Consumer Defensive · Household & Personal Products
Made onAug 1, 2026
Price at call$144.50
6-month call Bear -8.3%
Target by Feb 2027$132.50
Great value below$120.00
Modelv0.6.0
Projection vs Actual
(6M history + forecast)
The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change-8.3% to $132.50
Predicted High$143.80in 2 weeks
Predicted Low$132.50at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)-8.3%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 1, 2026 12:44 am
Bear
PG trends lower to
$132.50
(-8.3% from $144.50)
by Feb 2027.
decay
ThesisPG is a defensive compounder trading at a premium with weak sentiment, a cautious FY27 guide, and no near-term catalyst. Expect gradual de-rating toward fair value in the $125-135 zone over six months, with a low-beta drift rather than a sharp break, punctuated by a mild autumn earnings-season wobble.
Invalidated ifA reacceleration in organic sales growth on the next print or a risk-off rotation into staples pushing PG above $150 would falsify the drift-lower thesis.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $144.50 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 1, 2026
—
$144.50at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 15, 2026
$137.87–$151.13typical range · internal point $143.80
—
±4.6%
6/10
Mild drift lower on stale sentiment, no catalyst
What actually happened:
closed $144.55
on Aug 14, 2026 = +0.0% vs the call
(predicted -0.5%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 0.5 pp
· accuracy 10/10
· typical range ±4.6%:
inside the band
· S&P +4.0%
over the same window — beat it
1 month
Sep 1, 2026
$134.90–$154.10typical range · internal point $142.50
—
±6.6%
6/10
HSBC downgrade overhang, low-beta neutral tape
2 months
Oct 1, 2026
$139.80
—
-3.3%
5/10
Pre-earnings de-risking, staples rotation weak
3 months
Nov 1, 2026
$137.00
—
-5.2%
5/10
Q1 FY27 print reinforces cautious guide
4 months
Dec 1, 2026
$135.50
—
-6.2%
4/10
Value gravity toward composite fair value
5 months
Jan 1, 2027
$134.00
—
-7.3%
4/10
Year-end positioning trims premium compounders
6 months
Feb 1, 2027
$132.50
—
-8.3%
4/10
Convergence toward DCF and deserved value zone
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$141.66
(-2.0%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$144.50
Composite fair value
$117.77
Signal-adjusted fair value
$110.84
DCF fair value
$110.51
Anchored-PE fair value
$169.07
Buy-below (value lens)
$120.00
Value net score
-68
Value confidence
7 / 10
Quality net score
+68
Memo confidence
8 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)
Realized volatility (annualized)
1m 23.3% 3m 23.0% 6m 22.1%
Daily σ (realism noise)
1.5%
Beta vs S&P 500
1m -0.13 3m -0.22 5m 0.18
Trailing 6-month return
-2.3%
Knobs (equation params)
ladder
Array
llm_model
claude-opus-4-7
max_tokens
3000
control_knobs
Array
Neutral band (%)
5
earnings_brief
v1
prompt_version
p1
control_version
v0.3.0
Version & Tech Chain
What produced this prediction — stamped on the record so versions can be compared by success rate later.
Modelv0.6.0#271041f8fcd5
Tech composition (what this version is built from)
#
Process
Kind
Group
1
Synthesisvaluation-synthesis
deterministic
final
2
Scenario Analysisscenario-valuation
deterministic
valuation
3
Valuation / Mispricingext-lens-value
llm
extended
4
Company Qualityext-lens-quality
llm
extended
5
Forensic Memo (combiner)ext-forensic-memo
llm
extended
6
Classificationcompany-classification
llm
foundation
7
Live Quotefmp-quote
data
market-data
Inputs used (the runs that fed this prediction)
Upstream process
Ran
Lag
Run id
company-classification
Aug 1, 2026
freshest
PG-20260801-001034-e2ad
ext-forensic-memo
Aug 1, 2026
freshest
ext-PG-20260801-003431-3aa7
ext-lens-quality
Aug 1, 2026
freshest
ext-PG-20260801-003431-3aa7
ext-lens-sentiment
Aug 1, 2026
freshest
ext-PG-20260801-003431-3aa7
ext-lens-value
Aug 1, 2026
freshest
ext-PG-20260801-003431-3aa7
valuation-synthesis
Aug 1, 2026
freshest
PG-20260801-001034-e2ad
Inputs flagged 7d+ behind the freshest one may be stale relative to the rest of the analysis.
Saved History
2 frozen snapshots — the record we score once predictions mature.