The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change-5.1% to $181.00
Predicted High$193.80at 1 month
Predicted Low$181.00at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)-5.1%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 1, 2026 12:44 am
Bear
PM trends lower to
$181.00
(-5.1% from $190.81)
by Feb 2027.
ride-then-fade
ThesisPM trades well above every valuation anchor but rides a strong defensive-growth narrative with positive momentum and no near-term earnings catalyst to break it. Momentum likely persists near-term before value gravity slowly pulls the name back toward the deterministic endpoint, though not all the way to fair value.
Invalidated ifA break below $175 on volume or a regime flip to risk-off with sector rotation into cyclicals would falsify the near-term strength; conversely, sustained closes above $200 would invalidate the fade.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $190.81 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 1, 2026
—
$190.81at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 15, 2026
$178.98–$202.64typical range · internal point $192.50
—
±6.2%
7/10
52-week-high momentum and defensive bid persist short-term
What actually happened:
closed $190.40
on Aug 14, 2026 = -0.2% vs the call
(predicted +0.9%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 1.1 pp
· accuracy 10/10
· typical range ±6.2%:
inside the band
· S&P +4.0%
over the same window — beat it
1 month
Sep 1, 2026
$173.67–$207.95typical range · internal point $193.80
—
±9.0%
6/10
Narrative intact, no earnings catalyst to disrupt tape
Earnings likely beat but reaction muted at rich multiple
4 months
Dec 1, 2026
$185.50
—
-2.8%
4/10
Year-end profit-taking on extended defensive winners
5 months
Jan 1, 2027
$183.00
—
-4.1%
4/10
Value gravity asserts as anchors sit far below
6 months
Feb 1, 2027
$181.00
—
-5.1%
4/10
Convergence toward deterministic endpoint, not full fair value
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$181.42
(-4.9%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$190.81
Composite fair value
$116.23
Signal-adjusted fair value
$119.40
DCF fair value
$130.94
Anchored-PE fair value
$117.06
Buy-below (value lens)
$135.00
Value net score
-74
Value confidence
7 / 10
Quality net score
+66
Memo confidence
7 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)
Realized volatility (annualized)
1m 35.0% 3m 31.1% 6m 31.7%
Daily σ (realism noise)
2.0%
Beta vs S&P 500
1m -0.80 3m -0.57 5m -0.09
Trailing 6-month return
7.5%
Knobs (equation params)
ladder
Array
llm_model
claude-opus-4-7
max_tokens
3000
control_knobs
Array
Neutral band (%)
5
earnings_brief
v1
prompt_version
p1
control_version
v0.3.0
Version & Tech Chain
What produced this prediction — stamped on the record so versions can be compared by success rate later.
Modelv0.6.0#271041f8fcd5
Tech composition (what this version is built from)
#
Process
Kind
Group
1
Synthesisvaluation-synthesis
deterministic
final
2
Scenario Analysisscenario-valuation
deterministic
valuation
3
Valuation / Mispricingext-lens-value
llm
extended
4
Company Qualityext-lens-quality
llm
extended
5
Forensic Memo (combiner)ext-forensic-memo
llm
extended
6
Classificationcompany-classification
llm
foundation
7
Live Quotefmp-quote
data
market-data
Inputs used (the runs that fed this prediction)
Upstream process
Ran
Lag
Run id
company-classification
Aug 1, 2026
freshest
PM-20260801-001034-d3f0
ext-forensic-memo
Aug 1, 2026
freshest
ext-PM-20260801-003431-a698
ext-lens-quality
Aug 1, 2026
freshest
ext-PM-20260801-003431-a698
ext-lens-sentiment
Aug 1, 2026
freshest
ext-PM-20260801-003431-a698
ext-lens-value
Aug 1, 2026
freshest
ext-PM-20260801-003431-a698
scenario-valuation
Aug 1, 2026
freshest
PM-20260801-001034-d3f0
valuation-synthesis
Aug 1, 2026
freshest
PM-20260801-001034-d3f0
Inputs flagged 7d+ behind the freshest one may be stale relative to the rest of the analysis.
Saved History
2 frozen snapshots — the record we score once predictions mature.