The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change-6.1% to $145.50
Predicted High$159.50at 1 month
Predicted Low$145.50at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)-6.1%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Jul 22, 2026 6:10 am
Bear
TJX trends lower to
$145.50
(-6.1% from $155.00)
by Jan 2027.
ride-then-fade
ThesisTJX trades well above every fair-value anchor, but quality is elite, sentiment is a mild tailwind, and an 8-of-8 beat streak lands inside the m1 window - so the near path likely holds firm or drifts up on earnings before valuation gravity slowly pulls it toward the deterministic $145 endpoint over months.
Invalidated ifAn earnings miss or lowered comp guidance on 2026-08-19, or a break below $148 support, would accelerate the fade well past the baseline.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $155.00 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Jul 22, 2026
—
$155.00at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 5, 2026
$147.37–$162.63typical range · internal point $156.20
—
±4.9%
7/10
Low-beta drift into earnings, defensive bid intact
What actually happened:
closed $157.55
on Aug 4, 2026 = +1.7% vs the call
(predicted +0.8%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 0.9 pp
· accuracy 10/10
· typical range ±4.9%:
inside the band
· S&P +3.2%
over the same window — beat it
1 month
Aug 22, 2026
$143.94–$166.06typical range · internal point $159.50
What actually happened:
closed $140.52
on Aug 21, 2026 = -9.3% vs the call
(predicted +2.9%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 12.3 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±7.1%:
OUTSIDE the band
· S&P +2.3%
over the same window — lagged it
What actually happened:
closed $130.96
on Sep 21, 2026 = -15.5% vs the call
(predicted +1.8%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 17.3 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· S&P +3.5%
over the same window — beat it
3 months
Oct 22, 2026
$153.00
—
-1.3%
5/10
Value gravity begins asserting against rich multiple
Endpoint aligns with control model fair-value pull
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$145.29
(-6.3%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$155.00
Composite fair value
$87.26
Signal-adjusted fair value
$99.23
DCF fair value
$86.43
Anchored-PE fair value
$117.93
Buy-below (value lens)
$115.00
Value net score
-98
Value confidence
7 / 10
Quality net score
+100
Memo confidence
8 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)