The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change+3.9% to $275.50
Predicted High$275.50at 6 months
Predicted Low$261.00at 1 month
Max Drawdown (predicted)-1.6%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 4, 2026 1:18 am
Neutral
MCD trends range-bound to
$275.50
(+3.9% from $265.23)
by Feb 2027.
dip-then-recover
ThesisMCD is a low-beta defensive that has already absorbed a -15.8% drawdown and trades below the anchored-PE fair value of $338. With no imminent earnings catalyst, a mild sentiment headwind, and a risk-on tape that ignores defensives short-term, expect a shallow drift lower over the first month before value gravity and a Q3 print pull the stock back toward the mid-270s by winter.
Invalidated ifA break below $250 on consumer-stress news, or a move above $285 without an earnings catalyst, would falsify the shallow-recovery thesis.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $265.23 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 4, 2026
—
$265.23at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 18, 2026
$253.59–$276.87typical range · internal point $263.50
What actually happened:
closed $265.53
on Aug 17, 2026 = +0.1% vs the call
(predicted -0.7%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 0.8 pp
· accuracy 10/10
· typical range ±4.4%:
inside the band
· S&P +0.6%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Sep 4, 2026
$248.37–$282.09typical range · internal point $261.00
—
±6.4%
5/10
Consumer-stress narrative caps upside pre-print
What actually happened:
closed $259.63
on Sep 3, 2026 = -2.1% vs the call
(predicted -1.6%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 0.5 pp
· accuracy 10/10
· typical range ±6.4%:
inside the band
· S&P -0.9%
over the same window — beat it
2 months
Oct 4, 2026
$264.00
—
-0.5%
4/10
October drift, low beta dampens macro moves
What actually happened:
closed $231.89
on Oct 2, 2026 = -12.6% vs the call
(predicted -0.5%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 12.1 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· S&P -0.2%
over the same window — beat it
3 months
Nov 4, 2026
$270.00
—
+1.8%
5/10
Q3 earnings beat likely given 4-of-4 streak
4 months
Dec 4, 2026
$273.00
—
+2.9%
5/10
Post-print re-rating toward anchored-PE fair value
5 months
Jan 4, 2027
$272.00
—
+2.6%
4/10
January tax-loss reversal, defensive rotation
6 months
Feb 4, 2027
$275.50
—
+3.9%
4/10
Value gravity toward $338 anchor, slow grind
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$70,631,588.51
(+26,630,215.5%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$265.23
Composite fair value
$134,163,615.62
Signal-adjusted fair value
$158,420,061.73
DCF fair value
$184,760,943.21
Anchored-PE fair value
$338.06
Buy-below (value lens)
$225.00
Value net score
-48
Value confidence
7 / 10
Quality net score
+79
Memo confidence
8 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)