Skip to main content
Homepage
Full 18-step deep-dive · ~20–30 min · a member feature.
AGING Analysis Report
Aug 2, 2026
21 days ago · 100% complete
NOT DEPENDABLE This report predates a filing — its financial basis has been replaced.
Report generated: Aug 2, 2026 · Filing on record since: Aug 19, 2026 · 16 days after
For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page

What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.

Our current read (analysis of 2026-08-23): Designation Low · Gem Score -24 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality 8 · Value -51 · Sentiment 37 (timing only, not weighted) · Composite fair value $85.67 vs $86.56 at analysis

Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable reference-name attribute you can cite):

  • profile-header / price-overview — company profile, live quote, market cap
  • extended-analysisthe core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memo
  • future-predictions — our forward price-band predictions
  • market-narrative / ai-findings / gpt-critique — narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)
  • Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers): price-history, income-trend, key-metrics, financials (statement tables), insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.

More for machine readers: site briefing at /llms.txt · any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER · raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds); every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.

Robinhood Markets, Inc.

HOOD NASDAQ
Financial Services · Capital Markets
Menlo Park, CA 94025, United States robinhood.com Updated Aug 2, 2:21pm
Price
$86.56
Market Cap
$77.9B
Employees
2,900
Beta
2.34
Avg Volume
24,854,497
CEO
Mr. Vladimir Tenev

Robinhood Markets, Inc. operates a modern financial services platform that provides commission-free trading and investing tools through a single, app-based cloud platform powered by proprietary technology. The company offers retail brokerage services, enabling users to trade U.S.-listed stocks, Exchange Traded Funds, options, cryptocurrencies, futures, and prediction markets. Key features include fractional shares, real-time market data, dividend reinvestment, recurring investments, advanced trading tools, and cash management options such as debit card services. Its vertically integrated design supports fraud detection, derivatives trading, and portfolio management for stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Robinhood Markets, Inc. serves individual investors seeking accessible entry into capital markets, impacting the financial services sector by democratizing trading. Founded in 2013 and headquartered in Menlo Park, California, it continues to deliver innovative products tailored to contemporary investing needs across multiple asset classes.

Runs with full report Generated: Aug 2, 2026 2:29pm
Price Overview
Price at report time
$86.56
as of Aug 2, 2:40pm (21d ago)
Change · Aug 2
-0.04 (-0.05%)
Day Range
$83.68 – $89.50
52-Week Range
$63.52 – $153.86
50-Day MA
$96.64
200-Day MA
$99.29
Volume
22,867,000.00
Right now · live
Log in to get the live feed
Members see the real-time price and the move since this report (over 21d).
Share Structure
Outstanding 899,000,000.00
Float 783,496,256.00
Free Float 87.2%
High free float — 87.2% of shares trade freely, ~12.8% held by insiders/institutions
Very liquid — most shares trade freely. Low insider ownership can mean less management alignment, but makes large position sizing straightforward.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Aug 2, 2026 2:45pm (21d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Aug 2, 2026 2:45pm (21d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
TD Twelve Data statement HEX SEC filing
Industry comparison last run: Aug 2, 2026 2:27pm
P/E Ratio (Price per dollar of earnings)
HEX
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
42.22
Stock Price: $86.56
EPS (Diluted): 2.05
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
HEX
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
8.69
Stock Price: $86.56
Total Equity: $9.15B
Shares: 918,536,585
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
HEX
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
33.80
Market Cap: $77.95B
Total Debt: $0.00
Cash: $4.26B
EBITDA: $2.18B
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
HEX
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$73.7B
Market Cap: $77.95B
Total Debt: $0.00
Cash: $4.26B
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
HEX
Gross Profit / Revenue
83.3%
Gross Profit: $3.73B
Revenue: $4.47B
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
HEX
Operating Income / Revenue
46.8%
Operating Income: $2.09B
Revenue: $4.47B
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
HEX
Net Income / Revenue
42.1%
Net Income: $1.88B
Revenue: $4.47B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
HEX
Net Income / Total Equity
20.6%
Net Income: $1.88B
Total Equity: $9.15B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
HEX
NOPAT / Invested Capital
38.3%
Operating Income: $2.09B
Tax Rate: 10.7%
Equity: $9.15B
Total Debt: $0.00
Cash: $4.26B
Zero debt — invested capital = equity minus cash (very efficient)
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
HEX
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
1.26
Current Assets: $36.31B
Current Liabilities: $28.77B
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
HEX
Total Debt / Total Equity
0.00
Short-Term Debt: $0.00
Long-Term Debt: $0.00
Total Debt: $0.00
Total Equity: $9.15B
Zero debt — this company carries no debt obligations. Strongest possible score.
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
HEX
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$4.87
Revenue: $4.47B
Shares: 918,536,585
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
HEX
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
$9.96
Total Equity: $9.15B
Shares: 918,536,585
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
HEX
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$1.78
Operating CF: $1.64B
CapEx: $0.00
Shares: 918,536,585
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
TD
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
Last Dividend: $0.00
Stock Price: $86.56
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
HEX
Dividends Paid / Net Income
Dividends Paid: N/A
Net Income: $1.88B
Dividends paid not available in cash flow statement
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Aug 2, 2026 2:27pm
Compares HOOD against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 2, 2026 2:45pm (21d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue $1.8B $1.4B $1.9B $3.0B $4.5B
Cost of Revenue $509.0M $583.0M $452.0M $504.0M $745.0M
Gross Profit $1.3B $775.0M $1.4B $2.4B $3.7B
Operating Expenses $2.9B $1.7B $1.9B $1.4B $1.6B
Operating Income -$1.6B -$966.0M -$531.0M $1.1B $2.1B
Net Income -$3.7B -$1.0B -$541.0M $1.4B $1.9B
EBITDA $430.0M -$860.0M -$455.0M $1.1B $2.2B
EPS $-7.49 $-1.17 $-0.61 $1.60 $2.12
EPS (Diluted) $-7.49 $-1.17 $-0.61 $1.56 $2.05
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 2, 2026 2:21pm (21d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Cash & Equivalents $6.3B $6.3B $4.8B $4.3B $4.3B
Total Current Assets $19.3B $22.9B $31.8B $25.1B $36.3B
Total Assets $19.8B $23.3B $32.3B $26.2B $38.1B
Current Liabilities $12.3B $16.3B $25.5B $18.1B $28.8B
Long-Term Debt
Total Liabilities $12.5B $16.4B $25.6B $18.2B $29.0B
Total Equity $7.0B $6.7B $8.0B $9.2B
Retained Earnings -$3.9B -$4.9B -$5.4B -$4.0B -$2.2B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 2, 2026 2:45pm (21d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Operating Cash Flow -$884.8M -$852.0M $1.2B -$157.0M $1.6B
Capital Expenditure -$63.2M -$28.0M
Free Cash Flow -$948.0M -$880.0M
Acquisitions (net) -$125.4M $0 -$93.0M -$6.0M
Net Debt Issued / (Repaid)
Dividends Paid
Stock Buybacks $0 $0 -$608.0M -$257.0M -$653.0M
Net Change in Cash $4.1B -$913.0M -$11.0M -$651.0M $1.2B
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Aug 2, 2026 2:45pm (21d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue Growth -25.2% +37.3% +58.2% +51.6%
Gross Profit Growth -40.7% +82.3% +73.2% +52.3%
Operating Income Growth +41.1% +45.0% +298.9% +98.3%
Net Income Growth +72.1% +47.4% +360.8% +33.5%
EBITDA Growth -300.0% +47.1% +349.5% +92.1%
0Company Classification 1Industry Landscape 2Company Momentum 3Forward Projection 4aDCF Valuation 4bEarnings Power Value 4cAnchored PE 4dReverse DCF 4eRevenue-Based DCF 4fAnchored P/S 4gScenario Analysis 4hDividend Discount Model 4iBook Value Analysis 4jInsider Activity 4fCash Flow Quality 4gDebt Maturity Risk 4hMacro Environment 4iSector Intelligence 4jRevenue Confidence 4kSensitivity Analysis 4lSector Demand Cycle 5AI Investigation 5bThesis Evaluation 6Valuation Synthesis
computed not applicable not yet run 14 computed · 6 not applicable · 4 not yet run
Risk : Reward — if the last quarter repeats
Live · as of 2026-08-19 08:58
-0.4 : 1 recovery upside vs repeat-quarter downside
Even the bull case prices 32% below today — the ratio here measures the model-vs-market gap, not payoff odds. Another quarter like the worst recent one costs 81%. Caveat: revenue-DCF fits financials poorly (reported revenue omits net interest) — treat the legs as rough.
CaseGrowthMarginFair valuevs price ($86.56)
Bull — recovery +65% 35.0% $58.61 -32%
Base — stabilizes +44% 35.0% $35.15 -59%
Bear — keeps slipping +22% 35.0% $20.03 -77%
Stress — last quarter repeats +15% 35.0% $16.66 -81%
The next quarters keep the trajectory of the worst recent matched quarter (ending 2026-03-31) — growth stays at 15.1% and margins bend by the same profit-vs-revenue ratio (×1.00). Stress is a trajectory, not a prediction — it answers "what if the ship's current heading simply continues," which history says is the case to respect.
Why this is appearing: this company files quarterly, so its recent trajectory could be measured rather than assumed — the engine matched Jun 2026, Mar 2026 against the same quarters one year earlier and found revenue +24.0% · net income +26.2% year-over-year. That measured heading is what the stress case extends forward. Of those, the stress case extends the worst matched quarter — the one ending Mar 31, 2026 (revenue +15.1% YoY) — not the average. Data measured through Jun 30, 2026 — this card recalculates automatically when the next quarterly filing is ingested. Companies without quarterly filings (many foreign listings) never show this card: with no measured trajectory, there is nothing honest to repeat.
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for HOOD — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
Claude Reading
Independent analyst synthesis · claude-opus-4-7 · generated 2026-08-02 14:44:29
Verdict Overvalued at $86 given Q1 2026 margin compression (32.8% vs 47.2% prior) and decelerating sequential revenue; fair value closer to $55-65 unless Q2 reaccelerates and margins recover above 40%.

The raw numbers tell a more disquieting story than the "fair value" verdict lets on. Look at the quarterly trajectory: revenue went $637M → $1.01B → $927M → $989M → $1.27B → $1.28B → $1.07B. The most recent Q1 2026 print is a 16% sequential decline from Q4 2025, and net income collapsed from $605M to $350M — margin compressed from 47.2% to 32.8% in a single quarter. The 51.6% YoY revenue growth headline is arithmetically true but flattered by an easy Q1 2025 comp ($927M); the two-quarter run-rate is decelerating hard. This is exactly the pattern you'd expect from a business whose revenue is levered to crypto/options trading volumes rather than a subscription flywheel — and the Q4 2024 print with a 90.3% net margin ($916M NI on $1.01B revenue) reeks of a tax/deferred-asset benefit rather than operating leverage, which the models glide past.

The prior stack is internally contradictory in ways worth flagging. Pre-flight calls this "high-growth profitable" with accelerating growth; the synthesis calls it fair value; the thesis evaluator scores it -7 with the top bear ("margin compression contradicts the narrative mid-acceleration") outweighing bulls; and the narrative layer says fundamentals are doing all the work with negligible story premium. These don't reconcile. If margins are compressing 1,440bps QoQ while growth decelerates, the "durable high-margin fintech" framing embedded in the 17.4x P/S and 42x P/E is precisely the wrong frame — this is a transaction-fee business with a crypto beta, not a SaaS platform. The classification model is doing the heavy lifting here, and I think it's mis-bucketing HOOD. The narrative engine's "platform-monopoly" archetype is also generous: Fidelity, Schwab, and IBKR match on price, and Coinbase/Kraken match on crypto — there's no monopoly here.

A careful contrarian bull would counter: Q1 is seasonally soft for retail trading, crypto had a rough Jan-Mar 2026 tape, and the ~33% net margin is still exceptional in capital markets. ROIC of 38% is real. The 10 insider sales listed are small (all sub-14k share lots, likely 10b5-1 or RSU-related) and the secondary signal actually labels this "Net Insider Buying" — worth noting the models contradict themselves here too. Operating CF of $1.64B against a $78B cap is a ~2.1% cash yield, which isn't cheap but isn't insane for the growth profile. The bull case survives if Q2/Q3 2026 reaccelerates and margins normalize to the 40%+ range. But that's a bet on crypto tape and rate-sensitive cash sweep economics, not on business quality.

I dissent from the synthesis "fair value" call, leaning overvalued. At 17.8x sales and 42x earnings, HOOD needs to sustain 30%+ revenue growth AND hold ~40% net margins to justify $86 — and the most recent quarter fails both tests simultaneously. Normalize on trailing four quarters ($4.61B revenue, ~$1.9B NI blended) and apply a fintech-appropriate 25x P/E (still generous for a volume-cyclical broker), you get ~$47B market cap or ~$52/share. Even at a 30x multiple acknowledging platform optionality, you get ~$63. The gap from $86 to a $55-65 fair value range is the "durable platform" premium that Q1 2026 just undermined. The narrative engine is right that price tracks DCF — but the DCF inputs almost certainly assume mean-reversion in margins that isn't showing up. I'd wait for Q2 2026 to see whether the margin compression was seasonal noise or the start of a structural re-rating. Table-pounding conviction on the short side would require confirmation the crypto cycle has turned; for now, this is a "trim/avoid" not a "short."

GPT Reading
Independent reading · gpt-5.4 · generated 2026-08-02 14:44:42
Verdict Overvalued at $86.56 — Robinhood is a high-quality, newly profitable platform, but the latest quarter suggests normalization while the stock still prices near-peak growth and margins; fair value looks closer to $65-$75.

What stands out is not just that Robinhood became profitable, but how violently the income statement inflected: revenue went from $1.87B in 2023 to $2.95B in 2024 and $4.47B in 2025, while operating income swung from a $531M loss to $1.06B and then $2.09B. That is real operating leverage, not cosmetic adjustment. Gross margin at 83.3% and operating margin at 46.8% for 2025 are exceptional for any consumer finance platform. The balance sheet is also cleaner than most fintech stories that get this expensive: $4.26B of cash, no debt, and $1.64B of operating cash flow. If I looked only at the annual progression, I would say the market is right to treat Robinhood less like a fragile broker and more like a scaled financial distribution platform with unusually high monetization power.

But the quarterly data tells a more cautious story than the annual numbers. The latest quarter, 2026-03-31, shows revenue of $1.07B, up from $927M a year earlier, so still healthy at roughly 15% YoY, yet meaningfully below the 2025 exit rate of $1.27B-$1.28B in the prior two quarters. Net income also dropped to $350M from $605M in 2025-12 and $556M in 2025-09, with net margin falling to 32.8% from 47.2% and 43.6%. Even allowing for seasonality or market activity swings, that is a material compression in both revenue run rate and profitability. At $77.95B market cap, investors are paying about 17.4x trailing sales and about 41x trailing earnings for a business whose most recent quarter annualizes to only $4.28B of revenue and $1.4B of net income. On that run rate, the valuation is closer to 18x sales and 55x earnings. That is not absurd if growth is re-accelerating, but it is too rich for a platform whose transaction-driven economics can soften this quickly.

The key contradiction with the more benign “fair value” framing is that the market is valuing Robinhood on peak-ish profitability while the freshest data already shows normalization. The bizarre 2024-12 quarter, with $916M of net income on $1.01B of revenue and a 90.3% margin, is clearly not a representative base for extrapolation, and even 2025’s 42.1% annual net margin looks aggressive for underwriting a long-duration multiple in a cyclical retail trading business. Yes, ROE of 20.6% and ROIC of 38.3% are excellent, but those returns are being generated during a period of unusually favorable retail engagement and asset-market conditions. I think the right read is that Robinhood is a very good business, but not yet a business that deserves to be capitalized as if 35%-45% net margins and 30%+ top-line growth are durable through a full cycle. At $86.56, the stock is pricing in that durability.

The best counterargument is strong. Revenue did not merely recover; it more than doubled from 2023 to 2025, and unlike in prior hype cycles, the company is now keeping a huge share of that incremental revenue as profit. A debt-free platform with $4.26B in cash can invest, buy back stock, or absorb regulatory shocks better than most fintech peers. Even the “weaker” latest quarter still produced $350M of earnings on $1.07B of revenue, which would have looked extraordinary two years ago. If 2026 simply settles into a $4.5B-$5.0B revenue base with 30%+ net margins, then a premium multiple is justified because Robinhood has proven it can turn engagement into cash at scale. The bull case also fairly notes that traditional brokerage comps may be too conservative if the company continues broadening beyond vanilla trading into a higher-frequency, higher-wallet-share consumer finance ecosystem.

What would change my mind is not another good annual summary; it is evidence in the next two quarters that the March 2026 slowdown was noise rather than the beginning of a de-rating in fundamentals. If revenue gets back above $1.20B quarterly and net margin returns to 40%+, I would concede the business can sustain closer to the 2025 earnings power the market is capitalizing. Likewise, if operating cash flow continues compounding around the current $1.64B annual level while equity grows beyond $9.15B without leverage, the valuation premium becomes easier to defend. On the other hand, if quarterly revenue stays around $1.0B-$1.1B and earnings remain in the low-$300Ms, then the stock is plainly too expensive and should trade more like 25x-35x normalized earnings, which points materially below today’s price.

Grok Reading
Independent reading · grok-4.5 · generated 2026-08-02 14:45:21
Verdict Overvalued at $86.56 — 42x earnings and 18x sales on decelerating 15% YoY growth with compressing margins; fair value nearer $70–75 until growth reaccelerates

The raw numbers tell a story of a genuine business transformation that is now colliding with its own valuation. Robinhood went from $1.87B in 2023 revenue and a $541M loss to $4.47B and $1.88B in net income by year-end 2025—an extraordinary inflection, with 83% gross margins, 47% operating margins, and a clean balance sheet holding $4.26B cash against zero debt. That is real escape velocity. But the most recent print breaks the trajectory: Q1 2026 revenue of $1.07B is only 15% above the $927M year-ago quarter, a collapse from the 51% full-year 2025 growth rate, and it fell 16% sequentially from Q4’s $1.28B. Net margin compressed to 32.8% from 47.2% the prior quarter and 43.6% the quarter before that. At $86.56 and a $78B market cap, the stock trades at 42x trailing earnings and 18x sales on a business whose growth just decelerated by two-thirds in a single quarter. The market is still pricing the 2025 run-rate, not the 2026 slope.

What stands out hardest is the contradiction between the glossy annual metrics and the quarterly tape. ROIC of 38% and net margins above 40% on a full-year basis look like a scaled fintech platform; the last ninety days look like a cyclical brokerage whose crypto- and options-driven upside is mean-reverting. Q4 2024’s 90% net margin was clearly distorted by one-time items, so the clean earnings power is closer to the mid-to-high 30s—respectable, but not the kind of structural monopoly that supports 17–18x revenue. Insider activity reinforces the caution: the last ten filings are exclusively sales, totaling tens of thousands of shares across mid-July 2026, which directly contradicts the secondary signal claiming “net insider buying.” That is a data integrity flag, and the raw tape is what matters.

The bull case that deserves weight is straightforward. Full-year 2025 revenue grew 51% to $4.47B with $1.88B in earnings and $1.64B in operating cash flow; the company has demonstrated it can generate software-like incremental margins once scale is reached. If crypto volumes re-accelerate, gold/subscription attach rates keep climbing, and international expansion contributes meaningfully, a mid-20s growth rate on 35–40% net margins would still justify a premium multiple versus traditional brokers. The zero-debt fortress balance sheet and 20%+ ROE give management room to buy back stock or invest through a soft patch without balance-sheet stress. A smart opponent would argue Q1 is seasonally soft, that 15% is a floor not a ceiling, and that at roughly fair value to the composite DCF the asymmetry is still to the upside if the platform narrative reasserts.

I weigh that less because the valuation already embeds durable 30%+ growth and margin stability that the latest quarter actively undermines. Paying 42x earnings and 34x EV/EBITDA for a business showing sequential revenue decline and 1,400 basis points of margin compression in one quarter is not a discount to a durable winner—it is a premium to a peak print. The thesis evaluation’s −7 score and the explicit call-out of margin compression mid-acceleration match what the income statement is saying. Narrative intensity is minimal and price sits within 0.4% of DCF fair value precisely because the story has already been cashed in; there is no cult premium left to cushion a growth miss.

I would flip constructive if Q2 2026 revenue reaccelerates above 30% year-over-year with net margins reclaiming 40%, or if management prints clear evidence that non-transaction revenue (subscriptions, interest, international) has become large enough to decouple results from crypto and equity volume cycles. A sustained multi-quarter return to $1.3B-plus quarterly revenue run-rate at mid-40s margins would make 42x earnings defensible again. Until then, the stock is priced for a continuation of 2025 that Q1 2026 already put in doubt.

Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Each AI above independently stated a direction (undervalued, fairly valued, or overvalued) and how strongly it believes it (conviction, 0–5). We combine those into a Bull-Bear Index on a 0–10 scale: 5 is neutral, 10 is maximum bullish (undervalued at full conviction), 0 is maximum bearish. We compute the score ourselves with the same arithmetic for every seat — the models never grade their own bullishness — so the three are directly comparable. Δ shows how far each seat sits from the panel average of 1.3; a large Δ marks the dissenting voice, usually the one worth reading.
Claude claude-opus-4-7 2.0
overvalued · conviction 3/5 · Δ +0.7 vs panel · self: 3.0
GPT gpt-5.4 1.0
overvalued · conviction 4/5 · Δ -0.3 vs panel · self: 3.0
Grok grok-4.5 1.0
overvalued · conviction 4/5 · Δ -0.3 vs panel · self: 3.0
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
Separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-08-02 21:25:20
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Quality - wait for a dip 7/10
Solid business at fair price with a hot narrative tailwind - I want it 20% lower, not here.
The cruxWhether the prediction-markets narrative and analyst upgrades can sustain a premium multiple against 17% annual dilution and Q1's margin compression.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from HOOD's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwaySelf-Funding
DilutionHeavy Dilution
Earnings QualityGood Earnings Quality
The four lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
+8
Solid
edge √Σ 111 · risk √Σ 103 · conf 7/10

Robinhood has undergone a striking operating inflection: revenue grew from $1.36B (2022) to $4.47B (2025), gross margin expanded from 57.1% to 83.3%, and operating margin swung from -71.1% to +46.8%. Net income turned from -$1.03B to +$1.88B, and 2025 FCF of $1.64B corroborates the earnings (OCF/NI ratio noted as weak on the module but the multi-year cash swing is real). Liquid cash of $4.26B with no net debt makes the business self-funding with no survival question.

Strengths 3
m78
Operating inflection is real
Op margin moved from -71.1% (2022) to +46.8% (2025) on revenue rising 3.3x to $4.47B; gross margin at 83.3%. This is a genuine profitability step-change, not accounting noise.
m65
Self-funding with fortress liquidity
$4.26B liquid cash, zero net debt, $1.64B FCF in 2025. No external capital needed to operate or grow.
m45
Clean mechanical earnings quality
Accruals -2.7% of assets, no Beneish/accrual red flags. Cash generation broadly tracks the reported earnings turn.
Concerns 4
m72
Heavy share-count dilution
Diluted shares up ~87% since 2021 (492M to 918M), 16.9% CAGR. Buybacks recover just 41% of SBC - per-share economics badly lag business economics.
m55
Revenue base is cyclical and rate-sensitive
2022 revenue fell 25% to $1.36B when trading activity cooled; a large chunk of current profitability rides on retail engagement and net interest income levels. Durability through a full cycle unproven.
m40
Insider tape skews to selling
75 sells vs 2 buys in the last 12 months; recent tape (July 2026) is a steady drumbeat of small S-code sales including named insider Verma. Not alarming but not a vote of scarcity either.
m30
Altman Z in grey zone
Z of 2.07 reflects broker-dealer balance-sheet composition more than distress, but it does not clear the safe threshold.
This is a real inflection story - Robinhood is not the loss-making promotional platform of 2021-2022 anymore; margins, cash flow, and the balance sheet all point to a genuinely healthy operating business. My hesitation is twofold: the share count keeps grinding higher at 17% per year with buybacks not even keeping pace with SBC, which structurally caps per-share quality, and the revenue base still has a cyclical fingerprint. I grade this Solid - improving, well-funded, mechanically clean - but not yet Strong, because durability through a downturn is untested and shareholders are being diluted through the good times.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Composition of 2025 revenue between transaction, net interest, and other - to gauge rate sensitivity
  • Customer/asset concentration and cohort retention metrics from the 10-K
  • Details of SBC vesting schedule and any RSU cliff that would keep dilution elevated
  • Any pending regulatory matters (PFOF, crypto) that could impair revenue lines
  • Segment profitability - whether crypto and derivatives contribution is sustainable or spike-driven
Valuation / Mispricing
-51
Fairly Valued
edge √Σ 35 · risk √Σ 92 · conf 7/10
Price $86.56 vs deserved ~$85-87, gap under 2% - essentially fair, no edge either way. attractive below $68.00

The e2e synthesis lands at a composite FV of $85.12 and signal-adjusted FV of $86.91 against a $86.56 print - a rounding-error gap. The two component methods disagree wildly: the anchored-PE says $106 (roughly 22% upside) and the EPV floor says $12 (implying the market is paying almost entirely for growth, not for run-rate earnings power). Splitting that spread is exactly what the composite does, and the resulting $85 is defensible for a Solid-quality business with real cash flow but 17% annual share count creep.

Cheap signals 1
m35
Anchored PE points to $106
The anchored-PE method flags ~22% upside if you credit current earnings power as durable - a real signal but one that ignores cyclicality and dilution drag.
Rich / priced-in 4
m55
Zero margin of safety to composite FV
Price $86.56 sits 1.7% above the $85.12 composite FV and 0.4% below the signal-adjusted $86.91 - you are paying deserved value with no cushion for a cyclical revenue base.
m50
Dilution structurally caps per-share upside
17% annual share count growth with buybacks not offsetting SBC means even solid business-level compounding leaks out before reaching per-share value - the deserved multiple should be lower than a comparable non-diluting peer.
m45
EPV floor of $12 flags cyclical downside
The EPV floor at $12 is a runaway low read (no growth credit), but the enormous spread between EPV and price shows how much of the $86 is growth-and-cycle-dependent rather than run-rate earnings.
m30
Priced as a platform, not a broker
The $78B cap embeds the platform-monopoly narrative; if regulatory pressure on PFOF/crypto take-rates or free-brokerage competition compresses take-rates, the deserved multiple contracts fast.
Fully valued. The composite FV and the price are on top of each other, which is exactly what you expect when a Solid business is well-understood by the market. I need this ~20% lower - call it sub-$70 - before the anchored-PE upside case gives me a real margin of safety against the dilution drag and the cyclical EPV floor. Great business, fair price, no edge.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Net new funded accounts and ARPU trajectory in next 10-Q
  • Crypto revenue mix and take-rate sustainability post any regulatory action
  • SBC as % of revenue and net buyback pace - is dilution slowing
  • Interest-rate-sensitive net interest revenue as rates normalize
  • Options DARTs trend - core high-margin volume line
General Sentiment
+37
Tailwind
tail √Σ 101 · head √Σ 62 · conf 7/10

Sentiment on HOOD is running warm. Bernstein just hiked its target to $160 (78% upside call), the news flow is dominated by a fresh 'event contracts / prediction markets' growth story ($10M to $156M in a year), and the CFO is out doing IPO-access media hits - all classic signs of a strengthening bull narrative attaching itself to the name. The archetype is platform-monopoly with medium cult coefficient, and momentum is strong_positive (54.9% CAGR), so the tape is actively rewarding the story. Analyst tone is skewed bullish with target revisions going up, not down. The counter-pressure is macro: 10y at 4.68%, market PE 26.9, and a nascent neutral regime mean any risk-off flinch lands hard on a 2.34-beta retail-brokerage name whose earnings are levered to trading volumes and crypto. But right now the narrative pressure is clearly outrunning the macro drag, and news like 'stock is 43% off its high' frames the setup as a recovery story rather than a broken one. Net: a real, visible tailwind, not a mania - the intensity is described as minimal and durability only moderate, so this is push, not euphoria.

Tailwinds 3
m68
Bernstein target hike and bullish sell-side tone
Fresh $160 PT (from $130) with a widely-circulated 78% upside call is exactly the kind of analyst catalyst that pulls momentum money into a high-beta name. Sell-side revisions are trending up, not down.
m60
Prediction markets / event contracts narrative
Event contracts scaling from $10M to $156M quarterly gives the bull story a concrete new growth pillar to point at. This is the kind of fresh narrative hook that sustains multiple expansion beyond fundamentals.
m45
Strong price momentum reinforcing the story
54.9% CAGR and +71pp 3-year relative performance means the tape is already rewarding holders; momentum traders and trend followers stay engaged, which self-reinforces on a medium-cult name.
Headwinds 3
m42
High beta into a fragile neutral tape
Beta 2.34 means any shift from the current +22 neutral regime to risk-off hits HOOD roughly 2-3x the market. VIX 16 and a 2-day-old regime is not a stable footing for a trading-volume-dependent broker.
m35
Rates and market-PE macro drag
10y 4.68% and market PE 26.9 create a persistent valuation ceiling for high-multiple financials story stocks; capital-markets names in particular re-rate down when discount rates back up.
m30
Crypto cyclicality flagged in the flow
News is openly asking whether the trading boom offsets the crypto slump - a reminder that a chunk of the bull case is tied to a volatile, sentiment-driven asset class that can flip fast.
The non-fundamental pressure on HOOD is a genuine tailwind right now: Bernstein's target hike, a fresh prediction-markets narrative that gives the platform-monopoly story new legs, and strong price momentum are all pushing the same direction, with medium cult coefficient amplifying it. The offset is that this is a 2.34-beta name sitting on a nascent, only-mildly-positive tape with 10y yields near 4.7% - so the tailwind is real but conditional. If the regime holds, sentiment keeps lifting it; if the tape rolls over, the same beta cuts the other way violently. Net: tailwind, moderate conviction, not euphoric.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Whether other sell-side desks follow Bernstein higher or the $160 PT stays a lone outlier
  • Sustained growth in event-contract revenue - a single soft print would puncture the new narrative
  • VIX breaking above 20 or the regime flipping risk-off, which would punish the 2.34 beta disproportionately
  • Crypto tape - a sharp BTC/ETH drawdown would immediately compress HOOD sentiment
  • Any regulatory noise on options or crypto that would reactivate the bear archetype
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
Growth Outlook
not run

This lens hasn't been run for this ticker yet.

The forward growth verdict — is the business itself likely to grow (next 2 quarters / year 1 / years 2–3), judged against its category and against printed expectations. The full horizon ladder + creme renders on the Growth Outlook card above. Not a call on the price (Valuation owns that) or the tape (Sentiment owns that).
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure), and Growth Outlook (the forward growth verdict). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Price Prediction
Unavailable View weakness chain →

Prediction unavailable. No usable fair-value anchor — composite, DCF and anchored-PE are all absent from valuation-synthesis. Typical for pre-profit / narrative-platform names where those methods don't apply.

Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for HOOD. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
v1.1.562 · 9b2927c4 · 2026-08-22 16:52:06