The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change-4.2% to $134.00
Predicted High$141.20at 1 month
Predicted Low$134.00at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)-4.2%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 31, 2026 1:08 pm
Neutral
PEP trends range-bound to
$134.00
(-4.2% from $139.85)
by Mar 2027.
ride-then-fade
ThesisPEP screens as overvalued vs composite fair value ($107.86) but the defensive-dividend narrative, Cramer tailwind, and negative beta provide near-term support in a risk-on tape. Expect modest early drift up on sentiment, then gradual mean-reversion toward the deterministic baseline as value gravity reasserts over months.
Invalidated ifA break above $148 on sustained volume or below $128 would invalidate the mild-drift-then-fade path.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $139.85 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 31, 2026
—
$139.85at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Sep 14, 2026
$133.46–$146.24typical range · internal point $140.60
—
±4.6%
7/10
Defensive bid and Cramer tailwind hold near term
What actually happened:
closed $136.32
on Sep 11, 2026 = -2.5% vs the call
(predicted +0.5%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 3.1 pp
· accuracy 9/10
· typical range ±4.6%:
inside the band
· S&P -0.4%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Oct 1, 2026
$130.60–$149.10typical range · internal point $141.20
—
±6.6%
6/10
Sentiment carry continues, no catalysts
What actually happened:
closed $126.72
on Sep 30, 2026 = -9.4% vs the call
(predicted +1.0%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 10.4 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±6.6%:
OUTSIDE the band
· S&P -0.5%
over the same window — lagged it
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$136.17
(-2.6%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$139.85
Composite fair value
$107.86
Signal-adjusted fair value
$85.50
DCF fair value
$110.35
Anchored-PE fair value
$150.67
Buy-below (value lens)
$115.00
Value net score
-43
Value confidence
6 / 10
Quality net score
+46
Memo confidence
7 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)