For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page
What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.
Our current read (analysis of 2026-08-23): Designation Low · Gem Score -20 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality 49 · Value -76 · Sentiment -63 (timing only, not weighted) · Composite fair value $14.81 vs $64.85 at analysis
Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable
reference-name attribute you can cite):
profile-header/price-overview— company profile, live quote, market capextended-analysis— the core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memofuture-predictions— our forward price-band predictionsmarket-narrative/ai-findings/gpt-critique— narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)- Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers):
price-history,income-trend,key-metrics,financials(statement tables),insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.
More for machine readers: site briefing at
/llms.txt ·
any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER ·
raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds);
every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.
Shake Shack Inc.
SHAK NYSEShake Shack Inc. is a fast-casual restaurant company specializing in premium, made-to-order burgers, chicken sandwiches, hot dogs, and related American-style fare. The brand emphasizes high-quality ingredients, including all-natural, hormone- and antibiotic-free Angus beef and non-GMO potato buns, aiming to deliver a differentiated burger experience in the quick-service landscape. In addition to its core food offerings, Shake Shack serves crinkle-cut fries, frozen custard, hand-spun shakes, and a beverage lineup that includes draft root beer, seasonal lemonades, organic iced tea, coffee-based drinks, and bottled water. The company operates company-owned and licensed locations across multiple domestic and international markets, typically in high-traffic urban centers, shopping destinations, transit hubs, and select suburban areas. Shake Shack Inc. currently focuses on the restaurant and hospitality sector, competing within the broader consumer cyclical space, and positions itself between traditional fast food and full-service dining by combining quick service with an elevated menu and modern store design. The company is headquartered in New York City, United States.
Price Overview
Price History (1 Year)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
| Period | Revenue | Net Income | Net Margin | YoY/QoQ |
|---|
Key Metrics
EPS (Diluted): 1.09
Total Equity: $553.75M
Shares: 41,847,000
Total Debt: $247.73M
Cash: $360.12M
EBITDA: $169.11M
Total Debt: $247.73M
Cash: $360.12M
Revenue: $1.45B
Revenue: $1.45B
Revenue: $1.45B
Total Equity: $553.75M
Tax Rate: 31.5%
Equity: $553.75M
Total Debt: $247.73M
Cash: $360.12M
Current Liabilities: $244.92M
Long-Term Debt: $247.73M
Total Debt: $247.73M
Total Equity: $553.75M
Shares: 41,847,000
Shares: 41,847,000
CapEx: -$165.85M
Shares: 41,847,000
Stock Price: $62.75
Net Income: $45.73M
Industry Benchmarks
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 3, 2026 11:55am (20d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $739.9M | $900.5M | $1.1B | $1.3B | $1.4B |
| Cost of Revenue | — | — | — | — | — |
| Gross Profit | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Expenses | $755.7M | $927.4M | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.4B |
| Operating Income | -$15.9M | -$26.9M | $5.9M | $3.0M | $62.5M |
| Net Income | -$8.7M | -$24.1M | $20.3M | $10.2M | $45.7M |
| EBITDA | $43.1M | $45.9M | $97.2M | $105.5M | $169.1M |
| EPS | $-0.22 | $-0.61 | $0.51 | $0.26 | $1.14 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-0.22 | $-0.61 | $0.48 | $0.24 | $1.09 |
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 3, 2026 11:32am (20d ago)| Metric | 2023 | 2023 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash & Equivalents | $203.7M | $190.0M | $224.7M | $320.7M | $360.1M |
| Total Current Assets | $329.5M | $323.2M | $334.4M | $368.2M | $430.3M |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $1.6B | $1.6B | $1.7B | $1.9B |
| Current Liabilities | $150.2M | $152.2M | $164.1M | $187.3M | $244.9M |
| Long-Term Debt | $245.1M | $245.4M | $245.6M | $246.7M | $247.7M |
| Total Liabilities | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.3B |
| Total Equity | $448.4M | $459.1M | $469.4M | $493.6M | $553.7M |
| Retained Earnings | $1.9M | $9.6M | $16.8M | $27.0M | $72.7M |
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 3, 2026 11:55am (20d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $58.4M | $76.7M | $132.1M | $171.2M | $222.4M |
| Capital Expenditure | -$101.5M | -$142.6M | -$146.2M | -$135.5M | -$165.8M |
| Free Cash Flow | -$43.1M | -$65.8M | -$14.0M | $35.7M | $56.5M |
| Acquisitions (net) | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividends Paid | — | — | — | — | — |
| Stock Buybacks | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Change in Cash | $155.5M | -$71.9M | -$5.9M | $96.1M | $39.4M |
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Aug 3, 2026 11:55am (20d ago)| Metric | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | +21.7% | +20.8% | +15.2% | +15.4% |
| Gross Profit Growth | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Income Growth | -69.6% | +122.0% | -48.7% | +1,957.5% |
| Net Income Growth | -178.3% | +184.1% | -49.6% | +348.0% |
| EBITDA Growth | +6.4% | +111.7% | +8.6% | +60.3% |
Deep Analysis
Risk : Reward — if the last quarter repeats
Live · as of 2026-08-19 11:03Even the bull case prices 33% below today — the ratio here measures the model-vs-market gap, not payoff odds. Another quarter like the worst recent one costs 92%.
| Case | Growth | Margin | Fair value | vs price ($64.85) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bull — recovery | +23% | 10.5% | $43.29 | -33% |
| Base — stabilizes | +16% | 9.1% | $30.04 | -54% |
| Bear — keeps slipping | +8% | 7.8% | $20.23 | -69% |
| Stress — last quarter repeats | +14% | 1.3% | $5.22 | -92% |
Narrative Economics
market-narrative step).
Claude Reading
Looking at the raw tape first: Shake Shack put up $1.45B TTM revenue growing 15-16% YoY, with operating income expanding from $3.0M in 2024 to $62.5M in 2025 — a 20x jump. But the quarterly sequence tells a more nuanced story. Net income progressed $4.2M → $17.1M → $12.5M → $11.8M through 2025, then collapsed to -$290K in Q1 2026 on $366.7M revenue. That's not a "margin expansion story continuing" — that's a margin story that already peaked in Q2 2025 at 4.8% and has been decelerating for four straight quarters, culminating in a breakeven print. Revenue also stepped down sequentially from $400.5M to $366.7M (yes, seasonal, but the YoY comp against Q1 2025's $320.9M is +14%, in line, not accelerating). FCF of $56.5M on $2.68B market cap is a 2.1% yield; capex of $166M against $222M operating cash flow shows this is still a capital-hungry unit-growth story, not a mature cash cow.
The synthesis verdict claiming fair value of $17.42 against a $62.75 print is almost certainly broken — that's a -73% gap that no sane DCF produces for a 15% grower with expanding op margins and $360M cash against $248M debt. The Market Narrative layer even references "current price ~$17-18 range," which suggests the model is anchored on a stale or split-adjusted price series. I'd discount that composite fair value entirely as a data artifact. That said, the *direction* (overvalued) still has merit on independent grounds: 59.9x P/E and 14.9x EV/EBITDA on a restaurant with 4.3% operating margins, 8.3% ROE, and 9.7% ROIC is a rich multiple that requires the margin expansion thesis to keep compounding. The Q1 2026 breakeven print is the first real crack in that thesis.
The Pre-Flight "high-growth" tag conflicts with the Rule-Based "mature_earner" tag, and the truth is in between — SHAK is a unit-growth concept with commodity-exposed economics, not a software compounder. The insider activity flagged as "Net Insider Buying" is misleading: every transaction listed is an A-Award (equity grant) or F-InKind (tax withholding), i.e., zero open-market conviction buys. That's a false positive signal the models are treating as bullish. Contrarian bull case: same-store sales could reaccelerate if the drive-thru and kiosk rollout hits, chicken sandwich mix continues to lift ticket, and the -$290K Q1 was one-time (weather, calendar shift, or investment pull-forward). At $62.75 with $56.5M FCF that would need to triple to $150-180M within 3 years to justify current multiples — plausible if unit count doubles from ~550 to 1,100 at maintained margins, but that's a decade-long execution ask being priced in today.
My independent read: agree with the synthesis *direction* (overvalued) but reject its magnitude entirely. Fair value on 25-30x forward P/E (a fair multiple for a 15% grower with improving-but-thin margins) against ~$55-60M FCF and normalized EPS around $1.30-1.50 gets you to $38-45, not $17. That's still a 30-40% overvaluation at $62.75, and the Q1 2026 margin reversal is a genuine warning that the "20x operating income growth" narrative may not be extrapolable. Market Forces' "cautious optimism" is closer to right than the synthesis's crash call. I'd wait for the Q2 2026 print to see if the Q1 breakeven was noise or the start of margin mean-reversion; if margins snap back to 4%+ and revenue growth holds 15%, the stock defends $55-60. If Q1 is a leading indicator of labor/commodity re-inflation grinding down unit economics, this is a $40 stock. Data gaps to flag: no gross margin disclosure across any period (unusual and material for a restaurant), no FCF CAGR computed, and the narrative layer's price anchor is broken.
GPT Reading
What stands out is that Shake Shack is no longer a “concept stock” with hypothetical economics; it is a real chain finally producing operating leverage, but the equity is still priced for a lot more than the current earnings power. Revenue has scaled from $739.9M in 2021 to $1.45B in 2025, essentially doubling in four years, and operating income improved from a $15.9M loss to $62.5M. That is genuine progress. The last five reported quarters also show a business that has mostly crossed into consistent profitability: net income of $4.2M, $17.1M, $12.5M, $11.8M, then essentially breakeven at -$0.3M on $366.7M of revenue. The problem is that “mostly profitable” is not the same as “highly profitable.” On 2025 numbers, the company earned just $45.7M net on $1.45B of sales, a 3.2% net margin, and the latest quarter slipped back to flat earnings despite 14%+ revenue growth. At $62.75, investors are paying about 59.9x earnings, 4.9x book, and roughly 1.9x sales for a restaurant company with a 4.3% operating margin. That multiple assumes substantial future margin expansion, not just unit growth.
The cash flow line deserves a more careful read than the headline profitability. Operating cash flow of $222.4M looks strong relative to net income, but free cash flow was only $56.5M because capex ran at $165.8M. That tells you the current business is heavily reinvesting to grow the box count; it does not yet throw off large owner earnings after growth spending. The balance sheet is healthy enough to support that strategy — $360.1M cash against $247.7M debt gives net cash and removes existential financing risk — but it also means the equity story depends on management converting expansion spend into materially higher restaurant-level and corporate margins over time. If the chain merely keeps growing revenue 10-15% while net margins hover around 3%, today’s valuation is rich. Even using enterprise value rather than equity value, 14.9x EBITDA is not cheap for a brand still proving it can sustain profitability through labor and commodity volatility.
The strongest argument against my skepticism is that the slope of improvement is real, and restaurant equities often look expensive right before margins inflect. Annual revenue grew 16% in 2025 after 15%+ trajectories, operating income jumped from $3.0M to $62.5M, and ROIC is now 9.7% versus outright losses a few years ago. If Shake Shack can move from a 4.3% operating margin to something like 7-8% on a larger revenue base, earnings could expand much faster than sales. On $1.45B of revenue, every 100 basis points of operating margin is about $14.5M of additional operating profit; that kind of leverage matters when current net income is only $45.7M. The stock is also not balance-sheet-stressed, so investors have time for the thesis to play out. A high-quality consumer brand with whitespace for new units can support a premium multiple before the P/E looks “normal.”
I still weigh those positives less heavily because the latest quarterly evidence does not yet show a clean, durable margin march. Revenue climbed from $320.9M in the March 2025 quarter to $366.7M in the March 2026 quarter, but net income went from $4.2M to slightly negative. The last four quarters before that were profitable, but mostly in a narrow 3-5% margin band, and one weak quarter can wipe out a meaningful share of annual earnings when the base is this small. That fragility matters. A mature restaurant operator can absorb cost noise; Shake Shack cannot, at least not yet. So while I reject the ultra-bearish fair value outputs in the teens as too punitive for a net-cash brand growing mid-teens, I also think the market is giving the company too much credit for margin expansion that remains more forecast than fact. This looks closer to a good company at a full price than a broken growth name.
What would change my mind is straightforward: I would turn more constructive if the next few quarters show that the near-breakeven March 2026 result was an anomaly and the company can sustain at least 5% operating margin and 4%+ net margin while keeping revenue growth above 12%. On the current sales base, that would imply annual net income moving toward $60M-$70M and free cash flow rising materially above the current $56.5M despite continued openings. Conversely, if revenue growth slows into high single digits or quarterly margins keep snapping back toward zero, the stock deserves a much lower multiple, likely closer to 1.2-1.4x sales or the low-$40s. As it stands, the business is improving, but not enough to justify paying almost 60x earnings for a restaurant chain still proving its economics.
Grok Reading
The numbers show a real operating inflection that is easy to underweight if you only stare at the multiple. Shake Shack grew revenue from $740M in 2021 to $1.45B in 2025 (15.3% CAGR), and the 2025 P&L is the first year that looks like a scaled restaurant company rather than a perpetual growth experiment: operating income jumped from $3.0M to $62.5M, net income to $45.7M, and operating cash flow hit $222M against only $247.7M of total debt and $360M of cash. Free cash flow of $56.5M after $166M of growth capex is adequate, not spectacular, but the balance sheet is clean (net cash, debt-to-equity 0.45, current ratio 1.76). Quarterly run-rate has stabilized in the mid-to-high $350Ms with a seasonal peak near $400M. That is the bullish skeleton: double-digit top-line growth plus sudden operating leverage in a brand that still has unit white space.
The problem is what the market is already paying for that skeleton, and what the most recent print just did to the story. At $62.75 the stock trades at roughly 60x trailing earnings, 1.9x sales, and 15x EV/EBITDA on a 4.3% operating margin and 3.2% net margin—ROIC of 9.7% and ROE of 8.3% are still mediocre for a premium multiple. Worse, the quarter ended 2026-04-01 delivered $366.7M of revenue (solid +14% versus the year-ago $321M spring quarter) yet slipped to a $290k loss. That is not a seasonal nothing-burger; it is margin give-back on higher volume, and it arrives just as the secondary signals flag decelerating quarterly revenue. The valuation synthesis fair value near $17 is mechanically too punitive given $222M of operating cash flow, but the direction of that signal is correct: 60x earnings on mid-single-digit net margins with a freshly printed loss leaves almost no room for labor, beef, or traffic disappointment. Insider “buying” is almost entirely A-Awards and one F-InKind tax withholding—compensation noise, not conviction open-market purchases. The rule-based “mature earner” tag and the pre-flight “high-growth” tag are both half-right and therefore both incomplete; this is a mid-teens grower whose earnings power has only just appeared and is already being capitalized as if the margin expansion is permanent.
The strongest counter-argument is straightforward and quantitative: if the 2025 operating-income leap from $3M to $62.5M is the beginning of leverage rather than a one-year gift from lower inflation and easier comps, then forward earnings power at 7–8% operating margins on a $1.7–1.8B revenue base produces $120M+ of EBIT and something closer to $80–90M of net income. On that math the forward multiple compresses into the high-20s/low-30s while the company is still opening stores and throwing off rising FCF once maintenance capex normalizes below the current $166M growth spend. Net cash removes balance-sheet risk, EV/EBITDA of 15x is not outrageous versus growth QSR peers, and the brand still clears a premium price point. A smart opponent would say the market is simply discounting two more years of the same operating leverage that already occurred, and that $62.75 is a fair entry for a scarce fast-casual compounder rather than a short.
I would flip to constructive if the next two quarters show net margins back above 3.5% on continuing mid-teens revenue growth and management guides unit growth that keeps revenue CAGR ≥15% without further margin erosion; a print of $15M+ quarterly NI with stable or rising same-store sales would do it. I would become decisively more negative on another loss quarter or guidance that implies operating margins stuck in the 4% range while the multiple stays above 45x forward earnings.
Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
Shake Shack has moved from money-losing growth story to modestly profitable, self-funding operator. Revenue compounded from $740M (2021) to $1.45B (2025), roughly doubling, while operating margin swung from -2.1% to +4.3% and net income from -$8.7M to +$45.7M. FCF flipped from -$43M in 2021 to +$56.5M in 2025 — the first stretch where the business is clearly financing its own unit growth. Earnings quality looks clean: OCF/NI of 3.64x and accruals at -7.3% of assets say the reported net income is backed by cash, not accrual gymnastics. Balance sheet is comfortable: $360M cash, $112M net cash, no evident refi pressure. Dilution is running at a 1.7% diluted-share CAGR with SBC around 1.4% of revenue and essentially no buyback offset — modest but real per-share drag that a mature earner should eventually neutralize. Altman Z at 2.24 (grey zone) is the one mechanical yellow flag, consistent with a capex-heavy, lease-laden restaurant model rather than distress. Insider tape is a genuine positive: multiple directors (Silverman, Flug, Chapman) made open-market P-purchases in May 2026 totaling ~$623K alongside routine awards — mixed but net-buying, which is uncommon at this stage. What holds the grade back from Strong is the still-thin operating margin (4.3%), no visible moat beyond brand, cyclicality of casual dining, and the fact that the profitability inflection is one year old, not a decade-long track record.
Verify before trusting this (5)
- Lease obligations and operating-lease liability vs cash — the real leverage picture behind the grey Altman Z
- Same-store sales trajectory and traffic vs price mix in the 10-K/transcripts to test whether the margin inflection is unit-economics or price-driven
- SBC dilution schedule and any authorized buyback capacity — is management planning to neutralize the 1.7% CAGR drag
- Any convertible or off-balance-sheet financing terms behind the $360M cash / $112M net cash split
- Customer/geographic concentration and franchise vs company-operated mix
The e2e composite pegs fair value at $17.22 (DCF $9.68, EPV $12.88, anchored P/E $36.65) versus a $64.85 price - implying -73% downside. I discount the DCF/EPV extremes as too punitive for a genuine unit-growth story with a real FCF inflection ($56M swing, OCF/NI 3.64x), but even the most generous input - anchored P/E at $36.65 - sits ~43% below the current price. On a market cap of $2.68B against ~$46M net income and ~$56M FCF, the stock trades at roughly 58x earnings and ~48x FCF; that multiple only makes sense if unit count and store-level margins compound aggressively for years.
Verify before trusting this (4)
- 2026 new-unit AUV and store-level margin guidance
- Same-store sales trajectory and traffic vs price mix
- Sustainability of the OCF/NI 3.64x (working-capital tailwind or structural?)
- Any capex step-up that would compress the fresh FCF
The macro tape is only mildly constructive (regime +22, VIX 16, S&P off highs) but SHAK's 1.63 beta means it feels every wobble twice. With 10y at 4.68% and market PE 26.9, high-multiple consumer cyclicals are exactly where marginal money is trimming, and SHAK sits squarely in that bucket. This is not a name that benefits from a calm tape; it needs a risk-on, growth-hungry tape to re-rate, and that is not what we have.
Verify before trusting this (4)
- Q2 print reaction - especially beef cost commentary and same-store sales, the exact pressure points from the May 28% drop
- Whether analyst targets get trimmed post-print (crowded-long book is vulnerable)
- VIX behavior and whether the 2-day neutral regime holds or rolls back to risk-off
- Any shift in narrative intensity from moderate toward decisive - either a re-rating catalyst or a further break
This lens hasn't been run for this ticker yet.