The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change+20.7% to $435.00
Predicted High$435.00at 6 months
Predicted Low$352.00at 1 month
Max Drawdown (predicted)-2.3%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 4, 2026 2:48 am
Bull
KNSL trends higher to
$435.00
(+20.7% from $360.44)
by Feb 2027.
dip-then-recover
ThesisKNSL trades far below composite fair value with strong quality and a 5/5 beat streak, but sentiment is deeply negative and the specialty P&C cohort is de-rating on soft-cycle fears. Near-term drift stays soft with no catalyst, then value gravity and Q3/Q4 prints gradually pull the price higher, though full convergence to $600+ within 6 months is unlikely.
Invalidated ifA break below $300 on weak premium growth or a specialty P&C reserve charge would falsify the recovery path.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $360.44 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 4, 2026
—
$360.44at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 18, 2026
$331.88–$389.00typical range · internal point $358.00
—
±7.9%
6/10
No catalyst, sentiment drag continues short-term drift
What actually happened:
closed $367.16
on Aug 17, 2026 = +1.9% vs the call
(predicted -0.7%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 2.5 pp
· accuracy 9/10
· typical range ±7.9%:
inside the band
· S&P +0.6%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Sep 4, 2026
$319.05–$401.83typical range · internal point $352.00
—
±11.5%
5/10
Cohort de-rating persists, quiet-quality gets no bid
What actually happened:
closed $382.98
on Sep 3, 2026 = +6.3% vs the call
(predicted -2.3%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was up)
· off by 8.6 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±11.5%:
inside the band
· S&P -0.9%
over the same window — lagged it
2 months
Oct 4, 2026
$365.00
—
+1.3%
4/10
Q3 print approaches, beat-streak buyers step in
What actually happened:
closed $329.72
on Oct 2, 2026 = -8.5% vs the call
(predicted +1.3%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 9.8 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· S&P -0.2%
over the same window — lagged it
3 months
Nov 4, 2026
$390.00
—
+8.2%
5/10
Earnings beat reasserts quality, value gravity begins
4 months
Dec 4, 2026
$405.00
—
+12.4%
4/10
Post-earnings drift, valuation gap draws attention
5 months
Jan 4, 2027
$420.00
—
+16.5%
4/10
Year-end positioning favors quality compounders
6 months
Feb 4, 2027
$435.00
—
+20.7%
3/10
Partial mean-reversion toward anchored-PE fair value
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$626.64
(+73.9%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$360.44
Composite fair value
$841.88
Signal-adjusted fair value
$856.13
DCF fair value
$1,093.98
Anchored-PE fair value
$337.67
Buy-below (value lens)
$300.00
Value net score
-11
Value confidence
6 / 10
Quality net score
+73
Memo confidence
7 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)