Skip to main content
Homepage
Full 18-step deep-dive · ~20–30 min · a member feature.
AGING Analysis Report
Aug 11, 2026
12 days ago · 100% complete
NOT DEPENDABLE This report predates a filing — its financial basis has been replaced.
Report generated: Aug 11, 2026 · Filing on record since: Aug 22, 2026 · 10 days after
For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page

What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.

Our current read (analysis of 2026-08-23): Designation Low · Gem Score -15 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality 60 · Value -77 · Sentiment 31 (timing only, not weighted)

Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable reference-name attribute you can cite):

  • profile-header / price-overview — company profile, live quote, market cap
  • extended-analysisthe core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memo
  • future-predictions — our forward price-band predictions
  • market-narrative / ai-findings / gpt-critique — narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)
  • Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers): price-history, income-trend, key-metrics, financials (statement tables), insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.

More for machine readers: site briefing at /llms.txt · any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER · raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds); every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.

HLT NYSE
Consumer Cyclical · Lodging
McLean, VA 22102, United States hilton.com Updated Aug 11, 12:28pm
Price
$314.24
Market Cap
$70.0B
Employees
182,000
Beta
1.06
Avg Volume
1,984,818
Last Dividend
$0.60
CEO
Mr. Christopher J. Nassetta

Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. is a global hospitality company that manages and franchises a diversified portfolio of hotels, resorts, and timeshare properties. Headquartered in McLean, Virginia, it operates multiple brand families that span luxury, lifestyle, full-service, focused-service, and extended-stay segments, serving both business and leisure travelers across many regions worldwide. Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. primarily focuses on brand management, franchise relationships, and property-level support rather than owning the underlying real estate, enabling an asset-light business model centered on fees and service delivery. Its brands are present in key urban centers, resort destinations, airport hubs, and suburban markets, making the company a significant player in global travel and tourism. The group supports owners and operators with reservation systems, revenue management, loyalty programs, and marketing platforms, aiming to enhance occupancy and guest experience while maintaining consistent standards across its network.

Runs with full report Generated: Aug 11, 2026 2:28pm
Price Overview
Price at report time
$314.23
as of Aug 11, 2:36pm (12d ago)
Change · Aug 11
+3.23 (+1.04%)
Day Range
$311.81 – $315.36
52-Week Range
$253.54 – $358.00
50-Day MA
$331.56
200-Day MA
$307.67
Volume
60,520.00
Right now · live
Log in to get the live feed
Members see the real-time price and the move since this report (over 12d).
Share Structure
Outstanding 225,696,464.00
Float 215,814,742.00
Free Float 95.6%
High free float — 95.6% of shares trade freely, ~4.4% held by insiders/institutions
Very liquid — most shares trade freely. Low insider ownership can mean less management alignment, but makes large position sizing straightforward.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Aug 11, 2026 2:39pm (12d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Aug 11, 2026 2:39pm (12d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
TD Twelve Data statement HEX SEC filing
Industry comparison last run: Aug 11, 2026 2:27pm
P/E Ratio (Price per dollar of earnings)
HEX
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
51.35
Stock Price: $314.24
EPS (Diluted): 6.12
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
HEX
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
Stock Price: $314.24
Total Equity: -$5.35B
Shares: 238,000,000
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
HEX
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
24.07
Market Cap: $70.00B
Total Debt: $0.00
Cash: $918.00M
EBITDA: $2.87B
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
HEX
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$69.1B
Market Cap: $70.00B
Total Debt: $0.00
Cash: $918.00M
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
HEX
Gross Profit / Revenue
Gross Profit: N/A
Revenue: $12.04B
Missing from API: Gross Profit
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
HEX
Operating Income / Revenue
22.4%
Operating Income: $2.69B
Revenue: $12.04B
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
HEX
Net Income / Revenue
12.1%
Net Income: $1.46B
Revenue: $12.04B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
HEX
Net Income / Total Equity
Net Income: $1.46B
Total Equity: -$5.35B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
HEX
NOPAT / Invested Capital
Operating Income: $2.69B
Tax Rate: 29.5%
Equity: -$5.35B
Total Debt: $0.00
Cash: $918.00M
Zero debt — invested capital = equity minus cash (very efficient)
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
HEX
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
0.66
Current Assets: $3.00B
Current Liabilities: $4.51B
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
HEX
Total Debt / Total Equity
Short-Term Debt: $0.00
Long-Term Debt: $0.00
Total Debt: $0.00
Total Equity: -$5.35B
Zero debt — this company carries no debt obligations. Strongest possible score.
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
HEX
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$50.58
Revenue: $12.04B
Shares: 238,000,000
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
HEX
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
Total Equity: -$5.35B
Shares: 238,000,000
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
HEX
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$8.52
Operating CF: $2.13B
CapEx: -$101.00M
Shares: 238,000,000
CapEx is negative (outflow) — added to OCF to get FCF
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
TD
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
0.2%
Last Dividend: $0.60
Stock Price: $314.24
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
HEX
Dividends Paid / Net Income
9.8%
Dividends Paid: -$143.00M
Net Income: $1.46B
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Aug 11, 2026 2:27pm
Compares HLT against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 11, 2026 2:39pm (12d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue $5.8B $8.8B $10.2B $11.2B $12.0B
Cost of Revenue
Gross Profit
Operating Expenses $4.8B $6.7B $8.0B $8.8B $9.3B
Operating Income $1.0B $2.1B $2.2B $2.4B $2.7B
Net Income $410.0M $1.3B $1.1B $1.5B $1.5B
EBITDA $1.2B $2.3B $2.4B $2.5B $2.9B
EPS $1.47 $4.56 $4.36 $6.20 $6.18
EPS (Diluted) $1.46 $4.53 $4.33 $6.14 $6.12
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 11, 2026 12:29pm (12d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Cash & Equivalents $1.4B $1.2B $800.0M $1.3B $918.0M
Total Current Assets $2.9B $2.9B $2.6B $3.3B $3.0B
Total Assets $15.4B $15.5B $15.4B $16.5B $16.8B
Current Liabilities $3.0B $3.4B $3.7B $4.7B $4.5B
Long-Term Debt
Total Liabilities $16.3B $16.6B $17.7B $20.2B $22.1B
Total Equity -$819.0M -$1.1B -$2.3B -$3.7B -$5.3B
Retained Earnings -$6.3B -$5.2B -$4.2B -$2.8B -$1.5B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 11, 2026 2:39pm (12d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Operating Cash Flow $109.0M $1.7B $1.9B $2.0B $2.1B
Capital Expenditure -$35.0M -$39.0M -$151.0M -$96.0M -$101.0M
Free Cash Flow $74.0M $1.6B $1.8B $1.9B $2.0B
Acquisitions (net) $0 $0 -$236.0M -$4.0M
Net Debt Issued / (Repaid)
Dividends Paid $0 -$123.0M -$158.0M -$150.0M -$143.0M
Stock Buybacks $0 -$1.6B -$2.3B -$2.9B -$3.2B
Net Change in Cash -$1.8B -$226.0M -$411.0M $501.0M -$406.0M
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Aug 11, 2026 2:39pm (12d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue Growth +51.6% +16.7% +9.2% +7.7%
Gross Profit Growth
Operating Income Growth +107.3% +6.3% +6.5% +13.6%
Net Income Growth +206.1% -9.1% +34.5% -5.1%
EBITDA Growth +88.3% +5.1% +6.1% +14.1%
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Aug 11, 2026 12:29pm (12d ago)
Date Dividend Declaration Record Payment
2026-05-22 $0.15
2026-02-27 $0.15
2025-11-21 $0.15
2025-08-29 $0.15
2025-05-23 $0.15
2025-02-21 $0.15
2024-11-15 $0.15
2024-08-23 $0.15
2024-05-16 $0.15
2024-02-22 $0.15
2023-11-16 $0.15
2023-08-24 $0.15
2023-05-18 $0.15
2023-02-27 $0.15
2022-11-09 $0.15
2022-08-25 $0.15
2022-05-26 $0.15
2020-02-27 $0.15
2019-11-07 $0.15
2019-08-08 $0.15
0Company Classification 1Industry Landscape 2Company Momentum 3Forward Projection 4aDCF Valuation 4bEarnings Power Value 4cAnchored PE 4dReverse DCF 4eRevenue-Based DCF 4fAnchored P/S 4gScenario Analysis 4hDividend Discount Model 4iBook Value Analysis 4jInsider Activity 4fCash Flow Quality 4gDebt Maturity Risk 4hMacro Environment 4iSector Intelligence 4jRevenue Confidence 4kSensitivity Analysis 4lSector Demand Cycle 5AI Investigation 5bThesis Evaluation 6Valuation Synthesis
computed not applicable not yet run 12 computed · 6 not applicable · 6 not yet run
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for HLT — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
AI Lens 4th lens · how AI reaches this business · 5-yr
2026-08-11
58
AI Position
Mildly favorable - physical scarcity insulates, distribution layer is the exposed flank
Hilton's fee stream sits on physical rooms and a 200M-member loyalty graph that cheap intelligence cannot reproduce, but agentic travel search could re-intermediate the direct-booking advantage that justifies franchise fees.
Exposure 41 Confidence 66 50 = neutral
Primary Tailwind

AI-driven labor automation at the property level (front desk, housekeeping scheduling, F&B, revenue management) lands on the franchisee's P&L, where labor is the dominant cost — better owner returns support new-build ROI, conversions and net unit growth, which is the actual driver of Hilton's fee revenue.

Primary Pressure

If AI assistants become the default trip-planning and booking interface, they can commoditize brand choice and re-intermediate demand the way OTAs did — raising effective customer acquisition cost and weakening the distribution argument Hilton sells to owners for 10%+ of room revenue.

Forensic fingerprint same 11 factors for every stock · 0 unfavorable · 50 neutral · 100 favorable
Underlying Need Persistence do people still need this at all? 0
Does the underlying customer need survive much more capable AI?
relevance 0 · confidence 0
Solution Persistence will they still solve it this way? 0
Do customers keep solving it with roughly this type of product?
relevance 0 · confidence 0
Intelligence Commoditization does cheap AI power them or copy them? 0
Does cheap intelligence strengthen the position — or reproduce what was monetized?
relevance 0 · confidence 0
Responsibility Transfer are they paid to take the blame? 0
How much of the price is paid to hand over complexity, compliance, and blame?
relevance 0 · confidence 0
Scarcity Migration do their assets get rarer or more common? 0
Does AI move scarcity toward assets this company already owns?
relevance 0 · confidence 0
Customer DIY Preference will customers just build it themselves? 0
Once building is cheap, do customers still prefer buying?
relevance 0 · confidence 0
AI Intermediation Position do AI agents go through them or around them? 0
Do AI agents route activity through this company — or around it?
relevance 0 · confidence 0
Data Leverage does their data make AI better? 0
Does its proprietary data get more valuable as models improve?
relevance 0 · confidence 0
AI Margin Conversion do the AI savings become profit? 0
Do AI productivity gains actually reach retained profit?
relevance 0 · confidence 0
Revenue Unit Durability does the thing they charge for survive? 0
Does the unit being charged for survive AI adoption?
relevance 0 · confidence 0
Entrant Compression how easily can newcomers copy them? 0
How hard is the complete business to reproduce once code is cheap?
relevance 0 · confidence 0

AI Lens thesis

Outcome range spread 0

0Bear case
0Central case
0Bull case
Three headline numbers, deliberately never blended: Position (which way), Exposure (how much it matters at all), Confidence (how sure). The fingerprint asks every stock the same 11 questions so companies a sector label would lump together get told apart. Not an input to GEM/Coal or the Q/V/S lenses.
Claude Reading
Independent analyst synthesis · claude-opus-4-7 · generated 2026-08-11 14:38:08
Verdict Overvalued but high-quality — fair value $210-230 vs $314; Q4'25 earnings drop to 9.6% margin is the crack in the narrative, wait for a re-rating below $250 before engaging.

Looking at the raw quarterly tape first: revenue went $2.95B → $2.87B → $2.78B → $2.70B → $3.14B → $3.12B → $3.09B → $2.94B. That's not a clean growth story — it's seasonal noise with a step-up in mid-2025, then a Q1'26 print of $2.94B that is only 8.9% above Q1'25's $2.70B and actually *down* sequentially from four consecutive $3B+ quarters. Net income is lumpier: Q4'24 was $505M (18.1% margin) but Q4'25 collapsed to $297M (9.6%) — a 41% YoY earnings drop in the most recent seasonally-comparable quarter. The synthesis models are averaging through this and calling it "decelerating"; I'd call it "the earnings CAGR of 13% is backward-looking and the forward print is negative." Recent earnings YoY of -5.1% confirms this. On a mature franchisor trading at 51x trailing earnings, that Q4 miss matters enormously.

The negative equity ($-5.35B) is a red herring the models are half-flagging — for Hilton it's a feature of aggressive buybacks against an asset-light model, not distress. FCF of $2.03B on $101M capex is the real story: this is a genuine cash machine with ~17% FCF margin and near-zero reinvestment needs. But that's also *why* the multiple is stretched — everyone knows this. At $314 and $70B market cap, the market is paying 34x FCF for 6.3% FCF CAGR. Even generous — 8% fee growth, stable margins, continued buyback shrink — gets you to maybe $200-220 fair value on a DCF with a reasonable discount rate. The synthesis's $135-146 fair value feels too punitive (it likely under-weights the moat and buyback compounding), but the direction is right.

Where I diverge from the prior models: the Market Forces layer calls this "Market Tailwinds" while simultaneously flagging full valuation and no margin of safety — that's contradictory framing. The Narrative layer nails it better: this is an anchored-but-stretched platform story with moderate durability, and the $170 of narrative premium is exactly the kind of thing that unwinds on one bad RevPAR print or a corporate travel wobble. The contrarian argument I'd steelman: Hilton's fee model has *actually* proven recession-resilient (2020 was a wipeout but the model recovered fast), room pipeline visibility is real (they add units regardless of cycle), and in a cutting-rates regime lodging cyclicals get bid. But that steelman doesn't justify 51x — it justifies maybe 28-32x, which would be $200ish.

Data gaps: total debt is missing from the file, which is material for a negative-equity buyback machine — I can't independently check leverage. Insider "transactions" are all tiny director share awards, not signal. The 2026-Q1 datapoint sits alone against 2024/2025 comparables and the Q4'25 earnings miss is the single most important number in this file and the models mostly glossed it. I agree with the synthesis *direction* (overvalued) but think their fair value ($135-146) is too low — a quality franchisor with 17% FCF margins and buyback-driven per-share compounding deserves a premium multiple, just not this one. Fair value is more like $210-230. At $314 you're paying ~40-50% premium to a defensible number, with a decelerating earnings trajectory as the near-term catalyst pointing the wrong way. Not a short (too high-quality, buybacks provide a floor), but not a buy here. Wait for $240 or a genuine RevPAR reset.

GPT Reading
Independent reading · gpt-5.4 · generated 2026-08-11 14:38:29
Verdict Overvalued at $314 — elite asset-light economics are real, but the stock is priced for sustained double-digit compounding; fair value is closer to $230.

Hilton is an excellent business priced like an exceptional one. The operating model is exactly what investors usually want in lodging: revenue rose from $5.79B in 2021 to $12.04B in 2025, operating income expanded from $1.01B to $2.69B, and free cash flow reached $2.03B in 2025 on just $101M of capex. That is elite capital intensity. Even the latest quarter was solid on the surface: Q1 2026 revenue of $2.94B was up 8.9% from $2.70B a year earlier, and net income rose to $385M from $300M. The problem is not business quality; it is that at $314 the market is capitalizing this as if high-single-digit growth and very high conversion are both durable through the cycle. On 2025 numbers, you are paying roughly 51x earnings, 24x EV/EBITDA, and about 34x free cash flow. For a cyclical travel-exposed company growing revenue 7-8% and earnings 13% off a pandemic-recovery base, that is too rich.

What stands out in the raw data is that growth is good but not explosive, while profitability is more mixed than the premium multiple implies. Annual revenue grew 7.8% in 2025, but net income actually fell from $1.54B in 2024 to $1.46B in 2025 despite operating income improving from $2.37B to $2.69B. Quarterly margins are also not marching upward: net margin was 18.1% in Q4 2024, then 11.1% in Q1 2025, 14.0% in Q2 2025, 13.5% in Q3 2025, 9.6% in Q4 2025, and 13.1% in Q1 2026. Some of that is normal lumpiness, but a stock at 51x earnings should show cleaner earnings compounding than “revenue up, cash flow good, but bottom-line volatility persists.” The latest trailing four quarters from Q2 2025 through Q1 2026 produce about $12.29B of revenue and $1.54B of net income, essentially flat earnings power while the stock trades at a growth-stock valuation.

The balance sheet optics also matter more than bulls admit. Negative equity of $5.35B is not automatically a red flag for an asset-light franchisor that buys back stock, but it does mean there is less room for macro error when the current ratio is only 0.66 and cash is $918M. Hilton’s model is resilient relative to hotel owners because capex is low and fee streams are diversified, but it is still ultimately tethered to room demand, corporate travel, consumer confidence, and development activity. If the market were paying 20-25x earnings for that setup, I would shrug at the cyclicality. At 51x, cyclicality becomes the entire issue. This is a wonderful compounder if bought at a sensible price; at $314 it looks more like a high-quality duration asset priced for a near-perfect travel backdrop.

The strongest pushback is straightforward: Hilton deserves a premium because accounting earnings understate the quality of the model. A business that can produce $2.03B of free cash flow on $12.04B of revenue, with only $101M of capex, should not be judged like a conventional hotel operator. Revenue has nearly doubled since 2021, operating margin is a healthy 22.4%, and the latest quarter’s 8.9% revenue growth and 28% net income growth show there is still demand strength. A bull would also argue that the 2024-to-2025 net income decline is noise from below-the-line items, because operating income rose 13.5%, and that the market is correctly valuing a branded network with durable fee streams rather than a cyclical real-estate-heavy business. I take that seriously. But even if I give Hilton full credit for being a superior franchise and value it on free cash flow instead of net income, the multiple is still in the mid-30s on FCF for a business whose recent revenue trend has already decelerated from recovery rates to ordinary high-single digits.

What would change my mind is not another quarter of respectable growth; it would take evidence that Hilton can sustainably grow into this valuation. Specifically, I would want to see revenue growth re-accelerate into the low teens while maintaining operating margins above 22% and converting that into at least $2.4B-$2.5B of annual free cash flow, or alternatively a much lower share price that brings the stock closer to 25-30x earnings and under 25x free cash flow. If upcoming quarters show revenue slipping back toward 5-6% growth or net margins hovering around 10-13%, the premium multiple should compress. My bias is that fair value is far below the current quote, though not as low as the most punitive model outputs; a range around $220-$240 feels more defensible for this quality level and growth profile.

Grok Reading
Independent reading · grok-4.5 · generated 2026-08-11 14:39:03
Verdict Overvalued at $314; fundamentals support roughly $150–200, leaving a large narrative premium vulnerable to any growth deceleration

Hilton’s operating engine is clean and recognizably high-quality: $12.04B of 2025 revenue, $2.69B of operating income (22.4% margin), and $2.03B of free cash flow against only $101M of capex. That is the textbook asset-light franchisor print. Revenue has compounded at roughly 8.5% from the post-pandemic base, and the trailing four quarters still show mid-to-high single-digit top-line growth, with Q1 2026 revenue at $2.94B versus $2.70B a year earlier. The problem is not the business; it is the price. At $314 the stock clears 51× trailing earnings, 24× EV/EBITDA and 6.2× sales while net income actually slipped year-over-year from $1.54B to $1.46B and recent earnings growth prints negative. Paying growth-stock multiples for a mature earner whose revenue trend is already flagged as decelerating is the central contradiction in the tape.

The balance-sheet optics look ugly—negative equity of $5.35B and a current ratio of 0.66—but that is largely the residue of aggressive buybacks rather than operating distress; cash flow quality remains strong and the dividend is a token 0.19% yield with a 10% payout. What the numbers actually say is that management has already harvested a large share of the capital-return story, so the residual equity claim is levered to continued fee growth and multiple support. With FCF CAGR at only 6.3% and the most recent annual NI down, the $70B enterprise is discounting a multi-year stretch of high-single-digit fee expansion and stable-to-rising margins that the quarterly run-rate does not yet confirm.

The valuation models’ ~$146 fair-value anchor is directionally right even if the precise DCF is debatable; a 50%-plus premium to that level requires the market narrative of permanent RevPAR elevation and “platform monopoly” status to hold without interruption. I weigh the narrative as real but fragile: lodging is still cyclical, labor costs are a known margin pressure, and the 115% story premium leaves almost no room for a soft landing in corporate or leisure demand. Secondary signals (macro headwinds, decelerating revenue confidence, sector-average positioning) reinforce that the easy post-pandemic catch-up is behind the company.

The strongest counter-argument is straightforward: Hilton is one of the cleanest compounders in consumer discretionary, the franchise model converts incremental rooms into high-margin fees with almost no capital, operating income is still rising ($2.69B versus $2.37B), and Q1 2026 net income rebounded sharply to $385M. A patient bull can argue that 8–10% system growth plus buybacks justifies a mid-20s EV/EBITDA forever and that negative equity is irrelevant for an asset-light royalty stream. I discount that case because the current 51× P/E and 24× EBITDA already embed the optimistic end of that distribution; any reversion in RevPAR growth or multiple compression toward historical lodging norms produces large downside from $314 before the fundamental thesis is even wrong.

I would flip to neutral or constructive only if successive quarters re-accelerate revenue growth sustainably above 10% with operating margins holding above 23%, or if the stock corrected into the low-to-mid $200s while FCF stayed near $2B. Until one of those arrives, the asymmetry is unfavorable.

Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Each AI above independently stated a direction (undervalued, fairly valued, or overvalued) and how strongly it believes it (conviction, 0–5). We combine those into a Bull-Bear Index on a 0–10 scale: 5 is neutral, 10 is maximum bullish (undervalued at full conviction), 0 is maximum bearish. We compute the score ourselves with the same arithmetic for every seat — the models never grade their own bullishness — so the three are directly comparable. Δ shows how far each seat sits from the panel average of 1.3; a large Δ marks the dissenting voice, usually the one worth reading.
Claude claude-opus-4-7 2.0
overvalued · conviction 3/5 · Δ +0.7 vs panel · self: 3.0
GPT gpt-5.4 1.0
overvalued · conviction 4/5 · Δ -0.3 vs panel · self: 3.0
Grok grok-4.5 1.0
overvalued · conviction 4/5 · Δ -0.3 vs panel · self: 3.0
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
Separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), plus AI Impact (how the AI wave reshapes it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-08-11 14:49:02
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Quality name, priced rich - pass and wait for a dip 8/10
Elite asset-light franchisor priced roughly 30-50% above any defensible fair value, with tailwind sentiment defending the premium for now.
The cruxWhether lodging RevPAR and unit growth compound cleanly through the next cycle, or a single soft quarter cracks the ~$170 of narrative premium sitting above the DCF anchor.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from HLT's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwaySelf-Funding
DilutionShare Count Shrinking
Earnings QualityHigh Earnings Quality
The four lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
+60
Strong
edge √Σ 135 · risk √Σ 66 · conf 8/10

Hilton is a mature, asset-light franchisor throwing off real cash: revenue grew from $5.79B (2021) to $12.04B (2025), operating margin has held in a tight 21-24% band post-COVID, and FCF has climbed every single year from $74M to $2.03B. OCF/NI of 1.22x and accruals at -2.6% of assets say the reported earnings are backed by cash, not accruals. Altman Z of 2.91 sits in the grey zone, which is normal for a franchise model that runs a levered capital structure by design.

Strengths 4
m78
Aggressive per-share concentration
Diluted shares fell from 281M (2021) to 238M (2025), a -4.1% CAGR, with buyback/SBC of 1149.8% — management is genuinely returning capital, not offsetting stock comp.
m70
Clean earnings quality
OCF/NI 1.22x, accruals -2.6% of assets, and no Beneish flags. FCF ($2.03B) exceeds net income ($1.46B) in 2025, consistent with a capital-light royalty model.
m65
Durable operating margin
OpM 17.4% -> 23.9% -> 21.7% -> 21.2% -> 22.4%; margin recovered fully post-COVID and holds ~22% even as revenue nearly doubled, evidencing operating leverage in the franchise engine.
m55
SBC is modest and covered
SBC at 1.4% of revenue is disciplined for a large-cap, and buybacks dwarf it >11x — dilution risk is effectively neutralized.
Concerns 3
m55
Thin liquidity cushion and leverage
Cash/market cap only 1.3% ($918M) with Altman Z of 2.91 in the grey zone; the buyback pace is funded partly by leverage, which is fine in expansion but tightens the survival math in a severe lodging downturn.
m30
Cyclical demand exposure
Lodging revenue is inherently cyclical; 2021's $5.79B trough vs. 2025's $12.04B shows how far the top line can swing, though the franchise/fee mix cushions the earnings hit.
m20
No insider open-market buying
Insider tape shows only routine director awards — no P/S signal in either direction. Neutral, but no personal-capital conviction visible.
This is a textbook mature compounder in franchise clothing — capital-light, cash-generative, and shrinking the float at a steady clip while earnings quality checks out cleanly. The only reason it doesn't grade higher is structural: Hilton runs deliberately levered with a slim cash buffer, and lodging is a genuinely cyclical end-market, so 'Fortress' isn't the right word. But as a business, it's doing exactly what a high-quality franchisor should do — growing fees, protecting margin, and concentrating per-share value. Solidly Strong.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Net debt and maturity ladder — how much of the buyback is debt-funded and refinancing risk
  • Franchise vs. owned-hotel revenue mix and fee-based EBITDA share
  • Pipeline of contracted rooms and net unit growth trajectory
  • Any off-balance-sheet guarantees to hotel owners or JV obligations
  • Concentration by geography/brand and exposure to any single large owner-operator
Valuation / Mispricing
-77
Rich
edge √Σ 20 · risk √Σ 121 · conf 6/10
Price $314 vs deserved ~$135-215 depending on method; even the friendliest anchor implies ~30% overpayment, so no margin of safety. attractive below $190.00

The e2e composite pins deserved value at $134.86 and the signal-adjusted read at $145.83, implying roughly -54% versus the $314.23 print. Even the most generous input, anchored-PE at $214.91, still sits ~32% below today's price, while the EPV floor at $78.46 says the run-rate cash engine alone supports only about a quarter of the market cap. The DCF at $123.04 clusters with the composite. That is a consistent, multi-method message: the market is paying for years of continued RevPAR strength, unit growth and buybacks with essentially no cyclical discount.

Cheap signals 1
m20
Quality earns some premium
Strong quality grade (60), clean earnings, asset-light fees and steady buybacks legitimately lift deserved value above the raw DCF - but not to 2x.
Rich / priced-in 4
m78
Composite FV ~57% below price
Composite $134.86 and signal-adjusted $145.83 vs $314.23 implies the market is paying more than 2x deserved value on the blended read.
m60
Even the generous anchor is below spot
Anchored-PE of $214.91 is the highest of the three methods and still sits ~32% under $314; the friendliest lens says rich, not cheap.
m55
EPV floor screams cyclical risk
EPV of $78.46 means run-rate earnings power alone supports only ~25% of today's price; the rest is growth and multiple, both cycle-sensitive in lodging.
m45
Priced for permanent travel inflation
To justify $314, RevPAR and fee growth must compound through any macro softness while labor and franchisee economics stay benign - a heroic base case, not a conservative one.
I can't get to cheap here without believing lodging has stopped being cyclical. Every method the brief hands me - DCF, EPV, even the anchored-PE - sits below $315, and the composite is roughly half of spot. Hilton is a genuinely strong business and deserves a premium multiple, but a premium is not 2x deserved value. I'd want it closer to $190 before this becomes interesting on price alone, and I'd expect a real cycle scare to get there.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Forward RevPAR and net unit growth guidance versus consensus
  • Franchise fee take-rate trend and any signs of owner pushback
  • Buyback pace and net leverage trajectory
  • Any one-time items inflating recent EBITDA/EPS
  • Group and business-transient booking pace into next year
General Sentiment
+31
Tailwind
tail √Σ 90 · head √Σ 58 · conf 6/10

The macro tape is mildly risk-on (score +47, VIX ~15.5, S&P near highs) and HLT's beta of ~1.06 means it participates cleanly in that lift without the whiplash of higher-beta names. More importantly, the active narrative on HLT is a strong 'platform-monopoly / irreplaceable global franchise' story with moderate durability, and the just-reported Q2 2026 print (revenue $3.34B, net income $482M) plus upgraded guidance, a reaffirmed dividend, and buybacks are actively feeding that story rather than cracking it. News flow in the last 72h is net constructive: an 'undervalued on earnings and buybacks' piece and a 'bull case could change following strong Q2' piece, with the one negative-tinged headline (Airbnb surging while the rest of travel did not) being an Airbnb idiosyncratic story, not a lodging-sector rotation away from HLT. The offsets are real but secondary: 10y at 4.65% and market PE ~26 are a background headwind for a name trading at a premium multiple on a permanent-travel-inflation narrative, and the bear framing (2.15x DCF, ~$170 of premium on story) means any crack in RevPAR or corporate travel would hit sentiment disproportionately. Cult coefficient is low, so there is no fanatical bid to defend it if the narrative wobbles. Net: the tape and the story are pushing this specific name up right now, but the pressure is a steady tailwind, not a mania.

Tailwinds 3
m62
Strong platform-monopoly narrative
The 'irreplaceable global franchise, asset-light fee compounder' story is intense and currently being validated by results and guidance - narrative is in the strengthening phase, not fading.
m55
Q2 beat + capital return reinforces story
Fresh Q2 2026 print, upgraded guidance, reaffirmed dividend and buyback authorization are exactly the kind of news flow that keeps analyst tone constructive and defends the premium multiple near-term.
m35
Risk-on tape, beta ~1.06
Mildly risk-on regime with VIX 15.5 and S&P near highs lifts a market-beta consumer cyclical cleanly; not a huge push, but a supportive backdrop for a name that needs the travel/consumer mood to stay benign.
Headwinds 3
m45
Rich narrative premium is fragile to any wobble
Bear frame flags ~$170 of story-premium over DCF anchor; with cult low and durability only moderate, any RevPAR miss or consumer softness would trigger outsized sentiment de-rating - a latent, not active, headwind.
m30
Rates and market PE background pressure
10y at 4.65% and market PE ~26 are a persistent crosswind for premium-multiple cyclicals; not dominating the tape today but caps upside on multiple expansion.
m20
Airbnb divergence a mild narrative risk
Airbnb surging while traditional lodging did not is a hint that the 'travel platform' bid is bifurcating; minor for now, but worth watching as a narrative-sharing risk.
Net tailwind, but a measured one. The tape is friendly, the platform-monopoly narrative is strong and just got fed by a clean Q2 and capital return, and news flow is constructive - that is real upward pressure on THIS name over the next few weeks. But the story is already doing heavy lifting versus a DCF anchor far below the tape, cult is low, and rates are a quiet drag, so this is a Tailwind, not a Strong Tailwind. I lean long the sentiment here into any narrative-confirming data, and I get nervous fast on the first RevPAR or consumer-spending crack.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Whether sell-side target revisions after Q2 skew upward (would confirm tailwind) or stall (narrative maturing)
  • RevPAR trend and corporate travel commentary in the next monthly STR/industry data - the key crack point
  • Any rotation out of premium-multiple consumer cyclicals if 10y pushes above 4.75-5%
  • Whether Airbnb-style alt-lodging strength starts pulling narrative share from branded hotel platforms
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
AI Impact
+0
Mildly favorable - physical scarcity insulates, distribution layer is the exposed flank
opp √Σ 0 · thr √Σ 3 · conf 7/10
AI opportunities 0

None surfaced.

AI threats 11
m1
Underlying Need Persistence
m1
Solution Persistence
m1
Intelligence Commoditization
m1
Responsibility Transfer
m1
Scarcity Migration
m1
Customer DIY Preference
m1
AI Intermediation Position
m1
Data Leverage
m1
AI Margin Conversion
m1
Revenue Unit Durability
m1
Entrant Compression
The structural effect of the AI wave on this specific business over the next ~5 years — demand, cost leverage, moat, barriers to entry, position in the AI stack. The reality beneath the AI story, not the story's market pressure (General Sentiment owns that) — and not a call on the business today or the price.
Growth Outlook
not run

This lens hasn't been run for this ticker yet.

The forward growth verdict — is the business itself likely to grow (next 2 quarters / year 1 / years 2–3), judged against its category and against printed expectations. The full horizon ladder + creme renders on the Growth Outlook card above. Not a call on the price (Valuation owns that) or the tape (Sentiment owns that).
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure), AI Impact (structural ~5yr AI exposure), and Growth Outlook (the forward growth verdict). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Price Prediction
Unavailable View weakness chain →

Prediction unavailable. valuation-synthesis has no result for HLT — the prediction needs its fair-value anchors.

Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for HLT. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
v1.1.562 · 9b2927c4 · 2026-08-22 16:52:06