Skip to main content
Homepage
Full 18-step deep-dive · ~20–30 min · a member feature.
AGING Analysis Report
Aug 15, 2026
8 days ago · 100% complete
NOT DEPENDABLE This report predates a filing — its financial basis has been replaced.
Report generated: Aug 15, 2026 · Filing on record since: Aug 22, 2026 · 7 days after
For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page

What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for Ametek Inc. (AME) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.

Our current read (analysis of 2026-08-23): Designation Watch · Gem Score -6 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality 72 · Value -70 · Sentiment 37 (timing only, not weighted) · Composite fair value $137.37 vs $254.79 at analysis

Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable reference-name attribute you can cite):

  • profile-header / price-overview — company profile, live quote, market cap
  • extended-analysisthe core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memo
  • future-predictions — our forward price-band predictions
  • market-narrative / ai-findings / gpt-critique — narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)
  • Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers): price-history, income-trend, key-metrics, financials (statement tables), insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.

More for machine readers: site briefing at /llms.txt · any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER · raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds); every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.

Ametek Inc.

AME NYSE
Industrials · Specialty Industrial Machinery
Berwyn, PA 19312-1177, United States ametek.com Updated Aug 14, 6:53pm
Price
$254.79
Market Cap
$58.4B
Employees
22,500
Beta
1.00
Avg Volume
1,058,255
Last Dividend
$1.30
CEO
Mr. David A. Zapico

Ametek Inc. is a global manufacturer of advanced electronic instruments and electromechanical devices serving a wide range of industrial and technology-driven markets. The company operates through two primary segments: Electronic Instruments, which provides analytical, test, and measurement instrumentation for sectors such as aerospace, energy, medical, industrial, power, and research; and Electromechanical, which supplies automation and precision motion control solutions, thermal management systems, specialty metals, and highly engineered electrical interconnects and medical components. Ametek Inc. focuses on differentiated, application-specific technologies that support customers in complex and demanding environments, from process control and power generation to medical diagnostics and aerospace systems. Headquartered in Berwyn, Pennsylvania and founded in 1930, Ametek Inc. plays a significant role in the industrials sector by providing mission-critical components and instruments that are embedded in customers’ equipment, production processes, and infrastructure worldwide.

Runs with full report Generated: Aug 15, 2026 12:24am
Price Overview
Price at report time
$254.79
as of Aug 15, 12:33am (8d ago)
Change · Aug 15
-1.43 (-0.56%)
Day Range
$254.27 – $257.72
52-Week Range
$179.24 – $261.16
50-Day MA
$238.60
200-Day MA
$222.60
Volume
1,577,100.00
Right now · live
Log in to get the live feed
Members see the real-time price and the move since this report (over 8d).
Share Structure
Outstanding 229,261,244.00
Float 219,730,854.00
Free Float 95.8%
High free float — 95.8% of shares trade freely, ~4.2% held by insiders/institutions
Very liquid — most shares trade freely. Low insider ownership can mean less management alignment, but makes large position sizing straightforward.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Aug 15, 2026 12:33am (8d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Aug 14, 2026 6:53pm (9d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
TD Twelve Data statement HEX SEC filing
Industry comparison last run: Aug 15, 2026 12:21am
P/E Ratio (Price per dollar of earnings)
HEX
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
39.81
Stock Price: $254.79
EPS (Diluted): 6.40
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
HEX
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
5.54
Stock Price: $254.79
Total Equity: $10.63B
Shares: 231,259,000
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
HEX
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
25.80
Market Cap: $58.40B
Total Debt: $2.28B
Cash: $457.95M
EBITDA: $2.33B
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
HEX
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$60.2B
Market Cap: $58.40B
Total Debt: $2.28B
Cash: $457.95M
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
HEX
Gross Profit / Revenue
36.0%
Gross Profit: $2.67B
Revenue: $7.40B
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
HEX
Operating Income / Revenue
25.8%
Operating Income: $1.91B
Revenue: $7.40B
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
HEX
Net Income / Revenue
20.0%
Net Income: $1.48B
Revenue: $7.40B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
HEX
Net Income / Total Equity
13.9%
Net Income: $1.48B
Total Equity: $10.63B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
HEX
NOPAT / Invested Capital
12.6%
Operating Income: $1.91B
Tax Rate: 17.7%
Equity: $10.63B
Total Debt: $2.28B
Cash: $457.95M
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
HEX
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
1.06
Current Assets: $3.02B
Current Liabilities: $2.84B
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
HEX
Total Debt / Total Equity
0.21
Short-Term Debt: $1.21B
Long-Term Debt: $1.07B
Total Debt: $2.28B
Total Equity: $10.63B
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
HEX
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$32.00
Revenue: $7.40B
Shares: 231,259,000
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
HEX
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
$45.96
Total Equity: $10.63B
Shares: 231,259,000
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
HEX
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$7.23
Operating CF: $1.80B
CapEx: -$130.25M
Shares: 231,259,000
CapEx is negative (outflow) — added to OCF to get FCF
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
TD
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
0.5%
Last Dividend: $1.30
Stock Price: $254.79
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
HEX
Dividends Paid / Net Income
19.3%
Dividends Paid: -$285.35M
Net Income: $1.48B
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Aug 15, 2026 12:21am
Compares AME against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 14, 2026 6:53pm (9d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue $6.2B $6.6B $6.9B $7.4B
Cost of Revenue $3.6B $4.0B $4.2B $4.5B $4.7B
Gross Profit $2.1B $2.4B $2.5B $2.7B
Operating Expenses $603.9M $644.6M $677.0M $696.9M $757.1M
Operating Income $1.3B $1.5B $1.7B $1.8B $1.9B
Net Income $990.1M $1.2B $1.3B $1.4B $1.5B
EBITDA $1.6B $1.8B $2.0B $2.2B $2.3B
EPS $4.29 $5.04 $5.70 $5.95 $6.42
EPS (Diluted) $4.25 $5.01 $5.67 $5.93 $6.40
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 11, 2026 12:49pm (12d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Cash & Equivalents $346.8M $345.4M $409.8M $374.0M $458.0M
Total Current Assets $2.1B $2.5B $2.8B $2.6B $3.0B
Total Assets $11.9B $12.4B $15.0B $14.6B $16.1B
Current Liabilities $1.6B $1.6B $2.9B $2.1B $2.8B
Long-Term Debt $2.2B $2.2B $1.9B $1.4B $1.1B
Total Liabilities $5.0B $5.0B $6.3B $5.0B $5.4B
Total Equity $6.9B $7.5B $8.7B $9.7B $10.6B
Retained Earnings $7.9B $8.9B $9.9B $11.1B $12.3B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 14, 2026 6:53pm (9d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Operating Cash Flow $1.2B $1.1B $1.7B $1.8B $1.8B
Capital Expenditure -$110.7M -$139.0M -$136.2M -$127.1M -$130.2M
Free Cash Flow $1.0B $1.0B $1.6B $1.7B $1.7B
Acquisitions (net) -$2.0B -$429.7M -$2.2B -$117.5M -$933.2M
Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) -$59.7M $0 $0 -$300.0M -$514.9M
Dividends Paid -$184.6M -$202.2M -$230.3M -$258.8M -$285.3M
Stock Buybacks -$14.7M -$332.8M -$7.8M -$212.0M -$434.0M
Net Change in Cash -$866.1M -$1.4M $64.4M -$35.8M $84.0M
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Aug 14, 2026 6:53pm (9d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue Growth +7.3% +5.2% +6.6%
Gross Profit Growth +11.1% +3.9% +7.7%
Operating Income Growth +14.7% +13.8% +4.2% +7.3%
Net Income Growth +17.1% +13.3% +4.8% +7.6%
EBITDA Growth +13.7% +12.4% +5.7% +7.9%
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Aug 11, 2026 12:49pm (12d ago)
Date Dividend Declaration Record Payment
2026-06-15 $0.34
2026-03-16 $0.34
2025-12-05 $0.31
2025-09-15 $0.31
2025-06-13 $0.31
2025-03-14 $0.31
2024-12-06 $0.28
2024-09-16 $0.28
2024-06-14 $0.28
2024-03-07 $0.28
2023-12-07 $0.25
2023-09-13 $0.25
2023-06-09 $0.25
2023-03-09 $0.25
2022-12-06 $0.22
2022-09-13 $0.22
2022-06-09 $0.22
2022-03-09 $0.22
2021-12-07 $0.20
2021-09-13 $0.20
0Company Classification 1Industry Landscape 2Company Momentum 3Forward Projection 4aDCF Valuation 4bEarnings Power Value 4cAnchored PE 4dReverse DCF 4eRevenue-Based DCF 4fAnchored P/S 4gScenario Analysis 4hDividend Discount Model 4iBook Value Analysis 4jInsider Activity 4fCash Flow Quality 4gDebt Maturity Risk 4hMacro Environment 4iSector Intelligence 4jRevenue Confidence 4kSensitivity Analysis 4lSector Demand Cycle 5AI Investigation 5bThesis Evaluation 6Valuation Synthesis
computed not applicable 18 computed · 6 not applicable
Risk : Reward — if the last quarter repeats
Live · as of 2026-08-22 02:07
-0.8 : 1 recovery upside vs repeat-quarter downside
Even the bull case prices 56% below today — the ratio here measures the model-vs-market gap, not payoff odds. Another quarter like the worst recent one costs 67%.
CaseGrowthMarginFair valuevs price ($254.79)
Bull — recovery +15% 23.1% $111.18 -56%
Base — stabilizes +10% 20.0% $83.83 -67%
Bear — keeps slipping +5% 17.0% $61.96 -76%
Stress — last quarter repeats +11% 19.8% $84.26 -67%
The next quarters keep the trajectory of the worst recent matched quarter (ending 2025-09-30) — growth stays at 10.8% and margins bend by the same profit-vs-revenue ratio (×0.99). Stress is a trajectory, not a prediction — it answers "what if the ship's current heading simply continues," which history says is the case to respect.
Why this is appearing: this company files quarterly, so its recent trajectory could be measured rather than assumed — the engine matched Jun 2026, Mar 2026 against the same quarters one year earlier and found revenue +13.2% · operating income +13.8% · net income +13.5% year-over-year. That measured heading is what the stress case extends forward. Of those, the stress case extends the worst matched quarter — the one ending Sep 30, 2025 (revenue +10.8%, operating income +9.5% YoY) — not the average. Data measured through Jun 30, 2026 — this card recalculates automatically when the next quarterly filing is ingested. Companies without quarterly filings (many foreign listings) never show this card: with no measured trajectory, there is nothing honest to repeat.
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for AME — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
AI Lens 4th lens · how AI reaches this business · 5-yr
2026-08-15
The creme is there an opportunity here? Conditional opportunity
AMETEK is a quiet physical beneficiary of the AI buildout whose main structural risk is that the software premium inside its instruments, not its hardware, gets competed away.
The asymmetry: thermal, interconnect and precision-motion content sold into semiconductor and power-electronics capex can grow well above the ~3.6% industry rate while the market still frames this as a cyclical industrial roll-up, and 36%/25.8% margins on $7.40B with $1.67B FCF give real room for AI to lower engineering and integration cost without price giveback. The kill condition is entrant compression at 56 — AI-assisted design plus contract manufacturing attacking mid-tier instrument niches would undermine the very defensibility the acquisition engine pays premiums for. Watch Electronic Instruments organic growth and gross margin separately from Electromechanical; divergence there resolves the thesis before the cycle narrative does.
64
AI Position
Moderately favorable - physical scarcity plus a demand kicker
AMETEK's value sits in sensor physics, calibration and qualified positions on aerospace/medical/semiconductor platforms that cheap intelligence cannot copy, while AI capex quietly lifts its thermal, interconnect and precision-motion content.
Exposure 41 Confidence 66 50 = neutral
Primary Tailwind

AI infrastructure buildout is a direct demand pull for AMETEK's thermal management, engineered interconnects, precision motion and electronic test content used in semiconductor, power-electronics and data-center-adjacent manufacturing — a volume tailwind in an industry otherwise growing ~3.6%.

Primary Pressure

The information-processing layer of instrumentation — analysis software, workflow, interpretation — is the part AI commoditizes fastest, so differentiation migrates back toward hardware physics while software-based price premiums on some instrument lines erode.

Critical Hinge

Whether AMETEK keeps monetizing intelligence as instrument content (higher ASPs, attached analytics) rather than losing it to open AI toolchains; watch organic growth and gross margin in Electronic Instruments versus Electromechanical over several quarters.

Hard to Reproduce

Qualified sensor and materials know-how, calibration traceability, aerospace/medical certifications, decades-long design-in positions on flying and implanted platforms, and a distributed installed base of instruments in labs and plants.

Forensic fingerprint same 11 factors for every stock · 0 unfavorable · 50 neutral · 100 favorable
Underlying Need Persistence do people still need this at all? 88
Measurement, motion, thermal control and certified interconnect are physical needs that persist regardless of intelligence cost.
Aircraft still need actuation and test, fabs still need metrology, implants still need engineered components; AI increases the number of instrumented, cooled, powered systems rather than removing them.
Aerospace and defense order backlog · Semiconductor equipment capex cycle · Medical OEM component demand
relevance 80 · confidence 85
Solution Persistence will they still solve it this way? 74
Customers keep buying purpose-built certified hardware, though the analysis software around it becomes less differentiating.
The device and its qualification are the purchase; what changes is that generic AI can increasingly do the interpretation AMETEK once bundled as a premium.
Software attach and license revenue mix · Instrument ASP trends by line · Open-source analytics displacing bundled tools
relevance 70 · confidence 68
Intelligence Commoditization does cheap AI power them or copy them? 58
Cheap intelligence mostly powers AMETEK's products and engineering, but also erodes the software premium on mid-tier instruments.
Embedded AI raises instrument capability at low incremental cost, yet the same models let competitors match analytic features without matching sensor physics.
Edge-AI features in new product launches · Competitor feature parity claims · R&D spend per new platform
relevance 65 · confidence 60
Responsibility Transfer are they paid to take the blame? 66
Certification, traceability and liability on flight- and body-critical parts keep customers outsourcing to AMETEK.
An AI-designed alternative still needs AS9100/FDA qualification and calibration traceability that customers do not want to own; that is a real but narrower shield than a compliance-vertical vendor's.
Qualified-supplier position retention · Calibration and service revenue growth · Regulatory audit or recall events
relevance 45 · confidence 58
Scarcity Migration do their assets get rarer or more common? 72
Scarcity shifts toward physics, materials and thermal capability — assets AMETEK owns.
As algorithms become abundant, the binding constraints become heat, power density, precision sensing and certified supply, which is exactly AMETEK's asset base.
Thermal management order growth · Specialty metals utilization · Design-win announcements in power electronics
relevance 75 · confidence 65
Customer DIY Preference will customers just build it themselves? 78
Industrial and medical customers will not vertically integrate niche precision hardware to save small line-item cost.
AMETEK's components are low share of customer BOM but high consequence of failure; internalizing manufacturing and qualification is uneconomic even with AI-assisted design.
OEM in-sourcing announcements · Content-per-platform trends · Customer concentration shifts
relevance 50 · confidence 70
AI Intermediation Position do AI agents go through them or around them? 57
Agents may reroute procurement and distribution but cannot bypass a spec'd, qualified physical part.
Where sales run through distribution and catalog channels, AI-driven sourcing could pressure price discovery on the more commodity lines; specified aerospace and medical content is agent-proof.
Distributor versus direct mix · Price realization on catalog products · Digital channel order share
relevance 35 · confidence 55
Data Leverage does their data make AI better? 52
Large installed base of instruments generates useful signal, but it is fragmented across dozens of niche businesses.
Decentralized operating model that drives margin also blocks a unified data asset; without pooling, the installed base yields product features rather than a compounding data moat.
Connected-instrument fleet disclosures · Recurring software or data revenue · Cross-business data platform investment
relevance 45 · confidence 50
AI Margin Conversion do the AI savings become profit? 66
AI-driven engineering and back-office savings should stick given decentralized cost discipline and niche pricing power.
With 36% gross and 25.8% operating margins on $7.40B, modest reductions in design cycle and integration cost per acquisition flow to profit because customers are not benchmarking AMETEK on software cost.
Operating margin above ~26% · SG&A as percent of sales · Acquisition integration cost per deal
relevance 60 · confidence 58
Revenue Unit Durability does the thing they charge for survive? 80
The monetized unit is a shipped device with aftermarket, not a seat or billable hour.
AI compresses per-seat and per-hour pricing models; AMETEK charges for hardware plus calibration and service, units that cheap intelligence does not deflate.
Organic sales growth by segment · Aftermarket and service revenue share · Price/cost spread commentary
relevance 70 · confidence 75
Entrant Compression how easily can newcomers copy them? 56
AI lowers the software and design cost of attacking mid-tier instrument niches while certification and physics still deter entry at the high end.
Niche markets that AMETEK's roll-up buys for their defensibility are exactly where AI-assisted engineering plus contract manufacturing shortens the path for focused challengers.
New entrants in test and measurement niches · Acquisition multiples paid · Share loss in mid-tier product lines
relevance 70 · confidence 58

AI Lens thesis

AI reaches AMETEK through three narrow channels rather than the core: it can automate the analysis and interface layer sitting atop instruments, which is a modest pricing risk on the software-differentiated end of Electronic Instruments; it lowers the engineering and SG&A cost of running ~30-plus decentralized niche businesses, which in a 36% gross margin / 25.8% operating margin structure with $1.67B FCF converts into incremental margin and faster acquisition integration; and it raises demand for the physical enablers of compute — thermal management, interconnects, motion and test equipment for semiconductor and power electronics. The customer need (measure, move, cool, connect with certified precision) is physics, not cognition, so the solution persists; the monetized unit is a shipped device, not a seat or a billable hour, which insulates revenue from the seat-compression dynamic hitting software and services. The main way this goes wrong is competitive: cheap AI-assisted design plus commodity compute lets focused entrants replicate mid-tier instrument functionality, compressing the niche pricing power that justifies AMETEK's premium roll-up economics.

Thesis breaker Sustained organic decline or gross margin slippage in Electronic Instruments while Electromechanical holds would signal that the intelligence layer, not the cycle, is repricing the instrument franchise.
What the market may be underestimating

Upside AMETEK is an under-labeled AI-capex supplier: thermal management, specialty interconnect and precision motion content into semiconductor and power-electronics manufacturing can grow faster than the mature industrial average without the company being narrated as an AI name.

Downside The roll-up engine depends on paying reasonable multiples for niche leaders whose moat is partly software-defined; if AI erodes the defensibility of those targets, AMETEK could keep acquiring at premium prices into assets whose pricing power is quietly decaying.

Outcome range spread 35

42Bear case
63Central case
77Bull case
Three headline numbers, deliberately never blended: Position (which way), Exposure (how much it matters at all), Confidence (how sure). The fingerprint asks every stock the same 11 questions so companies a sector label would lump together get told apart. Not an input to GEM/Coal or the Q/V/S lenses.
Growth Outlook
Analyzed 2026-08-17 16:31

The question every valuation on this page silently assumes: is this company likely to grow? Judged forward — the business, its category, the world — against what's already printed.

Growing A mid-single-digit compounder: ~6.6% recent revenue YoY and 7.6% earnings YoY, tracking its category almost exactly, with the M&A engine and margin discipline doing the work while organic momentum quietly decelerates. conf 7/10
Inline with category Category growing · Category (Specialty Industrial Machinery) median recent growth is 6.63%; Ametek's recent revenue YoY is 6.63% — a near-exact match. Longer-run, its 5.9% revenue CAGR exceeds the industry's 3.6% CAGR, but that outperformance is largely acquisition-sourced rather than share capture in existing lines.
Next 2 quarters
Growing
Backlog in aerospace/defense and medical plus pricing carry the next two prints; the decelerating quarterly trend argues against re-acceleration but not against continued mid-single-digit revenue and high-single-digit EPS growth. Cost discipline has been reliable enough to hold the earnings line even if volumes soften.
↑ above expectations
Year 1
Growing
Full-year math is well anchored: ~6% revenue with earnings a point or two faster, split between low-single-digit organic and acquisition contribution. Volatility of 0.007 and all-positive years say the annual outcome rarely surprises in either direction.
≈ inline with expectations
Years 2–3
Growing
Structural earnings power grows, but at a bounded rate: a 3.6% industry CAGR caps organic contribution, so the compounding beyond that must be bought. Margin lift on acquired assets is a genuine, repeatable mechanism, which is why this is Growing rather than Holding — but not Accelerating, since nothing in the demand set is inflecting.
— expectations unclear
The creme: each rung's call measured against what's already printed (vs analyst estimates · vs guidance / FY consensus · vs price-implied growth) — expectations in print are already in the price, so only the variant margin can pay. Hover a rung's chip for the margin read.
Growth drivers
64 Acquisition engine as structural growth source — Ametek's growth is manufactured as much as earned: a serial-acquirer model buying niche instrumentation/electromechanical assets and lifting their margins into the corporate structure. This is why revenue CAGR (5.9%) sits well above the industry's 3.6% CAGR — the delta is bolt-on deployment, and it is repeatable so long as balance-sheet capacity and fragmented targets persist.
54 Earnings growing faster than revenue — Recent earnings YoY 7.6% vs revenue 6.6%, and multi-year earnings CAGR 6.2% vs revenue 5.9% — a persistent operating-leverage/mix wedge. Mission-critical, spec'd-in instruments give pricing that holds through soft volume, which is the mechanism that converts flat-ish organic demand into positive EPS growth.
44 Aerospace/defense and medical niche exposure — Test, measurement and interconnect content in aerospace and medical diagnostics are the longer-cycle, backlog-supported pieces of the portfolio; they cushion the short-cycle industrial process/automation exposure that swings with capex. This mix is the reason revenue volatility measures only 0.007 with all years positive.
38 Execution consistency against expectations — Four consecutive EPS beats of +4% to +5% (2.09 vs 1.99; 1.97 vs 1.90; 1.07 vs 1.03; 2.01 vs 1.94). Whether that is conservative guiding or genuine cost control, it evidences a management system that delivers the earnings line even when top-line growth is unremarkable.
Growth risks
55 Decelerating quarterly trend — The revenue-confidence read flags the quarterly trajectory as decelerating even while the annual YoY prints look healthy. That is the classic shape of a short-cycle industrial rolling over from order intake before it shows in reported revenue — the single most important thing to watch here.
52 Thin organic growth beneath the roll-up — With industry revenue compounding at only 3.6% and the sector demand score at 0 (neither boom nor bust), the organic core is likely low-single-digit. Strip M&A and this is a Holding business. Growth therefore depends on continued capital deployment at sensible prices — a discretionary, not automatic, input.
42 Macro headwinds on industrial capex — 10y at 4.63% with a flagged headwind backdrop pressures customer capex approvals, energy project timing and defense budget cadence. Ametek sells into others' capital budgets; a deferral cycle hits orders before it hits the P&L, and the company has limited ability to stimulate demand.
26 Bar set at flawless compounding — The business is followed as a near-zero-execution-risk compounder. Any integration stumble, or a quarter where the 4-5% beat cadence breaks, changes the growth narrative faster than the underlying fundamentals move.
The world Ametek sells into is neither inflecting up nor breaking down: a steady-phase industrial capital-goods cycle with a mature 3.6% underlying growth rate, financed against a 4.63% long rate that makes customers slower to approve projects. Nothing in the macro set-up creates a new demand wave; nothing threatens the installed base of spec'd-in instruments either. Structural tailwinds are narrow and real — electrification and power-electronics test, aerospace build rates and defense electronics content, medical diagnostics throughput — and Ametek's content sits in exactly those niches at small dollar values inside large customer programs, which is what protects pricing. The offsetting truth is that this is a portfolio assembled to be steady, not to be fast: no single end market is large enough to bend the consolidated growth rate, so the company's trajectory is essentially the weighted average of a flat world plus whatever the M&A pipeline adds. That yields a durable but bounded mid-single-digit revenue path with high-single-digit earnings growth — the shape a diversified niche instrumentation compounder should produce in a steady-demand decade.
Growth position composite +12
ShrinkingStallingHoldingGrowingAccelerating
70Next 2 quarters · Growing
70Year 1 · Growing
70Years 2–3 · Growing
+12Composite (−100…+100)
A research prediction, not advice. Forward-graded: each rung is scored against the prints that follow it. Not an input to the GEM designation — track record first.
Claude Reading
Independent analyst synthesis · claude-opus-4-7 · generated 2026-08-15 00:33:07
Verdict Modestly overvalued, not the -35% the synthesis claims — fair value $220-235 vs $255; hold quality, wait for a 10-15% pullback before initiating, exit only if organic growth breaks below 4%.

Looking at the raw numbers first: AMETEK is doing $2.04B/quarter with 20% net margins, up from $1.71B two years ago — that's roughly 9% YoY revenue growth in the most recent quarter (2Q26 vs 2Q25: $2.04B vs $1.78B = 14.6% actually, better than the 6.6% "recent" figure the momentum model shows, which appears to be using stale comps). Full-year 2025 hit $7.40B rev / $1.48B NI, and if I annualize the last two quarters ($3.97B H1'26), the run-rate is roughly $7.9-8.0B for 2026, implying ~7-8% growth with margins holding at 20%. That's a genuinely healthy trajectory — not spectacular, but the deceleration narrative in the secondary signals looks wrong: sequential quarterly revenue has stepped up cleanly ($1.71→1.73→1.76→1.78→1.89→2.00→1.93→2.04B). Balance sheet is pristine: $2.28B debt against $10.63B equity and $1.67B FCF, so debt/FCF is ~1.4x. Nothing to worry about here.

Where I part ways with the synthesis: a $141 composite fair value on a business generating $1.67B FCF ($7.28/share on 220M shares roughly) growing high-single-digits with 25%+ ROIC implies a ~19x FCF multiple, which is too punitive for a defense/aerospace-levered industrial compounder with this margin profile. Peers like Roper, Fortive, TDG trade 28-35x FCF. The narrative model's read that "35-40% of valuation is story" overstates it — at 35x FCF ($254 price), you're paying a quality premium versus the S&P at ~25x, not a bubble multiple. The market forces model's "fairly valued at premium multiple" is closer to right than the synthesis's -35% overvalued call. The ROIC of 12.6% is the one number that gives me pause — it's good but not the 15%+ the pre-flight thesis assumes, and it's the return on the acquisitive capital base that justifies the roll-up premium.

The contrarian case worth taking seriously: aerospace/defense is 30%+ of revenue and we're late in a defense budget upcycle; if MRO and OE demand normalizes in 2027-28, organic growth could drop to 3-4% and the multiple compresses to 25x FCF, taking the stock to $190. Insider activity is neutral-to-slightly-negative (mostly F-InKind tax withholdings and a J-Other 39,954 share transaction that's worth understanding — likely a trust/gift, not a signal, but unexplained). The current ratio at 1.06 is tight for an industrial and worth watching if working capital swings. The other real risk: M&A is 40%+ of AMETEK's historical growth algorithm, and private-market multiples for niche industrials have compressed enough that either they overpay (ROIC declines) or they can't deploy capital (growth decelerates). Either outcome breaks the compounder narrative.

Net: I dissent from the synthesis's -35% overvalued verdict but agree with market-forces that this is fairly-to-slightly-richly valued with limited margin of safety. A defensible fair value using 28-30x FCF on $1.75B forward FCF is $220-235; current $255 is ~10% above that, not 35%. This is a "hold quality, don't chase" setup — I wouldn't initiate here but I'd own it through a 15% drawdown to $215. The synthesis DCF appears to be undershooting by using overly conservative terminal assumptions on a business that has demonstrably compounded FCF for three decades. The narrative model's framing is fair but its quantification (35-40% narrative premium) is too aggressive for a business with this durability of returns. Watch aerospace book-to-bill and organic growth ex-M&A in the next two prints — if organic slips below 4%, the thesis cracks and $200 becomes the anchor.

GPT Reading
Independent reading · gpt-5.4 · generated 2026-08-15 00:33:24
Verdict Overvalued at $254.79 — superb business, but fair value is closer to $185-$210 unless growth reaccelerates materially above the current mid-single-digit pace.

AMEK looks exactly like the kind of business the market loves to overpay for: a highly reliable industrial compounder with excellent margins, low capital intensity, and enough acquisition credibility that investors stop demanding a margin of safety. The raw numbers absolutely support “excellent business.” Revenue went from $6.15B in 2022 to $7.40B in 2025, a solid 6.3% annualized climb, while operating income rose from $1.50B to $1.91B and net income from $1.16B to $1.48B. That is not financial engineering masquerading as growth; operating margin expanded from 24.4% to 25.8% and net margin sits at a striking 20.0% for an industrial company. Free cash flow of $1.67B on $1.48B of net income is clean conversion, and capex of just $130M on $7.40B of revenue underscores how asset-light this model has become. Balance sheet risk is modest too: $2.28B of debt against $458M cash and $10.63B equity is conservative for a company with this earnings stability.

The issue is price, not quality. At $254.79, the stock is valued at about 39.8x earnings, 8.0x sales, and 25.8x EV/EBITDA. Those are software-like or elite medtech-like multiples being assigned to a business whose actual growth profile is mid-single digits. The quarterly trend is healthy but not explosive: revenue rose from $1.78B in 2025 Q2 to $2.04B in 2026 Q2, while net income went from $358M to $407M. That is good execution, but it is still roughly 6.6% top-line growth and 7.6% earnings growth, not a reacceleration into the teens. If I annualize the first half of 2026, AME is running near $7.95B of revenue and about $1.61B of net income. The market cap of $58.4B therefore implies roughly 36x a fairly optimistic current-year earnings run-rate and more than 7x forward sales. For a business with ROIC of 12.6% and FCF growth of just 2.2% over the cited period, that is too rich. This valuation assumes that every traditional strength of the company—pricing power, aerospace exposure, M&A discipline, margin resilience—continues nearly uninterrupted.

The strongest pushback is obvious and serious: premium businesses often deserve premium multiples, and AME has earned investor trust. A gross margin of 36.0%, operating margin of 25.8%, ROE near 14%, and FCF conversion above 100% of net income are unusual in industrials. The quarterly figures also show no obvious deterioration; in fact, revenue has stepped up from $1.71B in 2024 Q3 to $2.04B in 2026 Q2, while net margins mostly held around 20% despite growth and integration activity. Debt is low enough that the company retains dry powder for acquisitions, and the tiny dividend payout ratio of 19.3% means capital can keep being recycled into deals or buybacks. If management can keep stacking 5-7% organic and bolt-on growth with modest margin uplift, then a stock that looks optically expensive can still compound acceptably from here. I just think that argument works better at 28-32x earnings than at essentially 40x.

What makes me lean against the bull case is that the underlying data do not show hidden acceleration powerful enough to justify such a stretched premium. This is not a company moving from 6% growth to 12% growth, or from 20% FCF margins to 25%; it is already highly optimized. Annual revenue added $460M in 2025 after adding $340M in 2024, so there is some improvement, but not enough to support a valuation that has detached this far from normal industrial compounding math. The insider tape is also not giving a bullish tell; it is mostly awards, option-related transactions, and small sales rather than meaningful open-market buying at these levels. I don’t see a short, because the business quality is real and downturn resistance is better than most peers, but I do see a stock priced for near-perfection.

I would change my mind if AME starts to earn its multiple through clear acceleration: think sustained 10%+ revenue growth, operating margin pushing toward 27-28%, and annual free cash flow moving above $2.0B without leverage materially rising. A large acquisition that is obviously accretive and preserves returns could also justify paying up, as could evidence that 2026 EPS power is closer to $7.50-$8.00 than the current run-rate implies. On the other hand, even one or two quarters of revenue growth slipping back to 3-4% while margins merely hold, not expand, would make the current valuation look even less defensible.

Grok Reading
Independent reading · grok-4.5 · generated 2026-08-15 00:33:55
Verdict Quality compounder overvalued at $255; fair value nearer $165–180 leaves ~30-35% downside with only mid-single-digit growth support

Ametek’s numbers describe a high-quality industrial compounder executing exactly as advertised—and getting paid a price that assumes almost nothing can go wrong. Annual revenue climbed from $6.15B in 2022 to $7.40B in 2025, a tidy mid-single-digit path that matches the 5.9% revenue CAGR and 6.2% earnings CAGR the models flag. Net margins have locked in near 20% across the last eight quarters (19.6–22%), operating margin sits at 25.8%, and free cash flow of $1.67B on only $130M of capex underscores genuine cash conversion. Balance-sheet leverage is light (debt/equity 0.21, $2.28B debt against $10.63B equity), ROIC is a respectable 12.6%, and the recent quarterly run-rate—$2.04B revenue and $407M net income in the June 2026 quarter—shows the machine is still humming. None of that is in dispute. What stands out is the multiple attached to it: 39.8× earnings, 25.8× EV/EBITDA, 8.0× sales, and a free-cash-flow yield of roughly 2.9% at a $58.4B enterprise. With organic-plus-M&A growth stuck in the mid-single digits and FCF CAGR a sluggish 2.2%, the market is capitalizing a 6% grower at nearly 40× as if margin expansion and flawless bolt-on integration are perpetual free options.

The valuation synthesis that marks the name ~35% above a $166 signal-adjusted fair value is directionally correct; the raw data simply do not support a 40× multiple once you strip out the “best-in-class roll-up” narrative. Recent revenue year-over-year of 6.6% and earnings growth of 7.6% are solid but decelerating on a sequential quarterly basis, and the secondary signals already register macro headwinds plus a decelerating revenue trend. Insider activity is noise—mostly option exercises, tax withholds, and awards—offering no signal either way. At current levels the stock embeds the entire 30-year compounding track record as a permanent valuation premium rather than as a reason to pay a modest premium and still demand a margin of safety.

The strongest counter-argument is that Ametek has earned the right to trade rich. Gross margins have held 36%, operating margins expanded steadily from the early-2020s base, and management has repeatedly turned fragmented niche acquisitions into higher-return assets inside aerospace test, power systems, and precision instrumentation. A patient holder who bought the quality and ignored the multiple has been rewarded for decades; the narrative layer correctly notes low cult coefficient and durable institutional sponsorship. If you believe ROIC stays north of 12–13%, organic growth never slips below mid-single digits, and the M&A pipeline continues to deliver 100–200 bp of incremental growth without multiple compression, then 25–26× EBITDA is simply the clearing price for scarce industrial compounders and the DCF understates franchise value. I weigh that history, but I do not let it override arithmetic: a 2.9% FCF yield and 6% growth leave almost no cushion if aerospace/defense (a material slice of the book) softens or if integration returns fade.

I would flip to neutral or constructive only if the next two to three quarters deliver sustained double-digit organic revenue growth (not just acquisition-inflated totals), operating margin expands another 100–150 bp toward the high-20s, or the multiple compresses toward the mid-20s P/E / ~18–20× EV/EBITDA while FCF continues to compound above 8%. Absent those, the stock remains a fine business priced for perfection.

Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Each AI above independently stated a direction (undervalued, fairly valued, or overvalued) and how strongly it believes it (conviction, 0–5). We combine those into a Bull-Bear Index on a 0–10 scale: 5 is neutral, 10 is maximum bullish (undervalued at full conviction), 0 is maximum bearish. We compute the score ourselves with the same arithmetic for every seat — the models never grade their own bullishness — so the three are directly comparable. Δ shows how far each seat sits from the panel average of 1.3; a large Δ marks the dissenting voice, usually the one worth reading.
Claude claude-opus-4-7 2.0
overvalued · conviction 3/5 · Δ +0.7 vs panel · self: 5.0
GPT gpt-5.4 1.0
overvalued · conviction 4/5 · Δ -0.3 vs panel · self: 3.0
Grok grok-4.5 1.0
overvalued · conviction 4/5 · Δ -0.3 vs panel · self: 3.0
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
Separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), plus AI Impact (how the AI wave reshapes it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-08-15 00:40:24
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Quality - wait for a dip 7/10
Top-tier specialty industrial compounder trading at a full-freight price with no margin of safety - a wait, not a buy.
The cruxWhether AME's mid-single-digit organic growth and mid-20s margins hold cleanly enough to justify a premium multiple; any slip and the multiple compresses before the fundamentals do.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from AME's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwaySelf-Funding
DilutionStable Share Count
Earnings QualityHigh Earnings Quality
The four lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
+72
Strong
edge √Σ 134 · risk √Σ 43 · conf 8/10

Ametek shows the profile of a well-run mature industrial: revenue expanded from $6.15B (2022) to $7.40B (2025), a ~6% CAGR, with gross margins holding 35-36% and operating margins steady at 24-26%. Net income grew from $1.16B to $1.48B and FCF ran $1.6-1.7B in each of the last three years, comfortably exceeding net income (OCF/NI 1.21x, accruals -1.9% of assets). Beneish M at -2.43 and Altman Z at 8.38 both sit in clean/safe territory, and no mechanical earnings-quality flags trip. Diluted share count is essentially flat (231-232M, -0.2% CAGR) with buybacks running 4.3x SBC and SBC only 0.7% of revenue - per-share value is being protected rather than eroded. Balance sheet is the one soft spot: net debt of ~$1.83B against just $458M liquid cash, and short-term debt of $1.21B exceeds cash on hand. Given $1.67B annual FCF, this is a working-capital/refi issue rather than a solvency concern, but it means the balance sheet is a constraint, not a cushion. Insider tape is neutral-to-slightly-negative: no open-market buys in 12 months, one small S-sale ($115K by Amato), rest are routine F-InKind tax withholdings and option exercises - no directional signal either way.

Strengths 4
m78
Durable high-margin profitability
Operating margin held 24.4-25.9% over four years on growing revenue ($6.15B to $7.40B), with gross margin steady near 36% - signals real pricing power and mix discipline typical of specialty industrials.
m72
Clean earnings quality
OCF/NI 1.21x, accruals -1.9% of assets, Beneish M -2.43, Altman Z 8.38. FCF of $1.67B tracks net income of $1.48B - reported earnings are backed by cash.
m60
Disciplined share count
Diluted shares -0.2% CAGR, SBC only 0.7% of revenue, buybacks 4.3x SBC. Per-share economics are being defended, not diluted.
m55
Consistent FCF generation
$1.01B, $1.60B, $1.70B, $1.67B over 2022-2025 - self-funding with no reliance on external capital.
Concerns 2
m38
Net debt with near-term maturity exposure
Net debt of $1.83B; short-term debt of $1.21B exceeds liquid cash of $458M. Manageable given $1.67B FCF but leaves no true cushion - balance sheet is a constraint, not a fortress.
m20
No insider conviction buying
Zero open-market buys in 12 months and one small sale. Not bearish, but no signal of insider confidence either.
This is a textbook high-quality specialty industrial: mid-20s operating margins that don't wobble, cash conversion above 100%, forensic scores clean, and a share count that actually shrinks slightly. Management is clearly running it for per-share value. The only thing that keeps me from calling it a fortress is the net debt position - $1.83B net debt with $1.21B coming due short-term against $458M of cash means they need the FCF spigot to keep flowing, which it will, but it's not a bulletproof balance sheet. Insider tape is boringly neutral - no red flag, no green flag. Net-net: a Strong business, comfortably above average, not quite elite.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Debt maturity ladder and refinancing terms for the $1.21B short-term debt
  • Organic vs acquisition split of revenue growth (Ametek is an active acquirer - is the compounding organic or bolt-on driven?)
  • Segment concentration and end-market exposure (aerospace, medical, process)
  • Goodwill and intangibles as % of assets given M&A cadence, and any impairment history
  • Cash conversion cycle trend and whether working capital is masking any deterioration
Valuation / Mispricing
-70
Rich
edge √Σ 25 · risk √Σ 113 · conf 7/10
Price $254.79 vs deserved ~$210-220 on a quality-adjusted anchored-PE read; roughly 15-20% overpriced, no margin of safety. attractive below $205.00

The e2e composite fair value of $141.09 and signal-adjusted $165.72 both imply 35-45% downside from $254.79. The DCF ($125.95) and EPV floor ($64.35) are punitive and probably understate a genuine mid-20s-margin compounder with >100% cash conversion, but the anchored-PE of $248.12 is the only method that even approaches the current price - and it lands slightly below it. That means the single method most favorable to a high-quality industrial still says fairly-valued at best, while every cash-flow-based method screams rich. Triangulating, a fair deserved value for a strong-but-levered specialty industrial with the quality lens's 72 score is somewhere in the $200-230 zone - clearly below $254.79. What is priced in: continued mid-single-digit organic growth, sustained mid-20s margins, uninterrupted accretive M&A, and no multiple compression. That is the textbook 'priced for perfection' setup the bear narrative flags. There is no margin of safety here; you are paying full freight for a proven compounder and relying entirely on continued execution plus a stable multiple to earn a return. Earnings quality is high (score 3), so no haircut is warranted, but high quality does not manufacture cheapness - it justifies a premium multiple, which the market has already awarded and then some.

Cheap signals 1
m25
DCF/EPV likely understate
$125.95 DCF and $64.35 EPV floor are implausibly low for a business with >100% cash conversion and mid-20s margins; they drag the composite unfairly.
Rich / priced-in 4
m70
Composite FV 45% below price
Signal-adjusted FV of $165.72 vs $254.79 implies -35% upside; even discounting the harsh DCF/EPV, the weight of methods points down.
m62
Anchored-PE also below price
The most quality-friendly method ($248.12) still sits under the tape - meaning even generous multiple assumptions do not justify $254.79.
m55
Priced for flawless execution
Current price requires sustained mid-20s margins, continued accretive M&A, and no multiple compression - the bear's 'priced as flawless compounder' concern is embedded.
m30
Quality already in the multiple
The 72 quality score justifies a premium, but the market has awarded a premium beyond what the anchored-PE supports - quality is paid for twice.
I like the business, I do not like the price. Every cash-flow method says overvalued and even the multiples-based anchor sits below the tape - that is a tell. I am not going to argue AME deserves an EPV-floor valuation, it clearly deserves a premium, but the market has already paid that premium and then some. This is a 'wait for a drawdown' name for me - I want it in the low $200s before the risk-reward turns. At $254.79 you are underwriting perfect execution with no cushion.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Organic growth guidance vs the mid-single-digit assumption baked into the anchored-PE
  • M&A pipeline and deployed-capital returns - the compounder story requires continued accretive deals
  • Aerospace and defense backlog trends given bear-case budget uncertainty
  • Whether the $1.21B short-term debt gets refinanced at materially higher rates and hits EPS
General Sentiment
+37
Tailwind
tail √Σ 82 · head √Σ 43 · conf 6/10

The tape is mildly risk-on with VIX at 14.3 and the S&P near highs, which is a benign setting for a beta-1.0 quality industrial like AME. The active narrative is a low-drama 'best-in-class serial acquirer / steady-compounder' story - moderate intensity but durable, with low cult risk - and the news flow of the last week actively reinforces it: a Q2 beat, raised guidance, dividend declared, analysts described as moderately bullish. That is the archetype of gentle, persistent buying pressure rather than momentum-chasing.

Tailwinds 3
m55
Narrative freshly validated by Q2 beat
The 4% pop on record Q2 sales growth and raised guidance directly reinforces the 'flawless compounder' story the stock trades on. When a durable narrative gets a clean earnings validation, the premium tends to stick.
m45
Risk-on tape suits a beta-1 quality industrial
With VIX at 14 and the index near highs, capital is comfortable owning cyclical-quality names. AME's beta of ~1 means it participates fully in the drift higher without needing a specific catalyst.
m40
Analyst tone moderately bullish, no downgrades in flow
Post-print coverage frames AME as an outperformer with constructive Wall Street posture. No visible target cuts or narrative cracks in the 72h window - a quiet positive drip for a name that trades on trust.
Headwinds 2
m35
Macro rate backdrop pressures the multiple
10y at 4.63% and market PE 26.2 create a subtle discount-rate headwind for long-duration compounders trading at a premium. It is not acute, but it caps how far the narrative premium can expand from here.
m25
Low cult, moderate intensity - limited upside slope
The story is durable but sleepy - there is no mania bid to chase. Tailwind is real but shallow; this is not a stock that runs vertical on good news.
Net tailwind, but a polite one. AME is exactly the kind of name a mid-cycle risk-on tape rewards - durable narrative, fresh earnings validation, moderately bullish sell-side, no controversy. The rate backdrop and premium multiple keep a lid on how excited anyone can get, and there is no cult bid to squeeze. I lean Tailwind with medium conviction - the pressure is up but slow, not the kind of force that dominates the tape.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Any downtick in semi/aerospace/MedTech end-market commentary from peers that could crack the broad-based demand story
  • Sell-side target revisions in the coming weeks - a wave of upward revisions would strengthen the tailwind
  • 10y yield moving above 4.75% which would pressure premium-multiple compounders more visibly
  • Whether the post-earnings drift holds or fades - a stall would signal narrative fatigue at these levels
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
AI Impact
+38
Moderately favorable - physical scarcity plus a demand kicker
opp √Σ 95 · thr √Σ 0 · conf 7/10

AI reaches AMETEK through three narrow channels rather than the core: it can automate the analysis and interface layer sitting atop instruments, which is a modest pricing risk on the software-differentiated end of Electronic Instruments; it lowers the engineering and SG&A cost of running ~30-plus decentralized niche businesses, which in a 36% gross margin / 25.8% operating margin structure with $1.67B FCF converts into incremental margin and faster acquisition integration; and it raises demand for the physical enablers of compute — thermal management, interconnects, motion and test equipment for semiconductor and power electronics. The customer need (measure, move, cool, connect with certified precision) is physics, not cognition, so the solution persists; the monetized unit is a shipped device, not a seat or a billable hour, which insulates revenue from the seat-compression dynamic hitting software and services. The main way this goes wrong is competitive: cheap AI-assisted design plus commodity compute lets focused entrants replicate mid-tier instrument functionality, compressing the niche pricing power that justifies AMETEK's premium roll-up economics.

AI opportunities 7
m61
Underlying Need Persistence
Measurement, motion, thermal control and certified interconnect are physical needs that persist regardless of intelligence cost.
m34
Solution Persistence
Customers keep buying purpose-built certified hardware, though the analysis software around it becomes less differentiating.
m14
Responsibility Transfer
Certification, traceability and liability on flight- and body-critical parts keep customers outsourcing to AMETEK.
m33
Scarcity Migration
Scarcity shifts toward physics, materials and thermal capability — assets AMETEK owns.
m28
Customer DIY Preference
Industrial and medical customers will not vertically integrate niche precision hardware to save small line-item cost.
m19
AI Margin Conversion
AI-driven engineering and back-office savings should stick given decentralized cost discipline and niche pricing power.
m42
Revenue Unit Durability
The monetized unit is a shipped device with aftermarket, not a seat or billable hour.
AI threats 0

None surfaced.

AMETEK is a quiet physical beneficiary of the AI buildout whose main structural risk is that the software premium inside its instruments, not its hardware, gets competed away. The asymmetry: thermal, interconnect and precision-motion content sold into semiconductor and power-electronics capex can grow well above the ~3.6% industry rate while the market still frames this as a cyclical industrial roll-up, and 36%/25.8% margins on $7.40B with $1.67B FCF give real room for AI to lower engineering and integration cost without price giveback. The kill condition is entrant compression at 56 — AI-assisted design plus contract manufacturing attacking mid-tier instrument niches would undermine the very defensibility the acquisition engine pays premiums for. Watch Electronic Instruments organic growth and gross margin separately from Electromechanical; divergence there resolves the thesis before the cycle narrative does.
Verify before trusting this (8)
  • Aerospace and defense order backlog
  • Semiconductor equipment capex cycle
  • Medical OEM component demand
  • Thermal management order growth
  • Specialty metals utilization
  • Design-win announcements in power electronics
  • Software attach and license revenue mix
  • Instrument ASP trends by line
The structural effect of the AI wave on this specific business over the next ~5 years — demand, cost leverage, moat, barriers to entry, position in the AI stack. The reality beneath the AI story, not the story's market pressure (General Sentiment owns that) — and not a call on the business today or the price.
Growth Outlook
+12
Growing
edge √Σ 102 · risk √Σ 90 · conf 7/10

The world Ametek sells into is neither inflecting up nor breaking down: a steady-phase industrial capital-goods cycle with a mature 3.6% underlying growth rate, financed against a 4.63% long rate that makes customers slower to approve projects. Nothing in the macro set-up creates a new demand wave; nothing threatens the installed base of spec'd-in instruments either. Structural tailwinds are narrow and real — electrification and power-electronics test, aerospace build rates and defense electronics content, medical diagnostics throughput — and Ametek's content sits in exactly those niches at small dollar values inside large customer programs, which is what protects pricing. The offsetting truth is that this is a portfolio assembled to be steady, not to be fast: no single end market is large enough to bend the consolidated growth rate, so the company's trajectory is essentially the weighted average of a flat world plus whatever the M&A pipeline adds. That yields a durable but bounded mid-single-digit revenue path with high-single-digit earnings growth — the shape a diversified niche instrumentation compounder should produce in a steady-demand decade.

Growth drivers 4
m64
Acquisition engine as structural growth source
Ametek's growth is manufactured as much as earned: a serial-acquirer model buying niche instrumentation/electromechanical assets and lifting their margins into the corporate structure. This is why revenue CAGR (5.9%) sits well above the industry's 3.6% CAGR — the delta is bolt-on deployment, and it is repeatable so long as balance-sheet capacity and fragmented targets persist.
m54
Earnings growing faster than revenue
Recent earnings YoY 7.6% vs revenue 6.6%, and multi-year earnings CAGR 6.2% vs revenue 5.9% — a persistent operating-leverage/mix wedge. Mission-critical, spec'd-in instruments give pricing that holds through soft volume, which is the mechanism that converts flat-ish organic demand into positive EPS growth.
m44
Aerospace/defense and medical niche exposure
Test, measurement and interconnect content in aerospace and medical diagnostics are the longer-cycle, backlog-supported pieces of the portfolio; they cushion the short-cycle industrial process/automation exposure that swings with capex. This mix is the reason revenue volatility measures only 0.007 with all years positive.
m38
Execution consistency against expectations
Four consecutive EPS beats of +4% to +5% (2.09 vs 1.99; 1.97 vs 1.90; 1.07 vs 1.03; 2.01 vs 1.94). Whether that is conservative guiding or genuine cost control, it evidences a management system that delivers the earnings line even when top-line growth is unremarkable.
Growth risks 4
m55
Decelerating quarterly trend
The revenue-confidence read flags the quarterly trajectory as decelerating even while the annual YoY prints look healthy. That is the classic shape of a short-cycle industrial rolling over from order intake before it shows in reported revenue — the single most important thing to watch here.
m52
Thin organic growth beneath the roll-up
With industry revenue compounding at only 3.6% and the sector demand score at 0 (neither boom nor bust), the organic core is likely low-single-digit. Strip M&A and this is a Holding business. Growth therefore depends on continued capital deployment at sensible prices — a discretionary, not automatic, input.
m42
Macro headwinds on industrial capex
10y at 4.63% with a flagged headwind backdrop pressures customer capex approvals, energy project timing and defense budget cadence. Ametek sells into others' capital budgets; a deferral cycle hits orders before it hits the P&L, and the company has limited ability to stimulate demand.
m26
Bar set at flawless compounding
The business is followed as a near-zero-execution-risk compounder. Any integration stumble, or a quarter where the 4-5% beat cadence breaks, changes the growth narrative faster than the underlying fundamentals move.
vs expectations: ~6m above · 1y inline · 2-3y unknown
The forward growth verdict — is the business itself likely to grow (next 2 quarters / year 1 / years 2–3), judged against its category and against printed expectations. The full horizon ladder + creme renders on the Growth Outlook card above. Not a call on the price (Valuation owns that) or the tape (Sentiment owns that).
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure), AI Impact (structural ~5yr AI exposure), and Growth Outlook (the forward growth verdict). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Price Prediction
Lower -6.6% v0.6.0 View full prediction →

When we made this prediction on Aug 15, 2026, AME was $254.79. We expect it to be $238.00 by Feb 2027, and we consider it great value under $205.00. This is an early model (v0.6.0) — the direction is more reliable than the exact price. Made Aug 15, 2026.

Price when predicted$254.79
Our estimate for Feb 2027$238.00-6.6%
Great value below$205.00
Price history shown (6 Months)

Blue is our prediction, starting the day we made it. Grey is a slower route to the same place — the same destination, taking longer. Black is the actual price, so you can see how we are doing.

Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for AME. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
v1.1.562 · 9b2927c4 · 2026-08-22 16:52:06