For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page
What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.
Our current read (analysis of 2026-08-23): Designation Low · Gem Score -34 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality 17 · Value -84 · Sentiment 38 (timing only, not weighted)
Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable
reference-name attribute you can cite):
profile-header/price-overview— company profile, live quote, market capextended-analysis— the core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memofuture-predictions— our forward price-band predictionsmarket-narrative/ai-findings/gpt-critique— narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)- Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers):
price-history,income-trend,key-metrics,financials(statement tables),insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.
More for machine readers: site briefing at
/llms.txt ·
any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER ·
raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds);
every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.
Seagate Technology Holdings plc
STX NASDAQSeagate Technology Holdings plc is a global provider of data storage technology and infrastructure solutions. The company develops, manufactures, and sells a broad portfolio of storage products, including mass-capacity hard disk drives, solid-state drives, hybrid drives, and storage subsystems designed for enterprise, cloud, edge, and consumer applications. Seagate Technology Holdings plc also offers specialized products such as video and image hard drives, network-attached storage drives, and controllers that support high-performance data transfer and connectivity in modern computing environments. In addition, the company provides the Lyve edge-to-cloud mass capacity platform, which combines modular hardware and software to help organizations manage, move, and store large volumes of data across on-premise and cloud architectures. Seagate Technology Holdings plc serves original equipment manufacturers, distributors, and retailers worldwide, with operational presence across regions including the United States, Singapore, the Netherlands, and other international markets. Founded in 1978 and headquartered in Fremont, California, Seagate is a significant player in the information technology and data infrastructure ecosystem.
Price Overview
Price History (1 Year)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
| Period | Revenue | Net Income | Net Margin | YoY/QoQ |
|---|
Key Metrics
EPS (Diluted): 6.77
Total Equity: -$453.00M
Shares: 217,000,000
Total Debt: $5.00B
Cash: $891.00M
EBITDA: $2.14B
Total Debt: $5.00B
Cash: $891.00M
Revenue: $9.10B
Revenue: $9.10B
Revenue: $9.10B
Total Equity: -$453.00M
Tax Rate: 2.9%
Equity: -$453.00M
Total Debt: $5.00B
Cash: $891.00M
Current Liabilities: $2.65B
Long-Term Debt: $5.00B
Total Debt: $5.00B
Total Equity: -$453.00M
Shares: 217,000,000
Shares: 217,000,000
CapEx: -$265.00M
Shares: 217,000,000
Stock Price: $831.06
Net Income: $1.47B
Industry Benchmarks
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 1, 2026 8:33pm (21d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $10.7B | $11.7B | $7.4B | $6.6B | $9.1B |
| Cost of Revenue | $7.8B | $8.2B | $6.0B | $5.0B | $5.9B |
| Gross Profit | $2.9B | $3.5B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $3.2B |
| Operating Expenses | $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.7B | $1.1B | $1.3B |
| Operating Income | $1.5B | $2.0B | -$342.0M | $452.0M | $1.9B |
| Net Income | $1.3B | $1.6B | -$529.0M | $335.0M | $1.5B |
| EBITDA | $1.9B | $2.4B | $171.0M | $716.0M | $2.1B |
| EPS | $5.43 | $7.50 | $-2.56 | $1.60 | $6.93 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $5.36 | $7.36 | $-2.56 | $1.58 | $6.77 |
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Jul 30, 2026 12:09am (24d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash & Equivalents | $1.2B | $615.0M | $786.0M | $1.4B | $891.0M |
| Total Current Assets | $3.8B | $4.0B | $2.9B | $3.3B | $3.7B |
| Total Assets | $8.7B | $8.9B | $7.6B | $7.7B | $8.0B |
| Current Liabilities | $2.9B | $3.6B | $2.6B | $3.1B | $2.6B |
| Long-Term Debt | $4.9B | $5.1B | $5.4B | $5.2B | $5.0B |
| Total Liabilities | $8.0B | $8.8B | $8.8B | $9.2B | $8.5B |
| Total Equity | $631.0M | $109.0M | -$1.2B | -$1.5B | -$453.0M |
| Retained Earnings | -$6.3B | -$7.1B | -$8.7B | -$9.0B | -$8.2B |
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 1, 2026 8:33pm (21d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $1.6B | $1.7B | $942.0M | $918.0M | $1.1B |
| Capital Expenditure | -$498.0M | -$381.0M | -$316.0M | -$254.0M | -$265.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $1.1B | $1.3B | $626.0M | $664.0M | $818.0M |
| Acquisitions (net) | — | — | $0 | $0 | -$88.0M |
| Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) | $967.0M | $499.0M | $22.0M | $212.0M | -$678.0M |
| Dividends Paid | -$649.0M | -$610.0M | -$582.0M | -$585.0M | -$600.0M |
| Stock Buybacks | -$2.0B | -$1.8B | -$408.0M | $0 | $0 |
| Net Change in Cash | -$513.0M | -$594.0M | $171.0M | $572.0M | -$467.0M |
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Aug 1, 2026 8:33pm (21d ago)| Metric | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | +9.2% | -36.7% | -11.3% | +38.9% |
| Gross Profit Growth | +18.9% | -61.1% | +13.7% | +108.3% |
| Operating Income Growth | +31.0% | -117.5% | +232.2% | +318.1% |
| Net Income Growth | +25.5% | -132.1% | +163.3% | +338.5% |
| EBITDA Growth | +27.4% | -92.9% | +318.7% | +199.0% |
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Aug 1, 2026 12:02am (22d ago)| Date | Dividend | Declaration | Record | Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-24 | $0.74 | — | — | — |
| 2026-06-24 | $0.74 | — | — | — |
| 2026-03-25 | $0.74 | — | — | — |
| 2025-12-24 | $0.74 | — | — | — |
| 2025-09-30 | $0.72 | — | — | — |
| 2025-06-25 | $0.72 | — | — | — |
| 2025-03-19 | $0.72 | — | — | — |
| 2024-12-13 | $0.72 | — | — | — |
| 2024-09-23 | $0.70 | — | — | — |
| 2024-06-20 | $0.70 | — | — | — |
| 2024-03-20 | $0.70 | — | — | — |
| 2023-12-20 | $0.70 | — | — | — |
| 2023-09-25 | $0.70 | — | — | — |
| 2023-06-20 | $0.70 | — | — | — |
| 2023-03-21 | $0.70 | — | — | — |
| 2022-12-20 | $0.70 | — | — | — |
| 2022-09-20 | $0.70 | — | — | — |
| 2022-06-23 | $0.70 | — | — | — |
| 2022-03-21 | $0.70 | — | — | — |
| 2021-12-21 | $0.70 | — | — | — |
Deep Analysis
Narrative Economics
market-narrative step).
Claude Reading
The raw quarterly trajectory is genuinely impressive and the models are underweighting it. Revenue has climbed monotonically from $1.89B (Jun-24) to $3.11B (Apr-26) — a 65% lift in seven quarters — while net margin has expanded from ~14% to 24%. That's not a cyclical bounce pattern; cyclical bounces are lumpy and mean-revert within 2-3 quarters. This is eight quarters of sequential acceleration with margin compounding, which is the fingerprint of pricing power on constrained supply (nearline HDD capacity is genuinely tight; Seagate and WDC have been disciplined on capex — note capex only $265M against $1.08B OCF). FY2025 revenue of $9.10B vs FY2024's $6.55B is 39% growth, and the exit run-rate ($3.11B × 4 = $12.4B) already exceeds the 2022 peak of $11.66B, but at materially better margins (24% net vs ~14% in 2022). So the "cyclical peak" framing the synthesis leans on is factually shaky — we're already above prior peak revenue.
That said, the valuation math is brutal and the synthesis is directionally right on price. At $831 and $188.6B market cap on an annualized $12.4B revenue and maybe $2.6B in earnings at current margin, you're paying ~15x forward sales and ~72x forward earnings for a business whose 10-year revenue CAGR is ~0%. Even generously assuming margins hold and revenue compounds 15% for three years, you land at ~$16B revenue and ~$4B net income by FY2028 — that's still 47x earnings on the terminal year, for a hardware company. The negative book equity (-$453M) and $5B debt against $891M cash is a genuine tail risk if the AI capex cycle inflects; Seagate has no balance sheet cushion. The pre-flight's "12-15x normalized earnings" reference frame is the honest one, and it implies fair value somewhere in the $200-350 range, not $831.
Where I disagree with the model chorus: the "Priced for Perfection / narrative platform" framing misreads the mechanism. This isn't a Lyve software story or an AI platform reclassification — nobody serious is buying STX for software optionality. It's a supply-discipline duopoly (STX + WDC) capturing nearline HDD demand from hyperscaler cold storage buildout, which is a real, measurable phenomenon with 2-4 year visibility given hyperscaler capex guidance. The narrative layer calling this "unanchored" is wrong; it's anchored, just to an aggressive extrapolation. The contrarian bull argument the models miss: if HDD supply stays constrained through 2027 and hyperscaler cold-storage demand keeps compounding, revenue could hit $14-15B at 25%+ margins, generating $3.5B+ FCF, and the multiple compresses into acceptability without the stock falling. That's a real scenario, not a fantasy — but it requires the cycle to run 2+ more years, which historically it doesn't.
The data quality concerns are real. Insider activity is essentially nil (two tiny transactions) — for an $831 stock that 5x'd, the absence of insider selling is either bullish signal or a reporting gap; I suspect the latter given only two entries. The "narrative_platform" archetype tag is misapplied — this is a cyclical hardware company, and the pre-flight correctly overrides to "deep-value" framing. The P/E of 122 is a stale annual figure; on trailing four quarters ($2.38B NI), it's ~79x, still absurd but not 122. Revenue Confidence being flagged "decelerating" contradicts the raw sequential data — that signal looks broken. I side with the synthesis verdict directionally (overvalued) but dissent on magnitude and reasoning: fair value is closer to $350-450 on a 15-18x normalized earnings framework assuming margins normalize to ~18% on $11B mid-cycle revenue. At $831 you're paying for a scenario where peak margins hold on a growing base for 3+ more years — possible, not probable, and asymmetric to the downside given negative equity. Not a short (momentum + supply discipline are real), but not ownable here. Wait for the cycle crack or a 40% drawdown.
GPT Reading
The first thing I do here is reject the price tape as if it were attached to the operating business in any normal way. At $831 and a $188.7B market cap, Seagate is being valued like a scarce AI infrastructure franchise, but the income statement still looks like a cyclical storage hardware recovery. FY2025 revenue was $9.10B, which is better than FY2024’s $6.55B trough but still well below FY2022’s $11.66B. Net income of $1.47B in FY2025 is likewise a rebound, not a new plateau, and annual free cash flow of $818M implies the stock trades at roughly 230x FCF. Even giving credit for the strong recent run, the quarterly progression from $2.16B to $2.44B to $2.63B to $2.83B to $3.11B shows a business climbing out of a downcycle, not one that has structurally escaped cyclicality. When a company below its prior revenue peak is priced at about 20x sales and nearly 88x EV/EBITDA, the burden of proof shifts overwhelmingly to the bull case.
The quarterlies are undeniably strong, but they actually reinforce the cyclicality argument. Revenue is up 39% year over year in the latest quarter and net income rose to $748M from $513M in the year-ago June quarter, but that prior-year comparison is distorted by a freakishly high 27.2% margin on just $1.89B of revenue. More importantly, the latest four quarters sum to roughly $10.4B of revenue and about $1.93B of net income. Annualizing that earnings power still leaves the stock around 98x run-rate earnings, and that assumes no mean reversion in storage pricing, utilization, or product mix. A mature hardware vendor with $5.0B of debt, only $891M of cash, and negative equity of $453M should not command software-platform valuation multiples just because nearline demand is hot. The balance sheet is not distressed, but it is not the kind of fortress that justifies investors hand-waving away cycle risk either.
What stands out most is the disconnect between the quality of the recovery and the absurdity of the valuation. Gross margin in FY2025 was 35.2% and operating margin 20.8%, which are very respectable for this business, but they are the kind of margins that can look excellent at the right point in the cycle and compress fast when hyperscaler ordering normalizes. Operating cash flow of $1.08B on $1.47B of net income is fine, yet not so extraordinary that I can argue accounting understates economics. If anything, cash flow confirms the stock is expensive: there is no hidden torrent of cash here large enough to support a $188B equity value. The market appears to be capitalizing a temporary combination of AI-storage enthusiasm, tight supply, and operating leverage as though Seagate has become a structurally advantaged compounder. I do not see evidence of that in the reported numbers.
The best pushback is that the business may be entering a genuinely better earnings regime than its own history suggests. The latest five quarters show remarkably consistent revenue and profit improvement, from $2.16B and $340M to $3.11B and $748M, with margins mostly holding in the mid-teens to low-20s. If AI training, inference, archiving, and cold storage create a durable demand layer for high-capacity HDDs, then comparing Seagate to its FY2022 peak may understate the next cycle’s ceiling. A smart bull would also point out that FY2023’s losses and FY2024’s weak profitability make trailing valuation metrics nearly useless, and if net income can sustainably run above $2.5B to $3.0B with modest capex of $265M, then the stock is less insane than it screens. I still weigh that evidence differently because even $3B of annual earnings would leave the stock above 60x earnings, which requires years of compounding and far less cyclicality than this business has ever demonstrated.
What would change my mind is simple: I need proof that this is not just a peak-margin, peak-multiple moment. If Seagate can hold quarterly revenue above $3.0B for the next 4-6 quarters, convert that into at least $1.5B-$2.0B of annual free cash flow, and do so without margin collapse or a balance-sheet stretch, then I would revisit the idea that the earnings base has structurally reset upward. Conversely, one quarter of flat-to-down revenue with a sharp drop from the current 20%+ net margin zone would expose how much perfection is embedded in the stock. At today’s price, the company does not need to merely perform well; it needs to stay near cyclical bests for years.
Grok Reading
The numbers tell a story of a ferocious cyclical snapback that the market has decided is permanent transformation. Seagate just posted $3.11B in quarterly revenue with a 24% net margin—up from $2.16B and 15.7% five quarters earlier—and the trailing twelve months now sit near $11.0B of revenue and roughly $2.4B of net income. That is real operating leverage: FY2025 delivered $9.10B revenue, $1.89B operating income and $818M of free cash flow after a catastrophic FY2023 loss. Sequential growth has been clean and accelerating, and nearline HDD demand tied to AI training corpora and cold storage is the clear driver. None of that is imaginary.
What is imaginary is the multiple. At $831 and a $188.7B market capitalization the stock trades at roughly 20x sales, 80x trailing earnings and something like 230x free cash flow. EV/EBITDA above 87x on a company that still carries $5.0B of debt against $891M of cash and negative equity of –$453M is not a valuation; it is a narrative premium detached from hardware economics. Even if the current $3.1B quarterly run-rate annualizes toward $12–13B and margins hold in the low-to-mid 20s, you are still looking at a mid-60s forward P/E for a mature dual-source supplier whose peak historical revenue was only $11.7B in FY2022. The balance sheet fragility (negative book value, net debt roughly $4.1B) makes the downside convex if hyperscaler capex pauses.
The strongest counter-argument is that this time really is different: high-capacity nearline drives remain the only economically viable medium for the exabyte-scale cold tier that AI data lakes require, HAMR technology is extending the density roadmap, and the Western Digital duopoly has restored pricing power that did not exist in prior cycles. Revenue CAGR of 11% and recent 39% year-on-year growth, combined with FCF quality that is actually good, give bulls a coherent claim that Seagate has re-rated from deep-cyclical to semi-structural AI infrastructure. If the next four quarters print above $3.3–3.5B with margins stuck near 24%, the earnings power could justify a higher normalized multiple than the trough-to-peak skeptic assumes. I weigh that evidence as real but already more than fully discounted; the stock has already moved from roughly $145 to $831 on exactly this thesis, so the asymmetry has flipped.
I would reverse to neutral or constructive only on two concrete developments: (1) two consecutive quarters of revenue above $3.5B with net margins holding 23%+ while net debt declines, proving the run-rate is not peak-cycle, or (2) a material, disclosed mix shift into higher-margin software/services (Lyve or equivalent) that is large enough to change the gross-margin structure rather than remain a slide-deck narrative. Absent those, the gap between a solid cyclical recovery and a 20x-sales software multiple is too wide to ignore.
Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
Seagate just completed a textbook cyclical whipsaw: revenue collapsed from $11.66B (FY22) to $6.55B (FY24) with operating margin swinging from 16.8% to -4.6%, then rebounded to $9.10B revenue at 20.8% operating margin and 35.2% gross margin in FY25 — the strongest gross margin in the five-year window. Net income recovered from a $529M loss to $1.47B, and FCF of $818M funded ongoing operations without external capital. Diluted share count fell from 245M to 217M (roughly -3% CAGR) with buybacks running 608% of SBC (SBC only 2.2% of revenue) — genuine per-share concentration, not the fake buybacks that merely mop up dilution.
Verify before trusting this (5)
- Debt maturity schedule and covenants given -$4.1B net cash position
- Customer concentration in hyperscale/nearline segment (10-K risk factors)
- HAMR product ramp status and share of FY25 revenue mix driving 35% GM
- Whether working-capital tailwinds inflated FY25 FCF vs. structural cash conversion
- Segment-level unit economics to distinguish cycle recovery from structural margin gain
The price anchor is $831.06 and market cap is roughly $188.7B for a company whose e2e valuation synthesis flags it trading at 21x sales on what looks like a cyclical recovery being mistaken for structural AI-driven growth. For a mature HDD manufacturer with $4.1B net debt, thin cash (0.5% of market cap), and a demonstrated history of deep cyclical troughs, a 21x sales multiple is the sort of number reserved for scarce, high-margin, secular compounders - not a hardware cyclical whose best defense is disciplined execution. The Company-Quality lens rightly calls this a Solid operator, but Solid does not deserve a hyperscaler multiple. Deserved value on a normalized, quality-adjusted basis is dramatically below the current print. Even generous assumptions about nearline/HAMR mix and AI cold-storage demand struggle to bridge a 21x sales gap; the bear case (SSD encroachment, hyperscaler in-house solutions, cyclical mean reversion) is essentially free-optioned against the buyer here. Earnings quality is good, so no haircut is warranted on that axis - but good earnings on a cyclical peak are exactly what gets over-extrapolated. Margin of safety is negative: the price already assumes the up-cycle is permanent.
Verify before trusting this (5)
- Nearline/HAMR unit trajectory and mix in the next two quarters to test whether AI demand is structural or a one-off build
- Hyperscaler capex commentary specifically calling out HDD vs SSD allocation
- Gross margin sustainability above mid-30s through a full year, not just one print
- Guidance vs sell-side consensus to see how much of the 'AI story' is already baked into estimates
- Any share issuance or debt refinancing that would change the per-share math
The dominant force on STX right now is a bullish AI-infrastructure narrative that has rerated the entire storage cohort. News flow is saturated with Big Tech capex headlines (750B for 2026), fresh analyst target resets (BNP Paribas citing 'unusual visibility' from long-term orders), and post-earnings enthusiasm that has STX 'soaring.' Momentum confirms the pressure: 38.9% recent versus 11.0% long-term CAGR, +23pp over three years. For a 2.1-beta hardware name that historically traded as a commodity cyclical, being repositioned as an AI pick-and-shovel play is a large tailwind. Countervailing pressures are real but smaller. The narrative itself is flagged as fragile and moderate-intensity, not a cult, and the stock is priced for 60% growth - meaning any crack in the AI-capex story hits this name harder than most. Monday delivered a 6% memory-cohort selloff, showing the tape can turn on this group in a single session. Macro is mixed: a nascent risk-on regime and calm VIX support the trade, but 4.75% 10y and a 26.9 market PE are ambient headwinds for a high-beta, high-multiple name. Net: analyst tone is upgrading, news flow is overwhelmingly constructive, momentum is strong, and the story is the story - tailwind, but not a strong one given fragility and the fresh cohort wobble.
Verify before trusting this (4)
- WDC earnings Aug 5 - a miss or soft guide would crack the AI-storage read-through and hit STX
- Any hyperscaler capex guidance revision, especially toward custom silicon or SSD substitution
- Whether the memory-cohort selloff extends beyond a one-day event into a rotation
- Follow-through on analyst target hikes vs. profit-taking from insiders after the run
This lens hasn't been run for this ticker yet.
When we made this prediction on Aug 4, 2026, STX was $831.06. We expect it to be $690.00 by Feb 2027, and we consider it great value under $300.00. This is an early model (v0.6.0) — the direction is more reliable than the exact price. Made Aug 4, 2026.
Blue is our prediction, starting the day we made it. Grey is a slower route to the same place — the same destination, taking longer. Black is the actual price, so you can see how we are doing.