Consumer Defensive · Education & Training Services
Made onAug 31, 2026
Price at call$86.55
6-month call Bull +27.7%
Target by Mar 2027$110.50
Great value below$75.00
Modelv0.6.0
Projection vs Actual
(6M history + forecast)
The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change+27.7% to $110.50
Predicted High$110.50at 6 months
Predicted Low$85.50at 1 month
Max Drawdown (predicted)-1.2%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 31, 2026 1:06 pm
Bull
LRN trends higher to
$110.50
(+27.7% from $86.55)
by Mar 2027.
dip-then-recover
ThesisLRN trades well below composite fair value with strong quality and consistent earnings beats, supporting gradual convergence upward. Risk-on regime and negative beta provide asymmetric setup, but absence of near-term catalyst means drift rather than surge; path grinds higher toward the $110-115 zone.
Invalidated ifA break below $80 on heavy volume or a materially missed earnings print would invalidate the convergence thesis.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $86.55 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 31, 2026
—
$86.55at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Sep 14, 2026
$76.61–$96.49typical range · internal point $87.20
—
±11.5%
6/10
Mild drift, risk-on tailwind, no catalyst
What actually happened:
closed $82.00
on Sep 11, 2026 = -5.3% vs the call
(predicted +0.8%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 6.0 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±11.5%:
inside the band
· S&P -0.4%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Oct 1, 2026
$72.14–$100.96typical range · internal point $85.50
—
±16.6%
5/10
Minor pullback, profit-taking after summer bid
What actually happened:
closed $77.98
on Sep 30, 2026 = -9.9% vs the call
(predicted -1.2%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 8.7 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±16.6%:
inside the band
· S&P -0.5%
over the same window — beat it
2 months
Oct 31, 2026
$89.00
—
+2.8%
5/10
Recovery as value lens attracts buyers
3 months
Dec 1, 2026
$94.00
—
+8.6%
5/10
Q1 earnings likely beat, guidance supportive
4 months
Dec 31, 2026
$99.50
—
+15.0%
4/10
Post-earnings momentum, year-end positioning
5 months
Jan 31, 2027
$105.00
—
+21.3%
4/10
January reallocation to quality mid-caps
6 months
Mar 3, 2027
$110.50
—
+27.7%
3/10
Continued convergence toward signal-adjusted fair value
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$115.20
(+33.1%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.