Skip to main content
Homepage
OLDER Analysis Report
Sep 1, 2026
36 days ago · 100% complete
This report is 36 days old — newer filings and price moves since then are not reflected.
For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page

What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for Regions Financial Corp. (RF) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.

Our current read (analysis of 2026-10-07): Designation Watch · Gem Score +23 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality 55 · Value 1 · Sentiment -15 (timing only, not weighted) · Composite fair value $32.24 vs $29.88 at analysis

Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable reference-name attribute you can cite):

  • profile-header / price-overview — company profile, live quote, market cap
  • extended-analysis — the core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memo
  • future-predictions — our forward price-band predictions
  • market-narrative / ai-findings / gpt-critique — narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)
  • Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers): price-history, income-trend, key-metrics, financials (statement tables), insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.

More for machine readers: site briefing at /llms.txt · any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER · raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds); every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.

Regions Financial Corp.

RF NYSE
Financial Services · Banks - Regional
Birmingham, AL 35203, United States regions.com Updated Sep 1, 3:30am
Price
$29.88
Market Cap
$25.5B
Employees
20,003
Beta
1.01
Avg Volume
8,218,127
Last Dividend
$1.06
CEO
Mr. John M. Turner Jr.

Regions Financial Corp. is a bank holding company that provides consumer and commercial banking, wealth management, and mortgage products and services. Through its main banking and advisory operations, the company serves individuals, small businesses, middle-market clients, and larger corporate customers with deposit accounts, lending solutions, treasury management, and fee-based financial services. Its business is organized around Corporate Bank, Consumer Bank, and Wealth Management, reflecting a broad mix of relationship banking and specialty finance activities. Regions Financial Corp. operates primarily across the South, Midwest, and Texas, using a network of branches, digital channels, and professional advisory teams to support everyday banking needs, business financing, and long-term financial planning. As a major regional financial institution, it plays an important role in connecting deposits, credit, payments, and wealth services across the communities and industries it serves.

Runs with full report Generated: Sep 1, 2026 3:45am
Price Overview
Price at report time
$29.88
as of Sep 1, 3:31am (36d ago)
Change · Sep 1
-0.45 (-1.48%)
Day Range
$29.84 – $30.27
52-Week Range
$22.70 – $32.47
50-Day MA
$30.83
200-Day MA
$28.36
Volume
9,221,914.00
Right now · live
Log in to get the live feed
Members see the real-time price and the move since this report (over 36d).
Share Structure
Outstanding 853,379,538.00
Float 847,976,553.00
Free Float 99.4%
High free float — 99.4% of shares trade freely, ~0.6% held by insiders/institutions
Very liquid — most shares trade freely. Low insider ownership can mean less management alignment, but makes large position sizing straightforward.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Sep 1, 2026 4:15am (36d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Sep 1, 2026 3:45am (36d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
TD Twelve Data statement HEX SEC filing
Industry comparison last run: Sep 1, 2026 3:41am
P/E · trailing (TTM) (Price per dollar of earnings over the past year — not a run-rate or forward P/E)
HEX
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
12.99
Stock Price: $29.88
EPS (Diluted): 2.30
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
HEX
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
1.47
Stock Price: $29.88
Total Equity: $19.10B
Shares: 937,391,304
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
HEX
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
—
Market Cap: $25.46B
Total Debt: $4.88B
Cash: $10.91B
EBITDA: N/A
EBITDA not available
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
HEX
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$20.6B
Market Cap: $25.46B
Total Debt: $4.88B
Cash: $10.91B
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
HEX
Gross Profit / Revenue
—
Gross Profit: N/A
Revenue: $7.53B
Missing from API: Gross Profit
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
HEX
Operating Income / Revenue
—
Operating Income: N/A
Revenue: $7.53B
Missing from API: Operating Income
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
HEX
Net Income / Revenue
28.6%
Net Income: $2.16B
Revenue: $7.53B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
HEX
Net Income / Total Equity
11.3%
Net Income: $2.16B
Total Equity: $19.10B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
HEX
NOPAT / Invested Capital
—
Operating Income: N/A
Tax Rate: 21.4%
Equity: $19.10B
Total Debt: $4.88B
Cash: $10.91B
Missing from API: Operating Income
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
HEX
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
—
Current Assets: N/A
Current Liabilities: N/A
Missing from API: Current Assets, Current Liabilities
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
HEX
Total Debt / Total Equity
0.26
Short-Term Debt: $750.00M
Long-Term Debt: $4.13B
Total Debt: $4.88B
Total Equity: $19.10B
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
HEX
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$8.03
Revenue: $7.53B
Shares: 937,391,304
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
HEX
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
$20.38
Total Equity: $19.10B
Shares: 937,391,304
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
HEX
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$2.33
Operating CF: $2.18B
CapEx: $0.00
Shares: 937,391,304
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
TD
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
3.5%
Last Dividend: $1.06
Stock Price: $29.88
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
HEX
Dividends Paid / Net Income
42.3%
Dividends Paid: -$912.00M
Net Income: $2.16B
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Sep 1, 2026 3:41am
Compares RF against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Sep 1, 2026 3:45am (36d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue $6.4B $7.2B $7.6B $7.1B $7.5B
Cost of Revenue — — — — —
Gross Profit — — — — —
Operating Expenses $2.4B $2.5B $2.6B $2.6B $2.8B
Operating Income — — — — —
Net Income $2.5B $2.2B $2.1B $1.9B $2.2B
EBITDA — — — — —
EPS $2.51 $2.29 $2.11 $1.94 $2.31
EPS (Diluted) $2.49 $2.28 $2.11 $1.93 $2.30
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Sep 1, 2026 3:31am (36d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Cash & Equivalents $29.4B $11.2B $6.8B $10.7B $10.9B
Total Current Assets — — — — —
Total Assets $162.9B $155.2B $152.2B $157.3B $158.8B
Current Liabilities — — — — —
Long-Term Debt $2.4B $2.3B $2.3B $6.0B $4.1B
Total Liabilities $144.6B $139.3B $134.7B $139.4B $139.7B
Total Equity $18.3B $16.0B $17.5B $17.9B $19.1B
Retained Earnings $5.6B $7.0B $8.2B $9.1B $10.2B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Sep 1, 2026 4:15am (36d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Operating Cash Flow $3.0B $3.1B $2.3B $1.6B $2.2B
Capital Expenditure — — — — —
Free Cash Flow — — — — —
Acquisitions (net) -$1.2B $0 $0 — —
Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) -$1.1B $0 $0 $3.6B -$1.9B
Dividends Paid -$608.0M -$663.0M -$787.0M -$890.0M -$912.0M
Stock Buybacks -$467.0M -$230.0M -$252.0M -$348.0M -$1.1B
Net Change in Cash $11.5B -$18.2B -$4.4B $3.9B $195.0M
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Sep 1, 2026 3:45am (36d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue Growth +11.3% +5.7% -6.5% +6.3%
Gross Profit Growth — — — —
Operating Income Growth — — — —
Net Income Growth -10.9% -7.6% -8.7% +13.9%
EBITDA Growth — — — —
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Sep 1, 2026 3:31am (36d ago)
Date Dividend Declaration Record Payment
2026-06-01 $0.27 — — —
2026-03-02 $0.27 — — —
2025-12-01 $0.27 — — —
2025-09-02 $0.27 — — —
2025-06-02 $0.25 — — —
2025-03-03 $0.25 — — —
2024-12-02 $0.25 — — —
2024-09-03 $0.25 — — —
2024-06-03 $0.24 — — —
2024-02-29 $0.24 — — —
2023-12-07 $0.24 — — —
2023-08-31 $0.24 — — —
2023-06-01 $0.20 — — —
2023-03-09 $0.20 — — —
2022-12-07 $0.20 — — —
2022-09-01 $0.20 — — —
2022-06-02 $0.17 — — —
2022-03-10 $0.17 — — —
2021-12-02 $0.17 — — —
2021-09-02 $0.17 — — —
0Company Classification 1Industry Landscape 2Company Momentum 3Forward Projection 4aDCF Valuation 4bEarnings Power Value 4cAnchored PE 4dReverse DCF 4eRevenue-Based DCF 4fAnchored P/S 4gScenario Analysis 4hDividend Discount Model 4iBook Value Analysis 4jInsider Activity 4fCash Flow Quality 4gDebt Maturity Risk 4hMacro Environment 4iSector Intelligence 4jRevenue Confidence 4kSensitivity Analysis 4lSector Demand Cycle 5AI Investigation 5bThesis Evaluation 6Valuation Synthesis
computed not applicable not yet run 13 computed · 6 not applicable · 5 not yet run
Risk : Reward — upside vs downside from this company's own quarters
Computed 2026-09-02 02:12
Why there is no ratio: Not measurable: fewer than 3 matched YoY quarter pairs (0)
CaseGrowthMarginFair valuevs price ($29.88)
Bull — recovery +5% 34.1% $28.06 -6%
Base — stabilizes +4% 29.7% $23.41 -22%
Bear — keeps slipping +2% 25.2% $19.20 -36%
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for RF — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
Growth Outlook
Analyzed 2026-09-01 04:35

The question every valuation on this page silently assumes: is this company likely to grow? Judged forward — the business, its category, the world — against what's already printed.

Growing Regions is growing again — mid-single-digit revenue and low-double-digit earnings YoY on NIM repricing, fee-income build and Southeast deposit share — but the multi-year record (roughly flat revenue CAGR) says this is a cyclical/rate-driven upswing rather than a structural change in earnings power. conf 6/10
Inline with category Category growing · Category (Banks - Regional) is in expansion with median recent growth of ~6.9%; RF's recent revenue YoY of 6.25% sits essentially on top of that, with earnings growth of 13.9% likely at or modestly above peer median given expense control. Over the multi-year window, however, RF's roughly flat revenue CAGR suggests it did not out-compound the category through the last cycle.
Next 2 quarters
Growing
Asset repricing and fee momentum carry into the next two prints; credit costs have shown no evident break; expense discipline and share reduction amplify EPS. No mechanism visible to stall growth within two quarters.
↑ above expectations
Year 1
Growing
Full-year NII and fee trajectory should stay positive on the current curve, with modest positive operating leverage. But the pace likely decays through the year as the easy repricing tailwind is consumed, so Growing rather than Accelerating.
≈ inline with expectations
Years 2–3
Holding
Structurally, earnings power is flat-to-slightly-up: volumes grow with nominal GDP in a mature category, the rate tailwind mean-reverts or reverses with cuts, and credit costs can only normalize upward from here. The Southeast footprint and fee build are real but not large enough to lift the whole franchise into durable Growing. This is the near/structural split — believe the cycle, not the compounding.
— expectations unclear
The creme: each rung's call measured against what's already printed (vs analyst estimates · vs guidance / FY consensus · vs price-implied growth) — expectations in print are already in the price, so only the variant margin can pay. Hover a rung's chip for the margin read.
Growth drivers
57 Asset repricing plus a re-steepening curve — With the 10y at 4.73 and a positive 0.39 curve, fixed-rate loan and securities books roll into higher yields while deposit costs have already peaked-and-begun-to-lag. That is the mechanical source of the +6.25% recent revenue YoY after years of flat top line, and it does not require loan growth to work.
42 Southeast deposit franchise / low-cost funding mix — RF's core deposit base sits in in-migration markets with above-average household and small-business formation; that supports both funding cost and organic loan demand better than the flat 3.3% industry revenue CAGR implies. It is the one genuinely non-commodity asset in an otherwise commodity business.
34 Fee income build (treasury management, wealth, capital markets) — Wealth Management and Corporate Bank fee lines are rate-insensitive revenue that dilutes NIM dependence; continued growth here is what would make a Growing call survive Fed cuts. Evidence of it is in earnings growing (+13.9%) faster than revenue (+6.25%).
28 Positive operating leverage and buyback-supported EPS — Earnings YoY of +13.9% on +6.25% revenue implies expense discipline and/or benign credit plus share count reduction. This is why the EPS estimate beats have been consistent rather than lucky.
Growth risks
57 Rate cuts reverse the main driver — The same mechanism driving current growth runs backwards if the Fed cuts: asset yields reprice down faster than sticky deposit costs, and NII — still the majority of revenue — stalls. This is the single biggest swing factor and it is outside management's control.
38 CRE and consumer credit normalization — Regional-bank CRE books remain the open question; a provision step-up would hit the earnings line first and hardest, and current earnings growth is partly flattered by benign credit costs that cannot improve further.
48 Structurally flat volume growth — Multi-year revenue CAGR of -0.3% and FCF CAGR of -2.8% against a mature industry (3.3% CAGR) say loan and fee volumes, absent rate help, roughly tread water. Nothing in the record shows RF compounding balances above the category.
23 Deposit competition from money funds and mega-bank tech spend — Non-bank cash alternatives cap how low funding costs can go, and scale players out-invest RF on digital acquisition — a slow share-of-wallet leak rather than a sudden break.
The world is handing regional banks a rate-shaped cycle, not a secular one. A 4.73% 10y with a modestly positive curve is close to the ideal configuration for a spread lender: earning-asset yields reprice up while deposit betas decay. Regions is capturing that, and its Southeast footprint gives it real demographic tailwind that the average regional bank lacks. But the deeper structure is unchanged — banking volumes in a mature market grow with nominal GDP, deposits are contestable by money funds in a way they weren't pre-2022, and scale rivals compound a technology advantage. Macro is flagged as headwind-leaning, which means credit (especially CRE) is the tail risk that converts a good revenue year into a bad earnings year. Net: believe the near-term upswing, discount its permanence.
Growth position composite -3
ShrinkingStallingHoldingGrowingAccelerating
70Next 2 quarters · Growing
70Year 1 · Growing
50Years 2–3 · Holding
-3Composite (−100…+100)
A research prediction, not advice. Forward-graded: each rung is scored against the prints that follow it. Not an input to the GEM designation — track record first.
Claude Reading
Independent analyst synthesis · claude-opus-4-7 · generated 2026-09-01 04:14:58
Verdict Modestly undervalued — fair value $33-35 on accelerating EPS and 11%+ ROE; the bearish "deteriorating franchise" narrative is contradicted by the actual quarterly print. Own it for the yield plus mid-teens total return.

Looking at the raw numbers first: quarterly NI has actually been strong and accelerating — $490M (Q3'24) → $534M → $490M → $563M → $569M → $534M → $559M → $570M (Q2'26). That's a clean ~16% YoY earnings growth trajectory in the most recent quarters, not the "flat and deteriorating" story the market-forces model implies. Annual NI went $1.89B → $2.16B (2024→2025), +14%. Revenue $7.08B → $7.53B, +6.4%. At 12.99× TTM P/E, 1.47× P/B, 11.3% ROE, and a 3.55% yield with a 42% payout, this is a well-run regional bank compounding book value in the low double digits with room for buybacks. That's not a value trap profile; that's a boring winner.

The prior models are internally inconsistent and I largely dissent from the bearish tilt. Market Forces calls it a "deteriorating franchise" with "hidden CRE risk" and "deposit flight" — none of which shows up in the actual numbers ($10.9B cash vs $4.88B debt, equity growing, NI accelerating). Thesis Evaluation scores -14 with "NIM compression" as the top bear at 68 weight, yet the actual print shows NIM expansion driving the earnings beat sequence. The revenue_cagr of -0.3% is a 5-year artifact distorted by the 2021 PPP-era peak ($6.44B rev but $2.52B NI on reserve releases); the relevant trend is the +6.3% recent YoY. The Synthesis fair value of $31.17 vs $29.88 (+4.3%) is directionally right but understates the earnings momentum. Narrative Economics correctly identifies this as anchored/minimal-story — which is exactly when fundamentals-based re-rating works.

The honest contrarian case: regional banks are cyclical, and RF's 2025 earnings strength partly reflects a favorable rate curve that could reverse if the Fed cuts aggressively into 2026. CRE exposure at Southeast regionals is a real tail risk, though RF's Sunbelt geography (Florida, Texas, Georgia) is structurally better than Midwest/coastal-office-heavy peers like KEY or CFG. ROA at 1.36% is decent but not elite (JPM ~1.3%, but with vastly more fee diversification); ROE at 11.3% is mid-pack. The insider "activity" is just routine July equity grants — zero signal, and no open-market buys is a mild negative on a bank trading near book. A skeptic would also note that "revenue" for banks is a fuzzy concept and the reported $7.53B mixes NII and fees; if NII compresses 5% in 2026 on rate cuts, EPS growth stalls and the 13× multiple has no cushion.

Net verdict: I dissent from the bearish Market Forces read and partially dissent from the "fair value" synthesis — RF looks modestly undervalued, not fairly valued. On $2.16B TTM NI growing ~10-12%, a 13× multiple is cheap for a Sunbelt-exposed bank with 11%+ ROE and a covered 3.55% yield. Peer regionals (TFC, FITB, HBAN) trade 11-13× on similar or worse growth; RF deserves the higher end. Fair value $33-35 (15-16× forward EPS of ~$2.25), roughly 10-17% upside plus the yield. The asymmetry is favorable: downside is capped by book value ($20+/share tangible) and the dividend, upside comes from either multiple re-rating on rate stability or continued EPS growth. Not a table-pounder — it's a bank, cyclicality is real, and a hard recession takes it to $24 — but at $29.88 you're paid to wait. Starter position warranted, add on any dip to $27.

GPT Reading
Independent reading · gpt-5.4 · generated 2026-09-01 04:15:13
Verdict Modestly undervalued at $29.88 — the market is treating Regions like a no-growth value trap even as earnings have recovered to a $2.2B+ run rate; fair value looks closer to $33.

At $29.88, Regions is not obviously cheap, but it is cheaper than the operating trend suggests. The key fact in the data is that earnings have quietly re-accelerated after the 2024 softness. Quarterly net income moved from $490M in 3Q24 and $534M in 4Q24 to $490M in 1Q25, then $563M, $569M, $534M, $559M, and $570M through 2Q26. That is not a bank falling into a margin cliff; it is a bank earning at roughly a $2.2B-$2.3B annualized run rate. On that basis, the current market cap of $25.46B implies about 11.1x-11.6x earnings power, a bit below the stated 12.99x annual P/E because trailing numbers still carry weaker quarters. Revenue is also better than the “stagnant regional bank” label implies: 2025 revenue was $7.53B, up 6.4% from $7.08B in 2024 and slightly above 2023’s $7.57B is within reach if current trends hold. This is a mature bank, yes, but not a deteriorating one.

The balance sheet and capital picture also argue against a hard bear case. Regions ended 2025 with $10.91B of cash against $4.88B of debt and $19.10B of equity, with debt/equity only 0.26 on the provided metrics. For a bank, I care less about industrial-style net debt and more about whether capital generation supports dividends and absorptive capacity; here, $2.18B of operating cash flow, a 42.3% payout ratio, and a 3.55% dividend yield suggest the current shareholder return is well covered by earnings. Return on equity of 11.3% is not elite, but it is solid enough to justify trading above book, and the market is valuing the franchise at 1.47x book. That multiple is not demanding if Regions can sustainably earn 11%-12% on equity; in fact, that spread roughly makes sense. What stands out to me is that the market seems to be valuing Regions as if earnings are capped, while the actual quarterly sequence says earnings have already stabilized and improved.

Where I differ from some of the more cautious framing is on the implied mismatch between valuation and fundamentals. The bearish narrative leans heavily on NIM compression, deposit pressure, and latent CRE issues, but the reported numbers are not showing that thesis biting hard yet. Net income rose from $1.89B in 2024 to $2.16B in 2025, and the most recent two quarters are both above $559M. If there were a serious franchise deterioration, I would expect either a much weaker earnings trajectory or a cheaper valuation—closer to book, not 1.47x. Instead, Regions sits in a middle ground: profitable, decently capitalized, earning a respectable ROE, and yielding 3.5%. That usually deserves something around 11x-12x normalized earnings and around 1.3x-1.5x book, which gets you to a fair value band of roughly $30-$34. I lean to the upper half because current earnings momentum is better than the “ex-growth” label.

The strongest case against my read is straightforward: over a five-year view, this is not a compounding machine. Revenue is only up from $6.44B in 2021 to $7.53B in 2025, while net income is actually down from $2.52B in 2021 and $2.25B in 2022 to $2.16B in 2025. ROE at 11.3% is adequate, not premium, and a 1.47x book multiple for a no-moat regional bank can become too high very quickly if credit costs normalize upward. The recent earnings improvement could also be a late-cycle illusion if reserve builds or CRE marks are still ahead. I take that seriously, and it is why I do not see deep undervaluation here. But those are arguments against multiple expansion, not necessarily for downside from $29.88. At under 13x trailing earnings with a mid-3% yield and improving quarterly profits, the stock does not look priced for perfection.

What would change my mind is evidence that the recent earnings run rate is not durable. If quarterly net income falls back below $500M for a couple of quarters, or if full-year revenue slips back toward the 2024 level near $7.1B, then the stock should trade closer to 1.2x book and the high-$20s would no longer look supportive. Likewise, any concrete sign that capital returns are getting constrained—through a materially higher payout ratio without earnings support, or a visible balance-sheet weakening—would make the current valuation too rich. On the other hand, if Regions can print another two quarters in the $560M-$600M range and hold ROE around 11%-12%, I would be comfortable underwriting value into the low-to-mid $30s.

Grok Reading
Independent reading · grok-4.5 · generated 2026-09-01 04:15:41
Verdict Modestly undervalued at $29.88 vs ~$31–33 fair value; 13× PE / 1.47× book regional with 3.55% yield and recovering $2.2B NI run-rate

Regions Financial at $29.88 is a textbook mature regional bank whose numbers tell a recovery-within-stagnation story rather than a growth story. Annual revenue bounced from $7.08B in 2024 to $7.53B in 2025 (+6.3%), and net income climbed from $1.89B to $2.16B (+14%), yet the five-year arc is flat-to-down: revenue CAGR of −0.3% and earnings that still sit below the $2.52B peak of 2021. Quarterly net income has stabilized in a tight $534–570M band over the last five reported periods, which is cleaner than the 2024 soft patch and supports a run-rate near $2.2B. At 13.0× trailing earnings, 1.47× book, and 3.72× sales, with ROE of 11.3% and a 3.55% dividend covered by a 42% payout, the market is paying a full-but-not-expensive multiple for mid-teens single-digit earnings power and a fortress-looking balance sheet—$10.91B cash against $4.88B debt and a 0.26 debt-to-equity ratio. Operating cash flow of $2.18B essentially matches reported NI, so the earnings quality is not fictional. The story the data tell is a well-capitalized Southeast franchise grinding out low-double-digit ROE with a usable yield, not a franchise compounding capital at an accelerating rate.

What the quantitative models underweight is the recent inflection: earnings CAGR of only 2% over five years masks a 13.9% year-over-year rebound and sequential NI that has held above $550M for three of the last four quarters. That is not the profile of a bank already in free-fall NIM compression. The valuation synthesis fair value of $31.17–$33.44 (4–12% above the current print) is directionally consistent with a modest discount, and the 3.55% yield plus sub-1.5× book provides a tangible floor that pure DCF skepticism tends to ignore. Insider activity is pure award noise—no selling—so management is not telegraphing distress. I read the stock as modestly cheap to fair value on current run-rate earnings, with the Southeast deposit base and low leverage as the real anchors.

The strongest case against this read is straightforward and data-backed. Revenue has gone nowhere for half a decade; the 2025 recovery simply clawed back the 2024 dip and still leaves the franchise below 2023’s $7.57B. ROA of 1.36% is mediocre for a bank, and the thesis engine’s −14 score correctly flags NIM compression from rate normalization and commercial real estate exposure as the dominant bears—weights of 68 and 62 respectively. Market Forces labels it a value trap absent an acquisition premium, and that framing is coherent: if the Fed cutting cycle compresses net interest margin faster than deposit costs fall, the 11.3% ROE slides toward high single digits and a 13× multiple becomes expensive rather than cheap. The narrative layer is minimal and anchored, meaning there is no story premium to cushion a credit or margin miss; the stock will re-rate purely on the numbers. I weigh this differently because the 2025 NI recovery, cash-heavy balance sheet, and already-modest multiple already embed a fair amount of that pessimism—the market is not pricing a premium ROE or multiple expansion—so the downside from further NIM pressure is real but partially discounted, while the upside from stable credit and a soft landing is underappreciated at $29.88.

What would flip the verdict is two consecutive quarters of NI below $480M (signaling genuine margin or credit deterioration), a sustained drop in ROE under 9%, or tangible book erosion from CRE charge-offs that pushes the stock above 1.6× then-depressed book. Conversely, a clean print of quarterly NI above $600M with stable net interest margin and any capital-return increase would push me from modest undervaluation to a higher-conviction long.

Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Each AI above independently stated a direction (undervalued, fairly valued, or overvalued) and how strongly it believes it (conviction, 0–5). We combine those into a Bull-Bear Index on a 0–10 scale: 5 is neutral, 10 is maximum bullish (undervalued at full conviction), 0 is maximum bearish. We compute the score ourselves with the same arithmetic for every seat — the models never grade their own bullishness — so the three are directly comparable. Δ shows how far each seat sits from the panel average of 8.0; a large Δ marks the dissenting voice, usually the one worth reading.
Claude claude-opus-4-7 8.0
undervalued · conviction 3/5 · Δ +0.0 vs panel · self: 7.0
GPT gpt-5.4 8.0
undervalued · conviction 3/5 · Δ +0.0 vs panel · self: 6.0
Grok grok-4.5 8.0
undervalued · conviction 3/5 · Δ +0.0 vs panel · self: 6.0
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
Separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-09-01 04:56:04
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Solid but full — nibble, wait for a dip 6/10
Solid regional bank at a fair-ish price with mild tape headwind — a starter here, real size only on a $26-27 flush.
The cruxWhether the credit book and AOCI marks (invisible to the lenses) stay clean as the Fed cuts and CRE reprices — that determines if the ~4-12% gap to fair value actually gets harvested or evaporates in a guide-down.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from RF's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwayFortress Balance Sheet
DilutionShare Count Shrinking
Earnings QualityGood Earnings Quality
The four lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
+55
Solid
edge √Σ 106 · risk √Σ 44 · conf 7/10

Regions delivers the profile of a well-run mature regional bank: revenue grew from $6.44B (2021) to $7.53B (2025), net income has held in a $1.89B-$2.52B band, and FCF ran $2.18B in 2025. Earnings quality checks out with OCF/NI at 1.11x and accruals at -0.2% of assets, meaning reported profits are backed by cash. Diluted shares fell from 1.01B to 937.4M (a 1.9% CAGR shrink), so per-share economics are being actively defended. The Altman Z of 0.25 flagged as 'distress' is a model artifact - Z-scores are not meaningful for banks because their balance sheets are structurally leveraged with deposits; I disregard it. The real questions on a bank are credit quality, deposit mix/beta, securities book marks (AOCI), and CRE exposure, none of which are visible in this pack. Net income drifted down 2021-2024 before rebounding in 2025, which fits the industry pattern of NIM pressure and higher provisions rather than a company-specific deterioration. Management behavior is consistent with a mature earner: buying back stock, paying out, and not diluting. Insider tape shows only routine director equity awards - no open-market buys or sells to read into. Overall this looks like a solid, unremarkable-in-a-good-way regional bank.

Strengths 4
m55
Share count actually shrinking
Diluted shares down from 1.01B to 937.4M over five years (-1.9% CAGR); per-share value is being concentrated.
m60
Clean earnings quality
OCF/NI 1.11x and accruals -0.2% of assets - net income is cash-backed, no aggressive accrual build.
m50
Stable revenue and profit base
Revenue $6.44B to $7.53B over 5 years with net income consistently near $2B; classic mature earner cadence.
m45
Consistent FCF generation
FCF $1.6B-$3.1B annually across the cycle; 2025 at $2.18B supports both buybacks and dividends without external funding.
Concerns 3
m35
Net income drifted 2021-2024
NI slid from $2.52B (2021) to $1.89B (2024) before recovering to $2.16B in 2025 - reflects NIM/credit pressure common to regionals; worth watching but not alarming.
m25
Bank-specific risks not visible in pack
AOCI marks on securities, CRE/office concentration, deposit beta, and NPL trends are not in the derived data; these are the actual drivers of regional bank quality.
m10
Altman Z 0.25 flag
Model is not applicable to deposit-funded banks; I do not treat this as a genuine distress signal, but noting it appeared in the module output.
This reads as a solid, cycle-tested regional bank rather than anything exceptional or anything broken. The forensics I can see are clean: real cash earnings, shrinking share count, no dilution games, no insider selling pressure. The Altman Z flag is noise for a bank. The genuine quality question here is not in these modules - it is in the credit book and the securities marks, which I cannot see. Absent that detail, I anchor around 'sound and improving' but do not stretch to 'solidly healthy across the board.' A competent mature earner in a structurally cyclical business.
Verify before trusting this (6)
  • AOCI and unrealized losses on the AFS/HTM securities book
  • Commercial real estate exposure, particularly office, and NPL/charge-off trends
  • CET1 ratio and regulatory capital cushion
  • Deposit mix - noninterest-bearing share and uninsured deposit concentration
  • Net interest margin trajectory and deposit beta assumptions
  • Allowance for credit losses coverage vs. nonperforming loans
Valuation / Mispricing
+1
Fairly Valued
edge √Σ 47 · risk √Σ 46 · conf 7/10
price $29.88 vs deserved ~$31-33, roughly 4-12% below fair - a rounding error, not a mispricing. attractive below $26.50

The e2e composite fair value of $33.44 and signal-adjusted $31.17 bracket a deserved price around $31-33 against a $29.88 tape, implying ~4-12% upside - inside the noise band for a regional bank whose earnings power swings with rate policy and credit costs. The anchored-PE method is the only cited driver, so this is essentially a normalized-earnings multiple call, not a triangulated bargain. Earnings quality is clean and the business is Solid (55), which supports the deserved value but does not create a discount.

Cheap signals 2
m40
Modest discount to composite FV
$29.88 vs $33.44 composite FV is ~12% upside; signal-adjusted $31.17 is only ~4%. Real but not a margin of safety for a bank exposed to NIM and CRE.
m25
Clean earnings quality
Good earnings-quality signal and disciplined share-count management mean no haircut to the deserved multiple - the FV read is trustworthy on its own terms.
Rich / priced-in 2
m35
Single-method anchor
Only anchored-PE is cited. A normalized-earnings multiple on a bank at a mid-cycle rate backdrop can flatter FV if forward EPS compresses as the Fed cuts.
m30
Unseen credit and securities marks
CRE exposure and AFS/HTM marks are invisible to the lenses; any adverse surprise there directly cuts deserved book and earnings power, closing the already thin gap.
This is fairly valued, not cheap. A ~4-12% gap on a single-method FV for a rate-sensitive regional bank is not an edge - it is the width of one quarter's guide. I would want it closer to $26-27 (a real teens-percent discount to signal-adjusted FV) before the price does the work for me. Solid business, full-ish price, pass unless it drops.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Forward NIM guidance and deposit beta commentary on next call
  • CRE (office, multifamily) NPL and reserve build trajectory
  • AOCI drag and securities book duration/marks
  • Buyback pace vs dividend coverage at lower forward EPS
General Sentiment
-15
Balanced
tail √Σ 36 · head √Σ 50 · conf 6/10

The macro backdrop is mildly risk-on (VIX 14.9, S&P just off highs), which is a modest positive for a beta-1.01 regional bank, but the 10y at 4.73% and a flattish curve (0.39) keep a low ceiling on regional-bank sentiment - the group trades on rate-path expectations and this name has no idiosyncratic story to break it out of the pack. With intensity 'minimal' and cult 'low', there is essentially no narrative premium or discount being applied; the tape is treating RF as a commodity carry vehicle. Recent 6-month price action (+6.3% vs -0.3% long-term) shows a mild positive drift, consistent with the risk-on regime lifting cyclicals modestly rather than any RF-specific catalyst. Analyst tone and news flow are quiet - no upgrade cycle, no downgrade wave, no CRE blow-up headlines hitting this name specifically. The bear points (NIM compression on cuts, CRE stress, deposit flight) are latent risks the tape is not actively pricing today. Net: this is a name the market is neither chasing nor dumping - pressure is close to neutral with a very slight positive drift from the risk-on tape, offset by a rates backdrop that caps enthusiasm for the whole regional-bank cohort.

Tailwinds 2
m28
Risk-on tape lifts beta-1 cyclicals modestly
VIX at 14.9 and S&P near highs is a mild tailwind for a beta-1.01 regional bank; the recent 6.3% short-term outperformance vs a flat long-term trend reflects this drift, not a RF-specific story.
m22
Quiet news flow, no active bear catalyst
No CRE blow-up headlines, no deposit-flight scare, no downgrade wave hitting this name. In a jittery-but-calm tape, absence of bad news for a regional bank is itself a small positive.
Headwinds 3
m35
Rates backdrop caps regional-bank sentiment
10y at 4.73% with a nearly flat curve (0.39) keeps NIM anxiety alive across the regional-bank cohort; RF gets tarred with the group even without a name-specific problem, and stretched market PE (25.8) means rotation risk out of financials if the tape wobbles.
m30
No narrative to defend or propel the name
Intensity minimal, cult low, archetype 'steady-compounder' - there is no story pulling in flows. In a market that rewards narrative (AI, GLP-1, etc.), a storyless regional bank drifts and gets ignored, which is a mild passive headwind on relative flows.
m20
Rising leverage a minor sentiment tick
D/E moving from 0.13 to 0.26 is the kind of datapoint that gives credit-focused sell-side an easy nit to pick; not a dominant force but a mild negative undertone for a bank name.
This is a Balanced read with a whisper of headwind. The mildly risk-on tape helps a beta-1 name at the margin, but the rates backdrop and complete absence of a narrative mean RF is a passive drifter - the market is not chasing it and not dumping it. Without a story to defend, it is vulnerable to any regional-bank scare (CRE, deposit flight, dovish Fed) getting applied indiscriminately to the whole cohort, but nothing acute is pressing today. Net pressure is close to zero, tilting very slightly negative on the rates/narrative-vacuum combo.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Any Fed rhetoric shift on the cut path - dovish tilt would compress NIM narrative further and pressure the group
  • CRE loss headlines at peer regionals that could re-ignite contagion sentiment onto RF
  • Deposit-beta commentary at the next earnings print vs peers
  • Whether the risk-on tape holds; a VIX spike above 20 hits beta-1 cyclicals harder than the market
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
Growth Outlook
-3
Growing
edge √Σ 83 · risk √Σ 87 · conf 6/10

The world is handing regional banks a rate-shaped cycle, not a secular one. A 4.73% 10y with a modestly positive curve is close to the ideal configuration for a spread lender: earning-asset yields reprice up while deposit betas decay. Regions is capturing that, and its Southeast footprint gives it real demographic tailwind that the average regional bank lacks. But the deeper structure is unchanged — banking volumes in a mature market grow with nominal GDP, deposits are contestable by money funds in a way they weren't pre-2022, and scale rivals compound a technology advantage. Macro is flagged as headwind-leaning, which means credit (especially CRE) is the tail risk that converts a good revenue year into a bad earnings year. Net: believe the near-term upswing, discount its permanence.

Growth drivers 4
m57
Asset repricing plus a re-steepening curve
With the 10y at 4.73 and a positive 0.39 curve, fixed-rate loan and securities books roll into higher yields while deposit costs have already peaked-and-begun-to-lag. That is the mechanical source of the +6.25% recent revenue YoY after years of flat top line, and it does not require loan growth to work.
m42
Southeast deposit franchise / low-cost funding mix
RF's core deposit base sits in in-migration markets with above-average household and small-business formation; that supports both funding cost and organic loan demand better than the flat 3.3% industry revenue CAGR implies. It is the one genuinely non-commodity asset in an otherwise commodity business.
m34
Fee income build (treasury management, wealth, capital markets)
Wealth Management and Corporate Bank fee lines are rate-insensitive revenue that dilutes NIM dependence; continued growth here is what would make a Growing call survive Fed cuts. Evidence of it is in earnings growing (+13.9%) faster than revenue (+6.25%).
m28
Positive operating leverage and buyback-supported EPS
Earnings YoY of +13.9% on +6.25% revenue implies expense discipline and/or benign credit plus share count reduction. This is why the EPS estimate beats have been consistent rather than lucky.
Growth risks 4
m57
Rate cuts reverse the main driver
The same mechanism driving current growth runs backwards if the Fed cuts: asset yields reprice down faster than sticky deposit costs, and NII — still the majority of revenue — stalls. This is the single biggest swing factor and it is outside management's control.
m38
CRE and consumer credit normalization
Regional-bank CRE books remain the open question; a provision step-up would hit the earnings line first and hardest, and current earnings growth is partly flattered by benign credit costs that cannot improve further.
m48
Structurally flat volume growth
Multi-year revenue CAGR of -0.3% and FCF CAGR of -2.8% against a mature industry (3.3% CAGR) say loan and fee volumes, absent rate help, roughly tread water. Nothing in the record shows RF compounding balances above the category.
m23
Deposit competition from money funds and mega-bank tech spend
Non-bank cash alternatives cap how low funding costs can go, and scale players out-invest RF on digital acquisition — a slow share-of-wallet leak rather than a sudden break.
vs expectations: ~6m above · 1y inline · 2-3y unknown
The forward growth verdict — is the business itself likely to grow (next 2 quarters / year 1 / years 2–3), judged against its category and against printed expectations. The full horizon ladder + creme renders on the Growth Outlook card above. Not a call on the price (Valuation owns that) or the tape (Sentiment owns that).
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure), and Growth Outlook (the forward growth verdict). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Price Prediction
Higher +8.6% v0.6.0 View full prediction →

When we made this prediction on Sep 1, 2026, RF was $29.28. We expect it to be $31.80 by Mar 2027, and we consider it great value under $26.50. This is an early model (v0.6.0) — the direction is more reliable than the exact price. Made Sep 1, 2026.

Price when predicted$29.28
Our estimate for Mar 2027$31.80+8.6%
Great value below$26.50
Price history shown (6 Months)

Blue is our prediction, starting the day we made it. Grey is a slower route to the same place — the same destination, taking longer. Black is the actual price, so you can see how we are doing.

Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for RF. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
v1.1.760 · f4b58a28 · 2026-10-07 20:07:48