The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change+18.5% to $55.80
Predicted High$55.80at 6 months
Predicted Low$47.80in 2 weeks
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 1, 2026 1:02 am
Bull
NVO trends higher to
$55.80
(+18.5% from $47.08)
by Feb 2027.
dip-then-recover
ThesisNVO is deeply discounted with valuation anchors well above spot and positive near-term catalysts (EU Wegovy pill, access deal) that should catalyze a bounce, but GLP-1 competitive pressure caps the rerating. Path drifts up as sentiment stabilizes and value gravity pulls toward mid-50s, short of full fair value.
Invalidated ifBreak below $44 on Lilly share-gain data or a Wegovy pill setback would invalidate; conversely a sharp rip above $60 pre-catalyst would front-run this path.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $47.08 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 1, 2026
—
$47.08at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 15, 2026
$43.67–$50.49typical range · internal point $47.80
—
±7.2%
7/10
Low-beta drift, oversold bounce off catalysts
What actually happened:
closed $45.89
on Aug 14, 2026 = -2.5% vs the call
(predicted +1.5%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 4.1 pp
· accuracy 8/10
· typical range ±7.2%:
inside the band
· S&P +4.0%
over the same window — beat it
1 month
Sep 1, 2026
$42.14–$52.02typical range · internal point $48.90
—
±10.5%
6/10
Sentiment stabilizes as access deal digested
What actually happened:
closed $45.12
on Sep 1, 2026 = -4.2% vs the call
(predicted +3.9%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 8.0 pp
· accuracy 7/10
· typical range ±10.5%:
inside the band
· S&P +1.9%
over the same window — lagged it
2 months
Oct 1, 2026
$50.50
—
+7.3%
5/10
Value buyers step in below fair value
What actually happened:
closed $37.91
on Sep 30, 2026 = -19.5% vs the call
(predicted +7.3%)
· direction MISS
(called up, was down)
· off by 26.7 pp
· accuracy 3/10
· S&P +2.2%
over the same window — lagged it
3 months
Nov 1, 2026
$52.20
—
+10.9%
5/10
EU Wegovy pill approval optionality builds
4 months
Dec 1, 2026
$53.80
—
+14.3%
4/10
Year-end positioning into GLP-1 recovery trade
5 months
Jan 1, 2027
$54.90
—
+16.6%
4/10
Gradual rerate toward DCF anchor
6 months
Feb 1, 2027
$55.80
—
+18.5%
4/10
Converges near deterministic baseline endpoint
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$55.95
(+18.8%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$47.08
Composite fair value
$65.61
Signal-adjusted fair value
$75.39
DCF fair value
$63.23
Anchored-PE fair value
$94.39
Buy-below (value lens)
$45.00
Value net score
+24
Value confidence
6 / 10
Quality net score
+59
Memo confidence
7 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)