For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page
What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.
Our current read (analysis of 2026-08-23): Designation Low · Gem Score -40 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality -2 · Value -78 · Sentiment 68 (timing only, not weighted)
Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable
reference-name attribute you can cite):
profile-header/price-overview— company profile, live quote, market capextended-analysis— the core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memofuture-predictions— our forward price-band predictionsmarket-narrative/ai-findings/gpt-critique— narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)- Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers):
price-history,income-trend,key-metrics,financials(statement tables),insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.
More for machine readers: site briefing at
/llms.txt ·
any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER ·
raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds);
every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.
Lumentum Holdings Inc.
LITE NASDAQLumentum Holdings Inc. is a technology company that designs, manufactures, and sells optical and photonic products for global communications and industrial markets. The company operates through two primary segments: Cloud and Networking, and Industrial Tech. In Cloud and Networking, Lumentum provides optical and photonic chips, components, modules, and subsystems used by cloud data center operators, AI and machine learning infrastructure providers, and network equipment manufacturers to build high-speed, scalable network and data center infrastructure. In Industrial Tech, it supplies short-pulse solid-state lasers, kilowatt-class fiber lasers, diode lasers, and gas lasers that support semiconductor device fabrication, solar cell production, display manufacturing, and electric vehicle and battery manufacturing. Headquartered in San Jose, California and incorporated in 2015, Lumentum today plays a significant role in enabling high-bandwidth connectivity and advanced precision manufacturing across the information technology and industrial sectors.
Price Overview
Price History (1 Year)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
| Period | Revenue | Net Income | Net Margin | YoY/QoQ |
|---|
Key Metrics
EPS (Diluted): 0.37
Total Equity: $1.13B
Shares: 69,600,000
Total Debt: $2.57B
Cash: $520.70M
EBITDA: -$75.80M
Total Debt: $2.57B
Cash: $520.70M
Revenue: $1.65B
Revenue: $1.65B
Revenue: $1.65B
Total Equity: $1.13B
Tax Rate: 115.0%
Equity: $1.13B
Total Debt: $2.57B
Cash: $520.70M
Current Liabilities: $392.80M
Long-Term Debt: $2.56B
Total Debt: $2.57B
Total Equity: $1.13B
Shares: 69,600,000
Shares: 69,600,000
CapEx: -$231.00M
Shares: 69,600,000
Stock Price: $810.35
Net Income: $25.90M
Industry Benchmarks
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 7, 2026 2:49am (16d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $1.7B | $1.8B | $1.4B | $1.6B |
| Cost of Revenue | $959.7M | $924.0M | $1.2B | $1.1B | $1.2B |
| Gross Profit | $783.1M | $788.6M | $569.0M | $251.5M | $459.9M |
| Operating Expenses | $256.1M | $485.3M | $684.7M | $685.5M | $640.0M |
| Operating Income | $527.0M | $303.3M | -$115.7M | -$434.0M | -$180.1M |
| Net Income | $397.3M | $198.9M | -$131.6M | -$546.5M | $25.9M |
| EBITDA | $618.4M | $384.9M | -$9.1M | -$323.4M | -$75.8M |
| EPS | $5.27 | $2.79 | $-1.93 | $-8.12 | $0.38 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $5.07 | $2.68 | $-1.93 | $-8.12 | $0.37 |
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 11, 2026 12:37pm (12d ago)| Metric | 2022 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash & Equivalents | $1.3B | — | $859.0M | $436.7M | $520.7M |
| Total Current Assets | $3.1B | — | $2.8B | $1.6B | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $4.2B | — | $4.6B | $3.9B | $4.2B |
| Current Liabilities | $716.5M | — | $633.8M | $269.3M | $392.8M |
| Long-Term Debt | — | — | — | $2.5B | $2.6B |
| Total Liabilities | $2.3B | — | $3.3B | $3.0B | $3.1B |
| Total Equity | $1.9B | — | $1.4B | $957.3M | $1.1B |
| Retained Earnings | -$129.1M | -$43.5M | -$340.6M | -$887.1M | -$861.2M |
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 7, 2026 2:49am (16d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $738.7M | $459.3M | $179.8M | $24.7M | $126.3M |
| Capital Expenditure | -$84.8M | -$91.2M | -$128.5M | -$133.0M | -$231.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $653.9M | $368.1M | $51.3M | -$108.3M | -$104.7M |
| Acquisitions (net) | $0 | $0 | -$861.6M | -$700.9M | $0 |
| Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) | — | — | $0 | $0 | $76.5M |
| Dividends Paid | — | — | — | — | — |
| Stock Buybacks | -$236.0M | -$543.9M | -$175.6M | $0 | $0 |
| Net Change in Cash | $476.3M | $515.9M | -$431.2M | -$422.3M | $84.0M |
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Aug 7, 2026 2:49am (16d ago)| Metric | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -1.7% | +3.2% | -23.1% | +21.0% |
| Gross Profit Growth | +0.7% | -27.8% | -55.8% | +82.9% |
| Operating Income Growth | -42.4% | -138.1% | -275.1% | +58.5% |
| Net Income Growth | -49.9% | -166.2% | -315.3% | +104.7% |
| EBITDA Growth | -37.8% | -102.4% | -3,453.8% | +76.6% |
Deep Analysis
Narrative Economics
market-narrative step).
AI Lens 4th lens · how AI reaches this business · 5-yr
2026-08-12Every GPU-to-GPU and campus-to-campus link in an AI cluster consumes optics, and photon generation cannot be virtualized — cheap intelligence raises the physical bandwidth bill, and Lumentum owns scarce InP epitaxy and high-speed EML/CW laser capacity that takes years and heavy capex to reproduce.
The monetized unit is a per-unit hardware price that erodes annually, and the module layer is contested by Broadcom's silicon-photonics vertical integration, Marvell DSP-led platforms, Coherent, and Chinese module makers — mix can shift Lumentum toward merchant laser die at commodity margins.
Whether the 800G/1.6T and co-packaged-optics transition keeps Lumentum's dollar content per port rising or strands it as a component vendor; the observable is Cloud & Networking gross margin path off 28% and whether laser/EML capacity remains sold out on long-term agreements.
Indium-phosphide wafer fabs, high-power CW and high-speed EML laser design and yield learning, and multi-year hyperscaler qualification records for links that cannot be allowed to fail in production clusters.
AI Lens thesis
AI reaches Lumentum as demand, not as substitution: no amount of cheap inference replaces the need to move photons between accelerators, so the interrogation is not 'can AI do this job' but 'who captures the interconnect dollar as speeds step up.' The need is near-certain and growing; the solution form is genuinely uncertain, because value can migrate from pluggable modules (where Chinese and semiconductor-integrated rivals compete hard) toward laser sources and packaging (where Lumentum's fabs are the bottleneck). Financials show the fragility of the unit economics — gross margin fell from 46% to 18.5% before recovering to 28% with FCF still negative on capex — so this is a capacity/mix story where the AI tailwind is real but retention of it is not assured.
What the market may be underestimating
Upside If co-packaged optics wins, external laser sources become the single hardest-to-source item in the stack — Lumentum could gain share of a smaller BOM at higher margin, the inverse of the consensus 'CPO kills the module vendor' fear.
Downside Capex and negative free cash flow mean the AI order book has to be pre-funded; if hyperscaler digestion pauses even briefly, Lumentum absorbs fixed InP fab underutilization exactly as it did in 2024, when margins collapsed on volume loss.
Outcome range spread 58 · unresolved
Claude Reading
The raw quarterly trajectory is the single most important fact in this file and the models are underweighting it. Revenue went from $337M (Sep-24) → $402M → $425M → $481M → $534M → $666M → $808M (Mar-26). That's not a cyclical recovery — that's a 140% sequential ramp over six quarters, with the last two prints accelerating (+25% and +21% QoQ). Net income turned meaningfully positive: $78M then $144M, an 18% net margin. Annualizing the March quarter gets you ~$3.2B revenue and ~$575M net income, which puts the forward P/E around 110x on trailing run-rate — still expensive, but nowhere near the "2,190x" or "38x sales" numbers the synthesis and thesis modules are anchoring on. The FMP canonical metrics are backward-looking to a fiscal year ending June 2025 that captured the trough, not the ramp. Every model here is fighting stale denominators.
That said, the synthesis and market-forces verdicts aren't wrong about the setup — they're right about the wrong metric. At $810 and $63B market cap, even generously extrapolating Q3-FY26 run-rate to $3.5-4B FY27 revenue and 20% net margins ($700-800M NI), you're paying 80-90x forward earnings and ~16x forward sales for an optical components business with $2.57B debt against $521M cash, negative FY25 FCF, and a genuinely commoditizing product category where Coherent, Marvell, Broadcom, and Chinese entrants all want the same hyperscaler sockets. The pre-flight module calling this "deep value" is flatly wrong given the price action from $111 to $810 — that reclassification should have triggered before synthesis ran. The narrative module's "not unanchored" note assumes $4B revenue and high margins that don't exist yet; it's pricing the destination, not the current state. Thesis-eval's -12 score understates the asymmetry: the bull case requires both sustained AI capex AND margin defense AND share gains, while the bear case only needs one to break.
The contrarian argument I'd make against my own skepticism: optical transceivers at 800G/1.6T with co-packaged optics roadmaps are genuinely supply-constrained through 2026, Lumentum's indium phosphide laser IP is not trivially replicable, and the sequential revenue acceleration suggests they're winning share, not just riding capex. If the March quarter is a new baseline and Q4/Q1 print $900M+ each, the annualization math tightens fast — $4B revenue at 22% net margins is $880M NI, and 70x forward becomes defensible if you believe two more years of 30%+ growth. Insider activity is uninformative here (routine awards, small size, no open-market buys or sells to read), which is itself a mild negative — no insiders are buying at $810 either. The balance sheet is the underappreciated risk: 2.27x debt/equity with negative annual FCF means any demand air-pocket forces dilution or refinancing at bad terms.
I partially dissent from the synthesis "priced for perfection" framing — it's directionally right but built on stale metrics that make the case look easier than it is. The real question is whether Q4-FY26 and Q1-FY27 confirm the $800M+ quarterly run-rate or show it was a pull-forward. At $810, you're not paying for perfection so much as paying for a specific execution path (sustained sequential growth, margin expansion to 25%+, no share loss to Coherent/Marvell) that has maybe a 35-40% probability. Fair value on a probability-weighted DCF with 15% discount rate lands me around $450-550 — meaningful downside but not the catastrophic overvaluation the raw ratios suggest. I'd short into strength above $850 with tight risk management, avoid longs here, and revisit if it pulls back to the $500s where the risk/reward inverts. The models are collectively right that this is overvalued and collectively wrong about how much — the true gap is 30-40%, not 80%.
GPT Reading
The raw data and the quoted stock price do not belong in the same sentence. Lumentum has clearly improved operationally over the last four reported quarters: revenue went from $336.9M in September 2024 to $808.4M in March 2026, and net income swung from a loss of $82.4M to a profit of $144.2M. On a trailing four-quarter basis, revenue is about $2.49B and net income about $439.9M, implying a trailing net margin near 17.7%. That is a real recovery, not financial engineering. But at a $63.29B market cap and $810.35 share price, investors are paying roughly 25x trailing sales and around 144x trailing earnings for a business that as recently as fiscal 2025 generated only $1.65B of annual revenue, posted an operating loss of $180.1M, and burned $104.7M of free cash flow. For a communications component supplier with a deeply cyclical history, that valuation is wildly detached from what the income statement and cash flow statement can support.
What stands out most is how narrow the bridge is between “strong recovery” and “priced for perfection.” The latest quarter annualized would imply a run-rate of about $3.23B revenue and $577M net income. Even if I generously assume this is the new baseline and not a peak-ish AI optics surge, the stock still trades at about 110x that annualized earnings power. To justify $63B on even a rich 30x earnings multiple, Lumentum would need to earn about $2.1B annually; at a 20% net margin, that implies more than $10B of revenue, roughly 4x the current trailing level. Nothing in the historical record suggests that kind of scale is imminent. The five-year revenue range is basically $1.36B to $1.77B annually before this rebound, and margins have been violently unstable: net income was $397.3M in 2021, $198.9M in 2022, then losses of $131.6M and $546.5M, before barely positive $25.9M in fiscal 2025. That is not the profile of a business that deserves mega-cap-style certainty multiples.
The balance sheet makes the valuation even harder to defend. Debt is $2.57B against just $520.7M of cash and $1.13B of equity, so net debt is around $2.05B and debt-to-equity is 2.27x. That leverage is manageable if the recovery sticks, but it is the opposite of what I want to see in a stock trading at nearly 50x book and over 35x annual sales on the canonical metrics. Cash generation is also lagging the accounting rebound. Fiscal 2025 operating cash flow was only $126.3M, and capex of $231.0M pushed free cash flow to negative $104.7M. Maybe that capex is exactly what positions the company for an AI-driven step-up, but the market is already capitalizing it as if the returns on that spend are proven. They are not. The quarterly net income line also has oddities — a 44.4% margin in June 2025 followed by 0.8%, 11.8%, and 17.8% — which suggests nonrecurring items or unusually lumpy profitability. I would not extrapolate the recent earnings ramp in a straight line.
The best argument against my bearish read is that the recent quarter progression is too powerful to dismiss as just a dead-cat bounce. Revenue rose sequentially from $425.2M to $480.7M to $533.8M to $665.5M to $808.4M over five quarters, which is a near-doubling in a year. If that reflects genuine hyperscaler design wins in AI optics rather than a normal telecom inventory snapback, then historical averages understate future earnings power. In that world, fiscal 2025 free cash flow weakness may simply be investment ahead of a much larger revenue base, and today’s P/E and P/B are backward-looking nonsense because book equity was crushed during the downturn and earnings were near zero during the transition. A smart bull would say the market is valuing not the $2.5B trailing business, but a future $5B-$7B optical interconnect franchise with much better mix and utilization. I weigh that less heavily because even those much larger revenue scenarios still struggle to make $63B look sensible unless margins become structurally exceptional and stay there through a competitive cycle.
What would change my mind is not another story about AI optics demand, but proof in the numbers that Lumentum is becoming a materially larger and more cash-generative company than it has ever been. I would need to see at least two more quarters with revenue above $850M, operating leverage that converts into something like 18%-20%+ net margins without one-offs, and free cash flow turning decisively positive even after capex. If annualized revenue starts pointing toward $4B+ and annualized net income toward $800M-$1B with debt coming down, then I would revisit whether the market is simply discounting a new scale regime. Short of that, this looks like a cyclical optical supplier whose shares have been marked up as if it already won the AI infrastructure endgame.
Grok Reading
The quarterly print trail is the only thing that matters here, and it is unambiguous: Lumentum has gone from a $337M revenue quarter with a 24.5% net loss to an $808M quarter at 17.8% net margin in six steps, with almost no sequential stalls. Last-four-quarter revenue is already roughly $2.49B against a $1.65B FY2025 base, and the two most recent quarters alone annualize near $3B. That is not a mild recovery from the optical inventory washout; it is a step-function demand shock consistent with AI datacenter interconnect pull-through. Gross margin on the annual still sits at only 28%, operating margin was still negative for the full year, and free cash flow was –$105M after $231M of capex, so the P&L has not yet caught the top line. But the direction of travel in the last three quarters—revenue +51% then +25% sequentially, net income from $4M to $78M to $144M—is the cleanest operational inflection in the entire optical cohort.
At $810 and a $63B enterprise, the market is not pricing a cyclical bounce. Trailing sales multiple is ~34x, EV/revenue ~35x, and even on a generous $3.2B forward run-rate the stock still clears 20x sales with a balance sheet carrying $2.57B of debt against $521M of cash and only $1.13B of equity. ROE is 2%, ROIC under 1%, and the 2,190x P/E is a mathematical curiosity produced by near-zero trailing earnings rather than a forward signal. This is the opposite of the “deep-value” framing some of the pre-models floated; it is a narrative-platform multiple that assumes Lumentum becomes a durable, high-share supplier of the optical fabric inside every large AI cluster and that hyperscaler capex never mean-reverts. The debt load and still-negative free cash flow mean any stumble in that narrative forces equity holders to absorb the leverage.
The strongest counter-argument is simply the slope of the recent numbers themselves. If the company can print two more quarters above $850–900M with net margins holding in the mid-to-high teens and convert that into positive FCF, the multiple compresses rapidly toward something that looks merely expensive rather than absurd. Design-win stickiness at the transceiver and coherent module level is real, supply remains tight, and the physics of 100k-GPU fabrics genuinely favor specialized optics over pure copper for longer reaches. A smart bull will also note that the FY2025 annual figures are lagging indicators that still embed the trough quarters; annualizing only the post-inflection data makes the $63B capitalization look less deranged. I weigh this less heavily because optical components have a long history of rapid commoditization once volumes scale—Broadcom, Marvell, Coherent, and low-cost Asian suppliers all have the technical ability and the customer access to attack the same sockets—and because a components company with 28% gross margins and a leveraged balance sheet has almost no cushion if AI optical spend decelerates even modestly.
I would reverse to a neutral or constructive stance only on clear evidence that the revenue run-rate can sustain above $3.5B with net margins above 18% and free-cash-flow conversion turning structurally positive for two consecutive quarters, or on multi-year sole-source or dual-source awards from at least two of the top four hyperscalers that visibly lock out share erosion. Absent that, the asymmetry at $810 is sharply negative.
Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
Lumentum's five-year trajectory tells a cyclical/reset story: revenue slid from $1.74B (2021) to a $1.36B trough (2024), gross margin collapsed from 44.9% to 18.5%, and operating margin swung from +30.2% to -31.9%. FY2025 shows a real inflection - revenue back to $1.65B, GM recovering to 28%, op margin loss narrowing to -10.9%, and net income barely positive at $25.9M - but the business is still not GAAP-profitable at the operating line and FCF remains negative (-$104.7M) for a second year after peaking at $653.9M in 2021. Earnings quality is clean on the mechanical checks (OCF/NI 1.53x, accruals -8%, Altman Z 12.65), and there is no sign of accounting games masking the downturn - the pain is showing up honestly. Capital allocation is a genuine strength: diluted shares fell from 78.4M to 69.6M (-2.9% CAGR) and buyback/SBC of 147% means the company is a net absorber of its own stock despite SBC running at 10.8% of revenue. Liquidity gives long rope - $877M cash and 33+ quarters of runway at current burn - but the balance sheet carries $1.70B of net debt, so this is rope, not a fortress. Insider tape shows only routine equity awards and tax withholdings, no open-market buys or sells - neutral signal.
Verify before trusting this (5)
- Segment mix and customer concentration (datacom/AI optical vs telecom vs 3D sensing) - is the recovery structural AI-driven demand or a broader cyclical rebound?
- Terms and maturity schedule of the debt stack behind the $1.70B net debt position, including any convertibles that could re-dilute
- Cleanroom/capacity investment plans - how much of the negative FCF is growth capex for AI optical demand vs maintenance
- Whether the FY2025 GM recovery is sustainable or benefited from one-time inventory/absorption effects
- Backlog and book-to-bill trend to confirm the FY2025 revenue inflection extends into FY2026
The e2e synthesis flags this as a $63B valuation on a $1.6B-revenue company still printing negative operating cash flow. Even on generous forward assumptions, that implies a mid-30x-plus sales multiple and a P/E north of 30x on hoped-for AI-optics earnings that have not yet materialized in cash. Deserved value on a cyclical optical-components business - even one with a real AI transceiver franchise - is far below what $820 requires. A more defensible deserved-value band, giving credit for the AI mix shift and Cloud Light acquisition, sits closer to $400-550 per share; you get to $820 only by underwriting hyperscaler capex compounding for years with no share loss to Broadcom, Marvell, Coherent, or Chinese entrants. The Company-Quality lens grades this Mixed (-2) - clean accounting and per-share discipline, but two years of negative FCF and still-negative operating margins. That raises deserved value modestly versus a sloppy peer, but nowhere near enough to close a gap of this size. Earnings quality is high, which I respect, but you cannot haircut your way to cheap when the starting multiple is this stretched. What is priced in: sustained 25-30% revenue growth, gross margin expansion into the high 30s, and durable optical-component pricing power. What has to go right is essentially everything, simultaneously, for multiple years.
Verify before trusting this (5)
- Forward revenue guide and datacenter/telecom mix in the next print
- Gross margin trajectory and whether it reclaims high-30s
- Free cash flow inflection - quarterly cadence, not just adjusted EBITDA
- Hyperscaler concentration and any pricing/share commentary
- Competitive commentary on 1.6T transceivers versus Broadcom and Marvell silicon-photonics roadmaps
The sentiment setup for LITE is about as favorable as it gets. The active narrative is platform-monopoly / AI-infrastructure-chokepoint with strong intensity, and it just got fresh oxygen: Q4 revenue of $1.01B up 109% YoY, EPS beat by $0.28, and guidance above consensus. Headlines explicitly frame LITE as one of the 'Nvidia partners' leading earnings movers - exactly the tag that keeps hot money buying this cohort. The one-time $7.8B non-cash convert-related charge is cosmetic noise the tape can shrug off; the operating story is clean. On a 1.51 beta name in a Risk-On tape (score +47), macro pressure lands as a mild positive rather than a drag - higher rates and a 26x market PE are real, but they are dwarfed by the AI-capex narrative for this specific ticker. Recent 21% run vs a negative long-term CAGR shows sentiment has already rotated hard into the name, and the print just validated it. Only real offset: narrative durability is only moderate and valuation embeds perpetual AI capex - any crack in hyperscaler spend narrative would unwind this fast.
Verify before trusting this (4)
- Whether the $7.2B GAAP loss headline gets picked up negatively in coverage over the next 48h or fades
- Analyst target revisions post-print - magnitude of upward revisions
- Any hyperscaler capex commentary from MSFT/META/GOOGL/AMZN that could crack the AI-infra narrative
- Broadcom / Marvell optical competitive commentary on their next prints
AI reaches Lumentum as demand, not as substitution: no amount of cheap inference replaces the need to move photons between accelerators, so the interrogation is not 'can AI do this job' but 'who captures the interconnect dollar as speeds step up.' The need is near-certain and growing; the solution form is genuinely uncertain, because value can migrate from pluggable modules (where Chinese and semiconductor-integrated rivals compete hard) toward laser sources and packaging (where Lumentum's fabs are the bottleneck). Financials show the fragility of the unit economics — gross margin fell from 46% to 18.5% before recovering to 28% with FCF still negative on capex — so this is a capacity/mix story where the AI tailwind is real but retention of it is not assured.
Verify before trusting this (8)
- Hyperscaler network capex commentary
- 800G/1.6T port shipment growth
- Scale-across and DCI link demand
- CPO design wins and laser-source specs
- Pluggable vs CPO port mix
- Dollar content per switch port
- EML/CW lead times and lead-time change
- Capex to capacity conversion
This lens hasn't been run for this ticker yet.
When we made this prediction on Aug 12, 2026, LITE was $820.59. We expect it to be $720.00 by Feb 2027, and we consider it great value under $450.00. This is an early model (v0.6.0) — the direction is more reliable than the exact price. Made Aug 12, 2026.
Blue is our prediction, starting the day we made it. Grey is a slower route to the same place — the same destination, taking longer. Black is the actual price, so you can see how we are doing.