The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change-5.2% to $266.00
Predicted High$284.00at 1 month
Predicted Low$266.00at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)-5.2%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Jul 21, 2026 8:53 am
Bear
LHX trends lower to
$266.00
(-5.2% from $280.55)
by Jan 2027.
ride-then-fade
ThesisSentiment tailwinds from Space Force/Army wins and defense-fortress narrative support LHX near-term, but rich valuation (fair value $183-208 vs $280 price) and negative 6-month momentum create value gravity that reasserts over months. Path is a modest ride-then-fade toward the deterministic baseline.
Invalidated ifA break above $300 on sustained defense budget upside or below $250 on a major contract loss or guidance cut would falsify the gentle-fade thesis.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $280.55 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Jul 21, 2026
—
$280.55at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 4, 2026
$265.41–$295.69typical range · internal point $282.50
—
±5.4%
6/10
Sentiment momentum from recent contract wins persists
What actually happened:
closed $277.86
on Aug 3, 2026 = -1.0% vs the call
(predicted +0.7%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 1.7 pp
· accuracy 10/10
· typical range ±5.4%:
inside the band
· S&P -0.3%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Aug 21, 2026
$258.61–$302.49typical range · internal point $284.00
—
±7.8%
5/10
Defense narrative and neutral tape hold price firm
What actually happened:
closed $270.44
on Aug 20, 2026 = -3.6% vs the call
(predicted +1.2%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 4.8 pp
· accuracy 8/10
· typical range ±7.8%:
inside the band
· S&P +1.8%
over the same window — beat it
2 months
Sep 21, 2026
$278.00
—
-0.9%
5/10
Post-earnings digestion, value rotation whisper grows
3 months
Oct 21, 2026
$273.00
—
-2.7%
5/10
Valuation gravity begins pulling toward fair value
Converges toward deterministic baseline as value asserts
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$266.29
(-5.1%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.4.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$280.55
Composite fair value
$183.65
Signal-adjusted fair value
$191.18
DCF fair value
$205.74
Anchored-PE fair value
$208.27
Buy-below (value lens)
$215.00
Value net score
-100
Value confidence
7 / 10
Quality net score
+29
Memo confidence
8 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)
Realized volatility (annualized)
1m 30.1% 3m 27.1% 6m 28.1%
Daily σ (realism noise)
1.7%
Beta vs S&P 500
1m -0.84 3m -0.10 5m 0.18
Trailing 6-month return
-17.6%
Knobs (equation params)
ladder
Array
llm_model
claude-opus-4-7
max_tokens
3000
control_knobs
Array
Neutral band (%)
5
prompt_version
p1
control_version
v0.3.0
Version & Tech Chain
What produced this prediction — stamped on the record so versions can be compared by success rate later.
Modelv0.4.0#d5854b4b2216
Tech composition (what this version is built from)
#
Process
Kind
Group
1
Synthesisvaluation-synthesis
deterministic
final
2
Scenario Analysisscenario-valuation
deterministic
valuation
3
Valuation / Mispricingext-lens-value
llm
extended
4
Company Qualityext-lens-quality
llm
extended
5
Forensic Memo (combiner)ext-forensic-memo
llm
extended
6
Classificationcompany-classification
llm
foundation
7
Live Quotefmp-quote
data
market-data
Inputs used (the runs that fed this prediction)
Upstream process
Ran
Lag
Run id
company-classification
Jul 21, 2026
freshest
LHX-20260721-030001-ac6d
ext-forensic-memo
Jul 21, 2026
freshest
ext-LHX-20260721-083846-c86d
ext-lens-quality
Jul 21, 2026
freshest
ext-LHX-20260721-083846-c86d
ext-lens-sentiment
Jul 21, 2026
freshest
ext-LHX-20260721-083846-c86d
ext-lens-value
Jul 21, 2026
freshest
ext-LHX-20260721-083846-c86d
scenario-valuation
Jul 21, 2026
freshest
LHX-20260721-030001-ac6d
valuation-synthesis
Jul 21, 2026
freshest
LHX-20260721-030001-ac6d
Inputs flagged 7d+ behind the freshest one may be stale relative to the rest of the analysis.
Saved History
2 frozen snapshots — the record we score once predictions mature.