 peak was followed by a 20% revenue drawdown, and 2022's peak by another. AMAT's last-twelve-months revenue ($29B) is ~26% above the 2021 base, and the Apr-2026 quarter run-rate ($31.6B annualized) likely represents a cycle peak being extrapolated as a new plateau. If China demand (currently ~30-40% of revenue and exposed to escalating export controls) compresses, and memory capex resets, $9B forward NI could revert to $6.5B within 18 months — putting the stock on 78x trough earnings. That's the real risk, and it's masked by the accelerating quarterly print. I dissent from the synthesis verdict (overvalued by 80%) as numerically unsupported, but I agree with the directional call: this is expensive. Fair value sits around $300-350 on normalized through-cycle earnings with a premium for the genuine oligopoly position alongside ASML, LRCX, and TEL. At $640 the market is paying ~2x that for narrative — durable narrative, per the Narrative layer, but brittle to any capex guide-down from TSMC or Samsung. I'd be a seller into strength, not a short, and a buyer only sub-$400.

GPT Critique
Second-opinion review · gpt-4o · generated 2026-06-23 03:05:34
Reviews the Opus findings above
Verdict I disagree with Opus's $300-350 fair value; I'd place it closer to $400, acknowledging both cyclical risks and structural advantages — a premium justified by AMAT's strategic position.

In examining the raw data for Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT), several key financial trends emerge. The company has demonstrated a strong upward trajectory in both revenue and net income over recent quarters, with revenue climbing from $6.78 billion in July 2024 to $7.91 billion in April 2026, and net income improving from $1.71 billion to $2.81 billion in the same period. Notably, the net margin has surged to 35.5% in the latest quarter, reflecting enhanced profitability. However, while annual revenue growth appears modest at 6.4% from 2022 to 2025, the company's quarterly performance suggests a potential acceleration in growth that may not be fully captured in trailing annual metrics. The balance sheet shows a solid cash position of $7.24 billion, and cash flow metrics indicate robust operating cash flows but also significant capital expenditures, suggesting ongoing investments in growth.

I agree with Opus's assertion that the $127 fair value posited by the Valuation Synthesis is excessively bearish. The synthesis's projection of an 80% downside seems disconnected from the company's demonstrated financial performance and strategic position in the semiconductor equipment market. Opus correctly highlights that the valuation assumes an extreme contraction in WFE spending, which is not substantiated by the latest financial data showing revenue growth and margin expansion. Additionally, I concur with the analysis that insider selling is not necessarily indicative of structural issues, as it aligns with rational financial behavior given the stock's recent highs.

However, I diverge from Opus's conclusion that fair value lies between $300-350. While Opus justifies this range by anchoring on a 25-30x normalized earnings multiple, I believe this overlooks the potential for sustained elevated capital expenditures driven by AI and advanced packaging demand. The narrative of AMAT as a "platform-monopoly" with structural pricing power supports a higher valuation multiple than typical cyclical companies. Hence, I would argue for a fair value closer to $400, reflecting both the cyclical risks and the structural tailwinds.

A skeptic might argue that the impressive recent quarter is a peak rather than a new baseline, citing historical cyclicality in semiconductor capital equipment spending. They might also question the sustainability of margins at 35.5%, given potential geopolitical risks and fluctuations in global semiconductor demand, particularly if Chinese export controls intensify or memory capex resets.

Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for AMAT. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
Data via Financial Modeling Prep · Cached for performance · fmp
v1.1.352 · d1100787 · 2026-06-26 11:39:30